Upcoming Events

National | Miscellaneous

no events match your query!

New Events

National

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Promoting Human Rights in Ireland

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link Food Firms Revolt Against Net Zero Over Australia?s Energy Crisis Mon Feb 03, 2025 13:00 | Sallust
Firms supplying food to major Australian supermarkets have launched a revolt against Net Zero, urging the Government to dump its renewables targets and focus on ramping up gas and coal production to cut electricity prices.
The post Food Firms Revolt Against Net Zero Over Australia’s Energy Crisis appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Wind Turbine Bursts into Flames Mon Feb 03, 2025 11:00 | Will Jones
A wind turbine has burst into flames in Cambridgeshire ? the latest instance of an issue previously described by Imperial College London as a "big problem" that is not being "fully reported".
The post Wind Turbine Bursts into Flames appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Year After Lockdown Saw Massive Spike in Attempted Child Suicides Mon Feb 03, 2025 09:00 | Richard Eldred
Lockdowns and school closures have triggered a devastating surge in child suicides and self-harm, with hospital admissions soaring and mental health disorders skyrocketing.
The post Year After Lockdown Saw Massive Spike in Attempted Child Suicides appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link The Chancellor?s ?Growth Agenda? Is Full of Sound and Fury, but Signifies Nothing Mon Feb 03, 2025 07:00 | Ben Pile
Ben Pile brands the Government's 'growth agenda' as empty political theatre, with wooden actors stumbling through hollow lines, written by someone who has no clue what growth actually is.
The post The Chancellor?s ?Growth Agenda? Is Full of Sound and Fury, but Signifies Nothing appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link News Round-Up Mon Feb 03, 2025 01:19 | Richard Eldred
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N?118 Sat Feb 01, 2025 12:57 | en

offsite link 80th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp Sat Feb 01, 2025 12:16 | en

offsite link Misinterpretations of US trends (1/2), by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jan 28, 2025 06:59 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter #117 Fri Jan 24, 2025 19:54 | en

offsite link The United States bets its hegemony on the Fourth Industrial Revolution Fri Jan 24, 2025 19:26 | en

Voltaire Network >>

'The time to stop the war on Iraq is now'

category national | miscellaneous | news report author Monday July 29, 2002 15:59author by Skibereen Eagle - Culchies against Capitalism Report this post to the editors

Scott Ritter, former UN arms inspector in Iraq, speaks out

SCOTT RITTER is not someone we would normally have much time for. He is a member of President George W Bush's Republican Party and was at the centre of US operations against Iraq during the 1990s. Yet in a packed meeting at the Houses of Parliament in London last week Ritter demolished the justification for the new war that Bush is planning against Iraq.

IN AMERICA we say, "Don't let friends drive drunk." There is a drunk at the wheel of American foreign policy. Friends of America must stand up and stop the madness, and take away the key driving the American machine towards war.

I am a card-carrying Republican who voted for George W Bush for president. I am not here as a friend of the Iraqi people. I was a weapons inspector in Iraq from 1991-8. I was not there to be friendly but to disarm Iraq. I am here as an American citizen concerned about the state of my country which is heading down a path that will lead to death and destruction. It will be a war the like of which you have never seen.

The United States of America has the best trained, the best led, the best equipped military forces the world has ever seen. We are the most efficient killing machine in the history of mankind. Iraq will be destroyed with a vengeance. I am a 12-year marine veteran. I fought in the first war against Iraq. When we talk about war, be clear that war means death and destruction.

When the bullets fly there is no movie music in the background. You kill people. You get killed. That's what war is about. There is no such thing as a good war. There can be a just war. If Iraq possesses weapons of mass destruction today I will be the first to sign up to wage war. For then Saddam Hussein is a pariah leader at the head of a rogue state.

If Iraq has weapons of mass destruction then I'm with you, Tony Blair and George W Bush. But back it up with evidence. I'll tell you what I know. I know that since December 1998 there have not been weapons inspectors in Iraq, and that without weapons inspectors we cannot know what has happened on the ground.

But, as of December 1998, the weapons inspectors had destroyed the factories that could be used to produce chemical, biological or nuclear weapons. They are gone.

We backed it up with monitoring and the most stringent controls in history to ensure that Iraq wasn't reconstituting that ability. We could not account for everything. But we do know that the factory where, for example, they made liquid bulk anthrax ceased production. We blew it up in 1996. Liquid bulk anthrax cannot survive for more than three years even under ideal storage conditions. So even if Iraq did hide some from us it is no longer viable.

As of December 1998 we came close to zero level in terms of Iraq's ability to produce or maintain weapons of mass destruction. Biological and chemical weapons must be produced in industrial facilities possessing the highest level of technology. Iraq would have had to procure much of this from abroad to reconstitute facilities.

I know that sanctions are a sieve. But I worked with the best intelligence agencies in the world. If Iraq were to attempt to acquire this equipment they would be detected. Even if they got it and attempted to reconstitute a biological, chemical or nuclear factory, it is detectable.

When you have the prime minister of Great Britain or president of the United States speak of a dossier, demand this dossier. The Bush administration has such a hunger for war with Iraq. They are desperate for any evidence to justify war with Iraq. If the US had any credible information it would be on the front page of every American newspaper tomorrow.

We are told we're going to war with Iraq because Iraq represents a threat to our national security. We are told they possess weapons of mass destruction and are linked with Al Qaida and terrorism. One-there are no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

Two-you cannot link Saddam Hussein to the terrorism of 11 September or anti-Western terror groups. Three-there is no record of Saddam Hussein providing anybody with weapons of mass destruction.

If this is not a national security issue, why are we doing it? It is about American domestic politics. We have in Washington DC an administration that has a visceral hatred of everything the Clinton administration stood for, including his unwillingness to decisively confront Iraq.

They spent time developing an ideology that espouses regime change in Iraq, and unilateralism in foreign policy-we don't need the rest of the world, the United Nations or international law. We will do this, they say, because we are America-we are the sole remaining superpower, and we can get away with it.

This has become policy-a part of the neo-conservatives' ideology. I have been accused of being unpatriotic, an enemy of the state. I'm a decorated 12-year marine veteran who has put my life on the line for my country. I am exercising my constitutional duty to hold my elected representatives accountable for what they do in my name.

If we go to war against Iraq we are only reinforcing the case put forward by Osama Bin Laden and his associates. They said 11 September was the opening salvo in a clash of civilisations between the West and Islam.

Most of Islam rejected this. They said, "No way, Osama. You don't speak for us." If we replaced Saddam Hussein, what will follow?

I don't believe that the US has the stomach to occupy Iraq for any length of time. When the US withdraws from Iraq our appointed government will collapse, and what will replace it will be Islamic fundamentalist. Many states in the region also have regimes whose populations are becoming more and more restive. You could see a domino effect-Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Turkey, Egypt-and Osama Bin Laden will have won.

An invasion of Iraq is the quickest way to give legitimacy to the men who attacked the US on 11 September. There is a momentum developing for war on Iraq. In California 20,000 marines are training for taking part in a major ground operation in Iraq as early as October this year.

Boeing is accelerating delivery of smart bombs so we can be in a position to wage war as early as October. Once you start deploying troops, committing economic, military and political capital to war with Iraq, then war becomes inevitable. The time to stop war with Iraq is now.

If you in Britain are able to create a shift in the policy of the Blair government you will have achieved a victory of tremendous proportions which will motivate people in America.

Many Americans feel powerless to stop this war. They need an example. I appeal to the British to lead by example. Stop this war.|

This is an extract from Scott Ritter's speech, edited for reasons of space.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

'Turn this into a massive demo'

THE MEETING in parliament was chaired by Labour MP George Galloway. He is a leading figure in the movement against Bush and Blair's war drive. He summed up with a vital rallying call to the anti-war movement:

"Our task is to make it politically impossible for our government to commit forces to war. We have built a massive anti-war movement in this country, which three times has put up to 100,000 people on the streets. The next demonstration is on 28 September, on the eve of the Labour conference. It is perhaps the most important political demonstration there has ever been in this country. It must be mammoth."

author by Cousin Jethro - Johnny Cash Appreciation Society (Marxist-Leninist)publication date Mon Jul 29, 2002 16:06author address author phone Report this post to the editors

SVEN LINDQVIST'S A History of Bombing (Granta, 10 euros) describes a century of aerial bombardment. It looks at the way our rulers have ruthlessly used this method to defend their power and privilege.

THE FIRST bombing from the air took place in 1911. Almost inevitably, given the history of European imperialism, it was a bloody massacre to put down colonial revolt. The Italian lieutenant Giulio Cavotti dropped four bombs on Arabs near Tripoli in north Africa who had fought back against Italian troops.

The official communique from the Italian military enthused that the bombs "had a wonderful effect on the morale of the Arabs". The British were impressed. The next year Commander Trenchard offered to try and win the war in Somaliland, east Africa, from the air. The British told the Somali leader Mohammed Hassan (who the British called the "mad mullah") to prepare for a visit.

He duly set up a special canopy to await the foreign emissaries. Trenchard then bombed the Somalis. The first bombardment killed much of Mohammed's family. British bombers attacked Mohammed and his core followers as they fled through the desert. Trenchard was hailed as a hero. Here was a certain way of defeating the "inferior races" without any major loss of life for Europeans.

The British quickly tried out the new methods against rebels in Iraq, Pathans on India's north western border, nationalist revolutionaries in Egypt, the Sultan of Darfur and in Afghanistan.

During the third Afghan war in 1919 the bombardment was organised by squadron chief Arthur Harris, the man who would go on to slaughter German civilians during the Second World War. Harris later wrote, "The Arab and Kurd now realise what real bombing means. "They now know that within 45 minutes a full sized village can be practically wiped out and a third of its inhabitants killed or injured by four or five machines which offer them no real target." The general concept of "blasting the natives" from afar was not new. British naval bombardment reduced the Egyptian city of Alexandria to rubble and ash in 1882. The bombs transformed the city into a sea of fire.

Air war greatly extended such murder. Lindqvist shows that popular writing at the end of the 19th century was full of racist fantasies about eliminating "the yellow man", the "African race" and others regarded as lesser than the white Europeans.

There was a yearning for a "super-weapon" that would unleash "a rain of awful death to every breathing thing, a rain that exterminates the hopeless race". There were no scruples about burning black people from the air.

The British airforce headquarters in India said, "International law does not apply to savage tribes who do not conform to codes of civilised warfare." Afghan women could be killed because "they are considered a piece of property somewhere between a rifle and a cow".

A Royal Air Force memorandum from 1922 lists timed bombs, phosphorus bombs, whistling arrows, crude oil to pollute drinking water and liquid fire as legitimate means of terror. The great powers then used air power against one another.

In 1932 British Tory prime minister Stanley Baldwin anounced that attack was the only effective form of defence and that "you have to kill more women and children more quickly than the enemy if you want to save yourselves".

The fascist bombing of Guernica in 1937 during the Spanish Civil War brought home the potential for air war to strike terror into enemy civilians. The dictator Franco ordered the destruction of Guernica. He had been part of the Spanish forces which murdered tens of thousands in Morocco during the colonial war.

Spain destroyed the sacred city of Chechaouen from the air in 1925. He used that example in the civil war. Guernica was a lesson that every power involved in the Second World War learned well. The German bombers' destruction of Coventry and the East End of London during the Blitz is well known. What is less well known is that the British bombing of German cities was far more brutal.

In October 1942 Charles Portal, the commander of the Royal Air Force wrote to the air ministry about his plans to drop 1,250,000 tons of bombs on Germany in the next two years. He calculated this would kill one million civilians, injure another million and leave 25 million homeless.

The air ministry responded, "It is undesirable to emphasise this aspect of our bombing which is contrary to the principles of international law." They did not oppose the plan. They just didn't want it talked about. British air attacks on Hamburg killed more people than all the German air attacks against English cities put together.

About 50,000 died on the single night of 27 July 1943 when the British dropped 1,200 tons of incendiary bombs on residential areas. Thousands of small fires joined together in one enormous inferno. The firestorm reached hurricane levels. The vast majority of the dead were women, children and old people.

The city of Dresden was full of refugees and practically undefended when the British and the US attacked in February 1945. The aim of the attack was, as the official papers said, "to show the Russians what Bomber Command can accomplish".

The firestorm this created meant the temperature rose to above 1,000 degrees centigrade. Some 100,000 civilians were killed. The largest children's hospital was hit by a blockbuster bomb in the first attack, then by incendiary bombs in the second wave and finally machine-gunned by US Mustangs in the third attack.

While the killing went on, the British and US commands refused to bomb the gas chambers at Auschwitz. It was possible to do it-oil refineries and factories in the area were bombed. Lindqvist shows around 500,000 Jews might have been saved if the gas chambers had been bombed at the earliest opportunity. If they had been bombed at the time of raids on the nearby factories then 100,000 might not have perished.

Instead, Harris was determined to "break the morale" of the residential areas. That meant killing civilians. British prime minister Winston Churchill decided to halt the bombing of residential areas after Dresden because he thought the raids were destroying housing that the invading allied troops needed. Hiroshima was the ultimate fantasy of the "super-weapon" made real.

When the atomic bomb hit, around 100,000 people (95,000 of them civilians) were killed instantly. Another 100,000 died long, drawn out deaths from the effects of radiation. Vietnam saw the development of the air-dropped cluster bomb. Now familiar from the war on Iraq and in Afghanistan, this is a canister that opens and spreads smaller bombs over a large area.

When the B-52s bombed Vietnam they often dropped explosive bombs first in order to "open the structures", then napalm to burn out the contents of an area and finally CBU-24 cluster bombs to kill the people who came running to help those who were burning.

Time-release cluster bombs wiped out people who thought the danger had passed. Between 1964 and 1971 almost 500,000 cluster bombs were dropped. They contained 285 million mini-bombs, seven bombs for every person in all of Indochina. Napalm, a sticky incendiary substance designed to burn people, was developed in the 1940s. It "peels human beings like oranges".

During the Second World War the US dropped 14,000 tonnes of napalm. In the Korean War of the 1950s US planes showered 32,000 tonnes of napalm. In Vietnam the US used 373,000 tons of napalm of a newer, more terrible, kind.

Lindqvist's book is organised in an unusual way. The pages contain 399 short passages and you have to follow signposts from one section to another by leafing back and forth through the volume. You get lost and the historical sequence breaks down in a way you can find either fruitful and enriching-or annoying, depending on your taste. This book unmasks the horror that ruling classes have inflicted on ordinary people through aerial bombardment during the last 100 years.

It shows the brutality of the armed wing of capitalist competition and the hypocrisy of Western leaders who denounce the violence of people who fight back against imperialism.

Forty years ago the Korean Pak Jong Dae, speaking through a face half burned away by napalm, said, "I do not think there should be any more victims like me in the world." After reading this you will be even more determined to make that wish a reality by mobilising to stop Bush and Blair's planned attack on Iraq.

 
© 2001-2025 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy