New Events

International

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb

offsite link The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog.? We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below).?

offsite link What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

offsite link The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by

The Saker >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Promoting Human Rights in Ireland

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link Convicted Terrorist Sues Landlord of ?Saracen?s Head Pub Because Sign Offends Him Tue Dec 17, 2024 11:00 | Toby Young
A man convicted of inciting terrorism by spreading Jihadist propaganda is suing a pub called The Saracen's Head, claiming the sign will incite violence against Muslims. Not a Babylon Bee story!
The post Convicted Terrorist Sues Landlord of ?Saracen?s Head Pub Because Sign Offends Him appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Dale Vince?s Ministry of Eco Education Preaches Climate Crisis to Seven Year-Olds Tue Dec 17, 2024 09:00 | Chris Morrison
Dale Vince's Ministry of Eco Education preaches about the climate crisis to seven year-old schoolchildren. Shouldn't we teach kids how to read and count instead of scaring them witless, asks Chris Morrison.
The post Dale Vince’s Ministry of Eco Education Preaches Climate Crisis to Seven Year-Olds appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Why Did Excess Deaths Not Drop After Covid? Tue Dec 17, 2024 07:00 | Nick Rendell
In 2020 Asian countries were praised for their pandemic response. But since 2021 they've seen soaring death rates, while the UK is still running hot. Why did deaths not drop once the 'pandemic' was over, asks Nick Rendell.
The post Why Did Excess Deaths Not Drop After Covid? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link News Round-Up Tue Dec 17, 2024 00:53 | Richard Eldred
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Lucy Letby?s Lawyers Say They Have ?New Evidence? that ?Significantly? Undermines Her Convictions Af... Mon Dec 16, 2024 20:00 | Will Jones
Lucy Letby?s lawyers have said they have new evidence that "significantly" undermines her convictions after a key medical witness changed his mind about three baby deaths. They urge the Court of Appeal to reopen the case.
The post Lucy Letby’s Lawyers Say They Have “New Evidence” that “Significantly” Undermines Her Convictions After Key Expert Witness “Changes his Mind” on Three Baby Deaths appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Israel's Shame

category international | anti-war / imperialism | other press author Wednesday October 10, 2007 13:40author by Miriam Report this post to the editors

Birth and death at the checkpoint

A doctor gives an account of the condition of the Palestinian people.

Le the usual Israeli state defenders say what they like, they can only seem evil and twisted in the light of Dr Asad Khan' s report from Palestine. A quote:

"At Huwwara checkpoint near Nablus, we saw a queue extending for half a kilometre out of the cramped shed and into the merciless sun. One by one, the Palestinians were called forward and their documents inspected. Some got through, others were turned back. Depending on the mood of the soldier. The explanation given for the checkpoints- 'security'- is a lie, as the barriers mostly stand between Palestinian cities and towns, not between Palestine and Israel.
Israel, through its system of 700 checkpoints, roadblocks and earth mounds in the West Bank strangles the Palestinians' freedom of movement. 68 women have been forced to give birth at checkpoints since the year 2000 ( www.ifamericansknew.org). Half of the babies involved have died, as have 4 of the women. Many of the babies born have suffered irreversible brain damage. Imagine being the helpless husband or son of a woman forced to endure the pain of labour on the baking earth at a checkpoint- with an armed soldier looking on- and you will begin to understand how suicide bombers are born. "

http://www.medialens.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=8971#8971

author by Noelpublication date Fri Oct 12, 2007 16:34author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Imagine being the helpless husband or son of a woman murdered by a suicide bomber and you will begin to understand how necessary checkpoints are.

author by Michael Martinpublication date Fri Oct 12, 2007 21:38author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Islamic terrorist have a long-standing record of employing female suicide bombers See wikipedia link below. Can you therefore really blame Israeli soldiers for not relaxing the control for women on the checkpoints? Also, it is well known that people often have to wait several hours to be dealt with on the checkpoints. Therefore it simply borders on utter stupidity for women to make such a journey when on the brink of giving birth. Don't blame the Israelis for the unfortunate death of newly born babies and pregnant women. But instead blame those terrorists for forcing the Israelis to create these checkpoints in the first place.

Related Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_suicide_bomber
author by widow's sonpublication date Fri Oct 12, 2007 23:53author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I was standing back from this, but then Martin's comment & link to wikipedia got me going. There has never been a female suicide bomber at the checkpoint. The most female suicide bombers presented themselves during the the al-Aqsa Intifada. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Aqsa_Intifada There were 6 of them. The first was Wafa Idris she died & killed one man in Jerusalem 2002 January http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wafa_Idris her death prompted this BBC article which reflects widespread consternation at the time & also widespread condemnation amongst muslims - on the mystery that a female would don the belt. Most of the examples in the source you gave did not die through belts.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1788694.stm

The most emotive from a geopolitical standpoint was Ayat al Akhras March 2002 - emotive in that it at least caused even Bush to reflect "“When an 18-year-old Palestinian girl is induced to blow herself up and in the process kills a 17-year-old Israeli girl, the future itself is dying, the future of the Palestinian people and the future of the Israeli people.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayat_al-Akhras

The last female suicide bomber to use a belt was in 2003 was Hanadi Jaradat who died in 2003. She killed 21 people. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanadi_Jaradat

The intifida to which their deaths and murders belong saw 704 Israeli civilians killed by Palestinians; 321 Israeli security force personnel killed by Palestinians in contrast to 4,267 Palestinians killed by Israeli security forces;
41 Palestinians killed by Israeli civilians;
541 Palestinians killed by Palestinians.

by careful examination of the source you present and the links to that source (as in reading the page properly) your "once bitten twice shy" thing rings hollow.
___________________________________

The IDF can scan for explosives at the checkpoint. They have the technology, for the widow's son, even the Myanmar Burmese airport has the technology.

They don't. That leads me to only one working conclusion - They do not engage in a military sound application of resources and equipment but rather in a strategy of psychological warfare, which is in ordinary terms - Terror.

See that? Jesus or the J word didn't come into it.
Miriam has offered us an excellent piece. After considering its comments let us ask the "pro-IDF" lot to ask that in future Israeli security forces use the equipment they have & not put their conscripts at risk or terrorise the Palestinians to whom this checkpoint is an utter imposition. That fair? Or we can go on slicing the baba in two.

Thanks Mim.

author by 2 States - publication date Sat Oct 13, 2007 00:49author address author phone Report this post to the editors

These checkpoints greatly predate the initial suicide bombers. Israel has unjustly occupied Palestinian land since the six day war in 1967. The first suicide bombing did not occur until 1993.

Islamic extremism is not the cause of suicide bombers. Anti-Semitism is not the cause of suicide bombers. Desperate human beings facing apartheid with no defence against a US backed military, is one of the reasons for suicide bombers.

author by wobmonglepublication date Sun Oct 14, 2007 00:35author address author phone Report this post to the editors


I’m somewhat bemused after reading Martins post because it leads me to assume that Israeli checkpoints operate under an "if she floats, she's a witch" philosophy. So, under this reasoning, if a heavily pregnant woman approaches them to pass through to deliver her baby she will always be refused because of the risk she could be carrying explosives. The fact that a security guard would stand unemotive at their post while a woman gave birth in front of them- or watch mother or baby die afterwards because of the fear she is a ticking time bomb does not seem a rational reason for allowing this to happen.

Secondly, the possible implication to my mind after reading this that there is even the slightest possibility that a pregnant woman would use her status to pass through the border with the intention of being a suicide bomber is one I do not even want to contemplate. It is difficult despite facts and statistics to get past that the situation in Palestine is a case study of the oppressed becoming the oppressors. The only rational conclusion I can come to for the situation described by Dr Khan in Miriam's post is that an active policy of repression and discrimination is in place by the Israeli government towards the people of Palestine and no vindication of this policy can possibly hold water in any individual with even the most basic semblance of a functioning conscience

author by Nodinpublication date Mon Oct 15, 2007 13:52author address author phone Report this post to the editors

"But instead blame those terrorists for forcing the Israelis to create these checkpoints in the first place."

These checkpoints are in the occupied territories. I suppose the logic is that the "terrorists" forced the Israelis to build apartment blocks and semi-detached housing there too.

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2024 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy