Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
 RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
News Round-Up Sat Nov 30, 2024 01:30 | Toby Young
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
?Ulez Architect? and 20mph Zone Supporter Appointed New Transport Secretary Fri Nov 29, 2024 17:38 | Will Jones
One of the 'architects of Ulez' and a supporter of 20mph zones has been appointed as the new Transport Secretary?after Louise Haigh's resignation, raising fears the anti-car measures may become national policy.
The post ‘Ulez Architect’ and 20mph Zone Supporter Appointed New Transport Secretary appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Assisted Suicide Set to Be Legalised as MPs Back Bill Fri Nov 29, 2024 15:07 | Will Jones
MPs have voted in favour of legalising assisted suicide as Labour's massive majority allowed the legislation to clear its first hurdle in the House of Commons by 330 votes to 275.
The post Assisted Suicide Set to Be Legalised as MPs Back Bill appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Australia Passes Landmark Social Media Ban for Under-16s Fri Nov 29, 2024 13:43 | Rebekah Barnett
Australia is the first country to ban social media for under-16s after a landmark bill passed that critics have warned is rushed and a Trojan horse for Government Digital ID as everyone must now verify their age.
The post Australia Passes Landmark Social Media Ban for Under-16s appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Is Banning the Burps of Bullocks Worth Risking Our Bollocks? Fri Nov 29, 2024 11:32 | Ben Pile
Is banning the burps of bullocks worth risking our bollocks? That the question posed by the decision to give Bovaer to cows to 'save the planet', says Ben Pile, after evidence suggests a possible risk to male fertility.
The post Is Banning the Burps of Bullocks Worth Risking Our Bollocks? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?110 Fri Nov 29, 2024 15:01 | en
Verbal ceasefire in Lebanon Fri Nov 29, 2024 14:52 | en
Russia Prepares to Respond to the Armageddon Wanted by the Biden Administration ... Tue Nov 26, 2024 06:56 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?109 Fri Nov 22, 2024 14:00 | en
Joe Biden and Keir Starmer authorize NATO to guide ATACMS and Storm Shadows mis... Fri Nov 22, 2024 13:41 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
On the Lisbon Treaty referendum
 national |
eu |
other press
 Wednesday September 30, 2009 14:54 by Alan Davis - International Bolshevik Tendency alan at bolshevik dot org
An open letter to the Socialist Party
IBT statement on the Lisbon Treaty in the form of an open letter to the Socialist Party makes the case for a spoiled ballot in the referendum The Socialist Party correctly criticises those trade-union leaders who are calling for a 'Yes' vote in the referendum on the Lisbon Treaty on 2 October. There can be no justification for anyone who claims to defend the interests of working people endorsing a treaty aimed at fine tuning the mechanisms of the imperialist European Union. It is, however, hardly surprising that some trade-union bureaucrats - after working hand-in-glove with the bosses for over 20 years of 'Social Partnership' - would decide to sign on as promoters of the Lisbon Treaty.
The centre-page article in the September issue of the The Socialist advocates a 'No' vote on the basis that 'the European Union has undermined the wages and conditions of workers across the continent'. In fact each national capitalist class has been waging its own campaign to drive down popular living standards - to blame the EU for this is to obscure the real dynamics of the bourgeois offensive.
Your article does correctly note that the Posting of Workers Directive (which came into force a decade ago) along with the court decisions on its enforcement (Laval, Viking, Rüffert, Luxembourg) have been used to justify the 'race to the bottom' that is hurting workers across Europe. But the Socialist Party is very wrong to push the notion that the Lisbon Treaty will 'significantly further the creation of a European Union which favours the interests of big business'. It is merely a continuation of business as usual for the European bourgeoisie - as your own supporting arguments make clear.
You put forward the nationalist-reformist argument that the Lisbon Treaty would make it 'more difficult for mass protest and popular pressure in countries to challenge developments in the EU by pressurising their elected governments'. Changes in bourgeois rule can sometimes make a significant difference to the terrain on which the class struggle is fought, but clearly not in this case.
The adoption of the Lisbon Treaty would make no significant difference to the ability of the working class to wage class struggle. Nationalist 'solutions' to the problems faced by working people can only weaken the labour movement. Whether it is better to vote 'No' or spoil your ballot in this referendum is a tactical question that boils down to how socialists can best promote class consciousness within the proletariat given current political circumstances.
The present political context is sharply defined by a rising tide of nationalism being pushed by elements of the ruling class and the trade-union bureaucracy as a response to the crisis. The poisonous chauvinism expressed by the 'British Jobs for British Workers' slogan vividly illustrates how nationalism is a form of capitalist ideology that is counterposed to the internationalist class consciousness required for the self-emancipation of the working class.
The majority of Europe's capitalists favour a 'Yes' vote. However, a significant minority of the bourgeoisie across Europe advocate 'No', represented in Ireland by Sinn Fein, the likes of Declan Ganley, and recently the UK Independence Party, which spent €180,000 on posting a 'No' vote leaflet to every household in Ireland. A 'No' vote in these circumstances buys into the petty nationalism represented by Sinn Fein and the trade-union bureaucracy.
Socialists must seek to develop a strategy, and the associated tactics, to enable the working class to defeat the capitalists' attempts to offload the costs of their economic crisis. Victorious defensive struggles by workers can help create conditions for going over to the offensive and ultimately launching a struggle to overturn the whole rotten capitalist system.
In this referendum the International Bolshevik Tendency is calling for working people to spoil their ballots. This tactic allows workers to reject bourgeois-nationalist demagogy while also registering opposition to capitalist squabbles over re-jigging the EU.
On 2 October 'Spoil Your Ballot!'
Alan Davis
for the International Bolshevik Tendency
29 September 2009
|
printable version
Digg this
del.icio.us
Furl
Reddit
Technorati
Facebook
Gab
Twitter
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (12 of 12)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12a spolied vote is like saying I don't like either option, which is valid in an election, if none of the candidates is up to your liking.
Option A
Option B
and I don't like either.... so I spoil the vote...
But when the choice is
CHANGE the way things are to Option A
DON'T take option A
spoiling the vote makes NO sense for anyone opposed to Option A.
Who dreamt this up?
Working people are not being offered the choice of a pro-workers Europe - the choice is between two versions of capitalist rule In Europe - either under the Lisbon Treaty or under the current arrangement.
the best way to register opposition to capitalist rule in Europe is to spoil your ballot in the referendum and more importantly get involved in the fightback against the attacks - which have started without Lisbon and will continue whether the treaty is passed or not.
the best way to register opposition to capitalist rule in Europe is to spoil your ballot in the referendum and more importantly get involved in the fightback against the attacks - which have started without Lisbon and will continue whether the treaty is passed or not.
In what way, would going up, ticking NO delay anyone from getting involved in the fightback against the attacks?
Sure, ticking NO isn't enough, but letting the YES voters have a walk over is counter productive.
It's not 'the lesser of two evils' thinking like weighing up FF v FG.
This is LISBON ... accept or reject.
Rejecting it, makes the fight easier, as it slows down the consolidation of power of those we want to fight against.
I'm voting NO, AGAIN.
It is a question of what the real difference, or not, you think the ratification of Lisbon would mean for the workers' movement.
If we thought that the passing of the Lisbon Treaty represented a qualitative set-back for the workers' movement then we would be for a No (as we were in 2005 regarding the European Constitution - see link below for our argument then) but our assessment is that the passing, or not, of Lisbon in 2009 will make effectively no difference to the workers movement and therefore the "spoil your ballot" position makes the most sense to get that point across.
the YES side realise that more NO than YES voters read indymedia
accordingly, if they can infiltrate sites like this and encourage mass vote spoiling on some daft premise like alans, then the YES side benefits
don't be fooled by this kind of "spoil your vote" ruse. The NO side needs all the votes it can get as it's neck and neck here.
VOTE NO
As a petty nationalist I've tallied at more counts than I care to think of. I've stood and watched spoiled votes come out. Some are obscene, some not filled out correctly and maybe one out of every hundred spoils I'd see has a political slogan on it (generally anarchist for what it's worth).
Anyone who thinks this is a meaningful form of political protest or thinks the reaction of activists tallying votes is anything other than wry indifference is completely disconnected from the real world and the struggles of real working class people.
If you spoil your vote on Friday I can guarantee you no one will ever know but the tally people and we won't care.
"a spoiled vote is like saying I don't like either option, which is valid in an election, if none of the candidates is up to your liking."
Well in this voting situation neither of the options - a capitalist Europe under the Lisbon Treaty rules or a capitalist Europe under the existing rules - is to my liking.
That is the real choice before us.
The message communists, like the IBT, want to get across is something like "For a workers' Europe - down with capitalist Europe".
In a situation where the outcome of this dispute over how capitalism should be run in Europe will make virtually no difference to the ability of the working class to defend itself against the attacks which rain down on us (and will continue to rain down on us irrespective of the result of this referendum) the best way to highlight that idea of a workers' Europe is the "spoiled ballot" tactic.
Jonah makes a valid point about spoiled ballots not being reported but a "spoil your ballot" perspective is not so much about the actual vote.
We don't think it matters what the result is as our assessment is that the ability of the working class to fight under either of these versions of capitalist Europe are pretty much the same. And given that there is no basis for siding with one lot of capitalists against the other.
What is important is the political discussion and debate around the referendum.
Our "spoil your ballot" tactic means we get to focus on something we think is very important - the class struggle against the bosses.
Of course it is possible to do this with a No vote as well but the reality of the No campaign by the left is that is has got sucked into various nationalist/reformist sidelines that have blunted this message of class struggle.
The WSM are the exception to this but the argument they put forward sounds like it should result in a "spoil your ballot" position to me:
Hi !
If the 'Yes' voters get a majority , when can we expect a re-run ?
Thanks!
Sharon.
"NO!" to Lisbon , June 2008.
"NO!" to Lisbon , October 2009.
my opinion is that the germans are slyly trying to do what they wanted in both world wars people be warned . this lisbon treaty has been a german pushed agreement as we have now lost our republic something that people of ireland had fought for for hundreds of years were just sold down the river last friday the 2nd of oct 2009 our history was destroyed in the matter of a few hours by people who did not read our constitution which has been stripped we sold out just for the chance of monitary stability but wake up people we are in a slump and so is the whole world and when the shit hits the fan and there are nazi snigals appearing in your area dont be surprised its your own faults .
Isn't it wonderful that the Irish people got it right by changing the result of their last referendum . This is cool, really it is. This is so kosher and real it trickles down your nasal passages like mead.
How many other referenda did the Irish people get wrong the first time?
It's a bit like being a rodent in a human scientist's labyrinth. You've got nothing much to do so you run down the laneway on the right. They give you an electric shock that fries your gonads like a courgette raised on amniopyralites.
So you forget about it. You get over it. You miss your nest and peers and general normal rodent life and rodent things. Then you run down the laneway on the left. They give you dopamiene, diamorphine, a lengthy full body massage & allow that illusory feeling that you too could one of "the rats of NIMH"(*) or at least get on a level with Mrs Frisby.
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mrs._Frisby_and_the_Rats_o..._NIMH http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Secret_of_NIMH
Ireland wouldn't have had Celtic Tiger choices without Europe, the USA, the peace process, FF, Ahern, little fairies who munch intestinal worms...,
Why would anyone call themselves the Bolshevik Tendency? Even if you think Bolshevism deserves another go surely you'd repackage it as something that doesn't conjure up purges, show trials, gulags, personality cults, and all that crack. Is there a Pol Pot appreciation society out there somewhere, maybe idkillmillionsgivenhalfachance.org?