Cops welcomed with smoke bombs and flares Dublin Pride 19:57 Jul 14 0 comments Gemma O'Doherty: The speech you never heard. I wonder why? 05:28 Jan 15 0 comments A Decade of Evidence Demonstrates The Dramatic Failure Of Globalisation 15:39 Aug 23 1 comments Thatcher's " blind eye" to paedophilia 15:27 Mar 12 0 comments Total Revolution. A new philosophy for the 21st century. 15:55 Nov 17 0 comments more >>Blog Feeds
Anti-EmpireNorth Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi? Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi? Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi? ?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi? US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty
The SakerA bird's eye view of the vineyard
Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Public InquiryInterested in maladministration. Estd. 2005RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Voltaire NetworkVoltaire, international editionVoltaire, International Newsletter N?118 Sat Feb 01, 2025 12:57 | en 80th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp Sat Feb 01, 2025 12:16 | en Misinterpretations of US trends (1/2), by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jan 28, 2025 06:59 | en Voltaire, International Newsletter #117 Fri Jan 24, 2025 19:54 | en The United States bets its hegemony on the Fourth Industrial Revolution Fri Jan 24, 2025 19:26 | en |
Endangered languages
national |
miscellaneous |
news report
Friday May 31, 2002 16:43 by Sean
We should ask ourselves if we are doing enough to preserve the Irish language.Fight the destructive influence of the English language!!! What does it mean to say a language is endangered? Is that what happened to dead languages like Ancient Greek and Latin? How do languages become extinct? Is language extinction sudden or gradual? How many languages are endangered? Whose languages are endangered? How many North American native languages are endangered? The languages that are not being transmitted to children, or that are being learned by few children, are endangered and likely to become extinct. In fact, only the 33 languages in the first group seem 'safe.' But most of these are threatened as well because their speakers live near other communities where the children speak English. And all native North American groups are under pressure to give up their native languages and use English instead. The younger generation feels the pressure especially strongly; television and movies often send a message that discourages the maintenance of community values, inviting young viewers to join a more glamorous and more commercialized world that has no apparent connection to their native community and its elders and traditions. Nonetheless, although a great deal of linguistic heritage is clearly in danger, the fact that so many Native American languages have survived into the 2lSt century is evidence of the strength of these communities and of the fundamental value of language to human beings. What does language extinction mean for a community-and for the rest of us? Much is lost from a scientific point of view as well when a language disappears. A people's history is passed down through its language, so when the language disappears, it may take with it important information about the early history of the community. The loss of human languages also severely limits what linguists can learn about human cognition. By studying what all of the world's languages have in common, we can find out what is and isn't possible in a human language. This in turn tells us important things about the human mind and how it is that children are able to learn a complex system like language so quickly and easily. The fewer languages there are to study, the less we will be able to learn about the human mind. But wouldn't it be easier if everyone just spoke the same language? What can be done to preserve endangered languages? Because so many languages are in danger of disappearing, linguists are trying to learn as much about them as possible, so that even if the language disappears, all knowledge of the language won't disappear at the same time. Researchers make videotapes, audiotapes, and written records of language use in both formal and informal settings, along with translations. In addition, they analyze the vocabulary and rules of the language and write dictionaries and grammars. Linguists also work with communities around the world that want to preserve their languages, offering both technical and practical help with language teaching, maintenance, and revival. This help is based in part on the dictionaries and grammars that they write. But linguists can help in other ways, too, using their experience in teaching and studying a wide variety of languages. They can use what they've learned about other endangered languages to help a community preserve its own language, and they can take advantage of the latest technology for recording and studying languages. Are new languages being born to replace the languages that die? But these new languages do not compare to the linguistic heritage that is being lost. The thousands of languages spoken in the world today have evolved over the entire course of human history. Every group of related languages is separated from every other group by at least 5000 years of development, usually more. If English were to become the sole language of every person on earth, it would take tens of thousands of years to produce anything like the diversity that is our heritage-assuming we could somehow reproduce the conditions under which this diversity grew. For all practical purposes, the diversity we have now is absolutely irreplaceable. For further information |
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (7 of 7)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7With the latest report showing that the Gaelteacht is shrinking we could take a very pessimistic view on the future of the Irish language. People talk about how to make the language more appealing to young people, how to make it "cool", how we should improve the curriculum in schools etc. but teaching children a second language for one hour a day for 13 years isn't going to work. Saving and reviving the language may seem like an impossible task but in fact it is a very easy thing to do. My parents learned Irish as adults and they sent me and my brothers and sisters to an all-Irish playschool, primary school and secondary school, we didn't even have to "learn" it, when your young you can pick up languages easily. The language had been dead in our family for hundreds of years but now we can all speak it, we, and lots of families like us are a living example of how a language can be revived. The Gaelscoil movement is getting bigger by the day but this alone is not enough to revive the language nationally. What we need to do to save our language and culture from Anglo-American domination is to change every school in Ireland into a Gaelscoil. This may sound radical or far-fetched but given the fact that every primary school teacher in Ireland can speak Irish anyway this would be easy to phase in over an 8 year period, ie in the first year low-infants classes would be taught through Irish, in the second year the high and low infants classes would be taught through Irish and so on up to sixth class. While this was happening secondary teachers could be trained to teach through Irish. Within 18 years everybody in Ireland between the ages of 5-18 would be able to speak Irish. This would continue indefinitely and eventually everyone would be able to speak Irish. This is just a bare skeleton idea of how it can be done. Of course whether or not it will happen is a different question entirely, it all depends on whether we want to save our culture. I know there are lots more issues regarding this eg, would parents and the Catholic Church go along with this? Who knows at this stage but I think we should have a serious debate on how to revive our language. If this succeeded it would bean inspiration to every group around the world that is losing their culture. There is nothing inevitable about the anglicisation of Ireland or the decline of languages throughout the world, if we want to save and revive our language we can, all we need is the will to do it.
I found Seans article facinating but feel that all I can influence is whats happening in my own locality so I will address Colms piece.
I think that it is a great idea. It would meet resistence from theose within the country who have an inferiority complex towards things British but thankfully they are of an older generation.
Secondly in the mean time its not 1 hours a week but at least 3 hours a week for thirteen years and the fact that most people can't carry out a conversation after this lenght of tuition is to put it mildly "a thundering disgrace". Whoever in the Department of Education is responsible for this farce has a lot to answer for. How can people be expected to appreciate prose or poetry when they can't even speak the language? Irish people know more french and german after 5 years then they do Irish after 13 years. So does the finger point at the department of education? Is that where these opinions should be directed?
Its embarassing!
The institutionalisation of the Irish language is a hideous and racist bit of fake nationalism. Irish has not been spoken as a day to day language for many hundreds of years in much of this country, including the pale and much of the North East. Aside from recent immigrants, it's institututionality also discriminates against the descendants of the various Norse settlers who were relatively unassimilated at the time of the first English invasions. The Irish language and all of the nationalist myths and cults associated with it, was a crucile building block in the construction of the clerical Irish state which persisted for most of the last century. It was used as ameans of discriminating against protestants and foreigners in the allocation of jobs. It's use by the state had the effect of imposing a rigid homogenous cultural identity on what had previously been a quite varied population. It deepened the divide between North and South and gave the best possible argument to the orange bigots when they could just look south of the border and see the intellectual wasteland patrolled by bishops. A place where people were forced to speak a language that they had no interest in and no use for.
A small example of the small-minded, nationalist use of the Irish language came recently at the election count in Dublin for the abortion referendum. One of the returning officers called out the result in Irish then said, with a smirk, "now i'll read out the results in English, in case there are any foreigners here". He'd have us believe that people whose ancestors had arrived in Dublin 800 years ago remain 'foreigners'.
I've nothing against Irish, in fact I like it and use it from time to time, but I'd say that capitalism has no place for small languages in the long term. However, a few things that we could do at one.
1. Irish, like all second languages, to be made entirely voluntary.
2. No discrimination in favour of Irish speakers for jobs.
Badman,
You have some fairly strong points there about how the state has used Irish to create the one brand of national identity etc and for the most part they are true but to say that Irish has not been spoken widespread for hundreds of years means that the state historians have done a good job on you. Up until the famine about 70% of the people on this Ireland spoke Irish. Just because the palers living in their cocoon didn't doesn't mean... The famine probably wiped out an entire underclass which lead to the gombean middleclass values becoming the norm.(this is another issue altogether!).
If you travel through "ne Déise" (thats south Tipp and west Waterford) you will see the "Géill Slí" sign used instead of "yield right of way" because Irish was the spoken language here well after the foundation of the state.
I think Irish should be compulsory for the simple reason that all place names in Ireland including those in the Pale* and the North East have a meaning in Irish. This has to be important for people to know unless of course you are only looking at things through capitalist tinted glasses:-)
*Exceptions to this are housing estate names like Westminister Downs which seem to be popular around South Dublin.
Seas an Fód!
I am a secondary school student and the way they teach Irish would put any one off it.The book I'm studying now (saibhreas 5) consists of lectures on the dangers of drug use and car accidents.I think the car accidents are supposed to be good for reading comprehension(what time, how many people died etc.) there are always alot of them in Irish textbooks but .....lets just say it gets boring.
If they taught us irish with slightly more intresting texts or at least varied(airplanes crash too!)I think the chances of us students at least staying awake would be significantly higher!
Maybe you should try the book Learning Irish +the 4 cassetes
Thank you Carlos I'll check it out!