Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
News Round-Up Thu Mar 06, 2025 01:19 | Richard Eldred
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
?Two-Tier Justice? as Ethnic Minority and Transgender Criminals to Get Special Treatment in Courts Wed Mar 05, 2025 19:30 | Will Jones
Judges have been told to consider the background of ethnic minority offenders before passing sentence in a move Robert Jenrick has slammed as "two-tier justice" with an "anti-white and anti-Christian bias".
The post “Two-Tier Justice” as Ethnic Minority and Transgender Criminals to Get Special Treatment in Courts appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
NHS Staff Should be Given ?Enforced Career Breaks? for Their Mental Health, Says Prince of Wales Wed Mar 05, 2025 18:23 | Will Jones
The Prince of Wales has suggested that NHS staff should be given "enforced breaks" in their careers for the sake of their mental health to help prevent burnout.
The post NHS Staff Should be Given “Enforced Career Breaks” for Their Mental Health, Says Prince of Wales appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Trump Compares Starmer?s Britain to Communist China in Podcast Wed Mar 05, 2025 15:30 | Dr Frederick Attenborough
President Trump compared Keir Starmer's UK to Communist China after the Government ordered Apple to give it backdoor access to users' encrypted data. This isn't far-fetched, says Frederick Attenborough: it exposes us all.
The post Trump Compares Starmer’s Britain to Communist China in Podcast appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
French Navy Refuses to Rescue 60 Migrants From Dinghy Filling with Water Off French Coast ? and Inst... Wed Mar 05, 2025 14:07 | Will Jones
French navy officers refused to rescue 60 migrants on a cramped boat filling with water off the French coast ? and instead radioed and asked UK Border Force to come and take them to Britain.
The post French Navy Refuses to Rescue 60 Migrants From Dinghy Filling with Water Off French Coast ? and Instead Demands UK Border Force Come and Take them to Britain appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?122 Fri Feb 28, 2025 12:53 | en
France, unable to cope with the shock of Donald Trump, by Thierry Meyssan Wed Feb 26, 2025 12:08 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?121 Sat Feb 22, 2025 05:50 | en
US-Russian peace talks against the backdrop of Ukrainian attack on US interests ... Sat Feb 22, 2025 05:40 | en
Putin's triumph after 18 years: Munich Security Conference embraces multipolarit... Thu Feb 20, 2025 13:25 | en
Voltaire Network >>
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (10 of 10)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10That's what will happen if the council succeed in implementing this unjust tax. They will sell off the service, the charges will go sky high, they will lay off workers to maximise profit, and the service will deteriorate further.
However, if we succeed in stopping these charges in Dublin they will have to be abolished elsewhere, and the people in those other areas will benefit.
My point exactly.
What contribution does the bin tax make towards eradicating the litter problem? Is Sligo a cleaner town than other areas with less bin tax? If the bin tax does not contribute towards cleaning cities up, what does?
How do we get clean cities without paying for it? I would be more than happy to pay higher taxes if it meant things would be cleaner.
The higher the charges the greater the incentive for people to just dump the rubbish anywhere, especially if you can hardly afford it. I would say the litter problem has increased.
It is various totally unaccountable private refuse 'services' which have been turning the Wicklow mountains into an open sewer in the past few years. It should be quite clear to the powers that be that the private services exist to maximise profits for their owners and if they can get away without having to pay for the actual deposit of the refuse in approved landfill or incineration sites quite obviously they will. Thus the dumping of dangerous materials (medical and hospital waste, etc.) in fields around Wicklow. Wicklow is the only place that has been publicised for this activity, it could be widespread in other counties too, for all I know.
Is this true. How do we keep our country clean if we do not pay for it to be cleaned ? Do people really throw their rubbish everywhere because they do not want to pay to have it properly disposed of. Sometimes taxes are good. I don't know in this case this is why I ask. But I do not agree that throwing your rubbish every where is a good protest what do you expect to be done ? That is just stupid. And selfish.
1. No one is 'throwing their rubbish everywhere', in fact the campaign is demanding that ALL rubbish be collected and disposed of.
2. Of course local services have to be paid for. The campaigns are arguing that workers already pay for them through PAYE and that additional revenue should come from taxing the rich and corporations. Taxation rates are far too low for this crowd.
The cheek of the Labour Party going on about how Sinn Fein voted for bin charges in Sligo. Remind us again of the the number of local authorities where Labour councillors voted for them?
Especially as the Shinners only voted for them once in return for the charge not going up that year and McManus being elected Mayor. As far as I know since then, and this was at least three years ago, they've voted against them the whole time.
I am open to correction on this as it was a Shinner who told me.
Labour have voted for the charges in Dublin, Cork and Waterford. They don't get to go round attacking other people, especially when Rabbitte said this yesterday:
"He would be better employed on the position of his own party in relation to issues like respect for the rule of law. I have never advocated non-payment of legal charges, I do not advocate the blockading of housing estates or illegal interfering with local authority vehicles, and I do not support the tactics employed in this protest," said Mr Rabbitte.
This position was made clear by Mr Rabbitte in an interview with the Waterford local radio station, WLR, yesterday morning, broadcast before Mr O'Donoghue's attack was launched.
Local authorities had legally imposed service charges from the 1980s, even though he acknowledged that Labour councillors in Dublin voted against them, said Mr Rabbitte.
Accepting the logic of service charges, he went on: "There was indeed a time when the PAYE worker was so heavily penalised in terms of carrying tax burden that people objected to additional charges at that time.
"The situation has changed dramatically. Taxes have been seriously reduced.
"I don't like the manner in which some of those decisions have been taken because they benefit the highest earners rather than concentrating from the bottom-up. But having said that, you can't argue that the tax burden has not been reduced with any comparison in Europe," he said, while the European Union's "polluter pays" principle equally justifies the charges.
"There are more and more households that understand that we can't go on producing and disposing waste in the fashion that we did, that we have to bring in measures that are designed to reduce and minimise waste."
Isn't that basically supporting the bin charges?
SF in Sligo voted for the charges in return for a go at being Mayor. Now that's fairly disgusting behaviour.
They have since voted to increase them in Sligo. More disgusting behaviour.
That still has nothing on Labour who voted for them... all over the place.
The likes of the SP and Finian McGrath and anyone else who consistently opposed the charges are entitled to have a go at SF over what they did in Sligo, I suppose. Labour sure as fuck are not entitled to do any such thing.
What about ppl who already reduced the quantity and stopped buying over packed products ?
who reduced the normal waist to 4 bins a year?
Who deliver all recyclable materials to recycling points twice a year,
who do compost all at their back garden?
The cost of this for such family may be as low as 50 € a year,
Now all this progressing education on all family member is completely waisted as lowest price for same now will be about 170 € a year minimum, with 3 general waist bins and few recyclable ones.
And those who don't care about quality or quantity will be paying maximum 275 €.
Same with lonely ppl living in a house?
What if they produce very low quantity of waist?
This is insane.