Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
The Government is Making Itself a Laughing Stock in its Battle to End Apple?s Encrypted Privacy Serv... Wed Mar 19, 2025 19:00 | Dr R P The UK Government is making itself a laughing stock in its use of Snoopers' Charter laws to end Apple's encrypted Advanced Data Protection privacy service. Fortunately, there are alternatives.
The post The Government is Making Itself a Laughing Stock in its Battle to End Apple’s Encrypted Privacy Service appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Covid Vaccine Damage Consultants Paid Millions More Than Victims Wed Mar 19, 2025 17:30 | Will Jones Consultants assessing Covid vaccine damage claims on behalf of the NHS have been paid millions?more than the victims, it has emerged, after US-based Crawford and Company dismissed more than 98% of cases.
The post Covid Vaccine Damage Consultants Paid Millions More Than Victims appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Biological Sex Erased From Official Data on Health, Crime and Education Wed Mar 19, 2025 16:30 | Toby Young Professor Alice Sullivan has completed her review of data collection by public bodies and found that because the word "gender" has started to replace "sex" cancer referrals have been missed and convictions overlooked.
The post Biological Sex Erased From Official Data on Health, Crime and Education appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The Study Showing the mRNA Vaccine Cancer Link That They Don?t Want You to See Wed Mar 19, 2025 13:00 | Rebekah Barnett A study from Japan shows the link between mRNA vaccines and cancer. No wonder it keeps getting censored, says Rebekah Barnett ? they really don't want you to see it.
The post The Study Showing the mRNA Vaccine Cancer Link That They Don’t Want You to See appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Police and Courts Allow Criminals to Choose Their Gender Wed Mar 19, 2025 11:25 | Will Jones Police forces and the courts are allowing criminals to self-identify their gender even if they have not legally changed sex, with preferred pronouns routinely being used by police officers and judges.
The post Police and Courts Allow Criminals to Choose Their Gender appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?124 Sat Mar 15, 2025 05:56 | en
"Kristallnacht" against the Alawites in Syria Sat Mar 15, 2025 05:38 | en
Is Donald Trump managing the possible collapse of the ?American empire??, by Thi... Tue Mar 11, 2025 06:59 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?123 Fri Mar 07, 2025 14:41 | en
Arab League summit for Gaza Fri Mar 07, 2025 11:53 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Supposed ‘hard fight’ to secure guarantees on Lisbon Treaty: a clever tactic to mislead says McKenna
national |
eu |
press release
Monday June 22, 2009 12:26 by O. O'C - The People's Movement 0872427049

So-called legally binding guarantees which the Government claim they fought hard to secure do not change one single aspect of the Lisbon Treaty
Not one single word of the Lisbon Treaty will be altered by these guarantees, which is why they do not need to be ratified by the National Parliaments of the 27 Member States. The so called ‘legal guarantees’ are nothing more than an interpretation by EU Heads of State as to what they think the Lisbon Treaty means. However, if the Lisbon Treaty comes into force, it will be the EU Court of Justice in Luxembourg which will interpret Lisbon. The EU Court is the only body authorised under the European Treaties to interpret the Treaties themselves and decide how they should be applied. The political decision and agreement of a particular group of EU Prime Ministers and Presidents, which is what we are being presented with, cannot and will not decide what Lisbon means. Supposedly ‘hard fight’ by Ireland to secure guarantees on Lisbon Treaty – a clever tactic to mislead voters, says McKenna
Speaking on the assurances obtained by the Irish Government on the Lisbon Treaty in Dublin today, Patricia McKenna, Chairperson of the Peoples Movement one of the leading groups campaigning for rejection of the treaty said, “the so-called legally binding guarantees which the Government claim they fought hard to secure do not change one single aspect of the Lisbon Treaty all they do is reiterate the same assurances given by EU Heads of State during the first referendum. These assurances given by the Yes side were not enough to convince people to vote in favour of the treaty first time around and will be dismissed by the voters with the same mistrust in any second referendum.”
McKenna who was speaking at a joint press conference with the Peace and Neutrality Alliance went on to say:
Not one single word of the Lisbon Treaty will be altered by these guarantees, which is why they do not need to be ratified by the National Parliaments of the 27 Member States. The so called ‘legal guarantees’ are nothing more than an interpretation by EU Heads of State as to what they think the Lisbon Treaty means. However, if the Lisbon Treaty comes into force, it will be the EU Court of Justice in Luxembourg which will interpret Lisbon. The EU Court is the only body authorised under the European Treaties to interpret the Treaties themselves and decide how they should be applied. The political decision and agreement of a particular group of EU Prime Ministers and Presidents, which is what we are being presented with, cannot and will not decide what Lisbon means.
The ‘Decision’ of the European Council that certain provisions of the Lisbon Treaty mean specific things is just an agreement between 27 Heads of State as to what they believe to be the case. This ‘Decision’ is not an international treaty between States because it does not require and will not go through the ratification process of all 27 Member States through approval in their National Parliaments. This is the normal process for ratifying international treaties and it is clear that without such a legally binding ratification process the ‘legal guarantees’ do not have this legal status.
The run-up to and presentation of these so-called legal guarantees is a deliberate attempt to divert attention away from the contents of the Lisbon Treaty which will remain unchanged in a second referendum. The hype surrounding the supposedly hard fight that the Irish Government faced to secure these guarantees is a clever way of getting people to believe that Ireland after a long struggle managed to achieve something. But all they have achieved is a regurgitation of the Yes side’s arguments endorsed by the EU Heads of State.
Even promises of ‘Protocols’ at a future date are irrelevant because once the new EU established under Lisbon comes into force then no Protocol can pull back from what Lisbon has established and it will be the EU Court of Justice that will decide what the Treaty means once it comes into force.
Ends
For further information phone: 0872427049, Patricia McKenna
|