UN Caves in to US

national | miscellaneous | news report

Tuesday June 17, 2003 11:52

by Aidan Hehir - Green Party

aidanhehir at hotmail dot com

US Granted Immunity

Below is an article detailing the recent shameful capitulation by the UN Security Council.
It is no surprise to read that the US considers itself above the law, but it is a damning indictment of the UN that it has buckled before the US. This further discredits what is an already flaccid and compromised organisation.

THE TORONTO STAR, Monday, June 16, 2003 EDITORIAL

Craven U.N. caves in

Should Americans be above international law? The United Nations Security
Council seems to think so.

Over Canada's principled objections, the council, by a 12-0 vote with three
abstentions, has just cravenly bent to pressure from Washington, and granted
Americans serving on peacekeeping missions immunity from prosecution by the
U.N.'s own International Criminal Court.

This is the second toadying one-year exemption for the United States and
other countries that don't accept the ICC. It undermines the court's
legitimacy. It is probably unlawful. And it is unwise and unnecessary.

Even peacekeepers commit crimes. A Canadian, Elvin Kyle Brown, was convicted
of manslaughter and torture by Canadian military judges in the death of a
Somali teenager back in 1993. He got five years.

The ICC's role is to prosecute worse offenders: Those involved in
Rwanda-style genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.

Most nations, including Canada, accept the court's jurisdiction.

The U.S., which threatens to veto U.N. peacekeeping missions unless it has
immunity despite the fact that fewer than 600 Americans are on U.N. duty, is
the chief holdout.

While it's hard to imagine U.N. peacekeepers involved in widespread criminal
horrors, no country should be above the law.

Speaking before the U.N. voted, Canadian ambassador Paul Heinbecker rightly
made that point with vigour, saying it is in everyone's interest to have "a
system based on law — the fair, predictable, equal application of principles
agreed to by all."

The Americans fret about being hauled up on frivolous charges. But they have
ample protections.

A U.S. peacekeeper accused of heinous crimes would face the ICC only if
Washington refused to prosecute. Moreover, the Security Council has the
power to block malicious, politically motivated prosecutions.

But Washington's objections are ideological, not practical. It won't play by
the same rules as others. And the U.N., shamefully, has buckled.

save preference

Comments (6 of 6)

Why Didnt You

by Black Rod

Tue Jun 17, 2003 12:30

Post a link or rewrite the story?

post a link....

by Dave D

Tue Jun 17, 2003 13:20

Rewriting takes time, perhaps he had a baby last year, moved house and didn't get around to it???

Some interesting articles in the Guardian today

by Anonymous

Tue Jun 17, 2003 14:19

We can seize the day - The task is not to overthrow globalisation but to use it for a democratic revolution.

by George Mombiot

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,978817,00.html

Scramble for Africa
Corruption and chaos - the true cost of the new oil rush.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,978989,00.html

You need to copy & paste the above links malheureusement

Tue Jun 17, 2003 14:23

Guardian today

Tue Jun 17, 2003 15:18

The url

Good for you Toronto Star

by Justin Morahan - Peace People

Wed Jun 18, 2003 09:50

Wouldn't it be nice to live in a place like Toronto where the main newspaper - unlike its Irish counterparts - has an independent line.
Here the news was tucked away without comment as if this horror was just another news item of less interest than the Red Cow Roundabout.
I am posting the piece to all my media links including the main newspapers.
Does anyone have a list of provincial newspaper addresses please?

Number of comments per page

Upcoming Events

New Events

Other Press

User Preferences

Feeds

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

The Saker

Lockdown Skeptics

Voltaire Network

UN Caves in to US

Comments (6 of 6)