Upcoming Events

National | Miscellaneous

no events match your query!

New Events

National

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Spirit of Contradiction

offsite link On The Decline and Fall of The American Empire and Socialism Sat Jan 26, 2019 01:52 | S. Duncan

offsite link What is Dogmatism and Why Does It Matter? Wed Mar 21, 2018 08:10 | Sylvia Smith

offsite link The Case of Comrade Dallas Mon Mar 19, 2018 19:44 | Sylvia Smith

offsite link Review: Do Religions Evolve? Mon Aug 14, 2017 19:54 | Dara McHugh

offsite link Fake News: The Epistemology of Media Wed Jun 07, 2017 11:52 | Gavin Mendel-Gleason

Spirit of Contradiction >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link Catholic Church: Dark influence still active

offsite link Tom Parlon launches new career in comedy Anthony

offsite link Presumption of innocence does not universally apply in Ireland Anthony

offsite link The poor standard of Irish political journalism Anthony

offsite link RTE bias: A failure of objective journalism Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Russia-India-China share a room with a view Mon Jul 01, 2019 16:17 | amarynth
by Pepe Escobar : Posted with permission The most important trilateral at the G20 in Osaka was confined to a shoddy environment unworthy of Japan?s unrivaled aesthetic minimalism. Japan excels

offsite link Expensive and Humiliating. Poland Bought Gas in the USA (Ruslan Ostashko) Sun Jun 30, 2019 20:20 | The Saker
TRANSCRIPT: An extra billion cubic meters of absolutely unnecessary, and highly costing gas, the president of the US has managed to sell it to Polish nationalists. The full beauty of

offsite link President Putin?s Press Conference Following G20 Osaka Summit 2019 (English subs) Sun Jun 30, 2019 19:28 | The Saker
Please make sure to press “cc” to see the English language subs!

offsite link Nasrallah: a War against Iran would Destroy Israel, the Saud and US Hegemony Sun Jun 30, 2019 19:26 | The Saker
Nasrallah: a War against Iran would Destroy Israel, the Saud and US Hegemony Speech by Hezbollah Secretary General Sayed Hassan Nasrallah on Friday, May 31, 2019, on the occasion of

offsite link Glimpses of Europe Sun Jun 30, 2019 19:17 | The Saker
by Jimme Moglia for the Saker Blog Back from a trip to Europe, I sketch down a few notes and observations. They are personal, and the patient reader may object

The Saker >>

Human Rights in Ireland
A Blog About Human Rights

offsite link China?s LGBT Community Mon Apr 15, 2019 19:19 | Human Rights

offsite link Declaration of Human Rights at Sea Mon Apr 08, 2019 07:31 | Human Rights

offsite link NZ Watchdog On Limits Of Free Speech Thu Mar 28, 2019 11:44 | Human Rights

offsite link US Abortion Restrictions Violating The Human Rights Of Women Thu Mar 14, 2019 15:33 | Human Rights

offsite link Human Rights Watch Urges the Human Rights Council to Renew and Strengthen Mandate of UN Commission Tue Mar 12, 2019 21:51 | Human Rights

Human Rights in Ireland >>

In America the Poor are also Hungry and Forgotten

category national | miscellaneous | news report author Tuesday March 05, 2002 18:17author by metropolitan InjunReport this post to the editors

Back in America, poor people are also going hungry. USA Today's cover story for its October 30 edition carries headings proclaiming "Tough times for laid-off, low-income workers," "After attacks, the jobless rate climbs, and assistance is harder to come by for the working poor" and "Unemployment claims at 10-year high." The story reports that unemployment was up from 5.5 million in September 2000 to 7 million in September 2001.

Haziza, a 12 year old girl from Kabul, Afghanistan, helped find her mother and baby brother dead in the rubble of their home on the first night of the U.S. bombing in early October.

In the N.Y. Times on October 30, from Peshawar, Pakistan, Barry Bearak reports that Haziza said she recalls two still bodies, "their faces crushed and covered with blood." Beneath a numbingly depressing sub-head of "Bombs, death, flight, and now a new life in squalor," Bearak relates how Haziza now lives with her father and older brother in "the wretchedness of ...one of Peshawar's many squatter camps that teem with Afghan refugees" who have fled the bombing of their homeland. "Haziza sleeps on the dank concrete of their single room,...Around them is poverty's familiar cavalcade--naked children wallowing in the mud, grown men despairing in idleness, chickens foraging in garbage heaps, sewage odors spoiling each breeze."

Hugh Pope of the Wall Street Journal reports on October 30 from the Makaki refugee camp in Afghanistan about the refugees who have little sympathy for the Taliban. However, a refugee named Abdulaziz, who arrived yesterday with six families of relatives after 20 days on the move, said, "We don't believe in America, the people are the target. For every two Taliban they kill, they kill 20 of us. The Taliban have plenty to eat,...but the people go hungry."

Back in America, poor people are also going hungry. USA Today's cover story for its October 30 edition carries headings proclaiming "Tough times for laid-off, low-income workers," "After attacks, the jobless rate climbs, and assistance is harder to come by for the working poor" and "Unemployment claims at 10-year high." The story reports that unemployment was up from 5.5 million in September 2000 to 7 million in September 2001.

With more than 350,000 jobs lost since September 11, economists are predicting that as many as 1.5 million more jobs might be lost in the next three quarters. This will sorely test the efficacy of the 1996 "welfare reform" as some welfare recipients are becoming ineligible as businesses are laying off folks.

Some states have even reduced the 5-year lifetime cap on how long folks can receive welfare. Social service support agencies like food banks have been strained due to donations to special emergency relief funds for September 11.

Professionals have been losing their jobs and unskilled workers are at a disadvantage in vying for jobs with them. Unfortunately, unemployment benefits are woefully inadequate with most of them being below the poverty level. Fewer than 40% of jobless Americans received unemployment benefits last year.

The Wall Street Journal reports that according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, big corporations laid off 117,000 workers last month after September 11. While poor and working class people are being laid off by big corporations and neglected by government, the U.S. House of Representatives gave huge tax breaks to big business at the expense of fired workers in the economic "stimulus" bill they passed last week.

The $100 billion bill is mainly a big corporate tax boondoggle that would speed up depreciation schedules for businesses and repeal the corporate alternative minimum tax that has required corporations with heavy deductions and tax breaks to pay at least some federal income tax.

The corporate alternative minimum tax repeal would give the corporations $24.4 billion next year with Ford Motor Co. getting $2.4 billion, IBM-$1.4 billion, General Motors-$832 million, General Electric-$671 million, Chevron-$314 million, Enron-$254 million, K-Mart--$102 million, U.S. Steel-$39 million, and Kroger-$9 million.

Commenting on the 216-214, mostly party-line vote, House Minority Leader Dick Gephardt said, "This bill is a giant tax giveaway to the largest corporations" and that "The workers who have lost their jobs get crumbs from this bill." Others said the Republicans were rewarding their largest donors.

This piece of trickle-down federal government largesse for the rich now goes to the U.S. Senate where, hopefully, the bill will be amended to cut back on the big breaks for the corporations and concentrate more on increasing unemployment benefits and subsidizing health care coverage for unemployed workers. South Carolina Congressman Lindsey Graham voted for the corporate giveaway and he will be endorsed on Thursday by retiring Strom Thurmond to take Thurmond's seat in the Senate.

South Carolina is a bottom tier state in per capita income and is facing rising unemployment, declining tax revenues, and budget cuts that will affect such vital services as health care for the poor and public education. Graham has already raised more than $2,000,000.00 for his campaign for the U.S. Senate with much of it coming from the big corporate interests who will benefit the most from the stimulus package.

I wonder what would happen if some poor, laid-off workers from South Carolina or raggedly refugees from Afghanistan showed up to dine at the $1,000.00-per-head luncheon of the Republican Senatorial Committee where Graham will receive the blessing of Strom Thurmond to take his fabled seat in that august body?

L´Etat, une fiction immaginaire...c´est tout!

http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=144679&group=webcast
http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=144676&group=webcast
http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=144668&group=webcast
http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=144665&group=webcast
http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=144660&group=webcast
http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=144657&group=webcast
http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=144654&group=webcast

State controls, because they are afraid! Afraid of what? That you copy them....

Preventing Terrorism , just say the truth now!

On April 4, 1967, exactly a year before he was assassinated, the Reverend Dr.
Martin Luther King summed up what many feel provoked the September 11
attacks: "the greatest purveyor of violence on the planet -my own government."

But we should not feel guilty! The government's militarism does not represent the
people! From Howard Zinn's "A People's History of the United States", pages 545
and 558: "By 1975, public opinion polls showed that '65 percent of Americans
oppose military aid abroad because they feel it allows dictatorships to maintain
control over their population.'" But Congress has given military aid to the Afghans
since 1980 and as recently as May of this year sent the Taliban $43 million to "fight
drugs."

The 1975 polls quantify what President Eisenhower stated: "The people want
peace; indeed, I believe they want peace so badly that the governments will just
have to step aside and let them have it." The government's military policies are in
the control of the weapons manufacturers, the biggest business on earth according
to the UN Research Institute. They can buy the most congressmen, who then vote to
keep them number one. Eisenhower warned, in his farewell address to the nation:
"We must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or
unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of
misplaced power exists and will persist."

The week following the 9/11 events the stock market suffered its worst decline
since 1940, but if you owned stock in weapons manufacturers you'd have made a
killing: the seven top gaining stocks (by percentage and by points) that week were
all military (details on request).

There is a serious and comprehensive proposal to rectify this and other failures of
the government to represent us. It was developed by one of the key people who
brought peace in Vietnam. U.S. Senator Mike Gravel in 1971 single-handedly
filibustered the Senate until they agreed to end the draft after 2 more years. At great
personal and professional risk, he officially released the Pentagon Papers which
exposed the lies and duplicity bulwarking our Vietnam policy. He was the first to
oppose nuclear power. His organization Philadelphia II is preparing an amendment
to the Constitution to permit We the People to propose and vote for the laws we
want, in parallel to existing legislative bodies. Then we can vote to change the
government's wicked military policies which arm our enemies and make us all the
target of the oxymoronic "holy war."

This is not going to be "instant democracy" or even the "fast-track" which the
President wants from Congress for trade issues. Our proposal includes extensive
hearings, deliberations by randomly-selected "citizen juries" and public information.
Claims by Washington Post uber-pundit David Broder that the initiative process in
24 US States is in the pockets of big money are largely false. The only academic
studies of this show quite the opposite. See http://Vote.org/gerber. Most problems
with initiatives are caused by the limitations imposed by the legislatures, which our
proposal addresses.

We're not going to beg Congress for this amendment making them share power
with us! (Gravel and others tried that in 1977, to no avail.) We're going to put the
Democracy Amendment in the Constitution the way We the People originally
ratified the Constitution -ourselves. This is called First Principles, known to few
besides constitutional lawyers. We are convening a symposium to address this and
other matters on February 16-18 in historic Williamsburg, Virginia. All details are on
our web site at http://ni4d.org.

There are many other reasons for us sharing law-making power with politicians.
This way we learn responsibility instead of being treated like children --abused
children. It gives us an incentive to educate ourselves. It gives politicians some
competition and incentive to do better. 100 years of state initiatives show an
excellent track record of legislation; much was later adopted by Congress (see
http://Vote.org). The 9/11 attacks give us a new reason: If the plane which crashed
in Pennsylvania had hit the US Capitol as the hijackers apparently planned, the US
would now be without a legislative branch of government. The "Legislature of the
People" we propose would be everywhere, impossible to target.

Don't hate the government, become the government!


http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=144679&group=webcast
http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=144676&group=webcast
http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=144668&group=webcast
http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=144665&group=webcast
http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=144660&group=webcast
http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=144657&group=webcast
http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=144654&group=webcast


It is time for President Bush to stop the cheer-leading and speak the truth.

He said last Thursday, "This great nation will never be intimidated. . . . Life in
America is going forward."

Who is he trying to kid? Last Friday at Los Angeles airport I saw people trying to
check their baggage - standing in a
line that was at least 200 yards long. I stood in five separate lines to identify
myself and my carryon luggage. The
soldiers in fatigues with submachine guns reminded me of a Third World country.

The politicians live in their own unreal world, with no idea of what's happening in
America. How many times has Air
Force One been late taking off? How many security lines have Donald Rumsfeld,
Tom Ridge, and Dick Cheney stood
in?

They care little about the traveling businessman who now must cut his work short
at lunchtime in order to catch a 5pm
flight. Or the individual who must get up at 4am to catch a morning flight.

Has the President noticed the hundreds of billions of dollars being added to
federal, state, and local government
budgets - spending piled on top of previous budgets, spending that's causing
huge deficits and tax increases,
spending that's coming out of the hide of American taxpayers?

When will he say straight out: "America rules the world by force, and the price of
that is for you to pay high taxes and
live in a nation that looks more and more like a police state."

No Neutrals

President Bush says, "You're either with us or against us."

Does that mean he'll bomb neutral Switzerland - the island of freedom, privacy,
and security in the midst of socialist
Europe - if it doesn't confiscate private bank accounts and otherwise act on every
whim of our President?

Why doesn't he simply tell the truth: "America rules the world and I rule America.
You will do as I say or I'll kill your
people."

Opposition

The President keeps telling us that the world supports the American war against
Afghanistan. But the truth is that he
has bought the support of foreign leaders with your money - while public opinion
polls show people in foreign countries
are overwhelmingly opposed to American military attacks.

Why doesn't he just tell the truth: "We are destroying the last vestiges of love for
America around the world - but that's
the price we must pay for me to become powerful and popular at home beyond
my wildest dreams."

Time for the Truth

When you know some of what politicians tell you are lies, you have to wonder how
many of their other statements are
lies as well.

What I want is the truth. I'd like to think I'm mature enough to handle whatever that
may be. And I could prepare for the
future much better if someone told me the truth - instead of all this rah-rah stuff.

America isn't leading the world. Leaders lead by example. And America is
providing no example of individual liberty,
personal responsibility, small government, or peace. America rules the world.
Rulers rule by force. They may succeed
temporarily, but at an awful cost.

It is long past time for the truth - the truth that many more Americans will have to
die to satisfy the politicians' lust for
power.

Related Link: http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=144715&group=webcast
© 2001-2019 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy