Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
 RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
Convicted Terrorist Sues Landlord of ?Saracen?s Head Pub Because Sign Offends Him Tue Dec 17, 2024 11:00 | Toby Young
A man convicted of inciting terrorism by spreading Jihadist propaganda is suing a pub called The Saracen's Head, claiming the sign will incite violence against Muslims. Not a Babylon Bee story!
The post Convicted Terrorist Sues Landlord of ?Saracen?s Head Pub Because Sign Offends Him appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Dale Vince?s Ministry of Eco Education Preaches Climate Crisis to Seven Year-Olds Tue Dec 17, 2024 09:00 | Chris Morrison
Dale Vince's Ministry of Eco Education preaches about the climate crisis to seven year-old schoolchildren. Shouldn't we teach kids how to read and count instead of scaring them witless, asks Chris Morrison.
The post Dale Vince’s Ministry of Eco Education Preaches Climate Crisis to Seven Year-Olds appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Why Did Excess Deaths Not Drop After Covid? Tue Dec 17, 2024 07:00 | Nick Rendell
In 2020 Asian countries were praised for their pandemic response. But since 2021 they've seen soaring death rates, while the UK is still running hot. Why did deaths not drop once the 'pandemic' was over, asks Nick Rendell.
The post Why Did Excess Deaths Not Drop After Covid? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Tue Dec 17, 2024 00:53 | Richard Eldred
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lucy Letby?s Lawyers Say They Have ?New Evidence? that ?Significantly? Undermines Her Convictions Af... Mon Dec 16, 2024 20:00 | Will Jones
Lucy Letby?s lawyers have said they have new evidence that "significantly" undermines her convictions after a key medical witness changed his mind about three baby deaths. They urge the Court of Appeal to reopen the case.
The post Lucy Letby’s Lawyers Say They Have “New Evidence” that “Significantly” Undermines Her Convictions After Key Expert Witness “Changes his Mind” on Three Baby Deaths appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
How Washington and Ankara Changed the Regime in Damascus , by Thierry Meyssan Tue Dec 17, 2024 06:58 | en
Statement by President Bashar al-Assad on the Circumstances Leading to his Depar... Mon Dec 16, 2024 13:26 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?112 Fri Dec 13, 2024 15:34 | en
Israel Passes Law Allowing Four-Year Detention Without Trial or Evidence Fri Dec 13, 2024 15:27 | en
Jihadist Mohammed al-Bashir, new Syrian Prime Minister Fri Dec 13, 2024 15:24 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
The Enemy Without
 international |
arts and media |
other press
 Saturday June 23, 2007 10:18 by David Manning & Miriam Cotton - MediaBite editors at mediabite dot org
The 'bought priesthood' strikes again
Free elections were held in Palestine in 2006 and the Hamas party were the Palestinian electorate's choice for government. The message was clear: if the UN, US, and Israel were to have any chance of negotiating a constructive outcome in the region, Hamas would have to be taken seriously. In a landslide victory, they had incontrovertibly become the legitimately elected voice of the Palestinian people.
But that is not what has happened. Palestine made the 'wrong' choice and mainstream media coverage has upended itself in its efforts to support the US's punishment of the Palestinians for not throwing up the 'right' result. Never mind that the ousted opposition party was both corrupt and incompetent. MediaBite's latest media shot examines the breathtaking media hypocrisy which has eviscerated the meaning of the term 'democracy' to help disguise what the US and Israel have done to destroy Palestine's legitimate democracy - a democracy that was more democratic than the US's own:
"The [day following the election] the Irish Times' Roula Khalaf and William Wallis wrote, as if to pre-empt Washington's ironic but inevitable dissatisfaction, to suggest a re-think on the behalf of the great democrats: 'Faced with these results", they said, "some Arab governments, and even liberal intellectuals, have been arguing that the US should now reconsider its approach to democracy in the Arab world.' "
The 'lberal intellectuals' have been dilligent in their work. Chillingly, The New York Times recently reported:
"Since the election victory of Hamas in January 2006, the United States and Israel have worked to isolate and damage Hamas and build up Fatah with recognition and weaponry." .
