Cops welcomed with smoke bombs and flares Dublin Pride 19:57 Jul 14 0 comments Gemma O'Doherty: The speech you never heard. I wonder why? 05:28 Jan 15 0 comments A Decade of Evidence Demonstrates The Dramatic Failure Of Globalisation 15:39 Aug 23 1 comments Thatcher's " blind eye" to paedophilia 15:27 Mar 12 0 comments Total Revolution. A new philosophy for the 21st century. 15:55 Nov 17 0 comments more >>Blog Feeds
Anti-EmpireNorth Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi? Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi? Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi? ?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi? US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty
The SakerA bird's eye view of the vineyard
Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Public InquiryInterested in maladministration. Estd. 2005RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Voltaire NetworkVoltaire, international editionVoltaire, International Newsletter N?118 Sat Feb 01, 2025 12:57 | en 80th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp Sat Feb 01, 2025 12:16 | en Misinterpretations of US trends (1/2), by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jan 28, 2025 06:59 | en Voltaire, International Newsletter #117 Fri Jan 24, 2025 19:54 | en The United States bets its hegemony on the Fourth Industrial Revolution Fri Jan 24, 2025 19:26 | en |
postmodernist election
national |
miscellaneous |
news report
Monday May 20, 2002 18:25 by postmodern
postmodernist election result? perhaps its the only analysis that could explain the outcome? Have the voters produced a postmodernist election result, with a very fragmented opposition and mixed messages. It seems to make more sense than what some media pundits etc are saying. |
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (6 of 6)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6All weekend we've had analysts saying 'the people clearly want X', or 'there were mixed messages about Y'. Its ridiculous.
This was an election, not a referendum. People didn't vote for one thing or another. They voted for hundreds of different (often contradictory) reasons, in 40 different constituencies, for hundreds of different candidates. Trying to pull one or two agreed messages out of those votes is just stupid.
The Irish Independent published a poll last Thursday which showed that only 21% of people thought politicians would fulfill promises when elected.
Yes Ray poses a reasonably pertainant point the election threw up a multiplicity of issues, (perhaps not hundreds though) In keeping with this the electorate choose many independents and some small parties to the left of the labour party. It will also be far from easy for media or self appointed left pundits to accurately discern trends from these mixed messsages, certainly none that will rhyme or even fit simplistic slogans. This of course fits well with a postmodernist perspective which rejects western rationalist solutions, however it requires a bit more intellectual effort than blindly relying on one theory/party/ etc to provide all the answers.
There is no cohesive 'electorate', there are just hundreds of thousands of electors. It isn't the case of 'the electorate' sending out a mixed message, its a case of hundreds of thousands of people sending out individual messages, in response to the multiplicity of candidates and issues (and at a local level there are hundreds of issues).
The only certainty is that about 40% of people didn't bother voting at all.
Actually I was talking about mixed messages (plural)
It would make life more challenging if your thesis is true: "its a case of hundreds of thousands of people sending out individual messages" It also poses the following questions are these hundreds of thousands making their own ideologies or are they saying to hell with all the political theories currently out there. It is one certainty (not the only one) that about 40% of the electorate did not vote, this is an international trend it seems, and is hardly that suprising given the virtually identical economic policies of certainly the main political parties.