Upcoming Events

National | Miscellaneous

no events match your query!

New Events

National

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Promoting Human Rights in Ireland

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link News Round-Up Sat Jan 25, 2025 01:55 | Toby Young
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link In Welcoming Trump, Let Us Remember Henry VIII Fri Jan 24, 2025 19:00 | Joanna Gray
We're all feeling a little giddy after the inauguration, but let us remember to put not our trust in princes, says Joanna Gray. After all, Thomas More effused at the coronation of Henry VIII, and look what happened to him.
The post In Welcoming Trump, Let Us Remember Henry VIII appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Have Covid Travel Requirements Gone Away? Fri Jan 24, 2025 17:00 | Dr Roger Watson
Back in 2022 and 2023 when Covid travel restrictions and vaccine passports were all the rage Dr Roger Watson published his country-by-country guide. Now, in 2025, he takes a look to see if any are still at it.
The post Have Covid Travel Requirements Gone Away? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link A Golden Age for American Meritocracy Fri Jan 24, 2025 14:15 | Darren Gee
The second Trump Presidency has already dissolved hundreds of DEI programmes and looks set to herald a new golden age of American meritocracy. It's a movement America and the world are hungry for, says Darren Gobin.
The post A Golden Age for American Meritocracy appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Think Tank?s Net Zero Survey Concludes the Public is the Problem Fri Jan 24, 2025 13:10 | Ben Pile
The Social Market Foundation has carried out a survey on public attitudes to Net Zero and concluded that the "uninformed" and reluctant public are the problem. Why else would they say no to heat pumps?
The post Think Tank’s Net Zero Survey Concludes the Public is the Problem appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter #117 Fri Jan 24, 2025 19:54 | en

offsite link The United States bets its hegemony on the Fourth Industrial Revolution Fri Jan 24, 2025 19:26 | en

offsite link For Thierry Meyssan, the Sarkozy trial for illegal financing of the 2007 preside... Fri Jan 24, 2025 19:23 | en

offsite link Should we condemn or not the glorification of Nazism?, by Thierry Meyssan Wed Jan 22, 2025 14:05 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N?116 Sat Jan 18, 2025 06:46 | en

Voltaire Network >>

Serbian news.

category national | miscellaneous | news report author Wednesday March 12, 2003 21:59author by ipsiphi quotes.... Report this post to the editors

the Kingmaker......Mr Vain...........Little Slobo is dead.

today is reported the assasination of Serbian Prime Minister Zoran Djindjic in Belgrade.

Zoran Djindjic, the slippery leader of the Democratic Party, a longtime enemy of President Kostunica, and – by irony uncommon even in the Balkans – his right hand is dead.

MR. VAIN
Djindjic was described as charismatic, intelligent and vain beyond comprehension. He was one of the minor founders of the Democratic Party (Demokratska Stranka - DS) in 1989, along with Kostunica. During 1991, Djindjic’s wing of the DS argued for cooperation with Milosevic as the way to power, and dismissed the Serbian national question as irrelevant. This was anathema to Kostunica, who founded his own party – the Democratic Party of Serbia (DSS) in early 1992. Since then, these two men have been bitter enemies – united only in their opposition to Milosevic.

Even that is not entirely true. Djindjic’s takeover of the DS in 1994 – an inter-party coup that left its former chairman, Dragoljub Micunovic, no choice but to back down in favor of the younger firebrand – is eerily reminiscent of the way Milosevic gained control of the Serbian Communist League in 1987. Furthermore, Djindjic kept lines of communication with Milosevic open at all times, even during the 1996-97 street protests, which gave him the plum post of Belgrade’s mayor.

NATO’s attack on Yugoslavia in 1999 revealed the extent of Djindjic’s conceit and cowardice. As bombs rained on his people, Djindjic first bemoaned their least significant consequence – a unification of Serbs under Milosevic’s banner of resistance – then fled to Montenegro, which backstabbed its federal partner by declaring neutrality. There he met with American and other NATO officials, trying to fashion himself into a leader of the unified anti-Milosevic opposition that would enjoy US support. It was a far cry from the man who razzed NATO in 1994 while sharing a roasted ox with Radovan Karadzic on a hill above Sarajevo, but completely in character. Djindjic has always had a nose for power, and whatever could give him more of it was target of his entreaties.

"LITTLE SLOBO"
Power was also the main motivator of Serbia’s now former ruler, Slobodan Milosevic. Despite a long list of accusations by his enemies that painted him as a Communist, a genocidal fascist, or a national-chauvinist, Milosevic really respected and fought for power alone. His constant betrayal of Serbs – whether in Krajina, Bosnia, Kosovo, or inner Serbia – is evidence enough of this motive. But while "Slobo" was the grand master of power, Djindjic is still but an apprentice. One of Serbia’s most pointed journalistic pens, Aleksandar Tijanic, labeled him "Mali Sloba" – Little Slobo.

