A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog.? We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below).?
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader 2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by The Saker >>
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
A Golden Age for American Meritocracy Fri Jan 24, 2025 14:15 | Darren Gee The second Trump Presidency has already dissolved hundreds of DEI programmes and looks set to herald a new golden age of American meritocracy. It's a movement America and the world are hungry for, says Darren Gobin.
The post A Golden Age for American Meritocracy appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Think Tank?s Net Zero Survey Concludes the Public is the Problem Fri Jan 24, 2025 13:10 | Ben Pile The Social Market Foundation has carried out a survey on public attitudes to Net Zero and concluded that the "uninformed" and reluctant public are the problem. Why else would they say no to heat pumps?
The post Think Tank’s Net Zero Survey Concludes the Public is the Problem appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Number of Children Who Think They are Wrong Sex Surges 50-Fold Fri Jan 24, 2025 11:10 | Will Jones There has been a 50-fold rise in children who think they are the?wrong sex in just 10 years, with two thirds of them girls, analysis of GP records suggests.
The post Number of Children Who Think They are Wrong Sex Surges 50-Fold appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lib Dem Leader Ed Davey: Go Back to Your Constituencies and Prepare to Live in Mud and Grass Huts Fri Jan 24, 2025 09:00 | Chris Morrison With all 72 Lib Dem MPs supporting the mad Climate and Nature Bill, their clownish leader Ed Davey is effectively telling them to go back to their constituencies and prepare to live in mud and grass huts.
The post Lib Dem Leader Ed Davey: Go Back to Your Constituencies and Prepare to Live in Mud and Grass Huts appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
In Episode 27 of the Sceptic: David Shipley on Southport, Fred de Fossard on Trump vs Woke Capitalis... Fri Jan 24, 2025 07:00 | Richard Eldred In episode 27 of the Sceptic: David Shipley on Southport, Fred de Fossard on Trump vs Woke Capitalism and Ed West on the grooming gangs as Britain?s Chernobyl.
The post In Episode 27 of the Sceptic: David Shipley on Southport, Fred de Fossard on Trump vs Woke Capitalism and Ed West on the Grooming Gangs As Britain?s Chernobyl appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
|
On antisemitism
national |
miscellaneous |
news report
Thursday May 30, 2002 11:18 by Oriana Fallaci
Oriana Fallaci, one of Italy's best know journalists, currently in retirement, expresses her feelings regarding the rising tide of Anti-Semitism in Europe. Oriana Fallaci on Antisemitism Today April 12, 2002 I find it shameful that in Italy there should be a procession of individuals dressed as suicide bombers who spew vile abuse at Israel, hold up photographs of Israeli leaders on whose foreheads they have drawn the swasitka, incite people to hate the Jews. And who, in order to see Jews once again in the extermination camps, in the gas chambers, in the ovens of Dachau and Mauthausen and Buchenwald and Bergen- Belsen et cetera, would sell their own mother to a harem. I find it shameful that the Catholic Church should permit a bishop, one with lodgings in the Vatican no less, a saintly man who was found in Jerusalem with an arsenal of arms and explosives hidden in the Oriana Fallaci, one of Italy's best know journalists, currently in retirement, expresses her feelings regarding the rising tide of Anti-Semitism in Europe. Oriana Fallaci on Antisemitism Today April 12, 2002 I find it shameful that in Italy there should be a procession of individuals dressed as suicide bombers who spew vile abuse at Israel, hold up photographs of Israeli leaders on whose foreheads they have drawn the swasitka, incite people to hate the Jews. And who, in order to see Jews once again in the extermination camps, in the gas chambers, in the ovens of Dachau and Mauthausen and Buchenwald and Bergen- Belsen et cetera, would sell their own mother to a harem. I find it shameful that the Catholic Church should permit a bishop, one with lodgings in the Vatican no less, a saintly man who was found in Jerusalem with an arsenal of arms and explosives hidden in the secret compartments of his sacred Mercedes, to participate in that procession and plant himself in front of a microphone to thank in the name of God the suicide bombers who massacre the Jews in pizzerias and supermarkets. To call them "martyrs who go to their deaths as to a party." I find it shameful that in France, the France of Liberty-Equality-Fraternity, they burn synagogues, terrorize Jews, profane their cemeteries. I find it shameful that the youth of Holland and Germany and Denmark flaunt the kaffiah just as Mussolini's avant garde used to flaunt the club and the fascist badge. I find it shameful that in nearly all the universities of Europe Palestinian students sponsor and nurture anti-semitism. That in Sweden they asked that the Nobel Peace Prize given to Shimon Peres in 1994 be taken back and conferred on the dove with the olive branch in his mouth, that is on Arafat. I find it shameful that the distinguished members of the Committee, a Committee that (it would appear) rewards political color rather than merit, should take this request into consideration and even respond to it. In hell the Nobel Prize honors he who does not receive it. I find it shameful (we're back in Italy) that state-run television stations contribute to the resurgent antisemitism, crying only over Palestinian deaths while playing down Israeli deaths, glossing over them in unwilling tones. I find it shameful that in their debates they host with much deference the scoundrels with turban or kaffiah who yesterday sang hymns to the slaughter at New York and today sing hymns to the slaughters at Jerusalem, at Haifa, at Netanya, at Tel Aviv. I find it shameful that the press does the same, that it is indignant because Israeli tanks surround the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem, that it is not indignant because inside that same church two hundred Palestinian terrorists well armed with machine guns and munitions and explosives (among them are various leaders of Hamas and Al-Aqsa) are not unwelcome guests of the monks (who then accept bottles of mineral water and jars of honey from the soldiers of those tanks). I find it shameful that, in giving the number of Israelis killed since the beginning of the Second Intifada (four hundred twelve), a noted daily newspaper found it appropriate to underline in capital letters that more people are killed in their traffic accidents. (Six hundred a year). I find it shameful that the Roman Observer, the newspaper of the Pope-a Pope who not long ago left in the Wailing Wall a letter of apology for the Jews-accuses of extermination a people who were exterminated in the millions by Christians. By Europeans. I find it shameful that this newspaper denies to the survivors of that people (survivors who still have numbers tattooed on their arms) the right to react, to defend themselves, to not be exterminated again. I find it shameful that in the name of Jesus Christ (a Jew without whom they would all be unemployed), the priests of our parishes or Social Centers or whatever they are flirt with the assassins of those in Jerusalem who cannot go to eat a pizza or buy some eggs without being blown up. I find it shameful that they are on the side of the very ones who inaugurated terrorism, killing us on airplanes, in airports, at the Olympics, and who today entertain themselves by killing western journalists. By shooting them, abducting them, cutting their throats, decapitating them. (There's someone in Italy who, since the appearance of Anger and Pride, would like to do the same to me. Citing verses of the Koran he exorts his "brothers" in the mosques and the Islamic Community to chastise me in the name of Allah. To kill me. Or rather to die with me. I find it shameful that almost all of the left, the left that twenty years ago permitted one of its union processionals to deposit a coffin (as a mafioso warning) in front of the synagogue of Rome, forgets the contribution made by the Jews to the fight against fascism. Made by Carlo and Nello Rossini, for example, by Leone Ginzburg, by Umberto Terracini, by Leo Valiani, by Emilio Sereni, by women like my friend Anna Maria Enriques Agnoletti who was shot at Florence on June 12, 1944, by seventy-five of the three-hundred-thirty-five people killed at the Fosse Ardeatine, by the infinite others killed under torture or in combat or before firing squads. (The companions, the teachers, of my infancy and my youth.) I find it shameful that in part through the fault of the left-or rather, primarily through the fault of the left (think of the left that inaugurates its congresses applauding the representative of the PLO, leader in Italy of the Palestinians who want the destruction of Israel)--Jews in Italian cities are once again afraid. And in French cities and Dutch cities and Danish cities and German cities, it is the same. I find it shameful that Jews tremble at the passage of the scoundrels dressed like suicide bombers just as they trembled during Krystallnacht, the night in which Hitler gave free rein to the Hunt of the Jews. I find it shameful that in obedience to the stupid, vile, dishonest, and for them extremely advantageous fashion of Political Correctness the usual opportunists-or better the usual parasites-exploit the word Peace. That in the name of the word Peace, by now more debauched than the words Love and Humanity, they absolve one side alone of its hate and bestiality. That in the name of a pacifism (read conformism) delegated to the singing crickets and buffoons who used to lick Pol Pot's feet they incite people who are confused or ingenuous or intimidated. Trick them, corrupt them, carry them back a half century to the time of the yellow star on the coat. These charlatans who care about the Palestinians as much as I care about the charlatans. That is not at all. I find it shameful that many Italians and many Europeans have chosen as their standard-bearer the gentleman (or so it is polite to say) Arafat. This nonentity who thanks to the money of the Saudi Royal Family plays the Mussolini ad perpetuum and in his megalomania believes he will pass into History as the George Washington of Palestine. This ungrammatical wretch who when I interviewed him was unable even to put together a complete sentence, to make articulate conversation. So that to put it all together, write it, publish it, cost me a tremendous effort and I concluded that compared to him even Ghaddafi sounds like Leonardo da Vinci. This false warrior who always goes around in uniform like Pinochet, never putting on civilian garb, and yet despite this has never participated in a battle. War is something he sends, has always sent, others to do for him. That is, the poor souls who believe in him. This pompous incompetent who playing the part of Head of State caused the failure of the Camp David negotiations, Clinton's mediation. No-no-I-want-Jerusalem-all-to-myself. This eternal liar who has a flash of sincerity only when (in private) he denies Israel's right to exist, and who as I say in my book contradicts himself every five minutes. He always plays the double-cross, lies even if you ask him what time it is, so that you can never trust him. Never! With him you will always wind up systematically betrayed. This eternal terrorist who knows only how to be a terrorist (while keeping himself safe) and who during the Seventies, that is when I interviewed him, even trained the terrorists of Baader-Meinhof. With them, children ten years of age. Poor children. (Now he trains them to become suicide bombers. A hundred baby suicide bombers are in the works: a hundred!). This weathercock who keeps his wife at Paris, served and revered like a queen, and keeps his people down in the shit. He takes them out of the shit only to send them to die, to kill and to die, like the eighteen year old girls who in order to earn equality with men have to strap on explosives and disintegrate with their victims. And yet many Italians love him, yes. Just like they loved Mussolini. And many other Europeans do the same. I find it shameful and see in all this the rise of a new fascism, a new nazism. A fascism, a nazism, that much more grim and revolting because it is conducted and nourished by those who hypocritically pose as do-gooders, progressives, communists, pacifists, Catholics or rather Christians, and who have the gall to label a warmonger anyone like me who screams the truth. I see it, yes, and I say the following. I have never been tender with the tragic and Shakespearean figure Sharon. ("I know you've come to add another scalp to your necklace," he murmured almost with sadness when I went to interview him in 1982.) I have often had disagreements with the Israelis, ugly ones, and in the past I have defended the Palestinians a great deal. Maybe more than they deserved. But I stand with Israel, I stand with the Jews. I stand just as I stood as a young girl during the time when I fought with them, and when the Anna Marias were shot. I defend their right to exist, to defend themselves, to not let themselves be exterminated a second time. And disgusted by the antisemitism of many Italians, of many Europeans, I am ashamed of this shame that dishonors my Country and Europe. At best, it is not a community of States, but a pit of Pontius Pilates. And even if all the inhabitants of this planet were to think otherwise, I would continue to think so.
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (5 of 5)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5I find it shameful that a minority population (Jews) can take over another peoples' land (Palestine) with the collusion of the Western powers (Britain and US).
I find it shameful that the Israelis can import their own kind and expel the natives to ensure they have an ethnic majority.
I find it shameful that the Israelis can continue to sunjugate the Palestinians, putting an entire nation under military siege and attempting to bring them to their knees.
I find it shameful that apologists for Sharon trawl the Internet to plant their propaganda on every site that "dares" to criticise Zionism.
Israel = aggressor, Palestine = oppressed.
Are Jews who oppose Israel, Sharon and Zionism also "anti-Semitic"? And does this mean Arabs and Palestinians are not Semitic people?
I'm going to copy-and-paste my post from the other troll/spam message on the middle east:
This is another "personal opinion of a concerned individual" troll/spam about the middle east, as with a few other posts to the newswire over the past few days. If nothing else, this conclusion would seem to be supported by the fact that nobody who posts these accounts ever subsequently comes back to try to defend them or discuss them.
Just for the record, all "peace" offers made to the Palestinians since 1967 (or, for that matter, since the foundation of Israel) essentially differ over the modalities of the occupation of Palestinian land by Israel; most offer a "state" along the lines of the South African Bantustan proposal, that is, a statelet within or near Israel over which Israel controls access, resources, policies, finance and almost everything else that matters. This is why so many commentators in the mainstream press are so approvingly urging a "two-state solution".
"This pompous who playing the part of Head of State caused the failure of the Camp David negotiations, Clinton's mediation."
Well, that’s not entirely accurate. See, Barak’s proposal was never written, so that makes it kind of a sticky subject to discuss. He’s also not commented on it since then, so we’re kind of in the dark about what precisely he offered. What we do have is major media correspondents telling us that, from hearsay, what Barak offered answered all of the Palestinians’ dreams. Well, when hearsay is repeated as fact by numerous ‘legitimate’ and ‘objective’ sources, it becomes fact. That’s how you legitimatize falsehoods. As a journalist you must know this at some level.
Now, what sources we have from the inside (Robert Malley etc) tell us that the trade that Israel was suggesting was rather meager for the Palestinians. He actually calls it no offer at all. See, apparently Israel was offering an unspecified 1% of its territory to the Palestinians in return for 9% of the West Bank. We’ll put aside the fact that this 9% containted most of the connecting roads and the most of the water in the region. Also, he promised that 10% would be temorarily held onto by Israel until the settlers on them moved. Well, Israel has a very succint way of describing their settler policy, and that’s by calling them ‘facts on the land’. These ‘facts’ establish a presence and claim legitimacy by simply being there. Arafat was not buying this one, as well he shouldn’t have. Previous promises to move settlements had been rescinded, so why shouldn’t this one be too? But let’s get back to the issue. The offer was no offer. Israeli analyst Ze’ev Schiff at the time (quoted in this month’s Z Magazine by Stephen Shalom) wrote: “the prospect [of the Palestinians] of being able to establish a viable state was fading right before their eyes. They were confronted with an intolerable set of options: to agree to the spreading occupation... or to set up wretched Bantustans or to launch an uprising.” And perhaps the term ‘Bantustan’ is correct, as Bishop Tutu recently pointed out, the situation in Israel is one of apartheid. Also, as Israeli activist Uri Avnery stated at the time: “Barak appears to be asking for only 10% of the occupied territories. In reality, it’s closer to 30%, taking into caccount the territories he wants t annex in the Jerusalem area and place under his security control in the Jordan Valley... the Palestinian state will consist of groups of islands, each surrounded by Israeli settlers and soldiers.” Nuff said.
Now, the recent suicide attacks by the Al-Aksa Martys Brigade are abhorrent. I know that, you know that. And Arafat isn’t exactly the best leader that the Palestinians can have. Now, Al-Aksa is an offshoot of Fatah, which has renounced terrorism, and Yasser doesn’t have much control over Fatah. So it’s ridiculous to imagine that on a word from him all suicide bombings can stop. I agree, he does need to do it, but I don’t see it making much of a difference. He’s an old man who’s obviously (to younger Palestinians) not connecting. Sharon’s demonstration of his weakness is proof of that.
Your equation of being anti-Israeli state terrorism with being anti-semitic is fundamentally flawed, the reason being that all the Jews who decry Israel’s deplorable treatment of the Palestinians (from before statehood to now) cannot be self-hating Jews. Recently a letter was going around signed by 108 Rabbinical students protesting the official government policy. Are they self-hating Jews? (an article about this by Phil Weiss appears in last week or the week before’s New York Observer) That European anti-semitism is on the rise is unfortunate. It is also unfortunate that they use the legitmate cause of Palestinian liberation to further their own hateful ends. But to equate European anti-semitism with Palestinian self-determination is ridiculous. Your comparison fails to account for anti-semites’ co-option of the issues.
One last thing, as it’s time for me to go to work. Read David Ben-Gurion’s papers or any biography about him. Hell, read any of the papers of the original Zionists (from back in the day, back in the 19-teens and forward) and you’ll understand a bit better where your Nazi-comparison logically leads.
The reason that I spent so much time fighting over the Camp David provisions is because it’s an area that lends itself easily to discussion. I could just as easily have picked other tidbits from your article that also warrant a closer look but I leave that to others.
i read the article when it was written several weeks ago, and I found it to be as disgusting then as it is now. Ms. Fallaci finds it shameful that people outside Palestine recognize an apartheid state when they see one and want to support an oppressed people? I find it to be shameful that right-wing zionists are almost indistinguishable from neo-nazi skinheads. both of them have guns, both are filled with hatred, both are calling for the killing of a specific ethnic and/or religious group.
you know what's shameful? Billions and billions of dollars in military aid from the US to Israel every year. Ms. Fallaci decries the linking of the swastika with Sharon and his disgusting cronies/beauracrats/structure and has the gall to compare supporters of the Palestinians with followers of Mussolini? I detest racism of all kinds. I think someone else had a good point when they mentioned that Palestinians are semitic too.