Antrim no events posted in last week
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
 RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
Keir Starmer?s Human Rights Lawyer Chum is Shipwrecking His Government Thu Jan 16, 2025 13:00 | Will Jones
From handing over the Chagos Islands to compensating Gerry Adams, Starmer's decisions owe more to human rights lawyers than sound politics. He needs to sack his chum Lord Hermer before he shipwrecks his Government.
The post Keir Starmer’s Human Rights Lawyer Chum is Shipwrecking His Government appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Why the ?1 in 73 Muslims in Rotherham? Statistic Is Misleading Thu Jan 16, 2025 11:00 | Noah Carl
One figure that has been repeatedly cited in the grooming gangs debate is that 1 in 73 Muslim men in the town of Rotherham has been prosecuted for grooming gang offences. However, this figure is slightly misleading.
The post Why the ?1 in 73 Muslims in Rotherham? Statistic Is Misleading appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Heat Pumps May Never be Cheaper than Gas Boilers, Miliband Admits Thu Jan 16, 2025 09:00 | Will Jones
Heat pumps may never be cheaper than gas boilers, Ed Miliband has admitted as Labour sneaks a new boiler tax through Parliament that will push up prices.
The post Heat Pumps May Never be Cheaper than Gas Boilers, Miliband Admits appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Net Zero vs AI: Starmer Hasn?t Worked Out That The U.K. Can?t Be a ?Superpower? in Both Climate and ... Thu Jan 16, 2025 07:00 | Ben Pile
Keir Starmer wants Britain to be both an "AI superpower" and a "clean energy superpower". He can't have it both ways, says Ben Pile. AI is hugely energy intensive and inconsistent with the path Net Zero is leading us down.
The post Net Zero vs AI: Starmer Hasn’t Worked Out That The U.K. Can’t Be a ‘Superpower’ in Both Climate and Computing appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Thu Jan 16, 2025 00:50 | Richard Eldred
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Trump and Musk, Canada, Panama and Greenland, an old story, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jan 14, 2025 07:03 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?114-115 Fri Jan 10, 2025 14:04 | en
End of Russian gas transit via Ukraine to the EU Fri Jan 10, 2025 13:45 | en
After Iraq, Libya, Gaza, Lebanon and Syria, the Pentagon attacks Yemen, by Thier... Tue Jan 07, 2025 06:58 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?113 Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:42 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Stop wars not benefit fraud
 antrim |
worker & community struggles and protests |
opinion/analysis
 Friday April 01, 2005 10:49 by Government lies and corruption
Benefit fraud hardly makes a ripple in the ocean, compared with our Government wasting billions of taxpayers money on pointless wars.
The government hands over billions of £ of taxpayers money to a few privately owned multinational arms dealer companies, for lucrative weapons contracts, just because their buisness associates and financers own shares in these companies and have vested interests in making profits through selling arms for war.
Corruption and fraud on a monumental scale. Ordinary taxpayers will never reap the benefits of revenue from oil acquired in Iraq, and the profits will never trickle down to us.
Taxpayers money was used to pay for this war, but a few privately owned arms dealer companies are the only ones who will reap the rewards in terms of lucrative Iraqi contracts and revenue from oil acquired in Iraq.
The truth is benefit fraud accounts for less than 1% of the total amount of taxpayers money squandered through inter governmental department beaurocrasy, and big buisness fraud and corruption.
If we look at Government run companies such as Enterprise Ulster/LEDU who hand over billions of £ of taxpayers money to fund fly by night fraudulent, corrupt buisness ventures, such as in the past the Dolorean project, and others.
In the late 1990's at the start of the New deal boom, the government handed over a quarter of a million pounds of taxpayers money to a privately run training company to allegedly train, single parents, none of the single parents recieved the resources, facilities or training equivalent to this funding. Instead the privately run, profit making company, pocketed the money for themselves, and gave the single parents the bare minimum, if no training at all, this company is now under investigation for fraud.
Benefit fraud is a drop in the ocean, compared with the billions of pounds worth of fraud and corruption by the professional buisness classes.
|
printable version
Digg this
del.icio.us
Furl
Reddit
Technorati
Facebook
Gab
Twitter
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (7 of 7)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Why not stop both? You can't excuplate a criminal by pointing to the worse criminal standing beside him.
I never thought of it that way.
Benefit fraud is OK because you disagree with the war in Iraq.
Does that mean the war in Iraq is OK because I think what Hitler did the Jews was worse?
The real criminals are the professionals/buisness classes, never trust the rich.
Sounds like a dole office occupation...
http://www.peanuts4benefits.co.uk/INDEX%20EVENTS.html
People commiting benefit fraud are in their own way registering their disgust at the much greater corruption present in our society.
No they're not - they're stealing from ordinary working people actually. I've never met a single welfare scrounger who was trying to make a political point.
you gotta admire anyone who engages in an act that financial benefits them and claims they're "making a larger political point"
If they took the money and gave to a anarchist collective, or charity, and survived on alternative sources, or if the benefit fraudster was using the cash to help them survive while on a long term political action (ie glen of the downs) then I would, maybe agree with the article, but not if a scrounger spent it on themselves.