A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog.? We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below).?
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by
The Saker >>
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
?Ulez Architect? and 20mph Zone Supporter Appointed New Transport Secretary Fri Nov 29, 2024 17:38 | Will Jones
One of the 'architects of Ulez' and a supporter of 20mph zones has been appointed as the new Transport Secretary?after Louise Haigh's resignation, raising fears the anti-car measures may become national policy.
The post ‘Ulez Architect’ and 20mph Zone Supporter Appointed New Transport Secretary appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Assisted Suicide Set to Be Legalised as MPs Back Bill Fri Nov 29, 2024 15:07 | Will Jones
MPs have voted in favour of legalising assisted suicide as Labour's massive majority allowed the legislation to clear its first hurdle in the House of Commons by 330 votes to 275.
The post Assisted Suicide Set to Be Legalised as MPs Back Bill appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Australia Passes Landmark Social Media Ban for Under-16s Fri Nov 29, 2024 13:43 | Rebekah Barnett
Australia is the first country to ban social media for under-16s after a landmark bill passed that critics have warned is rushed and a Trojan horse for Government Digital ID as everyone must now verify their age.
The post Australia Passes Landmark Social Media Ban for Under-16s appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Is Banning the Burps of Bullocks Worth Risking Our Bollocks? Fri Nov 29, 2024 11:32 | Ben Pile
Is banning the burps of bullocks worth risking our bollocks? That the question posed by the decision to give Bovaer to cows to 'save the planet', says Ben Pile, after evidence suggests a possible risk to male fertility.
The post Is Banning the Burps of Bullocks Worth Risking Our Bollocks? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The Ed Miliband Phenomenon ? What Makes ?Britain?s Most Dangerous Man? Tick? Fri Nov 29, 2024 09:00 | Tilak Doshi
With his zeal for impoverishing Britain and his imperviousness to inconvenient facts, Ed Miliband is Britain's most dangerous man, says Tilak Doshi. What makes fanatics like him tick?
The post The Ed Miliband Phenomenon ? What Makes ?Britain?s Most Dangerous Man? Tick? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lockdown Skeptics >>
national |
miscellaneous |
other press
Saturday December 12, 2009 01:53
by former green voter
printable version
Digg this
del.icio.us
Furl
Reddit
Technorati
Facebook
Gab
Twitter
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (5 of 5)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5A wretched man contorted, bending over backword to justify his unjustifable actions.
I have no sympathy for these losers.
Should be called the "Yellow Party"
http://soundcloud.com/ihasaflavour/fuck-you-deputy-stag...er1-1
The democratic electecd Dail Eireann runs Ireland.
Not......self servig,....well paid . public sector workers.
.
.
I really shouldn't be having to explain your sort of political system but perhaps you are putting blame in the wrong place.?
It is inherent in the form "parliamentary democracy" that unless some single party has a majority, and that depends on the people, not the parties, that "the govenrment" has to be formed by a coalition of parties. That means that representatives form the coalition "in power" will sometimes have to support measures that they and their party would not support were they:
a) a majority party able to rule on their own
b) not part of the governing coalition.
Let's look more closely at "b" (since "a" clearly is not an option at the present time).
When/why is this choice made (when is it the right choice)
a) One's party is about what is so different from what most of the people want (one's supporters are a small minority) that the whole exercise of running is simply to give a VOICE to this difference. To represent the interest groups supporting this party with at least words even though lacking enough clout to get ANYTHING that the people of these interest groups want. In other words, a form of protest.
b) There are other parties "in opposition" with whom with with a few more seats won collectively it might be possible to replace the ruling coalition with another coalition AND one has some reasonable expectation that in this coaltion there would be less times having to support measures that one's own party finds distasteful.
See -- the problem doesn't ever go away entirely. Not unless "the people" become surprisingly unified, everybody wants the same thing. Highly unlikely.
What I am saying here is that you have to evaluate "supporting measures that the party would not/should not want to support" against alternatives. ARE there alternative coaltion possibilities that would reduce the amount of thime that this was happening. Or is this a situation where unfortunately the best of the bad? Notice I am NOT arguing that it is, just that you should be trying to make the case that there IS some better alternative. Otherwise what you are arguing against is not the behavior of this party but the sort of "democratic system" you choose.