New Events

International

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link North Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link ?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty

Anti-Empire >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb

offsite link The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog.? We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below).?

offsite link What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

offsite link The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by

The Saker >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N?116 Sat Jan 18, 2025 06:46 | en

offsite link After the United Kingdom, Germany and Denmark, the Trump team prepares an operat... Sat Jan 18, 2025 06:37 | en

offsite link Trump and Musk, Canada, Panama and Greenland, an old story, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jan 14, 2025 07:03 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N?114-115 Fri Jan 10, 2025 14:04 | en

offsite link End of Russian gas transit via Ukraine to the EU Fri Jan 10, 2025 13:45 | en

Voltaire Network >>

Activists walk out of court as Swiss Police found not guilty after nearly killing climbers at G8 Pr

category international | summit mobilisations | news report author Saturday February 18, 2006 10:56author by Aubonne Support Group - Aubonneauthor email aubonne at no-log dot org Report this post to the editors

The facade of a trial against the police ended in a not guilty verdict with little chance of their victims ever receiving compensation. As the verdict was read out this lunchtime the activists walked out of court shouting that they had had enough of this bullshit. The whitewashed trial of two police officers in Switzerland, acquitted of the charges of causing severe bodily harm. The two victims narrowly escaped with their lives after a police officer cut a climbing rope during a protest action against the G8 in Evian, France in 2003. Despite clear video evidence that the police officers had cut the rope the judge supported police impunity by ruling that they had made mistakes but that these were understandable in the context of the stress they were under!

blanchir.jpg

As the verdict was read out this lunchtime the activists walked out of court shouting that they had had enough of this bullshit. The whitewashed trial of two police officers in Switzerland, acquitted of the charges of causing severe bodily harm. The two victims narrowly escaped with their lives after a police officer cut a climbing rope during a protest action against the G8 in Evian, France in 2003. Despite clear video evidence that the police officers had cut the rope the judge supported police impunity by ruling that they had made mistakes but that these were understandable in the context of the stress they were under!

Only 3% of incidents involving police brutality are brought to trial in Switzerland, and even then there is only a 0.08 % conviction rate so the odds were always against us. We only got as far as we did because of the support and solidarity of many people and it has shown us the importance of this. It was seen as a monetous occasion to see the police in court at all, (its never ahppened in that part of Switzerland before!)

Verdicts like this clearly show that you can’t expect justice from the courts or protection from the police and show that we are right to have no faith in our so called justice system, (the reason why direct action was used to blockade the Aubonne Bridge in the first place!)

This is one small instance of repression and injustice, from the 29 police-officers currently standing trial for acts of appalling brutality at the summit in Genoa, Italy in 2003, to the massive display of police and military force recently in Gleneagles, Scotland, the G8 is having to use enormous amounts of force to protect itself against the ever increasing amounts of people that challenge its legitimacy.

Background
http://www.aubonnebridge.net/
As part of the mobilisation against the G8 in June 2003, two climbers hung from a rope across the Aubonne Bridge in order to stop a G8 delegation from reaching the summit in Evian, France. The police cut the climbing rope and nearly killed two activists. Martin fell 25 m and broke his back, his pelvis and shattered his foot. Despite five operations, he will never make a complete recovery. Gesine, was saved when members of her affinity group grabbed her rope seconds before she fell. She has suffered from severe post-traumatic stress disorder and has had to undergo intensive treatment.

Many solidarity actions and campaigning took place after the incident and again around the court case AGAINST the activists in May 2004. At the trial in 2004 the activists were found guilty of blocking the road and endangering the lives of the drivers. Shortly afterwards the investigating judge decided to effectively drop the case against the police. Only after an appeal and a great deal of public pressure did the high court overturn his decision and allow for the case to go ahead.

The Trial against the police.
The court case against the police had the same judge who gave the activists suspended prison sentences so there was not much hope of a fair trial. The lack any genuine defence was illustrated by the fact that one of the main arguments used in favour of the police was simply that the climbers would not have been cut down if they had not been hanging there in the first place. BRILLIANT. They made out that despite many months of preparation and training they were completely unprepared for the possibility that people might blockade the motorway, despite the fact that they other security forces were stationed as lookouts on other bridges nearby.
Even if the charges against the police had been proven, there would have only be minor penalties, like fines or short sentences on probation. The Aubonne Bridge campaign from the very beginning has demanded the suspension of the two police officers involved, an independent investigation into the repression that took place during the G8 and compensation for those who were seriously injured. It is likely that the Canton de Vaud will now never pay a penny.

The Verdict
Protesters and press journalists gathered outside the court in Lausanne Switzerland, to hear the verdict of the case against the two policemen. Several wore big cardboard Swiss army knives on their backs to demonstrate that the Swiss police are killing people and that the justice system afterwards stabs them in the back. Other protesters were dressed as cleaners and started helping the court in their whitewash, cleaning the court with sponges and toothbrushes. Martin and Gesine, the two activists cut from the rope in over two years ago held a banner saying: “The justice system whitewashes police brutality”. The courtroom was filled with press and protesters as the judge read his 23 page judgement. As he began the judge, Pierre Bruttin, stated that in his court there is no police impunity, and that the court had considered the whole case with great caution and decided only on the basis of the facts and the law. It soon became clear that he was just repeating the arguments of the defense and the prosecution, contradicting all the arguments of the civil party and not considering the most critical points. He argued that the cutting of the rope was provoked by the temerity of the activists, and that while objectively the police has made mistakes, subjectively it had to be understood because they were under such great stress at the time. Video evidence shown in court, clearly shows that it was the actions of the police officers arriving on the scene that provoked the tension and the chaos not the other way around.

The reaction
At this point Gesine and Martin decided that they had had enough. They stood up, unfurling a banner saying “Police partout, justice nul part”, (police everywhere, justice nowhere) and declared, - “we are going, we have heard enough bullshit, lies and excuses” – and left the courtroom followed by their supporters. Outside the climbers made a statement in front of the TV cameras saying that this was just further evidence of police impunity in Switzerland and that it was clear that the justice systems covers up police brutality. Shortly afterwards the rest of the public and lawyers came outside. Asked what he thought of the acquittal the lawyer said that, “It is a judicial scandal that such behaviour can be excused by stress and impulsiveness.”

The climbers read out this declaration in front of the court :

“What we have seen here during the last three days is exactly the reason why we and thousands of other people like us all over the world think that direct action is the best way to overcome injustice.
The entire judicial procedure from the time the rope was cut has been clear whitewash. The prosecution is supposed to defend the law but what they actually defend is the state – and its officers. This court case has been an elaborate, expensive and time-consuming piece of theatre to provide a platform to find excuses for inexcusable actions and to misguide the public by pretending to provide justice. This verdict is a pure cover up of police brutality by the justice system and is just further proof of the almost complete police impunity in Switzerland.”

For more information, see: www.aubonnebridge.net

Tonight at the rampART social centre in London

PIG BROTHER LIVE SHOW 8PM

https://publish.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/02/333529.html

Some recent links:

- Support Aubonne Two in Court Case Against the Swiss Police:
http://indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/01/332584.html

- G8 Evian: Police in Court in the Aubonnebridge Case:
http://indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/02/332756.html

- Swiss Police face jail for Nearly Killing Two Activists in Evian 2003:
http://indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/02/333464.html

- G8 2003 cops on trial this week!: www.aubonnebridge.net:
http://indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/02/333505.html

- Aubonne Bridge Trial started - follow-up from the g8 protests in
Evian, 2003 :
http://indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/02/333607.html

Also,

Evian reports archive from imc-uk:
http://indymedia.org.uk/en/actions/2003/evian/
where you can find tones of links and background info about the case
itself, the bridge action and the Evian G8 in general. There are also
some features about the aftermath in there.

pict0121.jpg

pict0151.jpg

press_conf_martin.jpg

author by Justin Morahan - Peace Peoplepublication date Sat Feb 18, 2006 14:13author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The person to write to is:

Ambassador Josef Doswald
Embassy of Switzerland
6 Ailesbury Road
Ballsbridge
Dublin 4

Email: [email protected]

author by Mullypublication date Sun Feb 19, 2006 21:18author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I have mailed the ambassador and have asked for a response to this outrage.

I will post the reply as soon as possible.

author by mullypublication date Sun Feb 19, 2006 21:29author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The email bounced back

wrong email address!

author by Justin Morahan - Peace Peoplepublication date Mon Feb 20, 2006 03:46author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Sorry, that should be [email protected]

author by Justin Morahan - Peace Peoplepublication date Mon Feb 20, 2006 16:57author address author phone Report this post to the editors

18 February 2006

Ambassador Josef Doswald
Embassy of Switzerland
6 Ailesbury Road
Ballsbridge
Dublin

RE: ACQUITTAL OR TWO POLICEMEN IN AUBONNE BRIDGE (CUTTING OFROPE) CASE

Dear Ambassador

I wish to protest at the verdict of Not Guilty on two policemen in Switzerland who cut a rope holding two protestors, one of whom fell 25 metres breaking his back and pelvis and shattering his foot, the other, a woman, who, although saved by members of her support team has suffered from severe Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and has had to undergo intensive treatment. The protestors were hanging from a rope across the Aubonne Bridge as an action against the G8 Summit.

I am amazed at the statistics revealed in the aftermath of the trial, namely that only 3% of incidents involving police brutality are brought to trial in Switzerland, and that even then there is only a 0.08% conviction rate. The conduct of the trial in which the judge had already effectively ruled against the policemen standing trial at all (a ruling later overturned on appeal) makes a mockery of the court system in Switzerland.

That this judge was not dismissed from the case on the grounds of prejudice, or recuse himself, is almost unbelievable.

I urge your Government to re-open the case, not for the sake of punishing the policemen concerned, but to ensure that their action is known to be criminal in Swiss law as it is in morals: and to send out a signal that it should never happen again.
The State should compensate the injured people involved (although no compensation is sufficient for such injuries) and also ensure that the two policemen will never again be in a position to take such reckless and criminal action if they are
allowed to continue to act as policemen for the Swiss State.

With best personal wishes

Sincerely

Justin Morahan

 
© 2001-2025 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy