New Events

International

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb

offsite link The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog.? We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below).?

offsite link What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

offsite link The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by

The Saker >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Promoting Human Rights in Ireland

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link Food Firms Revolt Against Net Zero Over Australia?s Energy Crisis Mon Feb 03, 2025 13:00 | Sallust
Firms supplying food to major Australian supermarkets have launched a revolt against Net Zero, urging the Government to dump its renewables targets and focus on ramping up gas and coal production to cut electricity prices.
The post Food Firms Revolt Against Net Zero Over Australia’s Energy Crisis appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Wind Turbine Bursts into Flames Mon Feb 03, 2025 11:00 | Will Jones
A wind turbine has burst into flames in Cambridgeshire ? the latest instance of an issue previously described by Imperial College London as a "big problem" that is not being "fully reported".
The post Wind Turbine Bursts into Flames appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Year After Lockdown Saw Massive Spike in Attempted Child Suicides Mon Feb 03, 2025 09:00 | Richard Eldred
Lockdowns and school closures have triggered a devastating surge in child suicides and self-harm, with hospital admissions soaring and mental health disorders skyrocketing.
The post Year After Lockdown Saw Massive Spike in Attempted Child Suicides appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link The Chancellor?s ?Growth Agenda? Is Full of Sound and Fury, but Signifies Nothing Mon Feb 03, 2025 07:00 | Ben Pile
Ben Pile brands the Government's 'growth agenda' as empty political theatre, with wooden actors stumbling through hollow lines, written by someone who has no clue what growth actually is.
The post The Chancellor?s ?Growth Agenda? Is Full of Sound and Fury, but Signifies Nothing appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link News Round-Up Mon Feb 03, 2025 01:19 | Richard Eldred
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

State of the Union Speech: Bush is a serious challenge to Democrats

category international | rights, freedoms and repression | news report author Wednesday January 21, 2004 11:37author by Roger Jenkins Report this post to the editors

If Democrats hope to remove George Bush from power they are going need a Herculian effort!

The following is the entire text of George W. Bush's State of the Union address.
Since this is an open media forum it thought it appropiate to publish it.
Whatever your views on Bush certainly this speech is hard to beat!
John Kerry or Howard Dean please take note. Bush could trounce you in a public debate! The new articulate intelligent Bush is marching in your direction!
if the Right wing of America is to be defeated in November Democrats will have to come up with a better slogan that "No War For Oil"

THE PRESIDENT: Mr. Speaker, Vice President Cheney, members of Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow citizens: America this evening is a nation called to great responsibilities. And we are rising to meet them.

As we gather tonight, hundreds of thousands of American servicemen and women are deployed across the world in the war on terror. By bringing hope to the oppressed, and delivering justice to the violent, they are making America more secure. (Applause.)

Each day, law enforcement personnel and intelligence officers are tracking terrorist threats; analysts are examining airline passenger lists; the men and women of our new Homeland Security Department are patrolling our coasts and borders. And their vigilance is protecting America. (Applause.)

Americans are proving once again to be the hardest working people in the world. The American economy is growing stronger. The tax relief you passed is working. (Applause.)

Tonight, members of Congress can take pride in the great works of compassion and reform that skeptics had thought impossible. You're raising the standards for our public schools, and you are giving our senior citizens prescription drug coverage under Medicare. (Applause.)

We have faced serious challenges together, and now we face a choice: We can go forward with confidence and resolve, or we can turn back to the dangerous illusion that terrorists are not plotting and outlaw regimes are no threat to us. We can press on with economic growth, and reforms in education and Medicare, or we can turn back to old policies and old divisions.

We've not come all this way -- through tragedy, and trial and war -- only to falter and leave our work unfinished. Americans are rising to the tasks of history, and they expect the same from us. In their efforts, their enterprise, and their character, the American people are showing that the state of our union is confident and strong. (Applause.)

Our greatest responsibility is the active defense of the American people. Twenty-eight months have passed since September 11th, 2001 -- over two years without an attack on American soil. And it is tempting to believe that the danger is behind us. That hope is understandable, comforting -- and false. The killing has continued in Bali, Jakarta, Casablanca, Riyadh, Mombasa, Jerusalem, Istanbul, and Baghdad. The terrorists continue to plot against America and the civilized world. And by our will and courage, this danger will be defeated. (Applause.)

Inside the United States, where the war began, we must continue to give our homeland security and law enforcement personnel every tool they need to defend us. And one of those essential tools is the Patriot Act, which allows federal law enforcement to better share information, to track terrorists, to disrupt their cells, and to seize their assets. For years, we have used similar provisions to catch embezzlers and drug traffickers. If these methods are good for hunting criminals, they are even more important for hunting terrorists. (Applause.)

Key provisions of the Patriot Act are set to expire next year. (Applause.) The terrorist threat will not expire on that schedule. (Applause.) Our law enforcement needs this vital legislation to protect our citizens. You need to renew the Patriot Act. (Applause.)

America is on the offensive against the terrorists who started this war. Last March, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, a mastermind of September the 11th, awoke to find himself in the custody of U.S. and Pakistani authorities. Last August the 11th brought the capture of the terrorist Hambali, who was a key player in the attack in Indonesia that killed over 200 people. We're tracking al Qaeda around the world, and nearly two-thirds of their known leaders have now been captured or killed. Thousands of very skilled and determined military personnel are on the manhunt, going after the remaining killers who hide in cities and caves, and one by one, we will bring these terrorists to justice. (Applause.)

As part of the offensive against terror, we are also confronting the regimes that harbor and support terrorists, and could supply them with nuclear, chemical or biological weapons. The United States and our allies are determined: We refuse to live in the shadow of this ultimate danger. (Applause.)

The first to see our determination were the Taliban, who made Afghanistan the primary training base of al Qaeda killers. As of this month, that country has a new constitution, guaranteeing free elections and full participation by women. Businesses are opening, health care centers are being established, and the boys and girls of Afghanistan are back in school. With the help from the new Afghan army, our coalition is leading aggressive raids against the surviving members of the Taliban and al Qaeda. The men and women of Afghanistan are building a nation that is free and proud and fighting terror -- and America is honored to be their friend. (Applause.)

Since we last met in this chamber, combat forces of the United States, Great Britain, Australia, Poland and other countries enforced the demands of the United Nations, ended the rule of Saddam Hussein, and the people of Iraq are free. (Applause.)

Having broken the Baathist regime, we face a remnant of violent Saddam supporters. Men who ran away from our troops in battle are now dispersed and attack from the shadows. These killers, joined by foreign terrorists, are a serious, continuing danger. Yet we're making progress against them. The once all-powerful ruler of Iraq was found in a hole, and now sits in a prison cell. (Applause.) Of the top 55 officials of the former regime, we have captured or killed 45. Our forces are on the offensive, leading over 1,600 patrols a day and conducting an average of 180 raids a week. We are dealing with these thugs in Iraq, just as surely as we dealt with Saddam Hussein's evil regime. (Applause.)

The work of building a new Iraq is hard, and it is right. And America has always been willing to do what it takes for what is right. Last January, Iraq's only law was the whim of one brutal man. Today our coalition is working with the Iraqi Governing Council to draft a basic law, with a bill of rights. We're working with Iraqis and the United Nations to prepare for a transition to full Iraqi sovereignty by the end of June.

As democracy takes hold in Iraq, the enemies of freedom will do all in their power to spread violence and fear. They are trying to shake the will of our country and our friends, but the United States of America will never be intimidated by thugs and assassins. (Applause.) The killers will fail, and the Iraqi people will live in freedom. (Applause.)

Month by month, Iraqis are assuming more responsibility for their own security and their own future. And tonight we are honored to welcome one of Iraq's most respected leaders: the current President of the Iraqi Governing Council, Adnan Pachachi.

Sir, America stands with you and the Iraqi people as you build a free and peaceful nation. (Applause.)

Because of American leadership and resolve, the world is changing for the better. Last month, the leader of Libya voluntarily pledged to disclose and dismantle all of his regime's weapons of mass destruction programs, including a uranium enrichment project for nuclear weapons. Colonel Qadhafi correctly judged that his country would be better off and far more secure without weapons of mass murder. (Applause.)

Nine months of intense negotiations involving the United States and Great Britain succeeded with Libya, while 12 years of diplomacy with Iraq did not. And one reason is clear: For diplomacy to be effective, words must be credible, and no one can now doubt the word of America. (Applause.)

Different threats require different strategies. Along with nations in the region, we're insisting that North Korea eliminate its nuclear program. America and the international community are demanding that Iran meet its commitments and not develop nuclear weapons. America is committed to keeping the world's most dangerous weapons out of the hands of the most dangerous regimes. (Applause.)

When I came to this rostrum on September the 20th, 2001, I brought the police shield of a fallen officer, my reminder of lives that ended, and a task that does not end. I gave to you and to all Americans my complete commitment to securing our country and defeating our enemies. And this pledge, given by one, has been kept by many.

You in the Congress have provided the resources for our defense, and cast the difficult votes of war and peace. Our closest allies have been unwavering. America's intelligence personnel and diplomats have been skilled and tireless. And the men and women of the American military -- they have taken the hardest duty. We've seen their skill and their courage in armored charges and midnight raids, and lonely hours on faithful watch. We have seen the joy when they return, and felt the sorrow when one is lost. I've had the honor of meeting our servicemen and women at many posts, from the deck of a carrier in the Pacific to a mess hall in Baghdad.

Many of our troops are listening tonight. And I want you and your families to know: America is proud of you. And my administration, and this Congress, will give you the resources you need to fight and win the war on terror. (Applause.)

I know that some people question if America is really in a war at all. They view terrorism more as a crime, a problem to be solved mainly with law enforcement and indictments. After the World Trade Center was first attacked in 1993, some of the guilty were indicted and tried and convicted, and sent to prison. But the matter was not settled. The terrorists were still training and plotting in other nations, and drawing up more ambitious plans. After the chaos and carnage of September the 11th, it is not enough to serve our enemies with legal papers. The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States, and war is what they got. (Applause.)

Some in this chamber, and in our country, did not support the liberation of Iraq. Objections to war often come from principled motives. But let us be candid about the consequences of leaving Saddam Hussein in power. We're seeking all the facts. Already, the Kay Report identified dozens of weapons of mass destruction-related program activities and significant amounts of equipment that Iraq concealed from the United Nations. Had we failed to act, the dictatator's weapons of mass destruction programs would continue to this day. Had we failed to act, Security Council resolutions on Iraq would have been revealed as empty threats, weakening the United Nations and encouraging defiance by dictators around the world. Iraq's torture chambers would still be filled with victims, terrified and innocent. The killing fields of Iraq -- where hundreds of thousands of men and women and children vanished into the sands -- would still be known only to the killers. For all who love freedom and peace, the world without Saddam Hussein's regime is a better and safer place. (Applause.)

Some critics have said our duties in Iraq must be internationalized. This particular criticism is hard to explain to our partners in Britain, Australia, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Thailand, Italy, Spain, Poland, Denmark, Hungary, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Romania, the Netherlands -- (applause) -- Norway, El Salvador, and the 17 other countries that have committed troops to Iraq. (Applause.) As we debate at home, we must never ignore the vital contributions of our international partners, or dismiss their sacrifices.

From the beginning, America has sought international support for our operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, and we have gained much support. There is a difference, however, between leading a coalition of many nations, and submitting to the objections of a few. America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our country. (Applause.)

We also hear doubts that democracy is a realistic goal for the greater Middle East, where freedom is rare. Yet it is mistaken, and condescending, to assume that whole cultures and great religions are incompatible with liberty and self-government. I believe that God has planted in every human heart the desire to live in freedom. And even when that desire is crushed by tyranny for decades, it will rise again. (Applause.)

As long as the Middle East remains a place of tyranny and despair and anger, it will continue to produce men and movements that threaten the safety of America and our friends. So America is pursuing a forward strategy of freedom in the greater Middle East. We will challenge the enemies of reform, confront the allies of terror, and expect a higher standard from our friend. To cut through the barriers of hateful propaganda, the Voice of America and other broadcast services are expanding their programming in Arabic and Persian -- and soon, a new television service will begin providing reliable news and information across the region. I will send you a proposal to double the budget of the National Endowment for Democracy, and to focus its new work on the development of free elections, and free markets, free press, and free labor unions in the Middle East. And above all, we will finish the historic work of democracy in Afghanistan and Iraq, so those nations can light the way for others, and help transform a troubled part of the world. (Applause.)

America is a nation with a mission, and that mission comes from our most basic beliefs. We have no desire to dominate, no ambitions of empire. Our aim is a democratic peace -- a peace founded upon the dignity and rights of every man and woman. America acts in this cause with friends and allies at our side, yet we understand our special calling: This great republic will lead the cause of freedom. (Applause.)

In the last three years, adversity has also revealed the fundamental strengths of the American economy. We have come through recession, and terrorist attack, and corporate scandals, and the uncertainties of war. And because you acted to stimulate our economy with tax relief, this economy is strong, and growing stronger. (Applause.)

You have doubled the child tax credit from $500 to $1,000, reduced the marriage penalty, begun to phase out the death tax, reduced taxes on capital gains and stock dividends, cut taxes on small businesses, and you have lowered taxes for every American who pays income taxes.

Americans took those dollars and put them to work, driving this economy forward. The pace of economic growth in the third quarter of 2003 was the fastest in nearly 20 years; new home construction, the highest in almost 20 years; home ownership rates, the highest ever. Manufacturing activity is increasing. Inflation is low. Interest rates are low. Exports are growing. Productivity is high, and jobs are on the rise. (Applause.)

These numbers confirm that the American people are using their money far better than government would have -- and you were right to return it. (Applause.)

America's growing economy is also a changing economy. As technology transforms the way almost every job is done, America becomes more productive, and workers need new skills. Much of our job growth will be found in high-skilled fields like health care and biotechnology. So we must respond by helping more Americans gain the skills to find good jobs in our new economy.

All skills begin with the basics of reading and math, which are supposed to be learned in the early grades of our schools. Yet for too long, for too many children, those skills were never mastered. By passing the No Child Left Behind Act, you have made the expectation of literacy the law of our country. We're providing more funding for our schools -- a 36-percent increase since 2001. We're requiring higher standards. We are regularly testing every child on the fundamentals. We are reporting results to parents, and making sure they have better options when schools are not performing. We are making progress toward excellence for every child in America. (Applause.)

But the status quo always has defenders. Some want to undermine the No Child Left Behind Act by weakening standards and accountability. Yet the results we require are really a matter of common sense: We expect third graders to read and do math at the third grade level -- and that's not asking too much. Testing is the only way to identify and help students who are falling behind. This nation will not go back to the days of simply shuffling children along from grade to grade without them learning the basics. I refuse to give up on any child -- and the No Child Left Behind Act is opening the door of opportunity to all of America's children. (Applause.)

At the same time, we must ensure that older students and adults can gain the skills they need to find work now. Many of the fastest growing occupations require strong math and science preparation, and training beyond the high school level. So tonight, I propose a series of measures called Jobs for the 21st Century. This program will provide extra help to middle and high school students who fall behind in reading and math, expand advanced placement programs in low-income schools, invite math and science professionals from the private sector to teach part-time in our high schools. I propose larger Pell grants for students who prepare for college with demanding courses in high school. (Applause.) I propose increasing our support for America's fine community colleges, so they can -- (applause.) I do so, so they can train workers for industries that are creating the most new jobs. By all these actions, we'll help more and more Americans to join in the growing prosperity of our country. Job training is important, and so is job creation.

We must continue to pursue an aggressive, pro-growth economic agenda. (Applause.) Congress has some unfinished business on the issue of taxes. The tax reductions you passed are set to expire. Unless you act -- (applause) -- unless you act -- unless you act, the unfair tax on marriage will go back up. Unless you act, millions of families will be charged $300 more in federal taxes for every child. Unless you act, small businesses will pay higher taxes. Unless you act, the death tax will eventually come back to life. Unless you act, Americans face a tax increase. What Congress has given, the Congress should not take away. For the sake of job growth, the tax cuts you passed should be permanent. (Applause.)

Our agenda for jobs and growth must help small business owners and employees with relief from needless federal regulation, and protect them from junk and frivolous lawsuits. (Applause.)

Consumers and businesses need reliable supplies of energy to make our economy run -- so I urge you to pass legislation to modernize our electricity system, promote conservation, and make America less dependent on foreign sources of energy. (Applause.)

My administration is promoting free and fair trade to open up new markets for America's entrepreneurs and manufacturers and farmers -- to create jobs for American workers. Younger workers should have the opportunity to build a nest egg by saving part of their Social Security taxes in a personal retirement account. (Applause.) We should make the Social Security system a source of ownership for the American people. (Applause.) And we should limit the burden of government on this economy by acting as good stewards of taxpayers' dollars. (Applause.)

In two weeks, I will send you a budget that funds the war, protects the homeland, and meets important domestic needs, while limiting the growth in discretionary spending to less than 4 percent. (Applause.) This will require that Congress focus on priorities, cut wasteful spending, and be wise with the people's money. By doing so, we can cut the deficit in half over the next five years. (Applause.)

Tonight, I also ask you to reform our immigration laws so they reflect our values and benefit our economy. I propose a new temporary worker program to match willing foreign workers with willing employers when no Americans can be found to fill the job. This reform will be good for our economy because employers will find needed workers in an honest and orderly system. A temporary worker program will help protect our homeland, allowing Border Patrol and law enforcement to focus on true threats to our national security.

I oppose amnesty, because it would encourage further illegal immigration, and unfairly reward those who break our laws. My temporary worker program will preserve the citizenship path for those who respect the law, while bringing millions of hardworking men and women out from the shadows of American life. (Applause.)

Our nation's health care system, like our economy, is also in a time of change. Amazing medical technologies are improving and saving lives. This dramatic progress has brought its own challenge, in the rising costs of medical care and health insurance. Members of Congress, we must work together to help control those costs and extend the benefits of modern medicine throughout our country. (Applause.)

Meeting these goals requires bipartisan effort, and two months ago, you showed the way. By strengthening Medicare and adding a prescription drug benefit, you kept a basic commitment to our seniors: You are giving them the modern medicine they deserve. (Applause.)

Starting this year, under the law you passed, seniors can choose to receive a drug discount card, saving them 10 to 25 percent off the retail price of most prescription drugs -- and millions of low-income seniors can get an additional $600 to buy medicine. Beginning next year, seniors will have new coverage for preventive screenings against diabetes and heart disease, and seniors just entering Medicare can receive wellness exams.

In January of 2006, seniors can get prescription drug coverage under Medicare. For a monthly premium of about $35, most seniors who do not have that coverage today can expect to see their drug bills cut roughly in half. Under this reform, senior citizens will be able to keep their Medicare just as it is, or they can choose a Medicare plan that fits them best -- just as you, as members of Congress, can choose an insurance plan that meets your needs. And starting this year, millions of Americans will be able to save money tax-free for their medical expenses in a health savings account. (Applause.)

I signed this measure proudly, and any attempt to limit the choices of our seniors, or to take away their prescription drug coverage under Medicare, will meet my veto. (Applause.)

On the critical issue of health care, our goal is to ensure that Americans can choose and afford private health care coverage that best fits their individual needs. To make insurance more affordable, Congress must act to address rapidly rising health care costs. Small businesses should be able to band together and negotiate for lower insurance rates, so they can cover more workers with health insurance. I urge you to pass association health plans. (Applause.) I ask you to give lower-income Americans a refundable tax credit that would allow millions to buy their own basic health insurance. (Applause.)

By computerizing health records, we can avoid dangerous medical mistakes, reduce costs, and improve care. To protect the doctor-patient relationship, and keep good doctors doing good work, we must eliminate wasteful and frivolous medical lawsuits. (Applause.) And tonight I propose that individuals who buy catastrophic health care coverage, as part of our new health savings accounts, be allowed to deduct 100 percent of the premiums from their taxes. (Applause.)

A government-run health care system is the wrong prescription. (Applause.) By keeping costs under control, expanding access, and helping more Americans afford coverage, we will preserve the system of private medicine that makes America's health care the best in the world. (Applause.)

We are living in a time of great change -- in our world, in our economy, in science and medicine. Yet some things endure -- courage and compassion, reverence and integrity, respect for differences of faith and race. The values we try to live by never change. And they are instilled in us by fundamental institutions, such as families and schools and religious congregations. These institutions, these unseen pillars of civilization, must remain strong in America, and we will defend them. We must stand with our families to help them raise healthy, responsible children. When it comes to helping children make right choices, there is work for all of us to do.

One of the worst decisions our children can make is to gamble their lives and futures on drugs. Our government is helping parents confront this problem with aggressive education, treatment, and law enforcement. Drug use in high school has declined by 11 percent over the last two years. Four hundred thousand fewer young people are using illegal drugs than in the year 2001. (Applause.) In my budget, I proposed new funding to continue our aggressive, community-based strategy to reduce demand for illegal drugs. Drug testing in our schools has proven to be an effective part of this effort. So tonight I proposed an additional $23 million for schools that want to use drug testing as a tool to save children's lives. The aim here is not to punish children, but to send them this message: We love you, and we don't want to lose you. (Applause.)

To help children make right choices, they need good examples. Athletics play such an important role in our society, but, unfortunately, some in professional sports are not setting much of an example. The use of performance-enhancing drugs like steroids in baseball, football, and other sports is dangerous, and it sends the wrong message -- that there are shortcuts to accomplishment, and that performance is more important than character. So tonight I call on team owners, union representatives, coaches, and players to take the lead, to send the right signal, to get tough, and to get rid of steroids now. (Applause.)

To encourage right choices, we must be willing to confront the dangers young people face -- even when they're difficult to talk about. Each year, about 3 million teenagers contract sexually-transmitted diseases that can harm them, or kill them, or prevent them from ever becoming parents. In my budget, I propose a grassroots campaign to help inform families about these medical risks. We will double federal funding for abstinence programs, so schools can teach this fact of life: Abstinence for young people is the only certain way to avoid sexually-transmitted diseases. (Applause.)

Decisions children now make can affect their health and character for the rest of their lives. All of us -- parents and schools and government -- must work together to counter the negative influence of the culture, and to send the right messages to our children.

A strong America must also value the institution of marriage. I believe we should respect individuals as we take a principled stand for one of the most fundamental, enduring institutions of our civilization. Congress has already taken a stand on this issue by passing the Defense of Marriage Act, signed in 1996 by President Clinton. That statute protects marriage under federal law as a union of a man and a woman, and declares that one state may not redefine marriage for other states.

Activist judges, however, have begun redefining marriage by court order, without regard for the will of the people and their elected representatives. On an issue of such great consequence, the people's voice must be heard. If judges insist on forcing their arbitrary will upon the people, the only alternative left to the people would be the constitutional process. Our nation must defend the sanctity of marriage. (Applause.)

The outcome of this debate is important -- and so is the way we conduct it. The same moral tradition that defines marriage also teaches that each individual has dignity and value in God's sight. (Applause.)

It's also important to strengthen our communities by unleashing the compassion of America's religious institutions. Religious charities of every creed are doing some of the most vital work in our country -- mentoring children, feeding the hungry, taking the hand of the lonely. Yet government has often denied social service grants and contracts to these groups, just because they have a cross or a Star of David or a crescent on the wall. By executive order, I have opened billions of dollars in grant money to competition that includes faith-based charities. Tonight I ask you to codify this into law, so people of faith can know that the law will never discriminate against them again. (Applause.)

In the past, we've worked together to bring mentors to children of prisoners, and provide treatment for the addicted, and help for the homeless. Tonight I ask you to consider another group of Americans in need of help. This year, some 600,000 inmates will be released from prison back into society. We know from long experience that if they can't find work, or a home, or help, they are much more likely to commit crime and return to prison. So tonight, I propose a four-year, $300 million prisoner re-entry initiative to expand job training and placement services, to provide transitional housing, and to help newly released prisoners get mentoring, including from faith-based groups. (Applause.) America is the land of second chance, and when the gates of the prison open, the path ahead should lead to a better life. (Applause.)

For all Americans, the last three years have brought tests we did not ask for, and achievements shared by all. By our actions, we have shown what kind of nation we are. In grief, we have found the grace to go on. In challenge, we rediscovered the courage and daring of a free people. In victory, we have shown the noble aims and good heart of America. And having come this far, we sense that we live in a time set apart.

I've been witness to the character of the people of America, who have shown calm in times of danger, compassion for one another, and toughness for the long haul. All of us have been partners in a great enterprise. And even some of the youngest understand that we are living in historic times. Last month a girl in Lincoln, Rhode Island, sent me a letter. It began, "Dear George W. Bush. If there's anything you know, I, Ashley Pearson, age 10, can do to help anyone, please send me a letter and tell me what I can do to save our country." She added this P.S.: "If you can send a letter to the troops, please put, 'Ashley Pearson believes in you.'" (Applause.)

Tonight, Ashley, your message to our troops has just been conveyed. And, yes, you have some duties yourself. Study hard in school, listen to your mom or dad, help someone in need, and when you and your friends see a man or woman in uniform, say, "thank you." (Applause.) And, Ashley, while you do your part, all of us here in this great chamber will do our best to keep you and the rest of America safe and free. (Applause.)

My fellow citizens, we now move forward, with confidence and faith. Our nation is strong and steadfast. The cause we serve is right, because it is the cause of all mankind. The momentum of freedom in our world is unmistakable -- and it is not carried forward by our power alone. We can trust in that greater power who guides the unfolding of the years. And in all that is to come, we can know that His purposes are just and true.

May God continue to bless America. (Applause.) END 10:05 P.M. EST

Related Link: http://www.whitehouse.gov
author by iosaf - we are all victims. Black Ribbons White Ribbonspublication date Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:11author address author phone Report this post to the editors

white or black
stupid or intelligent
always think BIG.
first line text above:-
if Bush is to be removed from power a Herculean effort is needed, this is an example of one of those classical clichés that really pisses me off, oh yes, we need the big demi-God with the club to go bop the voters on the head.
No, you don't need a Herculean effort, you need something more like a very clever David with clear space.
It is most interesting how people pepper their thoughts with allusion to latin, greek and other texts. For the first time this year in Ireland a diary was mass-produced with a useful glossary of Latin expressions at the front. And of course at the back the map of theDART made to look impressive.
Well the DART is really just one line, and it's silly to pretend it's four lines by applying the crayon, it fools no-one, more effort ought to have been put into providing the people of Dublin with a proper and cheap transport system a long time ago. There was enough money about, but hey, where did it go?
Anyway back to the "classical allusion" thing, now it is quaint to pepper with a bit of Latin, oh yes, seems very educated, Greek on the other hand seems a bit too snooty. And you have the letter problem. The other stock phrase resource of course is references to other European myths such as Celtic or Nordic, but unfortuanately due to the increased presence of nasty elements on both sides of the Atlantic, these myths have been perverted as have their symbols. This does indeed worry many. Am I on track? Yes the hebrew analogies, now Borges the great, (who used really irritate his mother) loved being erudite, referrences to all over the place, and especially Hebrew.

In Short
you need
a David.

author by Republican and Proud.publication date Mon Jan 26, 2004 20:22author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Fidel Castro's Cuba!
Kim Jong IL's North Korea!
Islamic Iran!
Abbas's Syria!
Quadaffi's Lybia!

All of them one party police states!

author by Anarchopublication date Mon Jan 26, 2004 16:01author address author phone Report this post to the editors

George Orwell was right, almost. He just got the date wrong by 20 years. But on the other themes of 1984 he was right. While the Bush Junta has not reached the totalitarian nightmares of Big Brother, it is applying his principles and slogans quite liberally.

Take, for example, Bush's "State of the Union" address. He happily reiterated the doctrine of pre-emptive military action, claiming it had advanced the cause of democracy and non-proliferation around the world. He was unapologetic over the invasion of Iraq, asserting that Saddam Hussein's removal had made the world "a better and safer place".

So "war is peace" after all...
Yet even Bush could not deny that the Iraq war is still on-going. As he put it, America "face[s] a remnant of violent Saddam supporters" who "attack from the shadows." Moreover, they are "joined by foreign terrorists" and both "are a serious, continuing danger." So terrorists "killing . . . in . . . Baghdad" is an example of making the world "safer"?

What of the "terrorist" threat in the US? Bush proves himself a failure. In spite of invading Iraq and Afghanistan, he gave a sombre warning that the risk of new terrorist attacks "on American soil" remained: "To say that danger is behind us is understandable, comforting but false. The killing has continued . . . The terrorists continue to plot against America and the civilized world." So the world is "safer", yet the threat remains? In other words, US actions in Iraq and Afghanistan have not made the world safer at all. Indeed, according to Bush, the Patriot act should be renewed as the "terrorist threat will not expire" when it does. Terrorism remains and, thanks to US actions, has spread to a new area, namely Iraq.

Ah, the joys of "doublethink."

Incredibly, he tried to claim that the Iraqi invasion had persuaded Libya to renounce weapons of mass destruction. That Libya's announcement was the end result of nearly a decade of (Libya initiated) negotiation is obviously now in the "Memory Hole", along with most of the claims from last years "State of the Union" Address. Thus this year Bush significantly failed to repeat the claims that Iraq had massive stockpiles of banned weapons. Now it was a case that "weapons of mass destruction-related program activities" had been found in Iraq. Except no such "activities" were discovered. Obviously the Bush appointee ruling Iraq, Bremer, needs to correct his master on this the same way as he corrected Blair a few weeks back. "Had we failed to act" he said, those "programs would continue to this day." Yes, that vial of botox would have remained in that fridge...
Perhaps we can expect to see it noted that the "commander in thief" has been "malquoted" rather than simply making "misstatements"?

Ironically, given the blatant lying in the run up to war and in its aftermath, Bush actually argued that "for diplomacy to be effective, words must be credible and no one can now doubt the word of America"! In that case, where are the Weapons of Mass Destruction? Where are links between Saddam's regime and al-Qaida? How different it all was a year ago. Now it is a case of "seeking all the facts." Back then, it was Colin Powell saying to the United Nations that he was presenting evidence, not conjecture.

Should we be expecting an announcement that the "chocolate ration" has been increased?
But the rationale for the war has been changed. Bush noted that "some" people "did not support the liberation of Iraq." He talked of "the consequences of leaving Saddam Hussein in power" and significantly failed to suggest he was an immediate threat to the USA. Rather than actual WMD aimed at America we now get WMD "related program activities." He defended his ignoring the UN Security Council by suggesting that "had we failed to act" it would "have been revealed as empty threats, weakening the United Nations and encouraging defiance by dictators around the world." So by the US ignoring and defying the UN, it had in fact strengthened it. Lastly, the brutal nature of the regime was mentioned. Yet it was as horrific as when the US backed it and is as horrific as many other regimes supported by the US.

But, then again, "Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia"...

As well as the rewriting of history, he repeated his dismissal of democracy while claiming to promote it. He stressed that Washington was prepared to act unilaterally again, defending the Bush Doctrine of pre-emptive military engagement. "America," Bush threatened, "will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people." So having the unelected Bush Junta promising to attack whoever and whenever it likes makes the world a "safer" place? Why? He argued that America has "no desire to dominate, no ambitions of empire." Considering that the US has a military presence in 130 countries (out of total of 191 recognised by the United Nations) and has consistently intervened in other countries to defend its interests, this is somewhat incredulous. It appears that if you deny you are an empire then you can act as like an empire as much as you like. Simply change "security" to "profits" and "people" to "corporations", and we get the real reason for Bush's violation of international law and his promise to ignore the UN while, simultaneously, upholding it -- namely, imperialist reasons.
Bush linked this to a broader goal of promoting democracy around the world, by force if necessary. He defended the real Bush Doctrine (i.e. rejection of democracy), by arguing there was "a difference ... between leading a coalition of many nations, and submitting to the objections of a few." Bush is obviously refining his doublethink techniques on that one. He wants to imply that most of the world supported him, with a few exceptions (i.e. the French). In reality, the majority of the world opposed the Bush Junta and its poodle. Only four countries committed troops to the war. Of them, three (Britain, Poland and Australia) ignored the majority of their people. World opinion was against the Bush Junta.When the elites of France and Germany reflected this opposition, they were attacked and dismissed as "Old Europe." The "New Europe" praised by Rumsfeld were those governments who refused to represent the viewpoint of the (vast) majority of their people. This is the same Rumsfeld, of course, who stated in 2001 that "the mission determines the coalition and we must not let the coalition determine the mission." Hardly an endorsement of democracy within the "coalition" itself.

So "two plus two" is indeed much greater 187 (the number of the other nations who did not provide troops for the invasion) when it is required by interests of state.

Bush states (correctly) that "last January, Iraq's only law was the whim of one brutal man." Yet, today, Iraq's only law is that of Bush's appointee, Bremer. He has decreed press censorship, privatisation, the flat tax, brutal raids against the population and a host of other repressive measures while systematically refusing demands for direct elections. Instead, Bush's "transition to full Iraqi sovereignty" would be based on US appointed caucuses "electing" a government. Bush, to be fair, did not suggest the Iraqis were free just now. All of the grand plans for freedom and democracy in Iraq were, like "a basic law, with a bill of rights," were being worked on and would arrive sometime in the future. Until then, the Iraqi people would just have to tolerate the "whim" of Bremer and the occupying forces.

What next? "Freedom is slavery", perhaps...
Talking of which, Bush significantly failed to discuss his regime's systematic undermining of freedom within America. No mention of how the Patriot Act has given the state more powers over its subjects, undermining the very freedoms he stupidly claims the terrorists hate America for. Indeed, he wants to "renew" it. Nor the herding of anti-Bush protestors into "Free Speech Zones". Nor the criminalisation (and repression) of anti-globalisation protesters in Miami.

But Bush is a tad unclear what "justice" is. After all, he talked about how he had brought numerous al-Qaida terrorists and Ba'athists to "justice," by which he meant they had been arrested or been killed. Yet, for most people, justice is done when the alleged suspects are judged in a courtroom in a fair and honest trial. Bush has not brought a single alleged terrorist suspect to court. In over two years he has not brought a single person accused of planning the September 11th atrocity to trial. Instead, he has assassinated at will and incarcerated 700 people from around the world in Guantanamo Bay.

Not quite "Ministry of Love" levels, but little to do with real (or even bourgeois) justice.
So Bush, against all evidence, declared that "because of American leadership and resolve, the world is changing for the better." How, exactly? Iraq is a quagmire. At least ten thousand Iraqis were killed in the invasion (no one knows for sure, particularly their "liberators" who refused to count the numbers they killed). The Iraqis have seen a US-backed dictator replaced by a US appointed one (who is reemploying Saddam's thugs). People in North Korea Syria and Libya are as unfree as any subject in a US-backed authoritarian regime. The US economy plummeted to new depths, with Bush being the first occupier of the White House to oversee a net lose of jobs since Hoover presided over the start of the Great Depression (over 2 million jobs lost, so far). And not to mention Bush's turning Clinton's budget surplus into a massive $500 billion deficit. Or the rising cost of healthcare, assuming you are not among the 43.6 million who do not have health insurance in the US. Or the numerous corporate crime scandals. Or slashing $300 million from the federal programme that provides subsidies to poor families so they can heat their homes. Or the 6% increase in the number of US families in poverty since 2001. Or the 200 public-health and environmental laws Bush has attempted to downgrade or weaken. Or the 58 million acres of public lands Bush has opened to road building, logging and drilling.

But rest assured, making the rich even richer ("tax relief") ensures that the "economy is strong and growing stronger." Why? "The pace of economic growth in the third quarter of 2003 was the fastest in nearly 20 years." That figure was 8.2%. The 1930s also saw large growth rates. 7.7% in 1934, 8.1% in 1935 and 14% in 1936.Does that mean that people were doing well during the Great Depression? Of course not. The economy was simply making up lost ground. Likewise, the U.S. recessions of 1980-82 were the worst since the Great Depression. These years were followed by a seven-year boom. So to say that growth is as good as 20 years ago means that the recession Bush presided over was one of the worse America has seen. And, needless to say, one quarter of fast growth will not reverse this kind of damage. Significantly, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, December last year saw 1,000 new jobs were created. The unemployment rate only fell because 309,000 people gave up on searching for jobs. The $120 billion wasted on invading and colonising Iraq are resources stolen from education, health and other activities which would make the world a better place. Not to mention given decent jobs to countless Americans. Not to mention the human costs of 500 American, 50 British and unknown (and uncounted) thousands of Iraqi lives

And what of terrorism? Can Americans just ignore it? Of course not. Rather than use billions to increase the number of "anti-American" terrorists by invading and interfering in other countries, the money could be used to fight the root causes of terrorism. Such as fighting to eliminate inequality, oppression and ignorance at home and aboard by encouraging change from below rather than imposing it from above. This would, of course, mean that the US state stops propping up authoritarian regimes abroad, stops pushing "neo-liberalism" dogma onto its own citizens and other countries (and punishing those who say no), stops using globalisation to further the interests of its elites, stops interfering in other countries and embark on systematic reforms which will destroy concentrations of wealth and power. This will take time, but it is achievable -- unlike "the war on terror" which is utterly self-defeating.

Sadly that option is not going to happen. It would require a social movement in the US aiming for justice and liberty for all to force change from below. It would require, in other words, a revolution. Even the first stage, combating ignorance, would be an impossibility for this regime. For Bush "Ignorance is Strength." The ignorance of the American people is the source his power. He can only hope that the American people will not, as so many have across the rest of the globe, see through him. Our job as libertarians is to explain why Bush is bad for America and the world. But more than that, we need to convince people that changing the figure head is not enough. We must be strong on Bush but also on the causes of Bush: ignorance, inequality, oppression, corporate power, imperialism and the capitalism and statism that underlies them all.
Ultimately, this was no "State of the Union" address. Rather it was a very long party political broadcast made at the start of an election campaign and not a very good one at that. It is the first step in trying to be elected to the office of president for the first time. But it is significant in terms of charting the Orwellian nature of the Bush Junta and its increasingly self-contradictory rhetoric. The address was defensive, its posturing simply reflecting what an utterly miserable job he has done -- for the American people. For the corporations and billionaires who back him, well, that is a different issue.

Related Link: http://anarchism.ws/writers/anarcho.html
author by Republican and Proudpublication date Wed Jan 21, 2004 15:25author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Bill Clinton needed them while he got his mind blown under the Oval Office desk!

author by Davidpublication date Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:44author address author phone Report this post to the editors

or did they just teach him how to read?

If he ever had to do a live debate without prepared questions he would be trounced

author by RED BHOYpublication date Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:40author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Are you having a laugh saying George W would trounce Kerry or Dean in a public debate. George W Bush reads his 'speechs' off a pre-written script. I wonder why he rarely appears in front of News Cameras? Maybe because he can hardly string a sentence together without the aid of his backroom boys??? As for this 'speech' on the 'State' of the union- this was being wrote by a team of people who go through everything that has happened in the last year ,to pick out bits that they think will appeal to the people of America. To gauge this well prepared 'speech' with a live public debate is preposterous. You obviuosly dont know much about George W and his illustrious record.

author by pat cpublication date Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:37author address author phone Report this post to the editors

dean is just another social liberal who is trying to hide the economic conservatism he put into practice as governor of vermont. would he better than bush? in so far as he is unlikely to appoint "right to lifers" to the federal or put polluters in control of the epa, yes. but in terms of capitals war against the working class, no. he would apply some cosmetic changes like reversing the outrageous tax cuts and would likely raise the minimum wage.

but he wont be appointing john throne as secretary of labour.

author by pat cpublication date Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:26author address author phone Report this post to the editors

nah! nader is much more an old labour type!

author by fight starterpublication date Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:22author address author phone Report this post to the editors

pat i thought you would be in favour of Dean, as you do support the Labour party 'left opposition', surely you'd support Howard Dean as he is a left winger in your book.

author by pat cpublication date Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:14author address author phone Report this post to the editors

hes probably the best on offer, his politics are more to the left than the usual US greens.

author by Anonymouspublication date Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:13author address author phone Report this post to the editors

As discomforting as the above remarks are, they probably are indeed true. The bookies have Bush as clear favourite at present (though John Kerry at 5 to 1 looks inviting). The lack of one big Democrat front runner is no doubt hurting them at present but there is a long way to go.

As for "The new articulate intelligent Bush" - The script was written for him of course and I don't think someone just suddenly becomes intelligent. More learned, I hope he is becoming.

2004 U.S. Presidential Election Winner

George W Bush 4 - 11
John Kerry 5 - 1
Howard Dean 13 - 2
Wesley Clark 8 - 1
John Edwards 9 - 1
Hilary Clinton 40 - 1
Joe Lieberman 66 - 1

To Win Democratic Nomination

John Kerry 5 - 4
Howard Dean 5 - 2
Wesley Clark 3 - 1
John Edwards 7 - 2
Hilary Clinton 20 - 1
Joe Liebermann 33 - 1

http://www.paddypower.com/bet?action=go_category&category=SPECIALS

author by ec4dean?publication date Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:11author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Will "ec" still be supporting Dr. Howard Dean for the presidency? I guess you think he is being 'witch-hunted' by the leadership in the democrats!

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2025 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy