Shannon

national | miscellaneous | news report

Monday March 17, 2003 10:57

by Sparks

Article from the Irish Times regarding the pro-shannon forum held recently

From today's Irish Times:

Group set up to protect Shannon interests
By Gordon Deegan

Business and tourism interests have been warned of the negative consequences for Shannon airport and the west of Ireland if the use of Shannon is withdrawn from the US military.

Addressing a public meeting to discuss the future of Shannon, Fianna Fáil TD Mr Tony Killeen said: "These are difficult times for people in the US. They can be a very patriotic people and will certainly not be grateful to those who they feel are letting them down."

Mr Killeen told the meeting that unless the use of Shannon by the US military "is handled in the way that it needs to be handled, Shannon airport runs a huge risk in terms of its attractiveness to Americans into the future". He said yesterday it would be hard to make an argument for withdrawing the use of Shannon to the US military when opponents of the proposed US action against Iraq, France and Germany, continue to allow the US to use their airports and airspace.

His Fine Gael counterpart Mr Pat Breen TD - who organised the Shannon meeting - said he would remain in favour of US troops going through Shannon in the absence of a second UN resolution and the US taking unilateral action to go to war with Iraq.

At the meeting, which was attended by more than 200 people, mainly airport workers, concern was expressed about the publicity over recent anti-war protests at the airport.

Mr Breen told the meeting that images of gardaí in riot gear is not the image local people want of Shannon and Cllr Patricia McCarthy (Ind) said: "The protests have done terrible damage to the airport. The Government has designated Shannon as the airport to transit US troops so it should put in place a financial package to allow Shannon recover from the negative publicity."

Mr Michael Ryan, managing director of FBO Shannon, said yesterday: "I feel very strongly that the US military should be allowed to continue to use Shannon. They have been using the airport for the past 40 years and it has never been an issue before and it should not be an issue now."

At the meeting, it was unanimously agreed by those present that an action group be set up to protect the interests of the airport.

So, where were IAWM, GNAW, PANA, the Greens, Enda Kenny, or any of the others who have been protesting the use of Shannon either in the past, or in the proposed future of US unilateral invasion of Iraq?

save preference

Comments (4 of 4)

Where were they

by answer

Mon Mar 17, 2003 20:59

The meeting was held at the AIRPORT hotel.
Most of the people who most strongly protested against it are injuncted against going onto that property...

Ryan's FBO

by Tim

Mon Mar 17, 2003 21:03

Michael Ryan, managing director of FBO Shannon, said yesterday: "I feel very strongly that the US military should be allowed to continue to use Shannon. They have been using the airport for the past 40 years and it has never been an issue before and it should not be an issue now."

---------------------------------------------

FBO have never explained why one of their staff was seen wearing a Deptartment of Defense badge
which identified him as a "Special Agent"

FBO are the company that does the 'ground services' for the Hercules and the command jets and the navy logistics jets.

"I feel very strongly" means, I get most of the business.

Shannon Airport is a dump

by dick dowling

Mon Mar 17, 2003 21:23

Apart from the politics of the question, my big gripe against Shannon Airport is that it is a dump. You can't get a meal there, all that's available is sandwiches at rip-off prices. The place essentially closes down after about 1 p.m. There's nothing to do there, I don't know how many hours I have wasted sitting on the dirty seats in the dirty departure hall. They don't employ anyone to go around and clean off the tables etc, so the result is a filthy departure hall. And I don't like the people who work there either...

Not invited

by Evil Dave

Tue Mar 18, 2003 10:52

I have a strange feeling that those involved in the protest were not invited to the meeting (hence the unanimous vote) It did not appear to be an open meeting, merely a forum for the business interests in the area who are most likely to support America

Upcoming Events

New Events

Other Press

User Preferences

Feeds

Blog Feeds

The Saker

Public Inquiry

Human Rights in Ireland

Lockdown Skeptics

Shannon

Comments (4 of 4)