What this refers to is of course is the death and illness of many Palestinian people and the destruction of their society and infrastructure - culminating in civil war which now sees the democratically rejected and corrput Fatah party regaining control of parts of the territory - to the delight and relief of their US and Israeli sponsors. It could scarcely have been thought that life for the Palestinians could be made worse than it already was but that turns out not to be right. Their plight must now rank among the worst - if not the worst - of any oppressed group of people in the world.
Things are going well.
And the wiser heads who have chronicled these events from the west have made their own unique contribution to the accompanying media discourse as the murderous farce unfolded. The uncomfortable truth was made comfortable and it was accomplished very easily: committing genocide on defenceless people is now to be described as 'bringing democracy'. And so the intellectuals, the solemn faced-news presenters, pundits and reporters all get to sleep easily at night in places like Dublin and New York.
Link to media shot
http://www.mediabite.org/article_The-Enemy-Without--nda....html
|
printable version
Digg this
del.icio.us
Furl
Reddit
Technorati
Facebook
Gab
Twitter
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (13 of 13)
Jump To Comment: 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1You said
'Remember the internet, Dorothy. I did - I carried out a google search and found an excellent article about Militant's position on the Falklands war.
Anyone who wishes can read it here, assuming I've managed to link successfully -
http://www.socialistreviewindex.org.uk/pubs/sr-js.htm
Now I'm not a supporter and/or member of the SWP (I live 12,00 km away, and don't have the health to be an activist) but it's obvious they've nailed you here.'
If you are going to criticise the position of the Militant/CWI on the Falklands War - at least do it with what we actually said not what the SWP pass off for analysis. The SWP were/are incapable of understanding Marxism and Marxist analysis and take a hop-skip and jump approach to critiquing political statements.
If you want to deal with the CWI attitude to the Falklands I suggest you don't just stop at the first item that comes up on a google search.
Try this
http://www.socialismtoday.org/108/falklands.html
Ah, a little visit from our old transparently racist friend "Observer". Sure, sure, South Africa was MUCH better off under apartheid - all the white people had nice swimming pools and all the servants they could want, the blacks lived in shacks and only spoke when they were spoken to, and there were nice death squads to torture and murder anyone who objected to this set-up. Equally, Mozambique and Angola were much happier when Portuguese colonists sucked them dry. It's terrible to see, isn't it, those uppity blacks in SA going on STRIKE and actually demanding HIGHER wages!?! Who do they think they are - human?
http://www.irishexaminer.com/irishexaminer/pages/story....1.asp
Jonathan Steele exposes US action to destabilise Palestine and to break their democracy
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,,2108926,00.html
The good rabbi might care to explain - if Israel is the ANC of the Middle East, why was the Israeli state the most loyal and vociferous ally of the former apartheid regime in his home country? The Israeli elites clearly recognised the affinity between their treatment of the Palestinians and the SA regime's treatment of its own people. And why hasn't the ANC been so quick to recognise the parallel? Every prominent leader of the anti-apartheid struggle, from Mandela to Tutu, has spoken out in soldarity with the Palestinian cause.
Meanwhile, he turns to the Balfour declaration for proof of the legitimacy of Israel's conduct. A declaration issued by the then-greatest imperial power on earth, which held hundreds of millions of people in subjugation through brutal military occupation and exploitation. And issued by a man whose anti-Semitism was brazen and shameless, who introduced the first bill in the House of Commons to restrict immigation in response to the exodus of Jewish pogrom victims from Eastern Europe, and told the assembled MPs that Jews would be unable to integrate into British society and must be kept out.
Methinks Rabbi Goldstein might like to consider whether such folk are really true friends of the Jewish people, and wonder why those who stood full-square against fascism in Europe and defended the Jews in their darkest hour are now the same people defending the democratic rights of the Palestinians. Perhaps he's comfortable knowing that the most reliable defenders of Israel in the USA are the direct heirs of the Crusaders and the Inquisition, the people who believe that God will send the Jews to hell when the Rapture comes. If so, he really needs to get his head straight
Rabbi Warren Goldstein also wrote the following,
"What if, in siding against Israel, the world is siding against the only beacon of freedom and democracy in the Middle East, thereby endangering us all because the fate of Jews is often a sign portending the future?"
How could anyone take seriously the author of such nonsense?
http://www.zmag.org/sustainers/content/2007-06/21fletch...r.cfm
From Schecter on Znet: 'The Foxification of Al Jazeera"
"You don't need to bomb Al Jazeera to change its direction," said my source. "There is a softer way to influence its direction by taking it over from within and it can happen quietly almost as if in slow motion. You 'broaden' some programs, announce new 'guidelines,' issue new edicts reinforcing top-down control, purge some professionals you don't like, and then give more positive unchallenged airtime to backers of US foreign policy. Washington would not be open about any behind the scenes role it is playing in all this for fear of triggering a very negative public reaction."
This has all been happening over the last month or so.
http://www.zmag.org/sustainers/content/2007-06/18schech...r.cfm
Go to the site you want to link to .Put the cursor arrow on the address (http.www.etc)of the site you want to link to- left click with your mouse ;the address will turn blue. Then go to ‘edit’ on the top bar ,click -a list will appear. On the list click on the word ‘copy’. Return to the comment you want the link to appear on . Go to edit again . Now click on the word ‘paste’. The link will appear .
Hope that helps .It took me about three years to work it out
An even handed assessment of Hamas from Jewish Voice for Peace:
http://www.jewishvoiceforpeace.org/publish/article_292....ml#q1
A report from Green Left on 1 Feb 2006 sums up the reason for the victory - two brief excerpts here - full report at link below
"PALESTINE: Hamas wins election
Kim Bullimore
In a stunning victory, the Islamic Palestinian resistance group Hamas claimed 76 of the 132 seats in the second Palestinian Authority (PA) election on January 25. This was the first election for the Palestinian Legislative Assembly held in almost 10 years. Hamas decisively defeated the ruling Fatah party, which retained 43 seats. Hamas, which campaigned against corruption and for improved social services, was expected to do well in the election, but not to gain enough seats to take control of the PA in its own right. "
The election result was a direct message of defiance from the Palestinian people to the US and Israel. As Bullmore puts it later in the report:
"The continuing brutal military occupation of Palestine by Israel also contributed to the Hamas victory. Fatah’s inability to deliver promises of statehood and peace in the wake of the failed Oslo “peace” process has caused a decline in Fatah’s support. Oslo and subsequent “peace processes” strengthened the brutal 39-year-old Israeli occupation and led to an abysmal deterioration in Palestinian living conditions. In addition, even more land has been confiscated by Israel for the building of illegal Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT) and Israel has continued to pursue its construction of the illegal apartheid wall. "
[Kim Bullimore is a member of the Socialist Alliance and lived in the Occupied Palestinian Territories in 2004, where she worked with the human-rights organisation International Women’s Peace Service. .]
http://www.greenleft.org.au/2006/654/7554
The term 'landslide' is taken directly from an Irish Times report the day after the results were announced. The full quote was - “a spectacular landslide victory”. You can find it in the MediaShot this introduction links to.
http://www.mediabite.org/article_The-Enemy-Without--nda....html
The BBC reported a day earlier: "Hamas sweeps to election victory"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4650788.stm
"Hamas won the election, with 74 seats to the ruling-Fatah's 45, providing Hamas with the majority of seats and the ability to form a majority government on their own. "Hamas won 44 percent of the popular vote but 56 percent of the seats, while Fatah won 42 percent of the popular vote but only 34 percent of the seats" according to the New York Times [1]."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_legislative_el..._2006
"In a landslide victory, they had incontrovertibly become the legitimately elected voice of the Palestinian people."
Hamas did not win a landslide victory. They got 42% of the votes cast. This gave them a majority in parliament but not a mandate to create an islamic state. Fatah, the PFLP & DFLP got more than 50% of the vote between them.Secular parties got 55% of the vote in total.