Upcoming Events

National | Miscellaneous

no events match your query!

New Events

National

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link North Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link ?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty

Anti-Empire >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb

offsite link The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog.? We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below).?

offsite link What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

offsite link The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by

The Saker >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Promoting Human Rights in Ireland

Human Rights in Ireland >>

I'm RTE - Censor me!

category national | miscellaneous | news report author Monday April 21, 2003 15:04author by John O'Leary Report this post to the editors

The Larry O'Toole case - RTE self-censorship exposed

Key sections of the recent Sinn Féin Ard Fheis were screened live by RTE for the first time. March 2003 also marked the tenth anniversary of the Supreme Court decision that exposed the national broadcaster's strategy of self-censorship
44426_1.GIF

Ten years ago, in April 1993, then Sinn Féin member and trade union leader Larry O'Toole saw the Supreme Court put a second nail in the coffin of Section 31 censorship. The first nail had been driven home the previous July, when the High Court found that RTE had illegally banned Larry O'Toole from the airwaves under Section 31 of the Broadcasting Act.

Larry represented fellow union members in the Gateaux bakery dispute in Finglas in Dublin in 1990. RTE broadcast an interview with him as the workers' leader. RTE interviewed him again, but then refused to broadcast Larry's views. RTE confirmed it was because he was a member of Sinn Féin. The Section 31 censorship law banned spokespersons for Sinn Féin. RTE extended it to ban all members, no matter what they were talking about or whether they were speaking on behalf of Sinn Féin or not.

Censorship
Section 31 was brought in by Fianna Fáil in 1971 to deny a voice to republicans and to deny the population of the 26 Counties the truth about British brutality in the North. The conservative elite that ruled the South wanted to talk about unity but not to do anything about it. They panicked when nationalists in the North rose up against the British Army and unionist reaction. A system of thought control was instituted by Jack Lynch and reinforced by the Cosgrave, Cooney, O'Brien government after 1973.

RTE independence was squashed. The Authority was sacked, independent reporters lost their jobs or were moved to non-controversial areas like religion and children's programmes. RTE management brought in a regime of self-censorship that suppressed investigations into the Dublin-Monaghan bombings, the Garda Heavy Gang and the Birmingham Six. The NUJ said in 1976 that journalists were afraid to question government policy on the North.

Self-censorship

Openly anti-republican journalists were promoted and independent journalists suffered McCarthy type smears. Now President Mary McAleese recounts how she was ridiculed in RTE when she said that Bobby Sands could win the 1981 Fermanagh South Tyrone by-election. According to McAleese, RTE's Joe Mulholland passively presided over a team that called RTE's Forbes McFaul "a fucking provo" because they did not like a report on the hunger strikes.

This was typical of the atmosphere of suffocating anti-republicanism and anti-objectivity that thrived in RTE. Some RTE journalists openly campaigned to retain censorship. They were in tune with their managerial and political masters. They now write for the Sunday Independent, still batting on the same sticky wicket.

Joe Mulholland

It was fitting, therefore, that it was Joe Mulholland who wrote to Larry O'Toole in late 1990, confirming that he was banned under Section 31. These were the letters that the High Court confirmed as an illegal extension of censorship. The RTE news manager who claimed to be upholding the law and to be opposing republican law breaking was found to be a law-breaker on behalf of RTE and a willing self-censor.

I'm RTE - censor me!

After the High Court judgement, RTE was freed to interview Sinn Féin members involved in trade union, community or other activities. What did RTE do? Did they welcome this increase in their editorial freedom? No, they refused to obey the judgement and appealed to the Supreme Court to be re-censored. This decision bounced through increasingly astonished editorial rooms around the world. The reaction of the prestigious US Newspaper Guild was typical:

"We are astonished that RTE, instead of welcoming this liberal interpretation of an abhorrent censorship statute, is asking the Irish Supreme Court for a greater restriction of its free-speech rights."

Supreme Court

When the appeal was heard, even the conservative Supreme Court was astonished. When asked by the Court, RTE said that they would refuse to allow an actor who was a member of Sinn Féin to appear in a soap ad. The decision of the Court was clear: RTE had gone far beyond the law. RTE's confident regime of lies, half-truths and promotion of anti-republican propaganda was exposed. The eyes of the audience were opened to the sorry excuse for journalism to which RTE had been reduced.

Larry O'Toole and Sinn Féin went on to greater success. Larry was elected and is now a councillor in Dublin. Sinn Féin used the case to begin to break the wall of silence in the South. The audience already suspected that something was wrong when Bobby Sands and other republicans were elected in the North. The winning of the Larry O'Toole case strengthened the hand of then Minister Michel D Higgins when he got rid of Section 31 altogether the following January, a full eight months before the IRA ceasefire in August 1994.

RTE was dragged kicking and screaming into a regime of non-censorship ten years ago this month. They still have difficulty coping.

44426_2.GIF

44426_3.GIF

44426_4.GIF

44426_5.GIF

author by Bernardpublication date Mon Apr 21, 2003 15:45author address author phone Report this post to the editors

For "Sir Anthony O'Reilly" as he insists on being called. What a squireen, I thought that kind of provincialism was dead and buried but I was wrong.

Good article, well done.

author by joe raniipublication date Mon Apr 21, 2003 19:40author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Note how RTE had not the slighest input in exposing injustices such as Birmingham Six or British collusion in events such as Finucane murder.

If it wasn't for the British journalists who exposed the rottenness we'd still be in the dark about these things.

Maybe someone could help me out on this, but I have a vague memory as a child in 1981 that RTE did not even send a reporter to Fermanagh/Tyrone to be at the announcement of the Bobby Sands election. They thought, if indeed people like Eoghan Harris ever did any thinking, that the Unionist would win.

author by passivepublication date Mon Apr 21, 2003 19:49author address author phone Report this post to the editors

man, I am so angry about Brits. I just hate them. I'd love to just plant lots of bombs so as I could kill them all and we could live in our Gaelic paradise.
YOu muppets. RTE were not allowed interview members of Sinn Fein or the IRA because it was illegal to do so. A similar Act existed in Britain and several BBC journalists and executives were nearly sacked for screening an interview with a member of the INLA. RTE did not engage in self-censorship, they simply couldn't screen the interviews because it was against the law to interview anyone who was engaged in terrorist activity.
Grow up you little Provo muppets.

author by Niall Meehanpublication date Mon Apr 21, 2003 20:33author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Mr/Ms Passive has difficulty reading (or thinking). I thought the article was clear enough on the point.

If it is a matter of legality, the issue was definitely decided in the courts in 1992 and 1993.

The Irish High Court in July 1992 (and Supreme Court, when RTE appealed to be censored, in March 1993) found in 'O'Toole vs RTE' that RTE had extended the Section 31 censorship order into a system of self-censorship by banning Sinn Fein members (like trade unionist Larry O'Toole) rather than (as the censorship order stipulated) SF representatives.

The BBC understood the distinction between someone representing a party and simply being a member of it. For instance, in his first letter to RTE in 1990 Larry O'Toole pointed out that the BBC had interviewed Gerry Adams, who was broadcast with his own rather than an actor's voice on a BBC NI news programme as a constituency MP talking about constituency matters. There was no material difference between the two censorship orders in this context. RTE chose self-censorship, the BBC did not in this instance.

I hope that clarifies matters.

In the circumstances I will add an article to the Newswire which appeared in yesterday's (April 20) Sunday Business Post and one I had published in the same paper after the 1992 High Court decision in 'O'Toole vs RTE' when I can.

author by joe raniipublication date Tue Apr 22, 2003 08:18author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Passive says, "I am so angry about Brits. I just hate them" (we assume this is an attempt at irony).

Of course if Passive were able to read or think more clearly, s/he would see scarcely a mention of "the Brits" in any of the postings on this topic, indeed in my own posting I commended British journalists !

The postings are about Irish television, not the BBC--didn't s/he notice ? Certainly, "Passive" is a well-chosen nom-de-plume, since there is not much evidence of activity in his/her cerebrum !

Seriously, with each passing year it seems we get further away from the possibility of a Truth & Reconciliation commission on the South African model. Too bad, because responsibility for needlessly drawing out the Northern conflict rests just as much with the well-paid Mandarins of Montrose as it does with those who pulled triggers and planted bombs.

author by Fromm dePastpublication date Thu Dec 18, 2003 17:42author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Like the poster, hate the censorship.

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2025 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy