Cops welcomed with smoke bombs and flares Dublin Pride 19:57 Jul 14 0 comments Gemma O'Doherty: The speech you never heard. I wonder why? 05:28 Jan 15 0 comments A Decade of Evidence Demonstrates The Dramatic Failure Of Globalisation 15:39 Aug 23 1 comments Thatcher's " blind eye" to paedophilia 15:27 Mar 12 0 comments Total Revolution. A new philosophy for the 21st century. 15:55 Nov 17 0 comments more >>Blog Feeds
Public InquiryInterested in maladministration. Estd. 2005RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Human Rights in IrelandPromoting Human Rights in Ireland
Lockdown Skeptics
News Round-Up Mon Feb 03, 2025 01:19 | Richard Eldred
Towards Post-totalitarianism in the West: Some Warnings From the East Sun Feb 02, 2025 19:00 | Michael Rainsborough
Sky News Scrambles for Survival Amid Exodus of Viewers Sun Feb 02, 2025 17:00 | Richard Eldred
Britain Could Rejoin Brussels? Net Zero Climate Scheme Sun Feb 02, 2025 15:00 | Richard Eldred
Thousands Shut Down London As Protesters Chant ?Free Tommy? Sun Feb 02, 2025 13:00 | Richard Eldred
Voltaire NetworkVoltaire, international editionVoltaire, International Newsletter N?118 Sat Feb 01, 2025 12:57 | en 80th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp Sat Feb 01, 2025 12:16 | en Misinterpretations of US trends (1/2), by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jan 28, 2025 06:59 | en Voltaire, International Newsletter #117 Fri Jan 24, 2025 19:54 | en The United States bets its hegemony on the Fourth Industrial Revolution Fri Jan 24, 2025 19:26 | en |
Myths and Facts About Iraq
national |
miscellaneous |
news report
Friday February 07, 2003 21:42 by Irish American
A bit of truth for y'all.
Fact: Iraq enjoyed a strong economy until Saddam Hussein took power and launched attacks against his neighbors--Iran in 1980 and Kuwait in 1990--with devastating results for Iraq. It took 5 years for Saddam to accept the oil-for-food program. Saddam also has failed to implement policies that would boost economic growth and generate job opportunities to improve the population's living standards.
Fact: Sanctions have never prohibited or limited the import of medicine. In fact, the UN has urged the Iraqi regime to order more basic medicines, but Baghdad has refused. Saddam has been criticized by the UN for intentionally hoarding medicines in warehouses in government-controlled Iraq instead of distributing it to civilians. Myth: Sanctions prohibit humanitarian contributions to Iraq. Fact: Sanctions do not prohibit humanitarian contributions, Saddam does. Since June 1998, Saddam has publicly refused a number of humanitarian contributions while claiming that his people are suffering. Myth: Sanctions prohibit the import of pencils, books and journals, and desks for schools. Fact: Basic educational supplies including pencils, books, and desks have never been prohibited by UN sanctions. They have been sent to Iraq regularly since 1991 and nearly $64 million of supplies for the education sector, including photocopiers, and printing and lab equipment, have entered Iraq under the oil-for-food program. Myth: Sanctions prohibit Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) from working in Iraq and the UN can run whatever programs it wants in country. Fact: Saddam has refused to allow most NGOs into Iraq and sometimes impedes UN workers trying to oversee oil-for-food programs. In fact, Saddam launched a series of terrorist attacks against NGO and UN workers in northern Iraq in the early 1990s. Myth: Sanctions prevent Iraqis from going on the Hajj. Fact: Sanctions have never prevented Iraqis from making the Hajj. The Security Council exempted Hajj flights from flight restrictions and has offered the use of oil-for-food revenue to fund private Iraqi Hajj travel, but Baghdad rejected the plan. Myth: Sanctions prevent travel to the Muslim holy sites in southern Iraq. Fact: Sanctions have never prohibited travel in or out of Iraq. The UN Sanctions Committee approved a ferry service allowing pilgrims in the region to travel to An Najaf and Karbala. Myth: Sanctions have crippled Iraq's ability to export oil. Fact: Iraq's oil exports are approaching pre-war levels. Prior to the Gulf War, Iraq was exporting about 2.6 million barrels per day of crude oil. Its current crude oil exports have averaged about 2.2 million barrels per day in recent months, and the regime said it plans to increase exports to about 2.7 million barrels per day by yearend, which is higher than pre-war exports. In addition, Iraq is smuggling 2.8 million barrels of oil per month through the Persian Gulf. Myth: Sanctions on Iraq will never be lifted. Fact: Sanctions remain in place because Iraq refuses to comply with Security Council resolutions. The requirements for lifting sanctions have not changed since they were first imposed in 1991. UN Resolution 1284, which Iraq rejects, lays a path for the eventual suspension and lifting of sanctions. Myth: The international community has not taken measures to care for the Iraqi people. Fact: The UN designed the oil-for-food program in 1991 -- unprecedented in size and scope--to provide food and medicine for the Iraqi people. Saddam rejected it outright for four years and then slow-rolled it for another year and a half. The substantial expansion over the years has increased provisions for Iraqis. The international community continues to look for ways to improve the program, despite Saddam's effort to undermine humanitarian efforts. Myth: The oil-for-food program has failed to meet basic needs of the Iraqi people and it never will. Fact: Oil-for-food has made significant improvements in the lives of the Iraqis and will continue to do so. The increase in revenue under the oil-for-food program from $4 billion in the first year of the program to a projected $20.4 billion this year means there is a tremendous amount of money available for humanitarian goods. The government of Iraq must choose to make that happen. In northern Iraq, where the UN controls the humanitarian relief programs, child mortality rates are lower than they were before the Gulf War. However, in southern and central Iraq, where the Iraqi Government controls the oil-for-food program, mortality rates have doubled. Myth: There is a limit on the amount of food Iraq can import. Fact: There has never been a limit on the amount of food Iraq can import. Myth: Contract holds have kept a majority of goods from entering Iraq. Fact: Since the oil-for-food program was implemented in March 1997, the UN Sanctions Committee has approved about 90% of Iraqi contracts received. Myth: The Iraqi Government is doing all it can to make the oil-for-food program work. Fact: The regime is slow to order and distribute goods and Saddam's lack of cooperation on monitoring makes it difficult to ensure goods are equitably distributed to the Iraqi people. Baghdad has rejected UN recommendations to increase protein-enriched goods for malnourished children and pregnant women. The Iraqi Government has also rejected assistance by all but a few Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and other outside groups. Myth: The UN provides substandard goods under the oil-for-food program. Fact: Under oil-for-food, Saddam, not the UN, chooses what is purchased and from whom. Saddam's choice of suppliers is politically motivated. Over one-third of all contracts have gone to Iraq's three most vocal supporters on the Security Council. Iraq also continues to oppose placing mobile testing laboratories for humanitarian goods under oil-for-food at UN entry points that would insure the quality of goods delivered. Myth: Iraq does not have the resources to support the Iraqi people. Fact: Baghdad has significant resources available to alleviate much of Iraq's humanitarian suffering, but Saddam does not spend the money on the Iraqi people. The oil-for-food program allows Iraq to sell as much oil as required to meet humanitarian needs. From December 1999 to June 2000, Iraq earned approximately $8.3 billion from oil sales. Myth: There is little food available in Iraq. Fact: More than 13 million metric tons of foodstuffs have arrived in Iraq since the first deliveries of the oil-for-food program began in 1997. In fact, Baghdad has been caught exporting dates, corn, and grain outside of Iraq while claiming the Iraqi people are starving. Myth: Iraq is in compliance with UN Security Council Resolutions. Fact: Iraq has not complied with UN Security Council Resolutions that call for dismantling weapons of mass destruction programs, and returning Kuwaiti and other nations' missing persons and POWs and Kuwaiti property seized during the Gulf War. Myth: Iraq has accounted for all Kuwaiti POWs and missing persons during the Gulf War. Fact: Iraq has still not accounted for some 600 missing Kuwaitis. For over a year, the regime has refused to cooperate with the ICRC in this humanitarian endeavor. Baghdad also will not allow the UN Kuwaiti Issues Coordinator entry into Iraq to discuss POWs or the property Iraq stole from Kuwait. Myth: UNSCOM inspectors behaved badly and deserved to be thrown out of Iraq. Fact: The inspectors were not thrown out of Iraq. Iraq's obstructionism and refusal to cooperate with the weapons inspectors, who were carrying out a UN Security Council mandate, prevented the inspectors from fulfilling their mission and they had no choice but to leave. Myth: Saddam is not more brutal than other dictators. Fact: Saddam's gassing of the Kurds in northern Iraq in 1988 was one of the largest chemical weapon attacks ever waged against a civilian population. Even today, Saddam continues to practice systematic torture, executions, forced displacement, and repression against the Iraqi people. The U.S. is currently seeking an indictment of senior regime officials for these atrocities. Myth: Only ethnic minorities (not Sunnis) in Iraq are subject to harsh treatment by the regime. Fact: Any group opposed to Saddam Hussein's regime is subject to brutal repression. The regime has moved against its people -- be they Arab, Kurd, or Turkoman, Sunni, Shia, or Christian --through expulsion from their homes, razing of villages, arbitrary arrest, execution, and torture. Myth: Iraq is no longer a threat to its neighbors. Fact: As a result of its refusal to cooperate with the UN disarmament regime, Iraq maintains the capacity to produce missiles and chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons. The absence of UN inspectors from Iraq has afforded Saddam the opportunity to reconstitute his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction. Saddam has already launched two bloody wars; one against Iran in 1980 and the other against Kuwait in 1990. In the last couple of years, Saddam Hussein has repeatedly issued public threats against his neighbors, including calls for the overthrow of a number of regimes. Myth: Coalition air strikes are aimed at the Iraqi people. Fact: The air strikes are not targeted at the Iraqi people. They are the direct response for self-defense of the forces that protect the Kurds in the north and the Shia in the south from the regime's civilian repression. Myth: Saddam's palaces are used by the Iraqi people. Fact: The nearly 80 palaces and VIP residences in Iraq are purely for the enjoyment of Saddam, his family, and key supporters as a reward for their loyalty. Saddam's inner circle is immune from harsh living conditions facing the general population. |
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (12 of 12)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12how about this myth...
The USA will sterilise Iraqi bio/chem material without collateral damage to the Iraqi people or environment.
you really are doing a good job. who do you work for?
... how any of that justifies killing Iraqis?
bjg
Myth: UNSCOM inspectors behaved badly and deserved to be thrown out of Iraq.
Fact: The inspectors were not thrown out of Iraq. Iraq's obstructionism and refusal to cooperate with the weapons inspectors, who were carrying out a UN Security Council mandate, prevented the inspectors from fulfilling their mission and they had no choice but to leave.
Double-plus-fact: The inspectors were advised to leave because the US said that it couldn't guarantee that the bombs they were going to drop illegally wouldn't kill them.
Double-plus-ungood-fact: The inspectors were compromised by having CIA personnel included as members of the US complement.
Double-extra-plus-ungood-fact: None of the USA's bombings and torturings over the last 100 years and more has ever created Freedom and Democracy.
Britain used chemical warfare against innocent Iraqis in the 1920s. Britain still stockpiles nuclear,chemical and biological weapons, as does its senior partner the U.S. Between these two Anglo-Saxon imperialists there is hardly a country in the world that they have not invaded. Britain is still a threat to its neighbor, Ireland and has considerable military presence in this country. Both countries are a threat to world peace. Who will take pre-emptive action against them?
1) The US supplied weapons to Iraq in the Iran-Iraq war
2) The US supplied satellite and other intelligence on Iranian troop movements to the Iraqis during the Iran-Iraq war
3) Rumsfeld was shaking Saddams hand on the day the Kurds were attacked with Nerve gas
4) The US was the only country NOT to condemn the nerve gas attack on the Kurds at the UN
5) The US incineraterated 100,000+ Iraqi conscript soldiers when there was no need
6) The US 'Iraqi Water Project' set out to catalogue all the water supply and sewage systems in Iraqi before the Gulf War I, and then destroyed them all, knowing the effect would cause thousands of deaths for years afterwards.
6) The (radioactive) depleted Uranium from US heavy armour piercing weapons has caused massive increase in the cancer rate all over southern Iraqi.
7) The sanctions, combined with the destruction of the water system, combined with the depleted Uranium have caused the death of up to 1.5 million civilians in Iraq.
8) Bush Snr came on TV at the end of the Gulf War and encourage the Iraqis to rebel against Saddam. A successful uprising was on the way. Then the US allowed the Iraqi army to use their helicopters again, with the result the uprising was crushed, with result Saddam remained.
One could continue, except I am not fully employed by the State propaganda services as our friend 'Irish American' surely must be if he has time to write all that.
There is an excellent article from the November 2002 issue of Harper's Magazine that looks at how the Unites States deliberatly manipulated the sanctions program since 1991. Here's a quote from it:
"The United States has fought aggressively throughout the last decade to purposefully minimize the humanitarian goods that enter [Iraq]. And it has done so in the face of enormous human suffering, including massive increases in child mortality and widespread epidemics. "
Check it out at http://www.harpers.org/online/cool_war/?pg=1
Five years ago I was working for a UN sponsored group based out fo dublin that aimed to demystify and clarify international aid issues, disseminating field experince and findings to UN/NGO/Donors and academics through concise summaries. Below is a sample of what I found out, all sources not directly attributed are International NGO.
"All imports and exports must obtain a licence from the United Nations. In 1996 pencils designated for schoolchildren in the country sat in a UN warehouse in Baghdad for months. The reason: pencils contain graphite, a useful mineral for nuclear weapons! In 1995 a pest attack on southern Iraq's cereal and date palm crops destroyed millions of pounds worth of badly needed food stuffs. The Iraqi authorities were unable to spray the fields because of the 'no-fly zone'. FAO eventually carried out the spraying in May and June 1996. They were obliged by the Security Council to use non-Iraqi pilots, obtain permission to access helicopter spare parts held in storage and import pesticides"
The article also address the food for oil deal and looks at why even back in 1997 the UNSC resoultion 1153 (oil for food)was not going to work in allevating malnutrition and the downward trend in all health indicators.
On a different note well done to all at Shannon Camp and the small victory over World Airline.
See you next saturday.
Since 1945 the US has:
fought war in Korea, Vietnam, Panama, Grenada.
Have armed/trained death squads in almost all countries in central/south america including the overthrow of a democratically elected leader in Argentina and is currently trying to depose Chavez in Venezuala. The CIA attempted to kill Castro on many occasions and armed trained an army to invade Cuba.
This is not nearly the full extent of US military activities in Central/South America, they have interferred in Nicaragua, Guatamala and Colombia. Their next target in this region will be Lula in Brazil as soon as Chavez is gone.
You can make a similar list for Africa, Asia and Europe.
So who is the real ROUGE STATE!!!!
What is the source of your "truth" / "facts"??
"Fact: Sanctions have never prohibited or limited the import of medicine. In fact, the UN has urged the Iraqi regime to order more basic medicines, but Baghdad has refused".
How many innocent Iraqi people, especially children under the age of 5 have died, do you think have died because of the 12 year sanctions??
Please honestly answer that question.
Sorry, I meant to add under your above "fact"......Absolute rubbish! & more propeganda which you have probably been fed by some American "authority".
"Irish American", perhaps you should have pointed out that your facts come straight from the US state department's website, or you could have just posted the URL to save space, like this :
http://usinfo.state.gov/regional/nea/iraq/factsheet.htm
And here's a reply:
http://www.casi.org.uk/discuss/2001/msg00483.html
Mmmm I'm thinking Irish American.
Classy bit of propaganda that. Why didn't you source it, cause it would be laughed at as propaganda.
I love the way it mixes up lies with untruths eg;
Myth: Saddam is not more brutal than other dictators.
Fact: Saddam's gassing of the Kurds in northern Iraq in 1988 was one of the largest chemical weapon attacks ever waged against a civilian population. Even today, Saddam continues to practice systematic torture, executions, forced displacement, and repression against the Iraqi people. The U.S. is currently seeking an indictment of senior regime officials for these atrocities.
No one is disputing that Saddam is a fucking shit. We're disputing that there are many just as bad as him, and why aren't you going after them as well. Or that those things happen in regiemes friendly to the US but they aren't or problem. Or do you think killing iraqi civilians will ease their sufferes. The last line is a hoot and a half though, the bit about indictment. I mean indict him where? The International Criminal court? Gee no wait you refused to ratify it. And the bit about the US government protecting the world from War Criminals. One word "Kissinger".
Thats an untruth
Here's a lie.
Myth: Coalition air strikes are aimed at the Iraqi people.
Fact: The air strikes are not targeted at the Iraqi people. They are the direct response for self-defense of the forces that protect the Kurds in the north and the Shia in the south from the regime's civilian repression.
------------------------
And the bombing of civilian infrastructure such as sewage treatment plants is what?
Quit your fucking lying...
Now onto the other one.
Anonymous would you ever fucking mind not just mindlessly wandering around the site, posting petitions and agreeing with people. And would you also mind from refraining from asking questions of people posting and y'know lifting that fat arse of your and looking up something so you could add something to the debate rather that your purile nonsense questions.
And I swear to fucking god if you ask on one more fucking thread "Do you think it was right to break up the peace camp" I will pay for the the PI to find you so I can hunt you down and ram that question so far up your own arse.
Get this if they hadn't broke up the camp they would be in prison you fucking retard, they had a day to decide and if they were still there on Wednesday night they would have been arrested. Now would you kindly shut up about it. See I asked nice and everything.
Now would you quit this site and come back when you have something meaniful to add.