Blog Feeds
Anti-Empire
The SakerA bird's eye view of the vineyard
Public InquiryInterested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
Voltaire NetworkVoltaire, international edition
|
Cynical US Sponsored Coup in Venezuala: IMF Snipers do their bit for the Empire?![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() “The oil drilling is going fine but the locals are giving us a bit of trouble” We in Dublin got advance warning on the SOA/CIA/IMF (7) coup which has just taken place in Venezuela from Greg Palast during his recent public lecture in NCAD. He had spoken to Chavez just before the lecture and he was saying to Palast at the time that he wouldn’t last a month. Well he lasted a little longer. But just a little. Just long enough for the peaking of the Israel/Palestine conflict to provide something to occupy and divert the attention of the World’s press while a cynical anti-democratic coup to took place with minimal and mindbendingly uncritical reporting on the part of the World’s mainstream media. Cynical US Sponsored Coup in Venezuala: IMF Snipers do their bit for the Empire? “ The oil drilling is going fine but the locals are giving us a bit of trouble” “With the destruction of history, contemporary events themselves retreat into a remote and fabulous realm of unverifiable stories, uncheckable statistics, unlikely explanations and untenable reasoning. For every imbecility presented by the spectacle, there are only the media's professionals to give an answer, with a few respectful rectifications or remonstrations. And they are hardly extravagant, even with these, for besides their extreme ignorance, their personal and professional solidarity with the spectacle's overall authority and the society it expresses makes it their duty, and their pleasure, never to diverge from that authority whose majesty must not be threatened.” We in Dublin got advance warning on the SOA/CIA/IMF (7) coup which has just taken place in Venezuela from Greg Palast during his recent public lecture in NCAD. He had spoken to Chavez just before the lecture and he was saying to Palast at the time that he wouldn’t last a month. Well he lasted a little longer. But just a little. Just long enough for the peaking of the Israel/Palestine conflict to provide something to occupy and divert the attention of the World’s press while a cynical anti-democratic coup to took place with minimal and mindbendingly uncritical reporting on the part of the World’s mainstream media. A military coup supporting a general strike organized by business and employers associations – Yeah Right! Oil barons protecting their supply and keeping the prices of those barrels down rings truer. Just like Iraq, just like Afghanistan. Chavez was a popular and democratically elected leader but he dared to raise a defiant finger to the Washington consensus. He began to make the Oil work for the citizens of his country. So, as so often in recent history in Latin America, he had to be taken care of. He resigned we are told repeatedly – but did he? So where’s the letter? Why can’t he be accessed for an interview? Why no public statement? (6) Cuban representatives at the UN(1) have made no bones about bluntly stating that the whole affair was stage managed by those notorious lovers of freedom – the CIA (1). Other sources point to the hand of the notorious graduates of the (recently renamed for PR purposes) School of the Americas (3). The IMF has stated in recent times that it was prepared to support and finance an alternative administration if one presented itself. Why did they all want rid of him? The story will not remain so simple for long. Already strong opposition (4) to the coup is growing in the country. 150,000 on the streets does not represent a democratic people’s uprising in a city of 3,000,000 and a country of 30,000,000. For breaking news on this check out Narconews.com for the best independent journalism in Latin America and beyond on the subject. 1) http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=170975&group=webcast 2) http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=170970&group=webcast 3) http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=170970&group=webcast 4) http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=170967&group=webcast 5) http://www.indymedia.ie/cgi-bin/newswire.cgi?id=1884 6)http://www.narconews.com/pressbriefingvday3.html (7) http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=171008&group=webcast (8) http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=170990&group=webcast (9) http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=170973&group=webcast
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (1 of 1)
Jump To Comment: 1Reuters. 13 April 2002. Iran Sees U.S. Behind Chavez's Venezuela
Ouster.
TEHRAN -- Iran, which had built up friendly ties with deposed
Venezuelan
President Hugo Chavez, said Saturday the fiery populist's ouster by the
military was in part hatched by the United States.
[N.B.] State television said Washington was concerned that Venezuela --
the world's No 4 oil exporter and a leading supplier of petroleum
products to the U.S. -- would heed a call by Iran to cut oil supplies
for one month to countries that support Israel.
Noting that Chavez's foreign policies "were contrary to American
interests in Latin America" it said the flamboyant ex-paratrooper's
fall
"reminds one of the American-backed coup by General Augusto Pinochet in
Chile in 1973."
Chavez had visited fellow OPEC-member Iran and was warmly received in a
country strongly opposed to Washington since the 1979 Islamic
Revolution
and recently labeled by President Bush part of "an axis of evil."
The White House, clearly pleased by Chavez's departure, said it did not
consider his ouster a coup and said the Venezuelan people rose up for
the protection of democracy.
But for Iranian television, "the most important reason for America's
concern was the issue of oil...There was an increasing probability that
Venezuela would also support the stoppage" of supplies, suggested by
Tehran.
Iranian newspapers also saw the American hand in Chavez's downfall.
"Some reports indicate the United States gave the green light for the
coup d'etat and that Chavez was deposed because of his avowed
anti-American policies," wrote Resallat, a conservative daily.
For Jomhooriye Eslami, Chavez's ouster was "the culmination of a
concerted effort in which the United States played no small part. The
deposing of a government that favored a policy aimed at cutting the
production and raising the price of oil is no accident."
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .