Upcoming Events

National | Miscellaneous

no events match your query!

New Events

National

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link North Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link ?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty

Anti-Empire >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb

offsite link The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog.? We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below).?

offsite link What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

offsite link The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by

The Saker >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N?118 Sat Feb 01, 2025 12:57 | en

offsite link 80th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp Sat Feb 01, 2025 12:16 | en

offsite link Misinterpretations of US trends (1/2), by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jan 28, 2025 06:59 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter #117 Fri Jan 24, 2025 19:54 | en

offsite link The United States bets its hegemony on the Fourth Industrial Revolution Fri Jan 24, 2025 19:26 | en

Voltaire Network >>

Names of TDs who voted

category national | miscellaneous | news report author Friday March 21, 2003 17:27author by Justin Moran - Sinn Feinauthor email maigh_nuad at yahoo dot com Report this post to the editors

List of TDs who voted to support Government motion last night.

Some-one was asking for the names of the TDs who voted for or against the motions last night so find them below.

With 166 TDs and 137 votes cast people might wonder who did or did not vote. Some people abstained and some were paired. FF and FG operate a pairing system so that if for example a FG TD can't make it to a vote, then an FF TD on the other side also misses it. Several people in both parties who disagree with their parties lines were paired away. For example two FF TDs who had said they would not support the use of Shannon without a second UN mandate weren't there yesterday and so two FG were missing.

Neither the Greens, nor Sinn Féin support the pairing system, don't know about Labour.

There were also a series of amendments put by all parties. One that has been commented on by others was a Sinn Féin amendment supporting self-determination for the Kurdish people. Labour and the Greens abstained and only SF and six independents voted for it.

The Dáil divided: Tá, 77; Níl, 60.

Ahern, Bertie.
Ahern, Dermot.
Ahern, Michael.
Ahern, Noel.
Andrews, Barry.
Ardagh, Seán.
Brady, Johnny.
Brady, Martin.
Breen, James.
Brennan, Seamus.
Browne, John.
Callanan, Joe.
Callely, Ivor.
Carey, Pat.
Carty, John.
Cassidy, Donie.
Collins, Michael.
Cooper-Flynn, Beverley.
Coughlan, Mary.
Cowen, Brian.
Cregan, John.
Cullen, Martin.
Curran, John.
de Valera, Síle.
Dempsey, Tony.
Dennehy, John.
Devins, Jimmy.
Ellis, John.
Fitzpatrick, Dermot.
Fleming, Seán.
Gallagher, Pat The Cope.
Glennon, Jim.
Grealish, Noel.
Hanafin, Mary.
Harney, Mary.
Haughey, Seán.
Healy-Rae, Jackie.
Hoctor, Máire.
Keaveney, Cecilia.
Kelleher, Billy.
Killeen, Tony.
Kirk, Seamus.
Kitt, Tom.
Lenihan, Conor.
McCreevy, Charlie.
McDaid, James.
McEllistrim, Thomas.
Martin, Micheál.
Moloney, John.
Moynihan, Donal.
Moynihan, Michael.
Mulcahy, Michael.
Nolan, M. J.
Ó Cuív, Éamon.
Ó Fearghaíl, Seán.
O'Connor, Charlie.
O'Dea, Willie.
O'Donnell, Liz.
O'Donoghue, John.
O'Keeffe, Batt.
O'Keeffe, Ned.
O'Malley, Fiona.
O'Malley, Tim.
Power, Peter.
Power, Seán.
Roche, Dick.
Ryan, Eoin.
Sexton, Mae.
Smith, Brendan.
Smith, Michael.
Treacy, Noel.
Wallace, Dan.
Wallace, Mary.
Walsh, Joe.
Wilkinson, Ollie.
Woods, Michael.
Wright, G. V.

Níl
Allen, Bernard.
Blaney, Niall.
Boyle, Dan.
Broughan, Thomas P.
Bruton, Richard.
Burton, Joan.
Connaughton, Paul.
Connolly, Paudge.
Costello, Joe.
Coveney, Simon.
Cowley, Jerry.
Crawford, Seymour.
Crowe, Seán.
Cuffe, Ciarán.
Deenihan, Jimmy.
Durkan, Bernard J.
English, Damien.
Enright, Olwyn.
Ferris, Martin.
Fox, Mildred.
Gilmore, Eamon.
Gogarty, Paul.
Gormley, John.
Gregory, Tony.
Harkin, Marian.
Hayes, Tom.
Higgins, Joe.
Higgins, Michael D.
Hogan, Phil.
Kehoe, Paul.
Kenny, Enda.
Lynch, Kathleen.
McCormack, Padraic.
McGinley, Dinny.
McGrath, Finian.
McGrath, Paul.
McHugh, Paddy.
Mitchell, Gay.
Morgan, Arthur.
Moynihan-Cronin, Breeda.
Murphy, Gerard.
Naughten, Denis.
Ó Caoláin, Caoimhghín.
Ó Snodaigh, Aengus.
O'Dowd, Fergus.
O'Shea, Brian.
Pattison, Seamus.
Penrose, Willie.
Quinn, Ruairí.
Rabbitte, Pat.
Ring, Michael.
Ryan, Eamon.
Ryan, Seán.
Sargent, Trevor.
Sherlock, Joe.
Shortall, Róisín.
Stagg, Emmet.
Stanton, David.
Upton, Mary.
Wall, Jack.

author by ~¿$=€?publication date Mon Mar 22, 2004 16:33author address author phone Report this post to the editors

and make it simple.
their names:-


Ahern, Bertie.
Ahern, Dermot.
Ahern, Michael.
Ahern, Noel.
Andrews, Barry.
Ardagh, Seán.
Brady, Johnny.
Brady, Martin.
Breen, James.
Brennan, Seamus.
Browne, John.
Callanan, Joe.
Callely, Ivor.
Carey, Pat.
Carty, John.
Cassidy, Donie.
Collins, Michael.
Cooper-Flynn, Beverley.
Coughlan, Mary.
Cowen, Brian.
Cregan, John.
Cullen, Martin.
Curran, John.
de Valera, Síle.
Dempsey, Tony.
Dennehy, John.
Devins, Jimmy.
Ellis, John.
Fitzpatrick, Dermot.
Fleming, Seán.
Gallagher, Pat The Cope.
Glennon, Jim.
Grealish, Noel.
Hanafin, Mary.
Harney, Mary.
Haughey, Seán.
Healy-Rae, Jackie.
Hoctor, Máire.
Keaveney, Cecilia.
Kelleher, Billy.
Killeen, Tony.
Kirk, Seamus.
Kitt, Tom.
Lenihan, Conor.
McCreevy, Charlie.
McDaid, James.
McEllistrim, Thomas.
Martin, Micheál.
Moloney, John.
Moynihan, Donal.
Moynihan, Michael.
Mulcahy, Michael.
Nolan, M. J.
Ó Cuív, Éamon.
Ó Fearghaíl, Seán.
O'Connor, Charlie.
O'Dea, Willie.
O'Donnell, Liz.
O'Donoghue, John.
O'Keeffe, Batt.
O'Keeffe, Ned.
O'Malley, Fiona.
O'Malley, Tim.
Power, Peter.
Power, Seán.
Roche, Dick.
Ryan, Eoin.
Sexton, Mae.
Smith, Brendan.
Smith, Michael.
Treacy, Noel.
Wallace, Dan.
Wallace, Mary.
Walsh, Joe.
Wilkinson, Ollie.
Woods, Michael.
Wright, G. V.

Will the Irish People vote with their conscience?

The men and women above have been rewarded with more than 30,000€ each in the last year minimum which is the salary they draw from the State. Indeed many have enjoyed more, much much more.

author by %-) $=€publication date Mon Mar 22, 2004 16:30author address author phone Report this post to the editors

it was a distraction.
a red herring you might say.
one year on,


-did they vote with their conscience?

Will the Irish people vote with theirs?

author by Intransigentpublication date Mon Mar 24, 2003 22:38author address author phone Report this post to the editors

author by Simonpublication date Mon Mar 24, 2003 15:43author address Co. Clareauthor phone Report this post to the editors

Dear Kalid,

I am sure that they would. I do, if thats what they want.

author by Angrie Activistpublication date Mon Mar 24, 2003 12:01author address author phone Report this post to the editors

For Ireland. They want the Union Jack flying over the Dail again. They want a 'Socialist' Federation of the British Isles.

author by Kalid Farouk - SPpublication date Sun Mar 23, 2003 19:13author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Simon self determination is quite a precise thing. It means that a nation have the right choose their own destiny whether that be full independence or in some form of federation. Why don't the Greens support the right of the Kurds if they wish to become an independent nation?

author by Simonpublication date Sun Mar 23, 2003 12:35author address Co. Clareauthor phone Report this post to the editors

OK -SP. I take your point that self-determination can mean anything. Therefore the motion could have meant a number of things and should not have been put to a Dail vote. It is not a black and white situation and we should be careful not to dabble. If Kurdish people want independance I am all for it but they themselves know that they have to play politics just to survive. They have Iraq, Turkey, Syria and Iran all breathing down their necks.

Kurdish leaders may or may not represent their peoples, that is true. But what right have we to represent them or tell them how to run their affairs ? That is excatly how the U.S./Bush Junta are behaving.

author by hunterpublication date Sun Mar 23, 2003 04:17author address author phone Report this post to the editors

the real kurdish leaders i assume are those of the pkk marxist/leninist persuation, who advocate an independent kurdistan free from control by either iraq, turkey or the west.

mind you these are the same people that are rotting in turkish F-block jails in the name of anti-terrorism. fully supported by the freedom loving US/UK juntas.

can't wait til turkey get into the EU, soon we'll all be adopting the 'turkish principles'. (aka the british principles of the 1970s).

new EU constitution: down with dissent - kill all hippies - if leftists like the gulags so much them lets send them there (and of course - war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignornance is strenght). the bosses untied will never be defeated!

author by OK - SPpublication date Sun Mar 23, 2003 00:54author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The question also has to be asked whether or not 'Kurdish leaders' speak for their people.

Simon, now that Ireland's 'Leaders' are for war, does that not mean we are all for war?

author by OK - SPpublication date Sun Mar 23, 2003 00:53author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Simon, why dont you look up "self-determination" in the dictionary. If the Kurdish people voted to have autonomous regions in Turkey, Iraq, Syria, Iran then THAT IS SELF DETERMINATION!

Likewise, if they decided to have an independent state, that is Self detemination

Self-determination does NOT equal Independence.

author by Simonpublication date Sat Mar 22, 2003 14:36author address Co. Clareauthor phone Report this post to the editors

Here is an excerpt from a joint statement made by The Kurdistan Democratic Party and The Patriotic Union of Kurdistan on March 2nd last:

"The unity of the Iraqi Kurdistan Forces, under the JHL, will consolidate and strengthen the unity of the Iraqi opposition forces that aspire to end dictatorship and establish a democratic, pluralistic federal system in Iraq."

Here is the full statement on the KDP website:
http://www.kdp.pp.se/press/030303.htm

author by Simonpublication date Sat Mar 22, 2003 14:17author address Co. Clareauthor phone Report this post to the editors

Oisin Kelly, It is not as simple as supporting Kurdish self-determination or not. As far as I understand it, The leadership of the two Kurdish controled autonomous areas in Northern Iraq are not looking for independance. They are looking for autonomy in a new democratic Iraq. If the Kurdish people said quite clearly that they wanted independance then I'm sure that The Green Party and Labour would support it.

author by Intransigentpublication date Sat Mar 22, 2003 02:38author address author phone Report this post to the editors

yes you liberal fuckers the time for peaceful protest has ended...mass civil disobedience and if needs be anarchists go smash us a McD's

author by kevpublication date Fri Mar 21, 2003 22:21author address author phone Report this post to the editors

http://www.socialistparty.net/press/debateshannonamendment.htm

and some recent relevant press statements

Government Motion on Iraq: Monumental Hypocrisy and Utter Moral Delinquency Determines Government's Stand

http://www.socialistparty.net/press/pressshannonmotion1.htm

and

Government is "gutless, spineless and destitute of moral conviction" in Face of an Invasion of Iraq

http://www.socialistparty.net/press/pressshannonmotion2.htm

author by FourWindspublication date Fri Mar 21, 2003 21:47author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Pairing really does happen in Britain!

You live and learn.

author by Oisin Kelly - SPpublication date Fri Mar 21, 2003 20:17author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I think that it's disgraceful that Labour and the Greens would not support the amendment calling on self-determination for the Kurdish people. It just shows how swayed the Greens and Labour are by bourgeois argument about upholding the territory of Iraq.

Just a correction on Justin's original posting. Socialist Party TD Joe Higgins voted for that amendment. The Socialist Party fully supports the right of the Kurdish people to self-determination.

author by bakuninpublication date Fri Mar 21, 2003 18:40author address author phone Report this post to the editors

"The votes are basically, pointless, because of the pairing system the result is a foregone conclusion on both sides and everyone goes through the motions."

I see that the penny is staring to drop .... you are beginning to see how "parliamentary democracy" works ....

author by FourWindspublication date Fri Mar 21, 2003 18:20author address author phone Report this post to the editors

... no one in Britain has ever heard of it!

If this goes on then it's *very* hush hush. I shall ask around.

author by Justin Moran - Sinn Feinpublication date Fri Mar 21, 2003 17:58author email maigh_nuad at yahoo dot comauthor address author phone Report this post to the editors

In theory, pairing is only supposed to happen for serious issues like medical emergencys or funerals or whatever. In practice, if a FF TD wants to make a constituency event but is supposed to be present for a vote, he can find a FG TD to pair so they both stay away and since each side loses one vote the 'balance' is maintained. I understand they have a similar system in Britain.

In regard to the FG votes, some FG TDs had indicated they would have difficult supporting their party line and supported the continued use of Shannon, John Deasy for example, who was also not present to vote.

The votes are basically, pointless, because of the pairing system the result is a foregone conclusion on both sides and everyone goes through the motions

author by Dave Mc - Nonepublication date Fri Mar 21, 2003 17:52author email dbigmcenerny at eircom dot netauthor address author phone Report this post to the editors

Pairing my god i never knew the cosy cartel between FF and FG was that close. It is quite a ridiclous chummy system they have there. Good to Greens and SF for being against this. Hope you don't forget your routes when, after your principled stand against the war, your parties become more popular.

"Kick over the Statues"

Hey lets try and red paint all the tds this over the next week, they are like sitting ducks in their local clinics.

Well?

author by Mickpublication date Fri Mar 21, 2003 17:46author address author phone Report this post to the editors

If I understand what is said above about pairing, 4 votes against the government resolution were lost because 2 FF TD's wouldn't vote against their party? Surely the pairing system is intended where someone can't make it to a vote for a very good reason (hospital, family death etc), then someone who was going to vote the OPPOSITE would pass. It just shows to me that FG had no intention of threatening the government vote, that they truly agree with the Shannon stopover (not that I ever doubted it but their apparent opposition might have tricked a few naive ones).
Time to disrupt the economy. Blockades on roads, petrol stations, Shannon warport, etc

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2025 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy