A bird's eye view of the vineyard
 Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog.? We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below).?
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by The Saker >>
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
Lib Dem Leader Ed Davey: Go Back to Your Constituencies and Prepare to Live in Mud and Grass Huts Fri Jan 24, 2025 09:00 | Chris Morrison
With all 72 Lib Dem MPs supporting the mad Climate and Nature Bill, their clownish leader Ed Davey is effectively telling them to go back to their constituencies and prepare to live in mud and grass huts.
The post Lib Dem Leader Ed Davey: Go Back to Your Constituencies and Prepare to Live in Mud and Grass Huts appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
In Episode 27 of the Sceptic: David Shipley on Southport, Fred de Fossard on Trump vs Woke Capitalis... Fri Jan 24, 2025 07:00 | Richard Eldred
In episode 27 of the Sceptic: David Shipley on Southport, Fred de Fossard on Trump vs Woke Capitalism and Ed West on the grooming gangs as Britain?s Chernobyl.
The post In Episode 27 of the Sceptic: David Shipley on Southport, Fred de Fossard on Trump vs Woke Capitalism and Ed West on the Grooming Gangs As Britain?s Chernobyl appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Fri Jan 24, 2025 01:20 | Will Jones
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
One in 12 in London is an Illegal Migrant Thu Jan 23, 2025 19:30 | Will Jones
London is home to as many as 585,000 illegal migrants, equivalent to one in 12 of the city?s population, according to a previously confidential report.
The post One in 12 in London is an Illegal Migrant appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Illegal Afghan Migrant Kills Two and Wounds Three in Latest Knife Violence to Afflict Open-Borders G... Thu Jan 23, 2025 17:55 | Eugyppius
An illegal Afghan migrant has killed two and wounded three in the latest knife violence to afflict open-borders Germany. In response, Leftist organisations will light candles to demonstrate "solidarity and cohesion".
The post Illegal Afghan Migrant Kills Two and Wounds Three in Latest Knife Violence to Afflict Open-Borders Germany appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
|
Blegian Electoral registration office bans several left wing groups from contesting elections
 international |
politics / elections |
news report
 Tuesday April 20, 2004 16:26 by BelgianDemocrat
The electoral registration office in ‘French-speaking’ Wallonia rejected the signatures smaller parties had collected to legally stand in the forthcoming European elections. According to Belgian law, parties – in order to be able to contest the elections – either need the signatures of 5 members of parliament or have to collect 5,000 signatures of people who are entitled to vote. The authority’s main legal argument is that people did not know which candidates they were endorsing when they signed the election papers of parties like MAS, the Belgian affiliate of the cwi. But the same arguments could be used to prevent the main parties from taking part in the elections. Nobody knows who is running on their lists before they register nor is their any democratic control over the wheeling and dealing between the traditional parties once elections have taken place.
Parties hit by this managed democracy are the PTB (Parti du Travail de Belgique), a Maoist party), RWF (Rassemblement Wallonie Bruxelles) a party which wants Wallonia to break from Belgium and unify with France, CDF (Chrétiens démocrates francophones) a split from the Christian Democrats, and two fascist parties the FN (Front National) and FNB (Front National de Belgique).
The traditional parties in Wallonia have been nervous about the outcome of these elections for some time. The social democrat PS (Parti Socialiste), which has been the biggest party on that side of the language border for most of recent history, is worried about an electoral backlash against its neo-liberal policies in the national, regional and local governments and in protest at their cronyism in Wallonia. In the last elections, the green party, Ecolo, was hit by an electoral revolt against its role in government. They lost all their seats and part of the voters flocked back to the PS. The far right and fascist parties, which are extremely disorganised in the French speaking part of the country, have picked up support in the last two years, and are on the verge of a breakthrough. Recent opinion polls suggest that they might receive between 6% and 8% of the votes.
The rise of these parties is caused by the anti-working class policies of the ruling class and the lack of a political alternative that would defend the interests of the working class and poor. The working class is suffering the combined effects of de-industrialisation, with cuts in social provisions and welfare. The policies of privatisation and neo-liberalism have left some of the regions in Wallonia, where unemployment is over 20%, amongst the poorest in Europe.
The MAS is fighting these elections on a socialist platform. We want to build a working class alternative to the policies of the ruling class. We want to build a left opposition against neo-liberalism. We have a proud record, in Flanders as well as in Wallonia, of fighting against the parties of racism and fascism.
The ruling class think they can stop all anti-establishment parties from gaining influence by preventing them from taking part in the elections. This is going to have the opposite effect, as it is seen by a large layer of the population as an attempt by the main politicians to protect their interests. They would do anything to be able to stay on the European gravy train.
The way in which the traditional parties, in alliance with the judiciary, have cooked up this ‘deus ex machina’ shows their utter contempt for democracy if the latter does not suit their needs. Like characters in ancient Greek dramas, they think they can use divine powers to right all wrongs and secure their monopoly on political power. In Belgium, voting is obligatory but the vote is not free. Failing to go to the polling booth might end with a fine. Failing to organise in a political party approved by the ruling class might result in that party’s ban from standing in elections.
The MAS, Mouvement pour une Alternative Socialiste, together with all the other parties effected by the ban, except, of course, the fascists, is taking legal action against the decision of the electoral registration office. The final decision has to be taken this coming Thursday. This play is not over, just yet.
|
printable version
Digg this
del.icio.us
Furl
Reddit
Technorati
Facebook
Gab
Twitter
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (6 of 6)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6Reading this and discovering what a mess the Socialist and Green Parties have made of Belgium, I'm just so grateful that Ireland has an FF/PD government.
So your definition of a socialist party is a party whose name includes the word?
You would then, of course that the German Democratic Republic was, by the same logic, democratic, and its failure and collapse is a definitive and unrefutable demonstration that democracy cannot work?
... you may be glad to live under the FF/PD Junta but the rest of us are hardly going to benefit from privatisation, corruption and nepotism now are we?
"The ruling class think they can stop all anti-establishment parties from gaining influence by preventing them from taking part in the elections. This is going to have the opposite effect, as it is seen by a large layer of the population as an attempt by the main politicians to protect their interests. They would do anything to be able to stay on the European gravy train.
The way in which the traditional parties, in alliance with the judiciary, have cooked up this ‘deus ex machina’ shows their utter contempt for democracy if the latter does not suit their needs. Like characters in ancient Greek dramas, they think they can use divine powers to right all wrongs and secure their monopoly on political power. In Belgium, voting is obligatory but the vote is not free. Failing to go to the polling booth might end with a fine. Failing to organise in a political party approved by the ruling class might result in that party’s ban from standing in elections."
The above sounds remarkably like the BNP's arguments when they are prevented from doing things. Something almost identical was read out in Trinity last year, when a BNP representative was forced to cancel his engaging in debate by threatened protests. A letter from him was read out, and it sounded like the above. The first sentence in particular could describe the behaviour of left-wing groups with regard to appearances by new right figures.
In both cases, people are invking the right to freedom of speech and expression. So it doesn't really have to surprise anyone if the arguements may be similar.
You still have to decide whether it is right to give people a forum to spread their views, and such a decision must be based on what the consequences would be.
Whereas the ruling class may seek to hinder a potential threat from the left that might point out the true nature of the capitalist system, many people on the left rightly say that the far right would (mis)use this right to incite hatred and violence and therefore it shouldn't be allowed.
"You still have to decide whether it is right to give people a forum to spread their views, and such a decision must be based on what the consequences would be."
It's not necessarily true that such decisions need be based on what imagined consequences would result. With regard to the right, Vlaams Blok in Belgium, the Freedom Party in Austria and the Northern Alliance in Italy have all been elected to office with no collapse in the established system. There may be a rise in racist attacks, but whether the election of far-right figures is a cause or simply another symptom of the same problem is debatable. And in any event, it is not up to us to decide if people should be allowed speak. It's a human right.
"Whereas the ruling class may seek to hinder a potential threat from the left that might point out the true nature of the capitalist system"
The decision to ban a Maoist party is not automatically a decision based on a threat to the ruling class - I don't think there's a single government in Western Europe that's in danger of a real threat from the left - but rather on the ramifications of how they define themselves. A party defining itself as Maoist might face questions about the nature of China's human rights abuses under Mao, in particular his purge of "bandits, spies, bullies, and despots" which killed 700,000 people. Estimates of the number of Chinese killed for dissent during the start of his reign stand at about three million. The reasoning behind banning such a party is similar to the reasoning behind banning an openly fascist party.
I don't intend to argue that it's right to silence a political voice - I happen to disagree quite strongly with the idea of banning such parties and believe it only strengthens their core support. What I want to explain is how an adherence to a particular doctrine - in this case, the doctrine of leftist revolution - can blind one to the realities of political life and the reasons behind the decisions are made.