Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
Mandates Matter Sun Mar 16, 2025 13:00 | Dr James Allan Winning elections is pointless without real change, says Dr James Allan. Right-wing leaders must take bold stances on immigration, Net Zero and the culture wars ? playing it safe will only lead to failure.
The post Mandates Matter appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Shakespeare Set to Be Decolonised at His Own Birthplace Sun Mar 16, 2025 11:00 | Sallust Shakespeare's Birthplace Trust and woke academics are "decolonising" the Bard by downplaying his genius, linking his legacy to white supremacy and scrubbing "offensive" language from its collections.
The post Shakespeare Set to Be Decolonised at His Own Birthplace appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
German Political Establishment Responds to Trump with Idiotic Constitutionally-Anchored Pledge to De... Sun Mar 16, 2025 09:00 | Eugyppius The German political establishment has responded to Donald Trump with an idiotic constitutionally-anchored pledge to deindustrialise in the next 20 years. Could Friedrich Merz be more inept, laments Eugyppius.
The post German Political Establishment Responds to Trump with Idiotic Constitutionally-Anchored Pledge to Deindustrialise in the Next 20 Years appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
There?s No Such Thing as ?Green? Industry Sun Mar 16, 2025 07:00 | Ben Pile The collapse of Swedish battery startup Northvolt shows once more that there is no such thing as 'green' industry, says Ben Pile. Industry needs lots of cheap energy ? something that China has and Europe doesn't.
The post There’s No Such Thing as ‘Green’ Industry appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Sun Mar 16, 2025 01:23 | Will Jones A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?124 Sat Mar 15, 2025 05:56 | en
"Kristallnacht" against the Alawites in Syria Sat Mar 15, 2025 05:38 | en
Is Donald Trump managing the possible collapse of the ?American empire??, by Thi... Tue Mar 11, 2025 06:59 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?123 Fri Mar 07, 2025 14:41 | en
Arab League summit for Gaza Fri Mar 07, 2025 11:53 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
The Materialist Conception Of History
international |
anti-capitalism |
opinion/analysis
Wednesday February 10, 2010 00:14 by Paddy Hackett - Not a member of a political organisation rasherrs at eircom dot net

Philosophy of Science
The little piece below touches on the materialist conception of history. And it hints at how it renders relativism and positivism unjustifiable as philosophies of science.
With regard to the natural sciences it is humanity's universal interest in the technical control of nature that yields the meanings of statements made by these sciences. This cognitive interest establishes rules for the construction of these sciences' instrumental theories and for their critical testing. This is the cognitive interest that Jurgen Habermas discusses in some of his work. It is one (instrumental reason) of the three knowledge-constitutive interests that he claims exist.
The materialist assumption underlying the above conception is that humans, of necessity, act on nature in order to reproduce themselves through the provision of food, instruments of production and shelter. This is called human production. It shapes and determines the surrounding world of humanity thereby changing facts and creating new ones. This dialectical anthropological assumption is a transhistorical assumption. But human instrumental action on nature takes on different forms. These forms change over time. Accordingly these changes must lead to changes in the characteristics of instrumental reason --such as scientific revolutions.
This assumption provides the ontological foundation for the emergence and development of instrumental knowledge culminating in natural scientific knowledge. In other words ontology constitutes the source of epistemology. This ontological assumption precludes any justification for relativism or empiricism.
If the scientific method is merely based on facts then it follows that these facts are experienced through a conceptual system. The system influences, if not determines, the facts perceived by humanity. This means that there obtains no criterion against which to evaluate and test these facts and their corresponding conceptual framework. Relativism is thereby facilitated. Consequently there can exist no truth nor knowledge. Everything is relative.
The materialist conception of science, referred to, blocks off relativistic and empiricist theories of knowledge. This materialist philosophy of science provides the natural sciences with a materialist anthropological foundation from which to render science and its development secure. It also supplies the dynamic for qualitative change in instrumental cognition by rooting it in a dialectical ontology --ontology in the form of an active anthropology.
The materialist philosophy of science does not constitute a denial of objective reality. The point is rather that what we know about nature is always ultimately defined by the cognitive interest in manipulating nature in order to materially sustain and develop our humanity. It is this materialist anthropological condition that informs natural scientific inquiry. In this domain our cognitive interest is fundamentally instrumental. Nature is conceived, even in the theoretical and pure sciences, in terms of our interest in controlling it. It is this that gives instrumental reason its inherent teleological character. This means, in the Kantian sense, that knowledge and theory are never pure in the Kantian sense.
The materialist conception renders the justificiation of an empiricist ontology, of an independently existing world of things impossible. This thereby precludes the correspondence theory of truth in which every atom of knowledge must correspond with every atom of independently existing substance.
Now facts cannot exist independently of the observer. The facts observed are, as already indicated, determined by the conceptual system through which they are perceived. It is our universal cognitive interest in the technical control of nature that constitutes the conceptual framework by which facts are observed. This ontological context for epistemological relationships prevents the justification of the existence of a plethora of random disconnected scientific conceptual systems lacking any necessary linkage to each other. However this does not mean that just one absolute conceptual system will prevail. A series of scientific conceptual systems may historically emerge that possess necessary links to each other. Due to these historical and cognitive developments scientific revolutions may take place. But they cannot be, as with relativism, independent of each other in a discontinuous fashion. Their discontinuous appearance can only be justified on mystical grounds. They are still essentially based on the same cognitive interest. The diverse conceptual paradigms reflect the ontological development of this same essential cognitive interest.
Logical positivism, on the other hand, seeks to establish facts as absolutes by assuming that there exists one absolute conceptual framework. Logical positivism is chosen because of its relative simplicity while, unlike older empiricism, it includes symbologic logic. It denies the existence of more than one conceptual system by claiming that scientific inquiry is the only valid and legitimate epistemological activity. Their opinion is that there is only one basic form of scientific inquiry and thereby one instrumental conceptual system. Other systems, non-scientific, are no more than mere nonsense. Such a philosophy of science can only but restrict human freedom and is therefore oppressive. This means that they do not matter and cannot count as serious activities in relation to identifying and analysing the facts. Consequently this allows logical positivism to disregard them. This means that we establish raw data by means of the perception of the senses. Out of these sense-data, through logical construction, scientific knowledge is produced. For positivism then, philosophy's job is to define, clarify and develop the structure and logic of the natural sciences.
The materialist conception of science and positivism fundamentally differ concerning the basis for the acquisition of scientific knowledge. Consequently this leaves no common ground between them.
Paddy Hackett
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (1 of 1)
Jump To Comment: 1ontology: study of being, what exists and what doesn't
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontology
Epistomology: theory of knowledge
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemology
So Paddy, I guess the content of your article could be considered as "A Posteriori"? :-)