IPSC Statement in Solidarity with the London 'Ahava 4'

international | rights, freedoms and repression | press release

Monday August 09, 2010 20:21

by IPSC - IPSC

Subject: IPSC Statement in Solidarity with the 'Ahava 4'

Date: Monday 9th August 2010

To: The 'Ahava 4', London

Dear colleagues,

I am writing on behalf of the Ireland-Palestine Solidarity Campaign (IPSC) to express our support for you as you face trial on ridiculous charges of “aggravated trespass” for blockading a London-based Ahava store. You should be commended, not criminalised, for your attempts to prevent the sale of these illegal products of Israeli apartheid and colonialism.

The allegations are patently absurd, but they are also very grave. As with the recent cases of the "Scottish PSC 5" and the "EDO 7", this is another appalling attempt to criminalise one of the most effective tools at the disposal of international Palestine solidarity activists, namely the Boycott Campaign.

We wish you all the best in the trial, and we await what - as with the SPSC 5 and EDO 7 - can only be the dismissal of these ludicrous charges.

You have our full support.

In Solidarity

Freda Hughes
National Chairperson
Ireland Palestine Solidarity Campaign

=========

For more info on the court case and Ahava in general please see:

http://freepalestinefortnightlydemo.wordpress.com/

http://www.stolenbeauty.org/

save preference

Comments (1 of 1)

All activists acquitted today - Another victory for BDS

by Kev - IPSC

Tue Aug 10, 2010 18:21

[English] PSC Press Release

Tuesday 10 August 2010

Activists charged with blockading Israeli-owned beauty shop acquitted in court

Four activists charged with aggravated trespass for blockading the Israeli-owned cosmetics shop, Ahava, in Covent Garden, London, in 2009, were today acquitted of all charges against them.

The four –Bruce Levy, Tom Ellis, Jo Crouch and Tahir Alam Hussein, all from London – had locked themselves to concrete-filled oil drums inside the shop, closing it down for a day each time in September and December 2009.

They appeared at Highbury Corner Magistrates Court, London, this week, and were acquitted this afternoon when the primary witness for the prosecution, Ahava’s store manager, refused to attend court to testify, despite courts summons and threats of an arrest warrant.

Activists have held fortnightly demonstrations outside the Covent Garden store throughout 2010, in protest at its complicity in the occupation of Palestinian territory.

The Ahava factory, which uses mud from the Dead Sea to make beauty products, is based in the illegal Israeli settlement of Mitzpe Shalem in the Palestinian West Bank. It mislabels its products ‘Dead Sea: Israel’.

Sarah Colborne, director of campaigns and operations at the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, which supports the fortnightly protests, said: ‘Ahava is profiting from Israel’s occupation of the West Bank, an occupation which is illegal under international law, while also ensuring the financial survival of the illegal settlement in which it sits.

‘As such, it is the owners of Ahava who should be in court, not just for their role in helping to cement an unlawful occupation, but for violating the Fourth Geneva Convention by exploiting the natural resources of an occupied territory for profit.’

Ms Colborne added: ‘We call on all people of conscience to join a mass protest outside Ahava this Saturday to show that no court action will deter us from highlighting Ahava’s abuses of international law.’

Ahava has been the subject of worldwide protests, including in the United States, Holland and within Israel itself.

Notes to Editors:

* In July 2010, seven campaigners were found not guilty of causing damage to the EDO arms factory in Brighton during Israel’s three week assault on Gaza in 2008/9. The seven claimed they had acted to prevent further war crimes being committed.

Upcoming Events

New Events

Other Press

User Preferences

Feeds

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

The Saker

Lockdown Skeptics

Voltaire Network

IPSC Statement in Solidarity with the London 'Ahava 4'

Comments (1 of 1)