|
|
Blog Feeds
Anti-Empire
The SakerA bird's eye view of the vineyard
Lockdown Skeptics
Voltaire NetworkVoltaire, international edition
|
Shannon mentioned in Dail yesterday national |
miscellaneous |
news report
 Thursday November 14, 2002 12:09 by kahootz
 (From subscription Irish Times today) Shannon arrangements unchanged - Cowen The Minister for Foreign Affairs, Mr Cowen, said the Government "will continue to review" the granting of such facilities "in the light of developments". He told Labour's Mr Michael D. Higgins that the Government had received "no request for the use of military aircraft in the context of Iraq". All usage of Shannon "is in respect of the resolutions that have been cited already". Mr Higgins asked: "Why are they flying to Kuwait for the international campaign against terrorism?" Mr Cowen said "it is the view of the Department that what we are seeing here is applications being made for military aircraft in line with existing arrangements and we do not see any reason to change them." He said the landing of foreign military aircraft at Shannon was being done in compliance "with the normal orders". He also said any move to military action against Iraq should be considered by the UN Security Council. The Minister conceded that there was no international consensus on the legal validity of a pre-emptive strike in the event of a material breach by Iraq of last week's UN resolution. Ireland's interpretation of the resolution was that "we should come back to the Security Council" for authorisation of military action. But some countries believed a mandate for military action existed based on resolutions already approved. Mr Gay Mitchell, Fine Gael's foreign affairs spokesman, called on the Minister to ensure he came back to the Dáil to seek the consent of the House before Ireland's ambassador to the UN "is instructed regarding any declaration of war or punitive action against Iraq". The Minister said the parliament "may use its authority for the purpose of having a debate to hold the Government to account", but there was no legal basis for the suggestion that the Government was required to seek prior approval in relation to a Security Council resolution.
|
printable version
Digg this
del.icio.us
Furl
Reddit
Technorati
Facebook
Gab
Twitter
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (2 of 2)
Jump To Comment: 1 2What difference does it make that "Shannon was mentioned in the Dail"? Don't expect anything too dramatic to come from that ossified institution. Let's mention Shannon on the streets and get more demos going there. People power is needed.
a few TDs have been trying for about 13 months to raise the issue of Shannon in the Dail.
It's nothing to throw a party about, but given how far behind public opinion the Dail is, it shows that the Govt have no credible reply, even in the Dail where they hold the best cards.
small cracks are better than no cracks at all.
take it as a sign that we have to keep up the pressure.