Cops welcomed with smoke bombs and flares Dublin Pride 19:57 Jul 14 0 comments Gemma O'Doherty: The speech you never heard. I wonder why? 05:28 Jan 15 0 comments A Decade of Evidence Demonstrates The Dramatic Failure Of Globalisation 15:39 Aug 23 1 comments Thatcher's " blind eye" to paedophilia 15:27 Mar 12 0 comments Total Revolution. A new philosophy for the 21st century. 15:55 Nov 17 0 comments more >>Blog Feeds
Anti-EmpireNorth Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi? Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi? Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi? ?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi? US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty
The SakerA bird's eye view of the vineyard
Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Public InquiryInterested in maladministration. Estd. 2005RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Human Rights in IrelandPromoting Human Rights in Ireland |
One Deep Cultural Anomaly
national |
miscellaneous |
news report
Tuesday September 24, 2002 22:03 by Graham Caswell - Green Party caswell at indigo dot ie
Our world is organised to facilitate unsustainable behaviour. It is a fact that most people in the 'developed' countries act in an environmentally destructive way. They drive cars, use detergents, eat meat at every meal... Most people don't compost, don't use low-energy lightbulbs and don't think twice about jetting half way around the world for a holiday. They aspire to a large, well-heated house with many appliances and a car for everybody in the family. Worse still, they set the example in lifestyle to the other 80% of the world's people. Moreover, most people don't vote green. They aren't members of Earthwatch, or Greenpeace, or any other environmental or social-justice NGO. They don't write to their political representatives or newspaper editors on environmental matters and they don't protest unless an issue affects them directly and immediately. Ireland now supports three celebrity gossip magazines, several car magazines, and many other publications covering a variety of topics. Yet, in the richest time in Irish history, when environmental issues from Climate Change to Waste Disposal to the Collapse of Fisheries are becoming harder and harder to avoid, Earthwatch magazine- the country's main environmental journal - depends on an under-resourced FAS scheme for its survival. This is not just an Irish issue. Around the world the fortunes of Man. United (Plc.!) are far, far more important than any rain forest or coral reef. The Oscars, or the Grammys, or a single sporting event will attract much more attention and coverage than the Nitrogen Bomb or the state of the planet's ozone layer. Average people can recognise hundreds of brands, but only a few plants or trees. Children don't realise that 'chicken' is the body parts of dead hens, or that 'pork' is pieces of a dead pig. The conditions in which these animals exist is practically unmentionable in polite company and the environmental effects of their misery is as far removed from the consciousness of those who eat them as awareness of the sweatshops of Asia are to those who pride themselves on their stylishness. Amidst this profound apathy and ignorance more money is spent in a single advertising campaign promoting cola-flavoured sugar-water than is in Greenpeace's entire annual budget. Every day, much, much more money is spent promoting a single brand of car than is spent raising awareness about climate change. Far, far more is spent encouraging children to eat Big Macs than is spent promoting healthy eating. More is spent promoting alcohol than on treating alcoholism. Overall, hundreds of billions of pounds are spent each year to promote the message that happiness and satisfaction and purpose in life can be found in cars, or sugar-water, or cosmetics, or fast food. Practically the entire media is dependent on consumerism for it's Environmental destruction may have been around for millennia, but it has drastically accelerated since the enlightenment, the industrial revolution and the rise of corporate capitalism. In the last hundred years we have already seriously damaged the ozone layer, wiped out much indigenous forest, made many thousands of species extinct, introduced many toxins into the biosphere, seriously damaged most of the world's fisheries, destabilised the climate - and on and on. This isn't a technological problem; it is a cultural problem. We have become powerful beyond our wisdom and have enmeshed ourselves in a self-referencing, commercially-mediated worldview that is drifting further and further away from the physical and biological reality of the natural lifeforms and systems with which we share this planet and on which we depend. We do not have 100,000 years to stabilise our relationship with the rest of life - or 1000 years. Perhaps we have 10 years, perhaps we have 100 years. There is certainly reason for a sense of urgency. It is important to recognise that the many, many forms of environmental degradation are merely symptoms of one deep cultural anomaly. In the evolution of our modern, global culture we have taken a wrong turn and now the behaviour that flows from that culture is unsustainable – even unsurvivable. As a group, we value some things that we should not value - and we fail to value some things that we should value; we do things that we should not do - and fail to do things that we should; and we believe things that are not true - and ignore truths that are staring us in the face. In any context greater than a few centuries what most of us see as 'normalcy' is, in fact, a gross anomaly. Moreover our social institutions - the very 'system' itself - have grown and developed in accordance with our cultural miss-step. Many people's livelihoods depend on continuing and promoting some of the most socially and environmentally destructive behaviour ever seen on this planet. The structure and functioning of our media is similarly biased. A privileged number of people - generally the most powerful and influential individuals in our society- derive great advantage from the status quo. Our world is organised to facilitate unsustainable behaviour. What is to be done in the face of this big-picture predicament? Well, some things seem obvious. Individuals who care and are aware should constantly work to lessen their own footprint. Like-minded people should work together and direct their frustrations towards those who promote destruction rather than those who imperfectly search for solutions. The 'Green Movement' must be wedded to the truth and must be uncompromising regarding the necessity for social justice. Those who chose a sustainable path should be celebrated, and those who promote unsustainable behaviour condemned. 'Saving the world' from the unsustainability of modern global culture and behaviour involves changing the minds and hearts of millions. It involves changing the way people see their world and themselves. The tools are words, images, song, stories, symbols and media and, above all, personal example. |
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (3 of 3)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3http://www.worldsocialist-cwi.org/eng/2002/08/19environment.html
you should read this short pamphlet, published just before the 'earth summit'. if this isn't in-depth enough for you, then you can also write off for a book called 'Global Warning' by Martin Cock and Bill Hopwood (check http://www.socialistparty.org.uk).
[repost from http://www.indymedia.ie/cgi-bin/newswire.cgi?id=11699&start=240 in response to the article referred to]
It's an interesting article. Basically it was written in preparation for the Johannesburg summit and gives an overview of the global environmental crisis. While there's a brief explanation of the Green 'no-growth' perspective the author basically argues that the green perspective is not sufficiently 'anti-capitalist'.
The last part of the article presents a vision of 'eco-socialism' which, according to the author, is still marginalised in the Green movement, but "as the total inability of capitalist solutions to solve environmental problems become more apparent, interest in it will inevitably grow". I suppose it depends on what you mean by a capitalist solution.
The article is interesting because it is a detailed look at the green movement from an ideologically socialist perspective. However there's a few problems with it - not least that two of the most important books concerning 'no growth' or 'steady state' economics are ignored, even in the references. If you are really interested in green economics see EF Shumacher's 'Small is Beautiful' ( see http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0099225611 ) and Richard Douthwaite's 'The Growth Illusion' ( see http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/1870098765 ).
While there's a lot of similarities in the perspectives and motivations of socialists and greens there's some important differences as well. Greens would be less into 'one size fits all' solutions, for example, and would be much more supportive of small business and enterprise.
Personally I think that socialism and capitalism have a lot in common - big western ideas of how everybody should live. The green perspective is a bit more natural.
There are however many other green groupings including
London Greenpeace which split from Greenpeace International over many questions including Direct Action campaigns and funding issues.
Massive heavily advert maintained groups suc has Greenpeace International often at the individual level do little more than salve a bad conscience or dampen a nascent political activism by accepting a small donation and sending brochures.
That is not to underestimate the work of Greenpeace international activists or the efficacy of their campaigns, but it is to remind the public that there are many very effective small groupings out there who work well.
London Greenpeace were significant in supporting two heroes of our movement the MC LIBEL duo through their long struggle and beyond in the aftermath of that struggle.
In Ireland there are many small groupings that deserve mention and respect and thanks.
Western Civilisation is indoubtedly irrationally set upon the road to destruction but reasons for that will better be found in marxist anaysis of late capitalism such as the works of Fromm or Adorno. (for starters).
As such I would seek to illuminate some to the essential co-study of late "critical marxist" thought as well as "late eco-thought".
Reclaim the Streets!