Upcoming Events

National | Miscellaneous

no events match your query!

New Events

National

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb

offsite link The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog.? We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below).?

offsite link What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

offsite link The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by

The Saker >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Promoting Human Rights in Ireland

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link News Round-Up Tue Mar 04, 2025 01:26 | Richard Eldred
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Ramadan Begins in Londonistan Mon Mar 03, 2025 19:00 | Tim Dieppe
Ramadan has begun in Londonistan. It's another sign of how Islam is encroaching on Western culture, says Tim Dieppe. It's a long time since critics of any other religion were imprisoned. But don't you dare insult Islam!
The post Ramadan Begins in Londonistan appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Britain Paying ?180,000 an Hour to Switch Off Wind Farms Mon Mar 03, 2025 17:57 | Will Jones
Britain is paying almost ?180,000 an hour ? ?4.3 million per day ? to switch off wind farms because there is?nowhere for the excess power to go.
The post Britain Paying ?180,000 an Hour to Switch Off Wind Farms appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link When Will Ofcom go After Times Radio for its Anti-Trump Bias? Mon Mar 03, 2025 15:00 | David Craig
Ofcom has been hounding GB News for its 'bias' in not being uniformly Left-wing. David Craig wonders when the brave regulator will notice that Times Radio pours forth anti-Trump bile all day long and takes action there.
The post When Will Ofcom go After Times Radio for its Anti-Trump Bias? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Mannheim in Lockdown as Car Driven into Crowd Mon Mar 03, 2025 13:21 | Will Jones
Mannheim in Germany is in lockdown after a car was driven into a crowd, causing casualties. Police have told residents to stay at home.
The post Mannheim in Lockdown as Car Driven into Crowd appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

'We will accept no outcome but victory'

category national | miscellaneous | news report author Thursday March 20, 2003 04:52author by IMC Report this post to the editors

Full text of speech by U.S. President Bush tonight.

My fellow citizens, at this hour American and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm Iraq, to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger.

On my orders, coalition forces have begun striking selected targets of military importance to undermine Saddam Hussein's ability to wage war. These are opening stages of what will be a broad and concerted campaign.

More than 35 countries are giving crucial support, from the use of naval and air bases, to help with intelligence and logistics, to the deployment of combat units. Every nation in this coalition has chosen to bear the duty and share the honor of serving in our common defense.

To all of the men and women of the United States armed forces now in the Middle East, the peace of a troubled world and the hopes of an oppressed people now depend on you.

That trust is well placed.

The enemies you confront will come to know your skill and bravery. The people you liberate will witness the honorable and decent spirit of the American military.

In this conflict, America faces an enemy who has no regard for conventions of war or rules of morality. Saddam Hussein has placed Iraqi troops and equipment in civilian areas, attempting to use innocent men, women and children as shields for his own military; a final atrocity against his people.

I want Americans and all the world to know that coalition forces will make every effort to spare innocent civilians from harm. A campaign on the harsh terrain of a nation as large as California could be longer and more difficult than some predict. And helping Iraqis achieve a united, stable and free country will require our sustained commitment.

We come to Iraq with respect for its citizens, for their great civilization and for the religious faiths they practice. We have no ambition in Iraq, except to remove a threat and restore control of that country to its own people.

I know that the families of our military are praying that all those who serve will return safely and soon.

Million of Americans are praying with you for the safety of your loved ones and for the protection of the innocent.

For your sacrifice, you have the gratitude and respect of the American people and you can know that our forces will be coming home as soon as their work is done.

Our nation enters this conflict reluctantly, yet our purpose is sure. The people of the United States and our friends and allies will not live at the mercy of an outlaw regime that threatens the peace with weapons of mass murder.

We will meet that threat now with our Army, Air Force, Navy, Coast Guard and Marines, so that we do not have to meet it later with armies of firefighters and police and doctors on the streets of our cities.

Now that conflict has come, the only way to limit its duration is to apply decisive force. And I assure you, this will not be a campaign of half measures and we will accept no outcome but victory.

My fellow citizens, the dangers to our country and the world will be overcome. We will pass through this time of peril and carry on the work of peace. We will defend our freedom. We will bring freedom to others. And we will prevail.

May God bless our country and all who defend her.

author by ecpublication date Thu Mar 20, 2003 05:07author address author phone Report this post to the editors

"More than 35 countries are giving crucial support, from the use of naval and air bases, to help with intelligence and logistics, to the deployment of combat units. Every nation in this coalition has chosen to bear the duty and share the honor of serving in our common defense."

author by Gar C - [email protected]publication date Thu Mar 20, 2003 05:08author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The most telling part of the speech was the five minutes beforehand where Bush didn't realise he was going out live. He pouted to the camera, had his hair done, tried to look mean, practised his speech and made faces at his collegues. It was total farce. Most networks didn't show it,but it did go out on Euro News of all places audio and all. Truly comical performance from a world leader declaring war on another nation. He cannot really be taken seriously after that, can he?

author by Just a thought ?publication date Thu Mar 20, 2003 05:22author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Anyone ?

author by kinky gg supporterpublication date Thu Mar 20, 2003 05:27author address author phone Report this post to the editors

and available on cable in Erron - they probably did it deliberately . . . fair play to them

author by T Dillonpublication date Thu Mar 20, 2003 09:42author address author phone Report this post to the editors

With a brain in its head and a critical, educated populace at home and the word "Israel" instead of Iraq in this speech there might have been hope for the future. However that is simply unrealistic in this world full of evil and stupid people.

Bush is a psycho and the US has now mutated into Reagan's Evil Empire, plain for all to see, at least. The mask is off!

author by Jasonpublication date Thu Mar 20, 2003 10:31author email jasongrehan at yahoo dot comauthor address author phone Report this post to the editors

Correction: Bush did indeed know he was going out on air.

To ask 'He can't really be taken seriously now, can he?' for simply practicing his speech and having his hair combed is patheticly childish. You lny have to read his speech to take him seriously.

author by Gaiilimhedpublication date Thu Mar 20, 2003 12:42author address author phone Report this post to the editors

author by Michael Lenehanpublication date Thu Mar 20, 2003 13:02author email lenehanm at vodafone dot ieauthor address author phone Report this post to the editors

In Bush's war speech he claimed "More than 35 countries are giving crucial support, from the use of naval and air bases, to help with intelligence and logistics, to the deployment of combat units." I urgently need a suggestion as to where I can find out if he has named these countries explicitly. Particularly I need to know if he is including Rep. of Ireland in this number. Thanks in advance.

author by Michael Lenehanpublication date Thu Mar 20, 2003 13:41author email lenehanm at vodafone dot ieauthor address author phone Report this post to the editors

I actually got the answer I was looking for in the previous question. Here are more details for anyone who may be interested:

QUESTION: Can you, in any way you can, describe the functions of the 30 countries listed as part of the coalition? The first question, of course, would be, are more than a handful contributing troops? And -- well, let's begin with that.

MR. BOUCHER: There are 30 countries who have agreed to be part of the coalition for the immediate disarmament of Iraq. I'd have to say these are countries that we have gone to and said, "Do you want to be listed?" and they have said, "Yes."

I'll read them to you alphabetically, so that we get the definitive list out on the record.

They are: Afghanistan, Albania, Australia, Azerbaijan, Colombia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Georgia, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, the Netherlands, Nicaragua, the Philippines, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and Uzbekistan.

Each country is contributing in the ways that it deems the most appropriate. Some of these countries, I suppose all these countries have talked in public about what they're doing.

In addition to these countries, there are actually another 15 or so that we know of, probably more than 15, that are cooperating with us in -- and the coalition, or perhaps offering defensive assets in the event that Saddam resorts to the use of weapons of mass destruction.

Some of these people are what you might call boots on the ground, in terms of providing military support or deploying defensive military units like, for example, nuclear, biological and chemical specialists to be available for defense of areas if the Iraqi regime should use chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons.

There are other countries who may be providing access, basing, or overflight rights. Still others have committed themselves to post-conflict peacekeeping and reconstruction. And you have some -- for example, Japan was very clearly not in the former category, but in the latter.

I think all these countries, one way or the other, and some others, have talked about what they're doing.

Related Link: http://www.usembassy.org.uk/midest534.html
author by Michael Lenehanpublication date Thu Mar 20, 2003 13:45author email lenehanm at vodafone dot ieauthor address author phone Report this post to the editors

There is a good little article, linked on on indymedia, dealing with the "coalition of the willing":

Related Link: http://www.counterpunch.org/lindorff03192003.html
Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2025 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy