A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog.? We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below).?
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader 2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by The Saker >>
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
Year After Lockdown Saw Massive Spike in Attempted Child Suicides Mon Feb 03, 2025 09:00 | Richard Eldred Lockdowns and school closures have triggered a devastating surge in child suicides and self-harm, with hospital admissions soaring and mental health disorders skyrocketing.
The post Year After Lockdown Saw Massive Spike in Attempted Child Suicides appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The Chancellor?s ?Growth Agenda? Is Full of Sound and Fury, but Signifies Nothing Mon Feb 03, 2025 07:00 | Ben Pile Ben Pile brands the Government's 'growth agenda' as empty political theatre, with wooden actors stumbling through hollow lines, written by someone who has no clue what growth actually is.
The post The Chancellor?s ?Growth Agenda? Is Full of Sound and Fury, but Signifies Nothing appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Mon Feb 03, 2025 01:19 | Richard Eldred A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Towards Post-Totalitarianism in the West: Some Warnings From the East Sun Feb 02, 2025 19:00 | Michael Rainsborough The West's moral, spiritual and political decay mirrors the post-totalitarianism of Eastern Europe, says Michael Rainsborough. The difference is today's authoritarianism wears a progressive mask.
The post Towards Post-Totalitarianism in the West: Some Warnings From the East appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Sky News Scrambles for Survival Amid Exodus of Viewers Sun Feb 02, 2025 17:00 | Richard Eldred With viewers tuning out, finances in freefall and an industry in flux, Sky News is betting everything on paywalls, podcasts and a political reset to save itself from oblivion.
The post Sky News Scrambles for Survival Amid Exodus of Viewers appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
|
Amnesty International report 2005 (complete copy of report on Ireland)
& link to country by country report.
"Last September in a makeshift camp outside El Jeniena in Darfur, Sudan, I listened to a woman describe the attack on her village by government-supported militia. So many men were killed that there were none left to bury the dead, and women had to carry out that sad task"I listened to young girls who had been raped by the militia and then abandoned by their own communities. I listened to men who had lost everything except their sense of dignity. These were ordinary, rural people. They may not have understood the niceties of “human rights”, but they knew the meaning of “justice”. They could not comprehend why the world was not moved to action by their plight.
"It was yet another example of the lethal combination of indifference, erosion and impunity that marks the human rights landscape today. Human rights are not only a promise unfulfilled, they are a promise betrayed."
:- Irene Khan, Secretary General, Amnesty International.
"the gulag of our time" ...
"
Take, for instance, the failure to move from rhetoric to reality on economic and social rights. Despite the promises in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and international human rights treaties that every person shall have the right to an adequate standard of living and access to food, water, shelter, education, work and health care, more than a billion people lack clean water, 121 million children do not go to school, most of the 25 million people suffering from HIV/AIDS in Africa have no access to health care, and half a million women die every year during pregnancy or childbirth. The poor are also more likely to be victims of crime and police brutality.
In September 2000, world leaders adopted the Millennium Declaration, with human rights as a central thread, and a set of Millennium Development Goals, which established some concrete and achievable targets by 2015. They cover issues such as HIV/AIDS, illiteracy, poverty, child and maternal mortality, and development aid. But progress on the Goals has been agonizingly slow and woefully inadequate. They cannot be achieved without a firm commitment to equal respect for all human rights – economic, social and cultural as well as civil and political.
The indifference, apathy and impunity that allow violence against millions of women to persist is shocking. In countries around the world women suffer many forms of violence including genital mutilation, rape, beatings by partners, and killings in the name of honour. Thanks to the efforts of women’s groups, there are now international treaties and mechanisms, laws and policies designed to protect women, but they fall still far short of what is required. In addition, there is a real danger of a backlash against women's human rights from conservative and fundamentalist elements.
Women’s human rights are not the only casualty of the assault on fundamental values that is shaking the human rights world. Nowhere has this been more damaging than in the efforts by the US administration to weaken the absolute ban on torture.
In 1973 AI published its first report on torture. It found that: “torture thrives on secrecy and impunity. Torture rears its head when the legal barriers against it are barred. Torture feeds on discrimination and fear. Torture gains ground when official condemnation of it is less than absolute.” The pictures of detainees in US custody in Abu Ghraib, Iraq, show that what was true 30 years ago remains true today.
Despite the near-universal outrage generated by the photographs coming out of Abu Ghraib, and the evidence suggesting that such practices are being applied to other prisoners held by the USA in Afghanistan, Guantánamo and elsewhere, neither the US administration nor the US Congress has called for a full and independent investigation.
Instead, the US government has gone to great lengths to restrict the application of the Geneva Conventions and to “re-define” torture. It has sought to justify the use of coercive interrogation techniques, the practice of holding “ghost detainees” (people in unacknowledged incommunicado detention) and the "rendering" or handing over of prisoners to third countries known to practise torture. The detention facility at Guantánamo Bay has become the gulag of our times, entrenching the practice of arbitrary and indefinite detention in violation of international law. Trials by military commissions have made a mockery of justice and due process.
The USA, as the unrivalled political, military and economic hyper-power, sets the tone for governmental behaviour worldwide. When the most powerful country in the world thumbs its nose at the rule of law and human rights, it grants a licence to others to commit abuse with impunity and audacity. From Israel to Uzbekistan, Egypt to Nepal, governments have openly defied human rights and international humanitarian law in the name of national security and “counter-terrorism”.
Sixty years ago, out of the ashes of the Second World War, a new world order came into being, putting respect for human rights alongside peace, security and development as the primary objectives of the UN. Today, the UN appears unable and unwilling to hold its member states to account."
read it all
& the Amnesty International Report 2005
at
message-
http://web.amnesty.org/report2005/message-eng
report 149 countries-
http://web.amnesty.org/report2005/index-eng
.:./€/$/%/+ .:./€/$/%/+
Ireland report :-
Covering events from January - December 2004
Allegations persisted of ill-treatment by police officers, and such allegations were not investigated impartially. Concerns about the system for reporting, recording and prosecuting racist crimes continued. Conditions in psychiatric and other institutions for mentally disabled people remained unsatisfactory. Concerns were expressed about inadequate asylum-seeking procedures and discrimination against migrant workers. Provisions to protect women escaping violence in the family were insufficient.
Background
The European Committee of Social Rights issued its conclusions on Ireland’s first report, finding 12 cases of non-conformity and requesting further information on nine cases.
The Ombudsman for Children began to investigate complaints against some public institutions.
Treatment of people with disabilities
The report of the Inspector of Mental Hospitals, published in September, criticized seriously unsatisfactory conditions for the care and treatment of patients in psychiatric hospitals, as well as gaps in provision for specific groups of vulnerable persons.
The severe shortage in psychiatric services for young people resulted in children being detained in adult psychiatric hospitals.
A National Disability Strategy was published in September. This included the Disability Bill 2004, which, despite prior government pledges, was not human rights-based, and did not adequately provide for the progressive realization of economic and social rights of people with disabilities. The Strategy and Bill were criticized by disability groups.
Policing
Allegations continued to be made of ill-treatment and other serious misconduct by members of the Garda Síochána (police force), which were not adequately investigated by the Garda Complaints Board.
The Tribunal of Inquiry (the Morris Tribunal) into complaints against Garda officers in the Donegal Division issued its first report in July. The tribunal found culpability ranging from instances of negligence to two officers corruptly orchestrating the planting of ammunition and hoax explosives. It made recommendations for improved management, recording of incidents, an urgent review of policy on the handling of informants, and greater accountability.
Seven Garda officers were tried in connection with allegations of excessive use of force during a demonstration in Dublin in May 2002. Six were acquitted and the seventh was convicted of assaulting a teacher.
The Garda Síochána Bill 2004 was published in February, setting out for the first time in statutory form the functions of a police service. It also provided for the creation of an independent Garda Ombudsman Commission to deal with complaints, with powers of investigation, arrest and detention of Garda officers. The Irish Human Rights Commission voiced concern about certain provisions of the Bill. Its recommendations included: all interviews with suspects should be video-recorded; the Ombudsman Commission should have the right to inspect any Garda station; and all investigations, except the most minor, should be conducted by the Commission.
Places of detention
Detention conditions did not comply with international standards: many prisons were overcrowded, lacked adequate sanitation facilities and had insufficient education and employment programmes. People facing deportation were detained in prisons, rather than in special detention centres. Mentally ill prisoners continued to be held in padded cells in ordinary prisons rather than in specialized institutions.
The authorities failed to establish an independent and impartial individual complaints mechanism for prisoners, as recommended by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture.
Asylum-seekers and migrants
The Immigration Act 2004 was fundamentally flawed in its lack of respect for internationally recognized human rights. There was no independent human rights monitoring of immigration controls at ports of entry.
Concern heightened throughout 2004 about the status and entitlement of migrant workers, including their rights to family reunion, and to be provided with a means of appeal against a deportation order.
The 27th Amendment to the Constitution was passed, removing the constitutional guarantee of citizenship for people born in Ireland who do not have a parent with Irish citizenship.
Family members of children with Irish citizenship, who were not themselves Irish nationals, faced the retrospective application of changed government policy to deny them automatic residency. Such families were not entitled to legal aid when applying to remain on humanitarian grounds. According to official figures, by October, 32 parents of Irish children had been deported, and another 352 had been issued with deportation orders. Concern remained that the best interests of the child were not sufficiently being taken into account in deportation decisions. In October a decision by the European Court of Justice confirmed the rights of children who are citizens of the European Union (EU) to the care and company of their parents in the EU. In December, the government announced revised arrangements for processing claims from the non-national parents of Irish children born before 1 January 2005.
Racism and equality
There were inordinate delays in developing the National Action Plan against Racism. According to the National Consultative Committee on Racism and Interculturalism, there was an increase in the number of racially motivated incidents in the aftermath of a citizenship referendum in June. A number of human rights and Traveller groups condemned the erosion of travellers’ rights and heavy-handed policing methods used in relation to Travellers. Concerns about the inadequacy of the system for reporting, recording and prosecuting racist crimes persisted.
The Equality Act 2004, ostensibly enacted to comply with EU Directives on equal treatment in relation to race, employment and gender, inadequately implemented the Directives’ requirements, and undermined existing non-discrimination provisions. Of particular concern were provisions for differential treatment of non-EU nationals in access to education and to a number of state services, discrimination on the basis of nationality in the area of immigration and residency, and the continuing failure of the government to introduce a statutory duty on public authorities to ensure greater equality.
Violence against women
Voluntary organizations supporting victims of rape, sexual assault, domestic violence, and trafficking for sexual exploitation reported that they were seriously hampered by inadequate funding. There was also concern at the shortage of shelters for women and children leaving abusive situations, and at the vulnerability of immigrant women whose legal status prevented them from seeking help.
The only conviction for marital rape secured in Ireland was overturned in October.
Arms trade
In May, the government published a review of Ireland’s export control system for military and dual-use goods. It subsequently committed itself to introducing new legislation which would include controls on arms brokering and the submission of an annual report to the Oireachtas (Irish parliament). There were gaps in the proposed legislative framework.
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (16 of 16)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16breaks down into:-
* Treatment of people with disabilities.
"what happens in ireland's mental hospitals?"
+ Policing
"why is there no investigative body?"
.:. Places of detention
"why? quite simply why is there no compaints board?"
% Asylum-seekers and migrants
"why? quite simply why was the Immigration Act 2004 was fundamentally flawed in its lack of respect for internationally recognized human rights?"
* Racism and equality
"Minister Mc Dowell you have questions to answer."
€ Violence against women
"the only conviction for marital rape was overturned"
$Arms trade.
"oh that's Harney's thing".
Amnesty international may be very good at exposing abuses, but if something is done within the law they don't have a problem. I particularly remember when the bin tax protesters were being jailed and an Amnesty member I spoke to had no problem whatsoever with the state using draconian measures against protesters as it was done in accordance with the law! Amnesty don't oppose deportations. They only opposed deportations when they are not done in accordance with the law!
Surely they oppose the law when the law has people thrown into prison for speaking out against the government. Isn't what they're all about?
' an Amnesty member I spoke to had no problem whatsoever with the state using draconian measures'
I don't think Amnesty Ireland would take up a case within Ireland - I think that's part of their rules.
Amnesty is not 'right wing' - its conservative - in the sense that it is very slow and methodical and careful, not prone to hyperventalating rhetoric. This is why they have a strong rep on Human Rights.
Amnesty are not "right-wing". They are not left-wing either -thats the point. If they decided to be left-wing, then that would mean nobody would take them seriously as an independent and impartial group.
Its not right-wing to be silent when people are arrested for breaking the law. No offense -i dont like seeing Bin Tax protesters going to jail and I'm certaionly not saying they "deserved" it, but it's beyond the remit of Amnesty to speak out on this. If they did then they would be taking a stand on the Bin Tax issue, which would mean they had become a political advocacy group which they are not.
Amnesty's strength is the fact that they stay out of politics -that way if they criticise a government they cant be accused of being partisan (actually, human rights abusers are always accusing Amnesty of being partisan, but few take these claims seriously).
Likewise with deportations -its not Amnesty's job to comment on social policy unless it violates international human rights law -to do so would be to take a political stance, and would discredit them in the eyes of most of the population.
ps before anyone says so, i know that its arguably impossible to be 100% impartial, and of course some argue that trying to be impartial is siding with the status quo, or oppression etc. But the fact remains that Amnesty's strength is their almost flawless reputation among much of the public. When Amnesty point out that a government or group are carrying out human rights abuses, then the accusations have so much more moral weight than if they were made by overtly political groups. People generally know they can trust Amnesty on an issue, and this is precisely because the organisation stakes its reputation on being impartial. To take a stance an issues like the bin tax would immediately jeopardize that reputation and make it harder for Amnesty's accusations to be taken seriously, which would only make more difficult the organisation's attempts to campaign against human rights abuses of states and other actors.
"+ Policing
"why is there no investigative body?" Posted ny anomymous. Thats his/her read on the actual report which states "The Garda Síochána Bill 2004 was published in February, setting out for the first time in statutory form the functions of a police service. It also provided for the creation of an independent Garda Ombudsman Commission to deal with complaints, with powers of investigation, arrest and detention of Garda officers. The Irish Human Rights Commission voiced concern about certain provisions of the Bill. Its recommendations included: all interviews with suspects should be video-recorded; the Ombudsman Commission should have the right to inspect any Garda station; and all investigations, except the most minor, should be conducted by the Commission."
Im curious to know just how the shortened version meets with the actual. The report actually states that the bill does not protect Garda rights and requests we get the same protection that our prisoners do. I have no problem with an ombudsman being alowwed look around a station but by searching it does that include my locker? Surely I am entitled to some privacy.
the fact is that the jailing of Bin Tax protesters was an abusive act by the State. They were peaceful protesters that were surpressed by the State. That's a fact. You right-wingers (yes right wingers) in Amnesty did not care about that. A clear example of an abuse of State power and you turned a blind eye. Similarly on deportations. This is an inhumane and abusive act. So what if there is a law passed by FF/PD! It does not take from the fact that deportations are an abuse of basic rights. Amnesty are rightwing as they claim to be "apolitical". In reality this means that you are silent fearing that your friends in the political establishments around the western world are not offended.
If a socialist government tried to impose higher taxes on wealthy sectors of society, and then rich people organised protests and campaigns of non-payment of taxes to stop this, would it be an "abusive act by the state" to bring charges against some of these for not paying?
Or imagine for a second if a left-wing government placed rubbish collection under public control, and some right-wingers were against this. What if these right-wingers then organised campaigns to block bin lorries from collecting rubbish. Would it be an "abusive act by the state" to arrest these people?
''Socialist'' get over it you`re a disgrace, i have a lot of sympathy and support for the anti bintax cause. I think the way in which protesters were treated by the authorities was a disgrace but i dont think its comparable to abuses in places like abu ghraib or guantanamo, Amnesty have a track record off standing up for some of the most abused people in the world. They have brought much attention to and have acted upon abuse by governments and TNCs, and have had success. The fact that you`re posting behind a psuedonom just proves that you`re a disingenuious secterian bigot.
is not a right Europeans have or cherish, it is indeed one of the primary differences between us and our atlantic cousins the US and Canadians who have very dissimilar societies resulting from that right.
Rather we in Europe have progressively in the interest of social order seen that right proscribed, and generally only the police or security forces are allowed to carry fire-arms, placing a most serious bourden of responsibility on them, and giving them an unfair advantage in any conflict situation where they might not respond in an appropriate ethical way.
It is odd, that this week as we reflect on the death of Carlo, we see two men shot in Ireland by members of the Gardaí, who now must live with the certain knowledge that they have killed fellow men, in the fulfillment of their work, their job.
I wonder do they or their colleagues think it was worth it?
I am of the opinion that fire-arm training is not sufficient, and that those who carry these weapons are not taught properly how to use them in a non-lethal way, firing at limbs rather than body.
anyway-
Amnesty International has called for an independent investigation into the shooting dead by gardaí of two men, one of whom was unarmed, as they tried to rob a post office in Lusk, Co Dublin. An internal Garda investigation is under way into the circumstances surrounding the shootings of Colm Griffin (33) and Eric Hopkins (24), both from Dublin's north inner city.
Amnesty International are only weak kneed liberals. Why don't they criticise the Irish government for abuses such as the jailing of bin tax protesters? Or deportations? They only make statements so that they don't get into trouble with Western governments. If a socialist government met with opposition from a counter-revolutionary right-wing group they would be dealt with in a proper manner. Prison, etc. would be an overreaction to a few right-wingers stopping bin trucks. Remember the bin truck blockades were not the isolated actions by a few lefties they were the actions of working class communities! If a few right-wingers wanted to stop bin trucks they would not be able to as they would not have the support of the working class! Amnesty are a bunch of liberal muppets in my opinon. How can you be 'sectarian' against a group that are not in the workers' movement and are not left-wing?
"I wonder do they or their colleagues think it was worth it?" - Yes.
"I am of the opinion that fire-arm training is not sufficient, and that those who carry these weapons are not taught properly how to use them in a non-lethal way, firing at limbs rather than body. " - Do you know how hard it is to be certain of hitting a leg? And that still allows him to shoot back, I wonder if the robbers would attempt non lethal means.
Al you are a shite talker and know very little about firearms.
ERU officers carry state of the art weapons and if they are not trained to use them then they shouldnt use them. Firing a weapon is an onorous responsibility and for officers who carry weapons the principles of prevention, justification, minimum force and legal requirements apply.
Firing warning shots or containing shots here was obviously not feasible but firing shots to hit which land on the torso and incapacitate was feasible, remember that a round from a SIG pistol fired at close range will incapacitate and your assertion that the assailant would still be able to fire back shows your lack of firearms knowledge, I dont you are a policeman from your shite talk,
I have been a detective for 15 years and am trained in the use of the old 38" and the newer 9mm pistol with all its modern features.
Stop pretending
Course you are Tom. Your a gun nut with nothing better to do.
If your a Guard prove it, tell me something about the training. tell me something about a C72 or an A8.
No Guard worth his salt would go online and rip his colleagues apart without knowing the facts.
Sorry, I forgot that you possess sole insight into the needs and interests of the working class. Strange that they dont vote for your party isn't it?
And how stupid Amnesty are to waste all their time opposing mass murder, torture and genocide when they should obviously be focussing on refuse charges. They really should get their priorities sorted out.
But we can allow ourselves a moment to ask :-
will Ireland do any better next time?
None of the issues raised in the last report have been properly dealt with, in addition we now have lost points over asylum seeking, and the unresolved issue of "force feeding" and the allied freedom of the press issues during a recent protest in Dublin.
And as this comment is written, there appears to be a group of men encarcerated under a law which has been struck down by the Supreme Court as unconstitutional on the (23rd of May 2006). The minister for Justice has announced he will brief the cabinet next Tuesday (30th May 2006). These men may now be understood to be in illegal detention. So we may safely presume that Ireland will move down the human rights ranking................Not that anyone cares.