Upcoming Events

National | Miscellaneous

no events match your query!

New Events

National

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link North Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link ?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty

Anti-Empire >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb

offsite link The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog.? We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below).?

offsite link What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

offsite link The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by

The Saker >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N?118 Sat Feb 01, 2025 12:57 | en

offsite link 80th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp Sat Feb 01, 2025 12:16 | en

offsite link Misinterpretations of US trends (1/2), by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jan 28, 2025 06:59 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter #117 Fri Jan 24, 2025 19:54 | en

offsite link The United States bets its hegemony on the Fourth Industrial Revolution Fri Jan 24, 2025 19:26 | en

Voltaire Network >>

Endangered languages

category national | miscellaneous | news report author Friday May 31, 2002 16:43author by Sean Report this post to the editors

We should ask ourselves if we are doing enough to preserve the Irish language.Fight the destructive influence of the English language!!!

What does it mean to say a language is endangered?
An endangered language is one that is likely to become extinct in the near future. Many languages are failing out of use and being replaced by others that are more widely used in the region or nation, such as English in the U.S. or Spanish in Mexico. Unless cur- rent trends are reversed, these endangered languages will become extinct within the next century. Many other languages are no longer being learned by new generations of children or by new adult speakers; these languages will become extinct when their last speaker dies. In fact, dozens of languages today have only one native speaker still living, and that person's death will mean the extinction of the language: It will no longer be spoken, or known, by anyone.

Is that what happened to dead languages like Ancient Greek and Latin?
No. These languages are considered dead because they are no longer spoken in the form in which we find them in ancient writings. But they weren't abruptly replaced by other languages; instead, Ancient Greek slowly evolved into modern Greek, and Latin slowly evolved into modern Italian, Spanish, French, Romanian, and other languages. In the same way, the Old English of Chaucer's day is no longer spoken, but it has evolved into Modern English.

How do languages become extinct?
Outright genocide is one cause of language extinction. For example, when European invaders exterminated the Tasmanians in the early 19th century, an unknown number of languages died as well. Far more often, however, languages become extinct when a community finds itself under pressure to integrate with a larger or more powerful group. Sometimes the people learn the outsiders' language in addition to their own; this has happened in Greenland, a territory of Denmark, where Kalaallisut is learned alongside Danish. But often the community is pressured to give up its language and even its ethnic and cultural identity. This has been the case for the ethnic Kurds in Turkey, who are forbidden by law to print or formally teach their language. It has also been the case for younger speakers of Native American languages, who, as recently as the ig6os, were punished for speaking their native languages at boarding schools.

Is language extinction sudden or gradual?
Both. The fate of a language can be changed in a single generation if it is no longer being learned by children. This has been true for some Yupik Eskimo communities in Alaska, where just 20 years ago all of the children spoke Yupik; today the youngest speakers of Yupik in some of these communities are in their 2os, and the children speak only English. Likewise, Scots Gaelic was spoken on Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia, until the 194os, but by the 1970S the language was no longer being learned by children. In other cases, languages have declined much more slowly. Iroquoian languages like Onondaga and Mohawk, spoken in upstate New York and adjacent parts of Canada, have been declining for over two centuries; yet they are still spoken today by older adults and, in the case of Mohawk, some younger people as well.

How many languages are endangered?
According to one count, 6,703 separate languages were spoken in the world in i996. Of these, 1000 were spoken in the Americas, 2011 in Africa, 225 in Europe, 2165 in Asia, and 1320 in the Pacific, including Australia. These numbers should be taken with a grain of salt, because our information about many languages is scant or outdated, and it is hard to draw the line between languages and dialects. But most linguists agree that there are well over 5,ooo languages in the world. A century from now, however, many of these languages may be extinct. Some linguists believe the number may decrease by half; some say the total could fall to mere hundreds as the majority of the world's languages - most spoken by a few thousand people or less - give way to languages like English, Spanish, Portuguese, Mandarin Chinese, Russian, Indonesian, Arabic, Swahili, and Hindi. By some estimates, go% of the world's languages may vanish within the next century.

Whose languages are endangered?
Although the endangered languages are spoken by minority communities, these communities account for most of the world's languages. They include the tribes of Papua New Guinea, who alone speak as any as 900 languages; Aboriginal peoples of Australia, over go% of whose native languages will die with the current generation; the native peoples of the Americas, who still retain 90% or so of their languages; the national and tribal minorities of Africa, Asia, and Oceania, speaking several thousand more languages; and marginalized European peoples such as the Irish, the Frisians, the Provençal, and the Basques.

How many North American native languages are endangered?
According to a recent survey, out of hundreds of languages that were once spoken in North America, only 194 remain. Of these, 33 are spoken by both adults and children; another 34 are spoken by adults, but by few children; 73 are spoken almost entirely by adults over 50; 49 are spoken only by a few people, mostly over 70; and 5 may have already become extinct.

The languages that are not being transmitted to children, or that are being learned by few children, are endangered and likely to become extinct. In fact, only the 33 languages in the first group seem 'safe.' But most of these are threatened as well because their speakers live near other communities where the children speak English. And all native North American groups are under pressure to give up their native languages and use English instead. The younger generation feels the pressure especially strongly; television and movies often send a message that discourages the maintenance of community values, inviting young viewers to join a more glamorous and more commercialized world that has no apparent connection to their native community and its elders and traditions.

Nonetheless, although a great deal of linguistic heritage is clearly in danger, the fact that so many Native American languages have survived into the 2lSt century is evidence of the strength of these communities and of the fundamental value of language to human beings.

What does language extinction mean for a community-and for the rest of us?
When a community loses its language, it often loses a great deal of its cultural identity at the same time. Although language loss may be voluntary or involuntary, it always involves pressure of some kind, and it is often felt as a loss of social identity or as a symbol of defeat. That doesn't mean that a group's social identity is always lost when its language is lost; for example, both the Chumash in California and the Manx on the Isle of Man have lost their native languages, but not their identity as Chumash or Manx. But language is a powerful symbol of a group's identity. Much of the cultural, spiritual, and intellectual life of a people is experienced through language. This ranges from prayers, myths, ceremonies, poetry, oratory, and technical vocabulary to everyday greetings, leave- takings, conversational styles, humor, ways of speaking to children, and terms for habits, behaviors, and emotions. When a language is lost, all of this must be refashioned in the new language-with different words, sounds, and grammar- if it is to be kept at all. Frequently traditions are abruptly lost in the process and replaced by the cultural habits of the more powerful group. For these reasons, among others, it is often very important to the community itself that its language survive.

Much is lost from a scientific point of view as well when a language disappears. A people's history is passed down through its language, so when the language disappears, it may take with it important information about the early history of the community. The loss of human languages also severely limits what linguists can learn about human cognition. By studying what all of the world's languages have in common, we can find out what is and isn't possible in a human language. This in turn tells us important things about the human mind and how it is that children are able to learn a complex system like language so quickly and easily. The fewer languages there are to study, the less we will be able to learn about the human mind.

But wouldn't it be easier if everyone just spoke the same language?
Although for many people it's important to know a major national or international language, that does- n't mean they must abandon their mother tongue. Children who grow up speaking two or more languages learn those languages just as well as children who grow up speaking only one language.

What can be done to preserve endangered languages?
A community that wants to preserve or revive its language has a number of options. Perhaps the most dramatic story is that of Modern Hebrew, which was revived as a mother tongue after centuries of being learned and studied only in its ancient written form. Irish has had considerable institutional and political support as the national language of Ireland, despite major inroads by English. In New Zealand, Maori communities established nursery schools staffed by elders and conducted entirely in Maori, called kohanga reo, 'language nests'. There, and in Alaska, Hawaii, and elsewhere, this model is being extended to primary and in some cases secondary school. And in California, younger adults have become language apprentices to older adult speakers in communities where only a few older speakers are still living. A growing number of conferences, workshops, and publications now offer support for individuals, schools, and communities trying to preserve languages.

Because so many languages are in danger of disappearing, linguists are trying to learn as much about them as possible, so that even if the language disappears, all knowledge of the language won't disappear at the same time. Researchers make videotapes, audiotapes, and written records of language use in both formal and informal settings, along with translations.

In addition, they analyze the vocabulary and rules of the language and write dictionaries and grammars.

Linguists also work with communities around the world that want to preserve their languages, offering both technical and practical help with language teaching, maintenance, and revival. This help is based in part on the dictionaries and grammars that they write. But linguists can help in other ways, too, using their experience in teaching and studying a wide variety of languages. They can use what they've learned about other endangered languages to help a community preserve its own language, and they can take advantage of the latest technology for recording and studying languages.

Are new languages being born to replace the languages that die?
Yes. Many signed languages, including American Sign Language, have been born within the last few centuries. Tok Pisin, the national language of Papua New Guinea, developed from an English- based pidgin (a blend of two or more languages). And over many centuries, different dialects of a single language can grow to be distinct languages in their own right, just as dialects of Latin developed into French, Italian, and so on.

But these new languages do not compare to the linguistic heritage that is being lost. The thousands of languages spoken in the world today have evolved over the entire course of human history. Every group of related languages is separated from every other group by at least 5000 years of development, usually more. If English were to become the sole language of every person on earth, it would take tens of thousands of years to produce anything like the diversity that is our heritage-assuming we could somehow reproduce the conditions under which this diversity grew. For all practical purposes, the diversity we have now is absolutely irreplaceable.

For further information
Davis, Wade. 1999. "Vanishing Cultures". National Geographic. i96(2). 62-89.
Grenoble, Lenore, and Lindsay Whaley (eds.) i998. Endangered Languages: Language Loss and Community Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robins, Robert, and Eugenius Uhlenbeck (eds.) 1992. Endangered Languages. Oxford: Berg.
http://www.linguistlist.org

author by Colmpublication date Fri May 31, 2002 19:24author address author phone Report this post to the editors


With the latest report showing that the Gaelteacht is shrinking we could take a very pessimistic view on the future of the Irish language. People talk about how to make the language more appealing to young people, how to make it "cool", how we should improve the curriculum in schools etc. but teaching children a second language for one hour a day for 13 years isn't going to work. Saving and reviving the language may seem like an impossible task but in fact it is a very easy thing to do. My parents learned Irish as adults and they sent me and my brothers and sisters to an all-Irish playschool, primary school and secondary school, we didn't even have to "learn" it, when your young you can pick up languages easily. The language had been dead in our family for hundreds of years but now we can all speak it, we, and lots of families like us are a living example of how a language can be revived. The Gaelscoil movement is getting bigger by the day but this alone is not enough to revive the language nationally. What we need to do to save our language and culture from Anglo-American domination is to change every school in Ireland into a Gaelscoil. This may sound radical or far-fetched but given the fact that every primary school teacher in Ireland can speak Irish anyway this would be easy to phase in over an 8 year period, ie in the first year low-infants classes would be taught through Irish, in the second year the high and low infants classes would be taught through Irish and so on up to sixth class. While this was happening secondary teachers could be trained to teach through Irish. Within 18 years everybody in Ireland between the ages of 5-18 would be able to speak Irish. This would continue indefinitely and eventually everyone would be able to speak Irish. This is just a bare skeleton idea of how it can be done. Of course whether or not it will happen is a different question entirely, it all depends on whether we want to save our culture. I know there are lots more issues regarding this eg, would parents and the Catholic Church go along with this? Who knows at this stage but I think we should have a serious debate on how to revive our language. If this succeeded it would bean inspiration to every group around the world that is losing their culture. There is nothing inevitable about the anglicisation of Ireland or the decline of languages throughout the world, if we want to save and revive our language we can, all we need is the will to do it.

author by Eoinin na nEanpublication date Fri May 31, 2002 19:48author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I found Seans article facinating but feel that all I can influence is whats happening in my own locality so I will address Colms piece.

I think that it is a great idea. It would meet resistence from theose within the country who have an inferiority complex towards things British but thankfully they are of an older generation.

Secondly in the mean time its not 1 hours a week but at least 3 hours a week for thirteen years and the fact that most people can't carry out a conversation after this lenght of tuition is to put it mildly "a thundering disgrace". Whoever in the Department of Education is responsible for this farce has a lot to answer for. How can people be expected to appreciate prose or poetry when they can't even speak the language? Irish people know more french and german after 5 years then they do Irish after 13 years. So does the finger point at the department of education? Is that where these opinions should be directed?

Its embarassing!

author by badmanpublication date Sat Jun 01, 2002 00:01author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The institutionalisation of the Irish language is a hideous and racist bit of fake nationalism. Irish has not been spoken as a day to day language for many hundreds of years in much of this country, including the pale and much of the North East. Aside from recent immigrants, it's institututionality also discriminates against the descendants of the various Norse settlers who were relatively unassimilated at the time of the first English invasions. The Irish language and all of the nationalist myths and cults associated with it, was a crucile building block in the construction of the clerical Irish state which persisted for most of the last century. It was used as ameans of discriminating against protestants and foreigners in the allocation of jobs. It's use by the state had the effect of imposing a rigid homogenous cultural identity on what had previously been a quite varied population. It deepened the divide between North and South and gave the best possible argument to the orange bigots when they could just look south of the border and see the intellectual wasteland patrolled by bishops. A place where people were forced to speak a language that they had no interest in and no use for.

A small example of the small-minded, nationalist use of the Irish language came recently at the election count in Dublin for the abortion referendum. One of the returning officers called out the result in Irish then said, with a smirk, "now i'll read out the results in English, in case there are any foreigners here". He'd have us believe that people whose ancestors had arrived in Dublin 800 years ago remain 'foreigners'.

I've nothing against Irish, in fact I like it and use it from time to time, but I'd say that capitalism has no place for small languages in the long term. However, a few things that we could do at one.
1. Irish, like all second languages, to be made entirely voluntary.
2. No discrimination in favour of Irish speakers for jobs.

author by Eoineen na neanpublication date Sat Jun 01, 2002 00:47author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Badman,

You have some fairly strong points there about how the state has used Irish to create the one brand of national identity etc and for the most part they are true but to say that Irish has not been spoken widespread for hundreds of years means that the state historians have done a good job on you. Up until the famine about 70% of the people on this Ireland spoke Irish. Just because the palers living in their cocoon didn't doesn't mean... The famine probably wiped out an entire underclass which lead to the gombean middleclass values becoming the norm.(this is another issue altogether!).

If you travel through "ne Déise" (thats south Tipp and west Waterford) you will see the "Géill Slí" sign used instead of "yield right of way" because Irish was the spoken language here well after the foundation of the state.

I think Irish should be compulsory for the simple reason that all place names in Ireland including those in the Pale* and the North East have a meaning in Irish. This has to be important for people to know unless of course you are only looking at things through capitalist tinted glasses:-)

*Exceptions to this are housing estate names like Westminister Downs which seem to be popular around South Dublin.

Seas an Fód!


author by firewomanpublication date Wed Jun 05, 2002 09:29author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I am a secondary school student and the way they teach Irish would put any one off it.The book I'm studying now (saibhreas 5) consists of lectures on the dangers of drug use and car accidents.I think the car accidents are supposed to be good for reading comprehension(what time, how many people died etc.) there are always alot of them in Irish textbooks but .....lets just say it gets boring.
If they taught us irish with slightly more intresting texts or at least varied(airplanes crash too!)I think the chances of us students at least staying awake would be significantly higher!

author by carlospublication date Mon Jun 10, 2002 01:01author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Maybe you should try the book Learning Irish +the 4 cassetes

author by firewomanpublication date Wed Jun 12, 2002 02:18author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Thank you Carlos I'll check it out!

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2025 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy