North Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi?
US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty Anti-Empire >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
German Political Insanity Update: Ban on ?Unfiltered Opinions? Announced Thu Jan 16, 2025 17:00 | Eugyppius German political elites are freaking out as the AfD continues to poll high, boosted by the perfidious Musk. Clamping down on "unfiltered opinions" that undermine "democracy" has become the latest obsession, says Eugyppius.
The post German Political Insanity Update: Ban on “Unfiltered Opinions” Announced appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Richard Tice Demands Apology From Matt Hancock Over Covid Vaccines: ?Horrendous at Every Level? Thu Jan 16, 2025 15:38 | Will Jones Reform Party leader Richard Tice has called for former Health Secretary Matt Hancock to apologise over his handling of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, calling it "horrendous at every level".
The post Richard Tice Demands Apology From Matt Hancock Over Covid Vaccines: “Horrendous at Every Level” appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Keir Starmer?s Human Rights Lawyer Chum is Shipwrecking His Government Thu Jan 16, 2025 13:00 | Will Jones From handing over the Chagos Islands to compensating Gerry Adams, Starmer's decisions owe more to human rights lawyers than sound politics. He needs to sack his chum Lord Hermer before he shipwrecks his Government.
The post Keir Starmer’s Human Rights Lawyer Chum is Shipwrecking His Government appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Why the ?1 in 73 Muslims in Rotherham? Statistic Is Misleading Thu Jan 16, 2025 11:00 | Noah Carl One figure that has been repeatedly cited in the grooming gangs debate is that 1 in 73 Muslim men in the town of Rotherham has been prosecuted for grooming gang offences. However, this figure is slightly misleading.
The post Why the ?1 in 73 Muslims in Rotherham? Statistic Is Misleading appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Heat Pumps May Never be Cheaper than Gas Boilers, Miliband Admits Thu Jan 16, 2025 09:00 | Will Jones Heat pumps may never be cheaper than gas boilers, Ed Miliband has admitted as Labour sneaks a new boiler tax through Parliament that will push up prices.
The post Heat Pumps May Never be Cheaper than Gas Boilers, Miliband Admits appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Trump and Musk, Canada, Panama and Greenland, an old story, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jan 14, 2025 07:03 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?114-115 Fri Jan 10, 2025 14:04 | en
End of Russian gas transit via Ukraine to the EU Fri Jan 10, 2025 13:45 | en
After Iraq, Libya, Gaza, Lebanon and Syria, the Pentagon attacks Yemen, by Thier... Tue Jan 07, 2025 06:58 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?113 Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:42 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
The occupational failure, where to now for USI
Much debate has been taking place over the last few days regarding the success, or not, of the occupation of the department of education on Tuesday. By engaging in an occupation we are taking a particular stance. It is a form of direct action which means that the action has a direct effect on the people involved. You take a stance, issue demands, and do not move until those demands are met or you are forcibly removed. If your demands are met you have been victorious if you are removed the fight moves to another day but the victory lies in the fact that you have shown an unflinching belief in your tactics and what you stand for and a commitment to continue to bring the fight to the powers that be. Anything less is a failure. As such the occupation of Tuesday last was, in this regard a failure. This is not to deny that the decision to occupy a government building and the fact that so many people were willing to do so was very positive, and certainly a move in the right direction for USI.
The organisation however, must now stand back and honestly and critically asses the events and desist from the self important back patting and victorious rhetoric which followed the demonstration last Tuesday. It is an unfortunate reality that the student movement now looks weak in the eyes of the government. In a vain attempt to be respectable, through engaging in negotiations and undermining those participating in the occupation, certain members of USI officer board have now made a mockery of occupations as a form of direct action. Instead they have turned them into nothing more then another opportunity for a photo shoot and some quick sound bites on the radio. If those involved in the “occupation” can see through the empty threats of a sustained campaign it is unlikely that the minister is quaking in his boots at the prospect of a USI style sustained campaign of photo shoots and drinking coffee. It is only through action which directly attacks the state and brings those in power down from the pedestals they have placed themselves upon that we as a collective unit can hope for victory. The idea of an occupation and the success of taking over so many rooms should be acknowledged. I myself could even be found eating humble pie at one point early on in the day. However what had the prospect of being one of the most successful USI demos in many years and genuinely giving the government something to worry about finished with the “backbone” of USI campaigning force voluntarily leaving a building they had occupied only 5 hours before hand despite having vowed not to leave until the minister HIMSELF came to address them. We must now learn from the mistakes made on Tuesday and move forward. So where to now for the campaign?
First of all we must be clear what exactly it is we are campaigning for. We must part with tired slogans of “we don’t wana pay no fees, we just wana get degrees”. We have lost the battle if we can’t see past our own selfish interests. We merely come across as pretentious middle class spoilt upstarts who don’t want to part with drinking money so cynically disguise this as a campaign calling for equality in education. If we as a collective unit are serious about tackling inequality and injustice in the Irish education system we must fight for a complete overhaul of the system from top to bottom. Our demands must be clear and stretch far beyond our own self interest. This issues that breed inequality from the day a child is born, that ensure the prospect of reaching third level education is a non reality for many, must be challenged. This cannot be done if we focus our energies and channel our resources to a campaign that will change little or nothing for most. If the fee was abolished and we could get on with “getting our degrees” the system that produces the problems of access and inequality still exists. We must call for the resources to be put in place to ensure a truly free education system not one that simply makes life easier for a small few lucky ones. If we are to succeed we must stand back and genuinely analyse what we are fighting for and why? Did people occupy the department of education because its soo like cool to be radical and stuff, because their elected and sorta feel that its what you do when you’re a sabat, because they don’t want to pay an extra 80 euro, or because they feel sickened by the vast and obvious inequalities in education in Ireland and the broad effects this has on society at large, and particularly those living on the margins.
We must fight the state and the people who run the system as a strong united group. If we take a stance on an issue or make a political point, either through marches, sit-downs, occupations or all out war we must be unflinching in our commitment to follow through on our actions and face the consequences. Its time to seriously re address our strategies & aims, and what we hope to achieve before we get too caught up in our own self interest and self importance and delusions of success.
This is not meant as a personal criticism of any individuals but of decisions that were made and tactics adopted. I look forward to seeing if this can create a much needed debate within USI and other SUs about where we must take this campaign in order to be victorious and the tactics we use to do so.
|
View Full Comment Text
save preference
Comments (30 of 30)