Cops welcomed with smoke bombs and flares Dublin Pride 19:57 Jul 14 0 comments Gemma O'Doherty: The speech you never heard. I wonder why? 05:28 Jan 15 0 comments A Decade of Evidence Demonstrates The Dramatic Failure Of Globalisation 15:39 Aug 23 1 comments Thatcher's " blind eye" to paedophilia 15:27 Mar 12 0 comments Total Revolution. A new philosophy for the 21st century. 15:55 Nov 17 0 comments more >>Blog Feeds
Anti-EmpireNorth Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi? Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi? Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi? ?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi? US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty
The SakerA bird's eye view of the vineyard
Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Public InquiryInterested in maladministration. Estd. 2005RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Human Rights in IrelandPromoting Human Rights in Ireland |
Shannon
national |
miscellaneous |
news report
Monday March 17, 2003 10:57 by Sparks
Article from the Irish Times regarding the pro-shannon forum held recently From today's Irish Times: Group set up to protect Shannon interests Addressing a public meeting to discuss the future of Shannon, Fianna Fáil TD Mr Tony Killeen said: "These are difficult times for people in the US. They can be a very patriotic people and will certainly not be grateful to those who they feel are letting them down." Mr Killeen told the meeting that unless the use of Shannon by the US military "is handled in the way that it needs to be handled, Shannon airport runs a huge risk in terms of its attractiveness to Americans into the future". He said yesterday it would be hard to make an argument for withdrawing the use of Shannon to the US military when opponents of the proposed US action against Iraq, France and Germany, continue to allow the US to use their airports and airspace. His Fine Gael counterpart Mr Pat Breen TD - who organised the Shannon meeting - said he would remain in favour of US troops going through Shannon in the absence of a second UN resolution and the US taking unilateral action to go to war with Iraq. At the meeting, which was attended by more than 200 people, mainly airport workers, concern was expressed about the publicity over recent anti-war protests at the airport. Mr Breen told the meeting that images of gardaí in riot gear is not the image local people want of Shannon and Cllr Patricia McCarthy (Ind) said: "The protests have done terrible damage to the airport. The Government has designated Shannon as the airport to transit US troops so it should put in place a financial package to allow Shannon recover from the negative publicity." Mr Michael Ryan, managing director of FBO Shannon, said yesterday: "I feel very strongly that the US military should be allowed to continue to use Shannon. They have been using the airport for the past 40 years and it has never been an issue before and it should not be an issue now." At the meeting, it was unanimously agreed by those present that an action group be set up to protect the interests of the airport. © The Irish Times So, where were IAWM, GNAW, PANA, the Greens, Enda Kenny, or any of the others who have been protesting the use of Shannon either in the past, or in the proposed future of US unilateral invasion of Iraq? |
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (4 of 4)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4The meeting was held at the AIRPORT hotel.
Most of the people who most strongly protested against it are injuncted against going onto that property...
Michael Ryan, managing director of FBO Shannon, said yesterday: "I feel very strongly that the US military should be allowed to continue to use Shannon. They have been using the airport for the past 40 years and it has never been an issue before and it should not be an issue now."
---------------------------------------------
FBO have never explained why one of their staff was seen wearing a Deptartment of Defense badge
which identified him as a "Special Agent"
FBO are the company that does the 'ground services' for the Hercules and the command jets and the navy logistics jets.
"I feel very strongly" means, I get most of the business.
Apart from the politics of the question, my big gripe against Shannon Airport is that it is a dump. You can't get a meal there, all that's available is sandwiches at rip-off prices. The place essentially closes down after about 1 p.m. There's nothing to do there, I don't know how many hours I have wasted sitting on the dirty seats in the dirty departure hall. They don't employ anyone to go around and clean off the tables etc, so the result is a filthy departure hall. And I don't like the people who work there either...
I have a strange feeling that those involved in the protest were not invited to the meeting (hence the unanimous vote) It did not appear to be an open meeting, merely a forum for the business interests in the area who are most likely to support America