Upcoming Events

National | Politics / Elections

no events match your query!

New Events

National

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link North Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link ?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty

Anti-Empire >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Promoting Human Rights in Ireland

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link In Welcoming Trump, Let Us Remember Henry VIII Fri Jan 24, 2025 19:00 | Joanna Gray
We're all feeling a little giddy after the inauguration, but let us remember to put not our trust in princes, says Joanna Gray. After all, Thomas More effused at the coronation of Henry VIII, and look what happened to him.
The post In Welcoming Trump, Let Us Remember Henry VIII appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Have Covid Travel Requirements Gone Away? Fri Jan 24, 2025 17:00 | Dr Roger Watson
Back in 2022 and 2023 when Covid travel restrictions and vaccine passports were all the rage Dr Roger Watson published his country-by-country guide. Now, in 2025, he takes a look to see if any are still at it.
The post Have Covid Travel Requirements Gone Away? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link A Golden Age for American Meritocracy Fri Jan 24, 2025 14:15 | Darren Gee
The second Trump Presidency has already dissolved hundreds of DEI programmes and looks set to herald a new golden age of American meritocracy. It's a movement America and the world are hungry for, says Darren Gobin.
The post A Golden Age for American Meritocracy appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Think Tank?s Net Zero Survey Concludes the Public is the Problem Fri Jan 24, 2025 13:10 | Ben Pile
The Social Market Foundation has carried out a survey on public attitudes to Net Zero and concluded that the "uninformed" and reluctant public are the problem. Why else would they say no to heat pumps?
The post Think Tank’s Net Zero Survey Concludes the Public is the Problem appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Number of Children Who Think They are Wrong Sex Surges 50-Fold Fri Jan 24, 2025 11:10 | Will Jones
There has been a 50-fold rise in children who think they are the?wrong sex in just 10 years, with two thirds of them girls, analysis of GP records suggests.
The post Number of Children Who Think They are Wrong Sex Surges 50-Fold appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link The United States bets its hegemony on the Fourth Industrial Revolution Fri Jan 24, 2025 19:26 | en

offsite link For Thierry Meyssan, the Sarkozy trial for illegal financing of the 2007 preside... Fri Jan 24, 2025 19:23 | en

offsite link Should we condemn or not the glorification of Nazism?, by Thierry Meyssan Wed Jan 22, 2025 14:05 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N?116 Sat Jan 18, 2025 06:46 | en

offsite link After the United Kingdom, Germany and Denmark, the Trump team prepares an operat... Sat Jan 18, 2025 06:37 | en

Voltaire Network >>

SWP versus Derwin - the saga continues

category national | politics / elections | news report author Saturday November 15, 2003 13:42author by SIPTU bureaucrat Report this post to the editors

Branches nominations

Des Derwin, the independent socialist candidate for the SIPTU vice Presidency has received two nominations so far.

Derwin was nominated unanimously by the Electronics and Engineering Branch. He also received a nomination from the Education Branch in a very tight vote.

In a small Education Branch meeting, Derwin slipped home by a single vote. The SWP candidate, Derek Delaney came third. As predicted, not all of his votes transferred to Derwin.

The SWP continued to seek a nomination for their candidate elsewhere, meaning that the disastrous possibility of a split left vote has been lessened but not eliminated.

Yesterday, Delaney's own branch was meeting to decide its nomination. I'm not yet sure how it voted. If he failed to get a nomination from his branch then the SWP's sectarian stunt could be coming to a grisly end.

author by :-)publication date Sat Nov 15, 2003 13:47author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Andorra indymedia has put together a site to vote in the catalan presidential elections tomorrow: http://www.votaminutil.org/

author by Interestedpublication date Sat Nov 15, 2003 14:34author address author phone Report this post to the editors

if Delaney got a nomination yesterday or not?

author by Anonymouspublication date Sat Nov 15, 2003 15:29author address author phone Report this post to the editors

In case anyone missed the big debate on this issue it is still on the front page if you scroll down, or go to:-

http://www.indymedia.ie/newswire.php?story_id=61823&PHPSESSID=51de673af0998557236caa0b3a9092db

This debate has attracted some 130 comments - which is a record on Indymedia Ireland to my knowledge - and is still on-going.

Des Derwin only made an additional comment a few days ago, referring to the above nominations - which he entitles "Super Tuesday".

author by freaky deepublication date Sat Nov 15, 2003 18:25author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Who's the guy on the poster? I would trust him to get my dog run down

author by Trade Unionist - and Socialistpublication date Sat Nov 15, 2003 20:56author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Hi Des

I'm not in SIPTU but I would like to help you in the campaign. How can I get involved?

author by The Insiderpublication date Sun Nov 16, 2003 13:02author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The biggest discussion on indymedia revolves around inter-left bickering and infighting.

With enemies like this, the Government, and their friends in the SIPTU hierarchy, doesn't need any friends.

author by Another Anonymous SWPer - Front of the Monthpublication date Mon Nov 17, 2003 00:49author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The SWP pulls a cynical sectarian stunt that risks causing real damage to the left in SIPTU. Our anonymous SWP friend then argues that those who complain about the sectarian stunt are giving comfort to the government and SIPTU leadership up.

Typical

author by Den Baileypublication date Mon Nov 17, 2003 02:29author address author phone Report this post to the editors

An anonymous troll accuses someone of being SWP because he doesn't share the troll's prejudices. This issue has been argued out elsewhere but the bickering continues and anyone who suggests that the most popular topic on Indymedia -- Lefties slagging one another -- is a lot of old wank, is accused of being swp. No evidence is necessary of course. Any anonymous tosser can say anything. Do you think anyone takes you seriously?

author by The insiderpublication date Mon Nov 17, 2003 11:46author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Sorry matey, just a non party leftie who's looking on in disgust.

author by Steeliepublication date Mon Nov 17, 2003 11:52author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The rank sectarianism, back stabbing and opportunism of the SWP?

Or the fact that some people have the cheek to complain about it?

author by The Insiderpublication date Mon Nov 17, 2003 12:05author address author phone Report this post to the editors

....and also the fact that this is the latest in a long line of intra-left bickering. Look at the bin tax campaign - the SP and the SWP spend as much time fighting each other as they spend fighting the council!

The vast majority of working class are probably wondering how they tell each other apart. SP? SWP? What's the difference?

author by googoopublication date Mon Nov 17, 2003 12:28author address author phone Report this post to the editors

No, a vast majority of working class people know who the SP are, they just then wonder whether the SWP are the same party or a split from the workers party.

author by Steeliepublication date Mon Nov 17, 2003 12:41author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I'd say that the vast majority of people couldn't distinguish between the SP and SWP, except perhaps in certain areas of Fingal.

Personally, I don't like either but I can recognise that the real block to them unifying is the fact that the SWP appear to be so deeply sectarian that they will fuck over any allies at the drop of a hat if they think they can get some short-term advantage out of it.

When it comes to bickering, we see lots of complaints on indymedia that the Irish left doesn't spend enough time fighting the enemy and too much time fighting each other. Probably true, but you should remember that these bicker-wars normally spring up when somebody _is_ actually doing something and gets stabbed in the back by a group (nearly always the SWP). This particular war erupted as a consequence of Des Derwin trying to build a campaign in SIPTU. The minor bickerings on indymedia during the bin tax campaign were focused on the fact that the SWP were trying to hold back the campaign from blockades. Recall that, despite some strong disagreements in private, we never saw any bickering between the SP/ISN/WCA/WSM over the bin tax on indymedia. If we cast our mind back to the mother of all bicker-wars, around March 1st, we will also remember that the spark to this was GNAW organising a protest in Shannon.

The moral of the story is that, although there is lots of bickering here, most of it is actually because people are trying to do things, not just sitting around and moaning.

author by Irnbrewpublication date Mon Nov 17, 2003 15:23author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Since when was openly arguing that continual blockades in areas where there was continued collection of non-payers' bins is an inappropriate tactic, a stab in the back?
It is possible to disagree. It is desirable to argue your corner. But it's a bit strong -- but wholly in the best traditions of comments on Indymedia -- to describe people expressing a different tactic as "stabbing the left in the back".
By the way the continual blockades seem to have been quietly dropped. On Steelie's reckoning it looks like you've stabbed yourself in the back.

author by Steeliepublication date Mon Nov 17, 2003 15:55author address author phone Report this post to the editors

"Since when was openly arguing that continual blockades in areas where there was continued collection of non-payers' bins is an inappropriate tactic, a stab in the back?"

Since never. But that's not the problem. The problem is organising meetings where the only campaign representatives present argue against blockades, despite the fact that the majority position in the campaign was that activists should be pushing solidarity blockades where possible. That's what the SWP did. They went along to campaign activist meetings, argued their point, lost and then went out and ignored the campaign decisions. They did not act as part of the campaign, they acted as the SWP and damned if they were going to do anything that they didn't want to.

Whenever the campaign decided to hold blockades the SWP certainly argued against it, but when they lost, as they invariably did (except where they totally controlled the campaign as in DL) they just ignored the decisions and didn't take part.

The blockade tactic has not been quietly ditched. It has been noisily defeated. In part this is down to the SWP pretending to be part of the campaign when it suited them, but splitting our forces by not participating in anything that the campaign decided to do unless it was exactly in line with the position of their leadership. It is very difficult for a campaign to take effective action when parts of it just ignore decisions that they don't agree with.

author by Nominatorpublication date Mon Nov 17, 2003 18:47author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Can anyone tell us if Delaney actually got a nomination?

author by Amusedpublication date Mon Nov 17, 2003 20:01author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Steelies arguing for a democratic centralist position in the campaign - are you a leninist? Are just a hypocrite?

author by Irnbrewpublication date Mon Nov 17, 2003 22:27author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Steelie should get out more. At the mass meetings I was at the view was held by the great majority that where all bins were being collected routine or repetitive blckades of depots were not called for. The SWP people I saw agreed with that but argued for -- and helped organise -- blockades during the height of the jailings. They were there -- even at blockades that they felt uneasy about... What was conspicuous by their absence were the ordinary supporters of the campaign. Whatever the call from on high, they voted with their feet. So it looks like the terrible swp was more in tune with feeling on the ground on this tactic than those throwing "stab in the back" allegations around.
Also don't know where you get the idea that Ballyfermot is a ficticious campaign. 400 people marching through the area is pretty good for a "ficticious" campaign group.

author by irnbrewpublication date Mon Nov 17, 2003 22:36author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Steelie says:-
"Recall that, despite some strong disagreements in private, we never saw any bickering between the SP/ISN/WCA/WSM over the bin tax on indymedia"

But the usual excuse for hurling abuse around Indymedia is that strong argument is healthy.
You now seem to think that differences over tactics between different activists should be kept "private" away from the ears of the great unwashed.

My view would be that arguing the pros and cons of a tactic or a strategy is fine but name calling and slander is not.

As I recall it the SWP openly argued their opinion on these tactics. I don't recall them descending to the slander and point scoring that characterised Steelie's consuggesting that anyone who argued differentlt was an enemy of the working class or stabbing the movement in the back.

As I say Steelie should get out more.

author by Martinpublication date Mon Nov 17, 2003 22:43author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The SWP's attitude to blockades has been disgusting.

They said were in favour of blockades in areas where full non-collection was in force, but that's was a theoretical view as they played very almost no role in those blockades.

They tried their best to undercut solidarity blockades elsewhere and when they lost votes they just didn't show up. Following the decisions of the majority is for other people you see.

Then non-collection gets rolled out in a peacemeal fashion into places like Dun Laoghaire / Rathdown and South Dublin and the SWP who had been arguing that while they were against solidarity action they would be right there on the ground when non-collection arrived go entirely missing.

The SWP like to go on about other people "failing the test of the anti-capitalist movement". I respectfully submit that the SWP have failed the test of the anti-bin tax movement.

author by mepublication date Tue Nov 18, 2003 00:46author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Soooo whats happening in SIPTU then??

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2025 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy