North Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi?
US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty
Anti-Empire >>
A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog.? We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below).?
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by
The Saker >>
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (6 of 6)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6{ photos by redjade } (c)
Professional Archeology, Irish Style
Eamon O'Hare, Director of Transportation of Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council
The final irony - a road named for a castle that can no longer be viewed.
Work began on both sides of the Carrickmines Castle site at 8.30 am this morning. Road-building equipment, consisting of 35 tonne diggers, bulldozers and 50 tonne trucks began demolition of the features behind the farmhouse. The affected area which contains a mill race, kilns, moat, defensive wall and an industrial manufacturing area. A tree cutting crew began work on trees along side of the castle gate.
Across the road, archaeological works are still under way, and a team of archaeologists is busy removing the remaining section of defensive fosse. Ironically, the section of wall being removed is in the same location as where the castle wall was originally breached in the siege of 1642, leading to the partial destruction of the castle keep.
This morning a solicitors’ letter was sent to the Minister for the Environment, Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council, the National Roads Authority and the Attorney General this morning, warning them that the works are illegal, since the National Monuments Act 2004 is unconstitutional. They were given until 5:00 pm to respond. We are expecting to return to the High Court int he morning and seek an interloctury injunction.
At their last Court appearance, Dun Laoghaire Rathdown gave undertakings that they would not enter the site, until all the legal procedures had been followed, and they returned to court to have the undertakings relieved. It was on this basis that Judge Kearns did not grant an injunction. Having not returned to court first, the council has breached their promise to the Court, and acted in bad faith.
The battle for Carrickmines will continue. No amount of bulldozing, demolition or excavatio will change the fact that this is a national monument, and that the current motorway path is illegal.
and the good people that defended it...
indymedia: http://tinyurl.com/6rccf
and a great example of vinnies new thumbnailing feature i had no idea what it was he had done until i saw that...
CUT/PASTE from Unison.ie today - as it requires registration:
Campaigner to challenge law that allows completion of M50
AN environmentalist is to challenge in the High Court the legality of the National Monuments (Amendment) Act, introduced only a month ago to facilitate completion of the M50 at Carrickmines Castle.
Justice Michael Peart yesterday granted Dominic Dunne leave to seek injunctions restraining motorway development works, which resumed on Monday, until the constitutionality of the new legislation is determined by the court.
He told Coleman FitzGerald, counsel for Mr Dunne, of Benburb Street, Dublin, that short notice of the campaigner's intentions could be served on the Environment Minister Martin Cullen and Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council.
Mr FitzGerald told the court the act would be challenged as invalid on constitutional grounds and with regard to provisions of EU law - especially in respect of environmental impact assessments.
He said that on Monday, diggers and archaeologists had started to remove walls and artefacts and unless they were restrained by a court order from demolishing or altering the medieval remains, there would be nothing left to protect.
Mr FitzGerald said the act gave the minister virtually unfettered powers to decide on issues relating to any national monument affected by the completion of the M50.
He said the legislature had delegated to Mr Cullen, a member of the executive, its powers to make laws to an extent prohibited by the Constitution.
He said the act also failed to comply with the Constitution by allowing allow Mr Cullen to give directions to demolish a national monument.
Mr FitzGerald said Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council, in earlier proceedings relating to Carrickmines Castle, had given an undertaking in the High Court not to carry out development work. However, the council now claimed the 2004 act superseded earlier proceedings.
“We have agreed to a temporary cessation of work on the basis that the constitutional issue will go to a full hearing next week.”