It is Tijanic who first publicly raised the specter of Djindjic’s takeover, in his October 27 column in Danas daily [currently available only in Serbian].
http://www.aimpress.org/

Acknowledging Djindjic’s skill and pragmatism, Tijanic nevertheless warned that Little Slobo is perfectly capable of pulling a Yeltsin on Kostunica’s stunned Gorbachev – namely, using Kostunica’s name to win the Serbian elections in December, then use his connection with Montenegrin separatists to declare Serbia and Montenegro separate nations and dissolve Yugoslavia. This would leave Kostunica without a job and the Serbs saddled with another power-hungry maniac. Truly, a gambit worth of Richard III.

THE SHADOW KINGMAKER
There is plenty of evidence to prove Tijanic’s hypothesis. Djindjic was one of the main organizers of the October uprising, making behind-the-scenes deals and coordinating attacks on the Television, the Parliament and numerous other state institutions. While Kostunica was addressing the crowds the evening of October 5, Djindjic was busy setting up "crisis committees" that would govern major enterprises and state institutions, such as the Customs Service.

Soon thereafter, Djindjic bragged to UPI how he single-handedly won the "Revolution" by securing the allegiance of the Special Forces. Within days, The Independent declared him "the Shadow Kingmaker" of Serbia, running the show behind the scenes.

In the immediate aftermath of Milosevic’s defeat, it was difficult to notice how much of Kostunica’s authority was actually usurped by Djindjic. First of all, because most Western journalists tended to attribute statements to anonymous "DOS leaders," a tag made pointless by the fact that there were eighteen men who could be so labeled, each quite different from the others. Secondly, with Djindjic being Kostunica’s official campaign manager, it was taken as completely normal for him to make official statements even though Djindjic held no office in the new government.

Still, Djindjic was one of the loudest voices of the new government – meeting with the separatist leadership of Montenegro on matters of constitutional importance, announcing from Belgrade that the "Milosevic menace" still threatens Serbia, calling for purges in the military and police leadership, even threatening violence unless the Socialist government of Serbia did not resign and call for a new election. Kostunica seemed reduced to a ceremonial role – meeting foreign dignitaries, giving "confessions" on CBS and visiting funerals of dead poets – while Djindjic all but ran Serbia behind his back.

TROUBLE AT THE TOP

Kostunica was no pushover, though. When Djindjic announced in mid-October that General Nebojsa Pavkovic – CO of the Third Army during the Kosovo war and the current chairman of Yugoslavia’s Joint Chiefs – was to be sacked, Kostunica denied that statement and kept Pavkovic in his post for the sake of state stability. More recently, Djindjic’s faction in DOS threatened to quit the new transitional government unless Rade Markovic, head of Serbia’s State Security (a cross between the NSA and the KGB, and about as sinister) and a former Milosevic loyalist, resigns. Kostunica refused to fire Markovic, saying that Markovic was responsible to the Serbian government, which is yet to be elected, and not the federal government. More recently, Kostunica appointed Goran Svilanovic as his Foreign Minister, a rare DOS leader who, according to Mr. Tijanic, is not afraid of talking back to Djindjic.

The New York Times’ Belgrade correspondent covered this conflict in detail. In the NY Times article, Djindjic went on record as saying that "It is sure that Milosevic has his fingers in everything that is happening in the part of state security where [Rade] Markovic is the boss." General Momcilo Perisic, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs and a bitter enemy of Milosevic, said Markovic and Pavkovic were "protecting Milosevic and his interests." The NY Times also attributes to Perisic the accusation that Pavkovic’s and Markovic’s presence is "part of a general effort by Milosevic supporters to sabotage normal life, including electricity supplies and prices."

DOUBLE-BLIND
The fact that gen. Pavkovic and Mr. Markovic were accused of loyalty to Milosevic was not an accident, but rather a part of a clever strategy employed by Djindjic and his supporters. President Kostunica enjoys an approval rating of 85%, a dream of every Western politician. Anyone criticizing him openly would be shredded by the public opinion. On the other hand, striking at Kostunica by attacking former Milosevic loyalists who are now supporting him is a perfect double-blind, as Kostunica cannot defend them without appearing to defend Milosevic. As long as Kostunica keeps Pavkovic, Markovic and others like them in positions of power, Djindjic can discreetly smear him as a "softie" on the ancien regime.

Supported by the Army and in possession of the SDB files on opposition leaders – which Milosevic had gathered as leverage – Kostunica can deflect any dirty tricks by individuals or groups intent on taking over the country by less than legitimate means. The power of their organizations is too great to be wielded by anyone but the legitimate government. Demonstrating this is a line from the NYT report, stating that "There have already been leaks from some of those files, of uncertain authenticity, intended to undermine Mr. Markovic’s position and embarrass Mr. Kostunica."

SINISTER SUPPORTERS
There are indications that more sinister forces are involved as well. Mr. Tijanic’s above-mentioned analysis drew a vehement attack by Vesna Pesic, former head of Mr. Svilanovic’s Civic Alliance universally scorned for her elitist pseudo-intellectualism. Sonja Biserko, head of Serbia’s Helsinki Committee for Human Rights, called Kostunica a "Nazi" right after the elections. Her associates have been very fond of Djindjic, and considered him the right man to lead Serbia on the path of salvation – as they envisioned it. Biserko, incidentally, testified passionately in front of the US Senate immediately after the bombing (June 29, 1999) and called for some sort of occupation of Serbia in order to collectively reeducate its "Nazified" populace.

Again, it was not an accident that Djindjic enjoyed the support of this pseudo-intellectual elite. Part and parcel of his vanity was a feeling of arrogant elitism. Whether because he was educated in Germany, or because his life insulated him from the masses, Djindjic never really connected with the Serbian farmers and small-town folk, who constitute the majority of that republic’s population. In a statement to the Washington Post right after the elections, he said Kostunica was a better candidate because the people liked his nationalism, while Djindjic’s views were "too European for now."

A recent report by the Washington Post makes it obvious where Washington’s preferences lie, describing the "liberal, pro-Western views" of Djindjic’s party as opposed to Kostunica’s "conservative Serbian nationalism."

SHOWDOWN
In control of a private militia (armed followers, special Security Forces), most of the Serbian media, much of the government and many state enterprises, Djindjic is well situated for the coming showdown with Kostunica. All he lacks now is legitimacy – which could make him or break him in the end. Vuk Draskovic and his SPO, once a large and powerful party, lost legitimacy when they declined to support Kostunica in September. Because of that, the SPO sank faster than the Titanic after bumping an iceberg. Djindjic is aware of that danger, and plans to circumvent it by having Kostunica do all the work. Kostunica’s name on the ballot will easily win Djindjic the presidency of Serbia, opening the door to Yugoslavia’s – and Kostunica’s – demise.

And as things are, Kostunica is so determined to remove Milosevic’s party from power that he is willing to preserve the integrity of DOS at all cost – even if that means sacrificing himself. In doing so, he may actually be dooming the very people on whose behalf he is ready to fall on the sword. Or in this case, the poisoned dagger.

I am endebted to Neboysa Malik who wrote this report on Little Slobo for Balkan Express.

Nebojsa Malich left his home in Bosnia after the Dayton Accords and currently resides in the United States. During the Bosnian War he had exposure to diplomatic and media affairs in Sarajevo, and had contributed to the Independent. As a historian who specialized in international relations and the Balkans, Malich has written numerous essays on the Kosovo War, Bosnia and Serbian politics, which were published by the Serbian Unity Congress. His exclusive column for Antiwar.com appears every Thursday.

Link to tomorrows Guardian today
http://www.guardian.co.uk/serbia/article/0,2479,912747,00.html


I wonder how "too european for Serbians" will go down in Washington?

author by Brian Purcellpublication date Wed Mar 12, 2003 22:25author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Djindjic was given refuge in Montenegro during NATO bombing not out of cowardice on Djindjic's part but because Milosovic was attempting to have him assassinated.

author by Phuq Heddpublication date Thu Mar 13, 2003 17:27author address author phone Report this post to the editors

ZNet Commentary
Who was Djindjic? March 13, 2003
By Andrej Grubacic

Serbian Prime Minister Zoran Djindjic was a long time dissident. During his student days in the mid-1970s, he left for Germany to join other dissidents who were, with the help of western intellectuals, escaping harassment in Titoist Yugoslavia.

After his return to Belgrade, abandoning his anarchist ideas, Djindjic was among the founding members of the Democratic Party in 1989 - one of the main anti-Milosevic parties. A master tactician and a ruthless technocrat he soon took over as its leader.

Djinjdic came to international prominence at the end of 1996, when he was one of three opposition leaders who inspired and coordinated nearly three months of mass street demonstrations against the attempts of the Milosevic administration to annul the victories of the "Zajedno" (Together) coalition in municipal elections across Serbia.

The demonstrations - unprecedented in length and intensity in recent European history - brought victory. Djindjic's prize was to become mayor of Belgrade in 1997.

During the Kosovo conflict, when NATO carried out its aggression against Yugoslavia, Djindjic took refuge in Montenegro and the west, leaving the country, and suggestions that "Serbia should be bombed" were not received with support in Yugoslavia

After the aggression against Yugoslavia, Djindjic - as probably the most unpopular of Serb politicians - stayed in the background directing the ultimately successful campaign of another opposition leader, Vojislav Kostunica, in the race against Milosevic.

