Upcoming Events

Mayo | Environment

no events match your query!

New Events

Mayo

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Promoting Human Rights in Ireland

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link One in 12 in London is an Illegal Migrant Thu Jan 23, 2025 19:30 | Will Jones
London is home to as many as 585,000 illegal migrants, equivalent to one in 12 of the city?s population, according to a previously confidential report.
The post One in 12 in London is an Illegal Migrant appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Illegal Afghan Migrant Kills Two and Wounds Three in Latest Knife Violence to Afflict Open-Borders G... Thu Jan 23, 2025 17:55 | Eugyppius
An illegal Afghan migrant has killed two and wounded three in the latest knife violence to afflict open-borders Germany. In response, Leftist organisations will light candles to demonstrate "solidarity and cohesion".
The post Illegal Afghan Migrant Kills Two and Wounds Three in Latest Knife Violence to Afflict Open-Borders Germany appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Should Oxford Be Trusted to Assess the Safety of its Own Vaccine? Thu Jan 23, 2025 15:50 | Mark Walker
The Covid Inquiry was reassured by a scientist from Oxford University that the Covid vaccines were safe. But should Oxford, which received ?143m in royalties from its Covid vaccine, be trusted on this, asks Mark Walker.
The post Should Oxford Be Trusted to Assess the Safety of its Own Vaccine? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Does Starmer Know What He?s Talking About on AI? Thu Jan 23, 2025 13:28 | James Alexander
Why was Keir Starmer's recent speech on AI written like a Mr Men book? Prof James Alexander wonders if the Prime Minister knows what he's talking about. Is AI really "the ultimate force for national renewal"?
The post Does Starmer Know What He’s Talking About on AI? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Trump Puts all Diversity Staff on Leave ?Immediately? Thu Jan 23, 2025 11:00 | Will Jones
Donald Trump has ordered that all federal diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) staff be put on paid leave "immediately" and eventually laid off as the new President's war on woke goes nuclear.
The post Trump Puts all Diversity Staff on Leave “Immediately” appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Should we condemn or not the glorification of Nazism?, by Thierry Meyssan Wed Jan 22, 2025 14:05 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N?116 Sat Jan 18, 2025 06:46 | en

offsite link After the United Kingdom, Germany and Denmark, the Trump team prepares an operat... Sat Jan 18, 2025 06:37 | en

offsite link Trump and Musk, Canada, Panama and Greenland, an old story, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jan 14, 2025 07:03 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N?114-115 Fri Jan 10, 2025 14:04 | en

Voltaire Network >>

“Why don’t you just fuck off and mind your own business, we don’t care about you"

category mayo | environment | news report author Tuesday August 16, 2005 22:02author by Terry via Micheal Report this post to the editors

- Shell/Roadbridge Engineer to Rossport resident and relative of prisoner.

The reality of Shell’s promised “P.R. Blitz” – attempts to provoke trouble on the picket lines.

At 6.40 a.m. today one Rossport resident was at the Ballinaboy picket and got word that a small convoy of Limerick reg. jeeps had been seen in the area. Limerick reg. jeeps in Erris usually being those belonging to Roadbridge, one of Shell’s contractors. On driving back to the Rossport compound he found five jeeps pulled up outside it and seven of the higher echelon staff inside the compound. This included Kevin, one of Shell/Roadbridge’s top engineers, and Paul Gallagher, another one of Shell’s top boys, as well as an Italian, presumably from Sicim.

By 7.10 a.m there was ten picketers at the gate.
At 7.25 a.m. the standard Garda shift change took place (there are now two garda at each development site continually).
By 8.00 a.m. 20 picketers had arrived, a mix of campers and local residents, just before 8.00 a.m. 3 blue collar workers arrived, probably machine drivers, but didn’t attempt to enter the compound.
Between 8.00 a.m. and 8.45 a.m. the engineering staff and white collars were walking out of the compound and speaking to the 3 ordinary workers outside.
At 8.25 a.m. the picketers held the main gate and made it that any one going in or out would go through the adjoining public right of way – a small pedestrian gate, not passable to vehicles.
A Garda inspector who was at this stage present gave out about this to the demonstrators.

By 8.45 a.m. the majority of the white collar staff were now outside the compound, while one was leaving he shoved into a protestor, and when said protestor remonstrated with him and took his photo he said “I suppose that camera is stolen”. This protestor is a relative of some of the prisoners.
Attempts to file a complaint with the Garda, both for the shove and the verbal abuse met with an initial lack of interest on the part of the guardians of the peace (CL 132 and CL 277 and the inspector).

This particular member of Roadbridge/Shell staff then went to his Nissan Patrol 4 by 4, 01 – LM 579, complete with ‘Hey MTV Pimp My Ride’ sticker, and phoned into his superiors saying loud enough for all to hear: “There is nothing here but a shower of wankers”.
Shortly after this Kevin, a Roadbride/Shell engineer says to one local resident (and relative of a prisoner): “Why don’t you just fuck off and mind your own business, we don’t care about you, we don’t care what you want”

As one camper put it there was no attempt to take anything into the compound or to take anything out, or do any other kind of work, a fact which makes it obvious that this was an unsuccessful attempt at provocation.

Ear to the Ground.

In another incident on the picket lines, last Friday at 10.10 a.m., a conversation between Mick Coffey, another contractor, and a security guard was over heard.
The substance of this conversation was that Coffey hopes that the demonstrators will allow them in to dismantle the section of pipeline they have illegally constructed and that he feels they have to get the Rossport Five out of prison as he thinks the pickets will end then,. He was also talking about the possibility of re-routing the pipeline up the estuary – but says that would take two years in the planning process (this option was considered before and rejection due to environmental regulations). This conversation also revealed that the illegally constructed section of pipeline is actually sinking into the bog (most likely as the foundations were not built deep enough).

Related Link: http://www.shelltosea.com
author by barrypublication date Wed Aug 17, 2005 11:54author address author phone Report this post to the editors

A very honest question,do the people involved in this protest not have to work?

author by Barrypublication date Wed Aug 17, 2005 11:56author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Not me , the ranting republican northern one . Get your own handle ye troll .

author by Alpublication date Wed Aug 17, 2005 13:01author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Maybe they work shifts or have a few days off. Ever consider that imposter Barry?

You do realise that the majority of people in Ireland do not work a standard 9 to 5 monday to friday.

author by Curiouspublication date Wed Aug 17, 2005 15:06author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Shortly after this Kevin, a Roadbride/Shell engineer says to one local resident (and relative of a prisoner): “Why don’t you just fuck off and mind your own business, we don’t care about you, we don’t care what you want”

Whats the significance in the inclusion of the relative to prisoner bit, does one become some form of higher being above the rest of us mere mortals if one happens to be related to the rossport 5

author by Barry ( the real one)publication date Wed Aug 17, 2005 16:26author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The fact that a protestor is related to one of the imprisoned men is relevant to the piece , especially if some gobshite surveyor is using foul languauge and raving on about how no-one cares that principled family men are in a dirty stinking prison because of foreign thieves .

Anyone closely related to the men would I imagine find this especially offensive . It does not make anyone a "higher being" although if I was related to any of them Id be proud of the fact .

I hope youre actually being paid to show such spite , otherwise youre a sad , bitter and twisted effort rather than a purely mercenary one . Either way it wouldnt be hard to be a higher being than yourself .

author by curiouspublication date Wed Aug 17, 2005 16:45author address author phone Report this post to the editors

easy now, there is nothing wrong with questioning its relevance,

and do you automatically think that people that are in favour of the development are paid by or part of shell, cos that is certainly not the case for me

author by Barrypublication date Wed Aug 17, 2005 16:54author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Why would anyone in their right mind be in favour of this countrys natural resources being given away for free to an outfit like Shell , while honest men are lying in jail for trying to protect their homes and families ? Why your hostility towards the men ?

My point stands , either you are bitter and twisted ( perhaps due to some crackpot ideology) OR youre getting paid ? Explain your motivation please curious .

Im very curious .

author by curiouspublication date Wed Aug 17, 2005 17:14author address author phone Report this post to the editors

would have never been discovered in the first place if government hadnt the good sense to offer incentives to exploration companies to spend millions looking for them,

are you not being a touch naive to think shell would lash out the dosh looking for the stuff and then not reap the maximum they can from the discovery, come on get a grip

author by eeeekkkkkkpublication date Wed Aug 17, 2005 17:29author address author phone Report this post to the editors

you can keep 100% of it and write your expenses (huge) off against tax for ever (almost)

sounds like a sensible policy eh????????

really benefits me eh????????

Flying Pig-Human Alert Issued At 4pm Now In Effect

http://www.google.ie/search?q=flying+pig-human&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&filter=0

author by curiouspublication date Wed Aug 17, 2005 17:37author address author phone Report this post to the editors

who will explore for our natural resources if there are no incentives

exploration is very expensive business in case you dont know

please do not say there is no benefits, the local and national economy benefits directly and indirectly

author by Noelpublication date Wed Aug 17, 2005 17:49author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Gold in your back yard?

Let's pretend you have a house.
And let's pretend further it has a backyard.
There's gold in that there backyard too.
However, it's 100 metres down.
It would be uneconomical for you to dig it yourself. And there may not be much gold in there. However, there's a chap with a special digger who'll give you 25% of the value of the gold he's prepared to unearth. He'll also buy vittels from the local shop. He'll employ some of your neighbours too.

What do you do?
Let me guess - tell him to go f*uck himself?

author by guydebordisdeadpublication date Wed Aug 17, 2005 18:05author address author phone Report this post to the editors

it all depends, how many members of my family do I have to jail so that this man can dig up the gold?

author by Justin Morahan - Peace Peoplepublication date Wed Aug 17, 2005 18:05author address author phone Report this post to the editors

That crude remark was made by your friends to the protestors - not the other way round

author by Noelpublication date Wed Aug 17, 2005 18:10author address author phone Report this post to the editors

'it all depends, how many members of my family do I have to jail so that this man can dig up the gold?'

None.
However, if your family members are in contempt of court then it's off to the big house for them. That's the law.

author by Noelpublication date Wed Aug 17, 2005 18:14author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Justin,

The crude remark was the expected response from eeeek to the digger fella.
All imaginary of course, much like his backyard ownership.

author by eeekkkkkkpublication date Wed Aug 17, 2005 18:28author address author phone Report this post to the editors

"However, there's a chap with a special digger who'll give you 25% of the value of the gold he's prepared to unearth."

Shell etc in this case have made no such promise. They take 100% of the gold. Write off their tax against hole digging expenses.

Just how accurately their eventual profits will be measured is a murky murky issue.

What if the gas is sold in UK and profit is made there - how will irish state ever ever make any benefit from it?

Does anyone trust courrent or similar administrations to try to measure the amount of gas going out of ireland? They have obfuscated facts wrt how much is out there that it verges on treasonous. Are only 'insiders' allowed to have a clear picture of what is there and what might be there. That's what it seems like at present.


An eqitable arrangement is possible but the present one is one GIANT RIP-OFF.

Not even a Nigerian State type royalty. Not even a royalty of 5%. Anyone who portrays this as a good deal is BY DEFINITION a shell shiller.

I say onto you flying pig-human types - People are not stupid and treatimg them like they are is just liable to make them more angry and more informed.

author by gypsy Davypublication date Wed Aug 17, 2005 18:30author address author phone Report this post to the editors

As one of the protestors I would say to teh question about my job
is none of your business, my life is my life. If I chose to make certain aspects of it public ie my political views you have the right to question but other wise go and read the sundy indep. if you are curiuos about teh irelevancy of personal lives. Do people ask you do you work when your posting during the day. no becuase its not relevant

author by Noelpublication date Wed Aug 17, 2005 18:40author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Let me get this straight.
According to eeek, Shell's Corrib exploration will not bring one single euro of revenue to the state. Not one euro?

Who knew?

author by eeekkkkkkpublication date Wed Aug 17, 2005 18:47author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I suggest you familiarise yourself with how broadly corporations define 'expenses' and how high they are prepared to jump to minimise taxes.

In my opinion it is far from clear that any profits whatsoever will accrue to the consortium in Ireland. The gas is specifically meant to be pumped and sold abroad. So who will measure profits o sale of gas.

I'm not a businessman but if I was one involved in the consortium in mayo I would be doing my level best to ensure the thing ran at a loss in Irish terms. Profit is the singular (and declared) logic of corporations.

author by eeekkkkkpublication date Wed Aug 17, 2005 18:48author address author phone Report this post to the editors

NB

author by eeeekkkkkpublication date Wed Aug 17, 2005 18:59author address author phone Report this post to the editors

"Please give an estimate in monetary terms of how much the irish state will profit from the present deal through taxes on the consortium in the next 20 years?"

It is logical that such estimates are floating around. After all that is what you'd expect from servants of the state making a big deal like this with a corporation.

The truth is imho from information available it won't profit at all except through taxes on wages of workers (if it's lucky').

I'd also predict that dempsey would deny the existence of any estimates or guesstimates and blather on in a flying pig-human manner about various vague 'benefits which would accrue'.

FOI it Vincento- Go on ya good thing - might get info on such estimates before shell become the absolute de-facto legal authority in parts of mayo.

author by democratpublication date Thu Aug 18, 2005 00:58author address author phone Report this post to the editors

From reading this debate about weather the state benifits from the corrib field or not, i would have to question its relevence to the rossport 5.
So Fianna fail governments bent over and let enterprise energy (now owned by Shell)/statoil and marathon ride them for a gas field. Last i heard was the this was a democracy and fif you don't like what the government does you don't vote for them. So guess what? Don't vote for them.
Last I heard was that the protests were about the safety of a pipeline. So less of the anticapitalist/anarchist/crusty bullshit. It does the rossport 5 no good whatsoever.

author by eeekkkkkpublication date Thu Aug 18, 2005 01:19author address author phone Report this post to the editors

where is this? - I can't find it - are you a subtler form of a flying pig-human?

I'm a middle aged teacher (just about) as it happens.

author by Bog Trotter - Mankindpublication date Thu Sep 01, 2005 22:07author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I quote "when said protestor remonstrated with him and took his photo he.... "

that a nice tactic.....taking photographs to threaten and menace employees...just like the millitant animal rights shower

author by unknownpublication date Fri Sep 02, 2005 12:35author address author phone Report this post to the editors

the reality is that these men know that if the purge their contepmt shell will put a high pressure pieline in thier gardens-that goes under public roads - this has never been done before ever-that is bog-unstable land
they ar ejust protecting thier land and family ,their communitys-surely you guys are not fightin over how money is more important than lives-i think if we let this go we are just rollin ove r and lettin our government away with their shady deals -we must fight for our children and childrens children-what hapens if it is built and mayo is the new indusrtial county-detroyed forever for scum who want money
this wont happen we will stop shell.

author by In favourpublication date Fri Sep 02, 2005 16:11author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Come off it unknown...your type of post is most annoying as it merely just launches obsceneties and muck and has no basis in truth.

This is a good thing. In fact many of the supporters of the 5 men recognise that the gas is good for Ireland and good for mayo. they have genuine safety fears which I believe can and should be addressed. But it is unfair to just attempt to portray this in th way you have.

personally I believe the men shoud purge their contempt and work outside of prison to try and get the safety fears alleviated. this will be far more effective use of their time and their new found celebrity status!

author by Northsiderpublication date Fri Sep 02, 2005 18:53author address author phone Report this post to the editors

"In Favour" states that the gas is good for Ireland and good for Mayo. I don't know what you mean by "good" in light of two basic points below:

1-Mayo will not be getting any gas, from Corrib or anywhere else.

2-Irish consumers will pay the going commercial rate for gas, whether it comes from Corrib or Venezuela or Baku, so I don't know what you mean when you say that the gas is good for Ireland.

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2025 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy