Cops welcomed with smoke bombs and flares Dublin Pride 19:57 Jul 14 0 comments Gemma O'Doherty: The speech you never heard. I wonder why? 05:28 Jan 15 0 comments A Decade of Evidence Demonstrates The Dramatic Failure Of Globalisation 15:39 Aug 23 1 comments Thatcher's " blind eye" to paedophilia 15:27 Mar 12 0 comments Total Revolution. A new philosophy for the 21st century. 15:55 Nov 17 0 comments more >>Blog Feeds
Anti-EmpireNorth Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi? Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi? Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi? ?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi? US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty
The SakerA bird's eye view of the vineyard
Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Public InquiryInterested in maladministration. Estd. 2005RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Human Rights in IrelandPromoting Human Rights in Ireland |
Five Burlington cases dismissed
national |
miscellaneous |
news report
Thursday January 30, 2003 13:46 by Andrew
Five cases against activists arising out of the police riot at the anti-capitalist protest at the Burlington hotel (Oct 2001) were dismissed in court today. Details below based on a mobile call from outside the court. Four of the cases, including that of a WSM member, relied on the evidence of a cop who was supposed to be the arresting officer. His evidence fell apart when he claimed to have made the arrests within one minute of the scuffle at the doors of the hotel. Anyone who was there at the night knows that the police charge and subsequent arrests happened a good deal after the scuffle. The cops evidence was full of other inconsistencies, when the defence pointed out that if this was a jury trial the case would already have been dismissed the judge then moved to lecture the cops and dismiss it. The fifth case to be dismissed was of another protester charged with carrying an 'offensive weapon' ie some tiny pocket knife. Details of the original demonstration at http://struggle.ws/wsm/news/2001/butlingtonOCT.html |
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (1 of 1)
Jump To Comment: 1Just to say that i was one of the activists cleared this morning. The difference in being convicted or dismissed seems to have come down to the strength of the case put by the defence lawyer in exposing the 'inconsistencies' of the cops case.
Also the video evidence was helpful, though not in our case decisive.
The cops are likely to try and build a much more 'consistent' case the next time they decide to attack the movement. We should try and have a lot of digital cameras on hand for the fifteenth and other protests, and i think in the case of large demos and possible direct actions beware of provocations.