Kostunica gained the largely honorary post of Yugoslav President, while Djindjic took over at the centre of power - as prime minister of Serbia.

Djindjic had transferred Milosevic to The Hague Tribunal in 2001 - in the face
of opposition from the people and many Serb political forces, including President Kostunica.

He introduced neoliberal capitalism of the worst kind in Serbia. His media manipulation and his technocratic behavior made him more and more unpopular, as Serbia was becoming one of the poorest countries in the region. Every day, more than
15,000 workers were on the street, protesting. More than 900,000 people in Serbia were fired (Serbia has a population of about 7 million), unions were aroused
and social unrest was brewing.

So called "Workers Resistance", from Kragujevac, an industrial city of Serbia,
was vehemently protesting against Djindjic ^Qs neoliberal policies. Coalitions and social movements, such as "Another World is Possible", and many others, were
starting to take shape, and to resist IMF-iseration of the country. A handful
of intellectuals and journalists were fighting against an imposition of a "false debate"- you have to choose between neoliberal "reformists" or "ultranationalists" - and there emerged a so-called "Belgrade consensus": a convergence of the neoliberal and the nationalistic political elite and intellectual commissars who
were restoring the capacity of coercion against the people who tried to look beyond both options being presented, nationalism and neoliberalism.

With regards to political parties, for much of the past two years, there has been a power struggle between Kostunica and Djindjic. Kostunica enjoyed popularity, and Djindjic was detested because of his technocratic approach and what is called "reforms" ( meaning: stabilization, privatization, liberalization, in the
spirit of the "Washington Consensus")
Yet Djindjic was very succesful. He has used his links with President Djukanovic of Montenegro to establish a loosely-knit union of Serbia and Montenegro.

The power struggle with Kostunica finally went Djindjic's way with the replacement of Yugoslavia by the union of Serbia and Montenegro over the past month. This left Kostunica without an office and transferred him back to the opposition.
Djindjic was not able to enjoy the fruits of his almost absolute power for more
than a few weeks. There are a lot of speculations about today^Rs assassination.
According to one scenario, the most probable one perhaps, Djindjic was a victim of his own alliances with organized crime. Post-Yugoslavia, as every other "country in transition" (towards complete poverty) has seen a "new class" being formed, a group of oligarchs who made their money under Milosevic and found new protectors in Djindjic or Kostunica. A virulent element of this new class, comprised of buisness people and politicians, was mafia and organized crime. Another scenario is interpreting Djindjic's assasination as a political plot. There is a suggestion that he was perhaps executed by Albanian nationalists who are gaining more and more strength in the south of Serbia.

Djindjic's circle, neoliberal technocrats, will use this situation and benefit from it. This is not good: I have seen it happening with Milosevic who had become almost a martyr after his extradition to the Hague. As I am writing these lines, one of the TV stations loyal to Djindjic is broadcasting the movie "JFK". There is, also, another danger, the one of organized crime transforming this situation into a gang warfare. After this, gangs, and mafia in general, could be encouraged. And a situation of complete disorder could be introduced.

In the best scenario, neoliberals-in-power will use and exploit this opportunity for their own benefit and further impoverishment of the country. Nationalist forces could be encouraged as well. As for the people who are fighting for "another Serbia", against neoliberalism and nationalism, for them, at least at the moment, the situation doesn^Rt look very promising.

author by Killian Forde - personal viewpublication date Thu Mar 13, 2003 18:49author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I spent four years in the Balkans and am a little surprised at the commenst above. Djindic was the kind of politician needed in Serbia and his assination is a terrible shame, he was willing to challenge Serbs on some of their more shameful espisodes of recent history and made attempst to improve Serbia image in the rest of the world.

He and Cosic managed to defuse the crisis in Southern Serbia, extradite Milosovic and, up until yesterday control the more extreme and nasty elements of Serbian Nationalism.

It must be borne in mind when the likes that Milosovic was ousted by a combination of the liberal softer intelluctual ad student populations from Belgarde and Novi Sad and the extereme nationalists from Nis and Cacak (as he had failed in his Big Serbia) project.

The space now left by Djindic will result in a power struggle in Serbia of which I fear the far right will rise again.

He may have had his faults but to anyone familiar with Serbian politics he was head and shoulders in every sense above a, admitely bad bunch.

author by ipsiphipublication date Fri Mar 14, 2003 18:34author address author phone Report this post to the editors

little slavonic balkan group of IMC ireland.

now who killed him is attracting much speculation but really what is more important are these questions...

1. shall this makr a deterioration of the Balkan situation?
2. shall Slovenia and other new allies of NATO/USA be forced to intervene?
3. shall LIFFE traded futures options on Balkan reconstruction post the last war be affected?

any thoughts would be welcome.
Hvala=thank you
Dosta = Basta = 'enough'.

 
© 2001-2025 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy