Clarification on Garda CCTV requests
I sent a mail to Dataprotection.ie to ask for clarification on the issue of CCTV. I mentioned that at least one person had been told that as they were not the only person visible in the relavent frames, that the footage could not be made available. Here's the response.
From : Sean Sweeney/Data Protection Agency
To : ,
cc : ,
bcc: ,
Brief Description : CCTV
Comments :
Mr Wilde,
I refer to your e-mail of 22/05/20002 concerning access to Garda video footage.
In general, the Data Protection Act provides an access right (under section 4),
whereby data subjects can make a written request to a data controller seeking
copies of their personal data. A data controller is obliged to respond to such a
request within 40 days, and may charge a fee not exceeding six euro thirty five
cents.
There is a provision in the Act (section 5(1)(a)) which states that an Access
Request need not be responded to if a response would prejudice the investigation
of an offence. This is on a case by case basis, not a general exemption.
Before considering what data must be supplied subject to an access request, it
is first necessary to establish if the CCTV system is subject to the provisions
of the Act. The Act only apples to processable personal data. For a CCTV system
to be deemed to be processing data, an operator must be able to automatically
retrieve a segment of tape. (for instance, by inputting an index or reference
number).
In order for data to be personal, the data controller (An Garda Síochána) must
have information in its possession that would identify an individual. In public
areas the issue of identification may become problematic.
However, where the system is processable and a person is identifiable to the
data controller, then if that person makes an Access Request, An Garda Síochána
would be obliged to consider the request. If the section 5 exemption noted above
does not apply, then An Garda Síochána would appear to be obliged to give the
data subject a copy of his / her data. However, the data subject is not entitled
to receive the data of other people. Consequently, any images released should
obscure the identities of other people (unless their consent has been sought).
I trust that this has clarified matters for you. Further information on your
access rights may be found on our website www.dataprivacy.ie.
Regards,
Seán.
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (6 of 6)
Jump To Comment: 6 5 4 3 2 1Will you be coming allong to the meeting on Wednesday, I'd be very interested in hearing how your meeting with the Gardaí went.
8den
When I was meeting with two Gardaí with my solictor, she asked them what the story was with the CCTV at Ulster Bank (One lad got his face smashed off it by the boys in blue). They stated (with completely straight faces) that there was in fact no camera in the ATM. Everyone knows that this is utter bullshit. The cover-up is in full swing I'm afraid.
I know a request for Ulster bank CCTV was handed in on Tuesday the 6th, and a legal request for CCTV was given to the Gardaí by at least one Law Firm.
So yes, and no they've recieved no response.
Or is everybody enjoying crying 'censorship!', too much?
Can anyone clarify why tapes can be withheld if they have already been shown on television? Surely the case is already prejudiced?
Regards Philomena
So then, the question is what does "prejudice an investigation" count as? Also does a video tape with a time-seekable index count as a "searchable" (and for that matter exactly what are the CCTV systems held by the Gardai?).