Gemma O'Doherty: The speech you never heard. I wonder why? 05:28 Jan 15 0 comments A Decade of Evidence Demonstrates The Dramatic Failure Of Globalisation 15:39 Aug 23 1 comments Thatcher's " blind eye" to paedophilia 15:27 Mar 12 0 comments Total Revolution. A new philosophy for the 21st century. 15:55 Nov 17 0 comments The recent Ebola outbreak 19:28 Jul 03 1 comments more >>Blog Feeds
The SakerA bird's eye view of the vineyard The Bamiyan Buddhas: an Afghan tale Wed Mar 03, 2021 17:26 | amarynth Sitrep: Eradicating absolute poverty in China Wed Mar 03, 2021 16:07 | amarynth Leaked: Smith College memo demands workers admit White privilege Wed Mar 03, 2021 01:04 | amarynth Moveable Feast Cafe 2021/03/02 ? Open Thread Tue Mar 02, 2021 15:30 | Herb Swanson Bernays and Propaganda ? The Transition to Education and Commerce ? Part 4 Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:16 | amarynth
Public InquiryInterested in maladministration. Estd. 2005Mainstream media: Failing to speak truth to power David Quinn’s selective tolerance Anthony A Woulfe in judges clothing Anthony Sarah McInerney and political impartiality Anthony Did RTE journalists collude against Sinn Fein? Anthony
Human Rights in IrelandA Blog About Human RightsPoor Living Conditions for Migrants in Southern Italy Mon Jan 18, 2021 10:14 | Human Rights Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights Turkish President Calls On Greece To Comply With Human Rights on Syrian Refugee Issues Wed Mar 04, 2020 17:58 | Human Rights US Holds China To Account For Human Rights Violations Sun Oct 13, 2019 19:12 | Human Rights
Spirit of ContradictionThe Party and the Ballot Box Sun Jul 14, 2019 22:24 | Gavin Mendel-Gleason On The Decline and Fall of The American Empire and Socialism Sat Jan 26, 2019 01:52 | S. Duncan What is Dogmatism and Why Does It Matter? Wed Mar 21, 2018 08:10 | Sylvia Smith The Case of Comrade Dallas Mon Mar 19, 2018 19:44 | Sylvia Smith Review: Do Religions Evolve? Mon Aug 14, 2017 19:54 | Dara McHugh | Article about the dangers of software patents national | miscellaneous | news report Wednesday May 08, 2002 14:51 by Marc Stallman: Software patents victimise developers The EU - Commission is going to introduce SWpatents. Software patents are victimising developers with a system which is making it increasingly difficult to write programs, according to free software guru Richard Stallman http://news.zdnet.co.uk/story/0,,s2107481,00.html Richard Stallman can be found at For European Petition see Myriads of information and International Campaign UK Campaign For the last few years the European Patent Office has, contrary to the letter and spirit of the existing law, granted about 30000 patents on computer-implementable rules of organisation and calculation (programs for computers). Now the European patent movement wants to change the law so as to legalise this practise and remove all barriers to patentability. Programmers are to lose their freedom of expression and the control over their copyrighted work. Citizens are to be barred from independently developping their preferred forms of communication. As a compensation for this "intellectual expropriation", we are offered ... less innovation, less competition, less good software.
European Commission wants Unlimited Patentability! The patent system's history can be described as a victorious movement of lawyers against economists. As long as patentable inventions were confined to the realm of applied natural science and only industrially manufactured material objects were monopolised, the negative effects of these monopolies were not widely felt and still seemed, at first glance, justifiable in view of macro-economic advantages such as stimulation of R&D. During the last decades however the patent system has been expanding into "fields of technology", in which it provokes only tearful laughter from specialists in addition to the ever more devastating criticism from economists. Yet patent inflation is continuing at full pace year by year, due to the uncontrolled legislative power of an congregation of believers led by patent offices, patent lawyers and patent departments of various corporations and governments. The victims of the patent landgrab are still relatively dispersed, unaware and unorganised. Fairly visible damage is incurred by small and medium software companies, independent programmers, free/opensource software and even patent jurisprudence, whose recent theoretical disorientation is perhaps most adequately described by means of satire. |