Cops welcomed with smoke bombs and flares Dublin Pride 19:57 Jul 14 0 comments Gemma O'Doherty: The speech you never heard. I wonder why? 05:28 Jan 15 0 comments A Decade of Evidence Demonstrates The Dramatic Failure Of Globalisation 15:39 Aug 23 1 comments Thatcher's " blind eye" to paedophilia 15:27 Mar 12 0 comments Total Revolution. A new philosophy for the 21st century. 15:55 Nov 17 0 comments more >>Blog Feeds
Anti-EmpireNorth Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi? Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi? Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi? ?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi? US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty
The SakerA bird's eye view of the vineyard
Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Public InquiryInterested in maladministration. Estd. 2005RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Voltaire NetworkVoltaire, international editionMisinterpretations of US trends (1/2), by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jan 28, 2025 06:59 | en Voltaire, International Newsletter #117 Fri Jan 24, 2025 19:54 | en The United States bets its hegemony on the Fourth Industrial Revolution Fri Jan 24, 2025 19:26 | en For Thierry Meyssan, the Sarkozy trial for illegal financing of the 2007 preside... Fri Jan 24, 2025 19:23 | en Should we condemn or not the glorification of Nazism?, by Thierry Meyssan Wed Jan 22, 2025 14:05 | en |
Belgium amends law to avoid war crimes lawsuit against Bush
national |
miscellaneous |
news report
Wednesday March 26, 2003 13:41 by an outlaw for international law
Time to do a 'pre-emptive protest' at the Belgian Embassy? Let's Roll! / Belgian Embassy 2 Shrewsbury Road, Dublin 4. +353 1 269 2082 / Belgium amends law to avoid war crimes lawsuit against Bush Tue Mar 25, 7:04 PM ET BRUSSELS (AFP) - The Belgian parliament amended a controversial law to prevent US President George W. Bush being prosecuted for war crimes over the conflict in Iraq . The law allows Belgian courts to try suspects for war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide, regardless of where the alleged acts took place or the nationality of the accused. Under the amendment -- which the Belgian Senate must approve before it takes effect -- a federal prosecutor will decide in certain cases whether to accept a suit filed under the so-called "universal competence" law. This was one of the "filters" that lawmakers inserted into the law to prevent plaintiffs bringing "harebrained" lawsuits. Critics of the law, including the United States, have warned Belgium that its role as host to international institutions like NATO and the European Union , would be threatened if a war crimes suit were filed against Bush. "It's a serious problem," said US Secretary of State Colin Powell , after he was named last week in a lawsuit for alleged crimes during the 1991 Gulf war along with former US president George Bush and current Vice President Dick Cheney . "For a place that is an international center they should be a little bit concerned about this," Powell said. The lawsuit against him was filed by seven Iraqi families over the bombing of a civilian shelter in Baghdad that killed 403 people on the night of February 12-13, 1991. Powell served as the head of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff and Cheney as defense secretary during the 1991 Gulf war. Some 30 current or former political leaders are facing action under the Belgian law, including Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon , Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat and Cuban President Fidel Castro . "I expect there to be, any day, a suit against President (George W.) Bush in Belgium," Herman De Croo, speaker of Belgium's lower house of parliament, said earlier Tuesday. Throughout the day, Prime Minister Guy Verhofstadt had hosted intense negotiations among political leaders from his ruling "rainbow" coalition to discuss changes to the law. Under the amendments passed, the prosecutor will decide if a lawsuit is valid if the alleged crime did not happen in Belgium; if the alleged perpetrator is not Belgian or is not on Belgian territory; and if the victims are not Belgian or have not resided in Belgium for at least three years. If one of these conditions applies, the lawsuit goes ahead automatically. If none of the conditions apply, the Belgian justice minister can pass on the case to the country of the accused. The amendments will affect only cases filed after July 1, 2002 -- like the one against Bush senior -- and only those where the country of the accused has war crimes legislation. Fears that a war crimes lawsuit over the Iraqi conflict could be brought against the current US president have further strained relations between the United States and Belgium, which has been a fierce critic of the war on Iraq and was at the center of an unprecedented crisis at NATO over the conflict last month. The changes to the law came only a week before Belgium's parliament was due to be dissolved ahead of a general election scheduled for May 18. According to parliamentary sources, the parties in the ruling coalition were divided over how to amend the law. Verhofstadt's Liberals, backed by Flemish-speaking Socialists, had proposed a "diplomatic filter" allowing the government to pass on any cases to the country where the alleged crimes took place, providing it is democratic. Francophone Socialists and Greens feared that the law would be rendered toothless if the amendments were too radical. |
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (3 of 3)
Jump To Comment: 3 2 1Israel for example in prosecuting genocidal criminals (and peace activists like Mordechai Vanunu). But I suppose if Israel does it it’s okay, while if Belgium does it it’s silly. Or maybe its just when it's Israeli war criminals that are targetted.
The Dáil for example has passes a law criminalising sexual abuse of children in other countries. Is this also idiotic?
Yes maybe you are correct but can you explain me the 'Irish' view on neutrality? ;)
Belgium's courts are so idiotic. What is the point of asserting a jurisdiction you can't enforce? The Dail might just as well pass a law banning smoking on Mars...