Gemma O'Doherty: The speech you never heard. I wonder why? 05:28 Jan 15 0 comments A Decade of Evidence Demonstrates The Dramatic Failure Of Globalisation 15:39 Aug 23 1 comments Thatcher's " blind eye" to paedophilia 15:27 Mar 12 0 comments Total Revolution. A new philosophy for the 21st century. 15:55 Nov 17 0 comments The recent Ebola outbreak 19:28 Jul 03 1 comments more >>Blog Feeds
Anti-EmpireCuomo Wins Al-Qaeda’s ‘Jihadi of the... Wed Mar 03, 2021 15:15 | Rafi Metz Facing MBS Questions Washington Suddenly... Wed Mar 03, 2021 14:38 | Dave DeCamp Previously Unreleased Footage of Iranian... Wed Mar 03, 2021 13:27 | Colonel Cassad Orban Gets a Sinopharm Jab, Slovakia Imp... Wed Mar 03, 2021 12:34 | bne IntelliNews Anti-Empire — Shadow Banned by Google Tue Mar 02, 2021 19:12 | Anti-Empire
The SakerA bird's eye view of the vineyard Sitrep: Eradicating absolute poverty in China Wed Mar 03, 2021 16:07 | amarynth Leaked: Smith College memo demands workers admit White privilege Wed Mar 03, 2021 01:04 | amarynth Moveable Feast Cafe 2021/03/02 ? Open Thread Tue Mar 02, 2021 15:30 | Herb Swanson Bernays and Propaganda ? The Transition to Education and Commerce ? Part 4 Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:16 | amarynth Book review: ?Disintegration? by Andrei Martyanov Tue Mar 02, 2021 02:32 | The Saker
Public InquiryInterested in maladministration. Estd. 2005Mainstream media: Failing to speak truth to power David Quinn’s selective tolerance Anthony A Woulfe in judges clothing Anthony Sarah McInerney and political impartiality Anthony Did RTE journalists collude against Sinn Fein? Anthony
Spirit of ContradictionThe Party and the Ballot Box Sun Jul 14, 2019 22:24 | Gavin Mendel-Gleason On The Decline and Fall of The American Empire and Socialism Sat Jan 26, 2019 01:52 | S. Duncan What is Dogmatism and Why Does It Matter? Wed Mar 21, 2018 08:10 | Sylvia Smith The Case of Comrade Dallas Mon Mar 19, 2018 19:44 | Sylvia Smith Review: Do Religions Evolve? Mon Aug 14, 2017 19:54 | Dara McHugh | Powell's Mid East Mission a Great Success. Here's is Why national | miscellaneous | news report Tuesday April 23, 2002 03:11 by Stephen McDonald Op Ed on the results of Powell's recent mission for a cease fire Despite the punditry, the best thing imaginable happened this past week, Colin Powell´s visit to the Middle East. The US Secretary of State went to the troubled region to try to broker a cease fire, in a war where the screws on the pressure cooker have been tightened to the max and the burner is on full bore. There is about to be an explosion and the United States, under constant pressure from the world, felt that it needed to step in and try to broker a cease fire deal. First things first. It is naive to think that any cease fire could be negotiated when both sides are still primed for the fight. Historically, cease fire agreements come after stalemates; it appears neither side has reached a point where they are ready to sue for peace in the form of a cease fire. There has to be a military victory for one side to truly submit and humble themselves to an oppressor (a title that both sides have used on the other), and it´s clear that neither side is even close to this. The true gem of Mr. Powell´s excursion to the region is that he showed the world, without a doubt, that Yassir Arafat has no interest in peace. As a career instigator, his job security lies in stirring the Palestinian people to riot-like frenzy, where they sacrifice their children for his cause - maintaining power. Peace is the furthest thing from Mr. Arafat´s mind. In a cunning move, the Bush Administration appeased the world´s elite and seemingly heeded calls to get involved. It looked like the best intentions were going to be served. From the view of the world´s media, who is overwhelmingly pro-Arab and pro-Palestinian, it looked like a great opportunity to sling some mud at the US. Not the case. This is what happened. Colin Powell, at the direction of his boss, was to show the world a clear demonstration of Mr. Arafat´s intentions - that is, to drag out the conflict for all it is worth. Exiting the stage and letting the world come to the conclusion that the Israelis came to years ago, Washington was able to toss the ball to the Palestinians, as if saying, “When you´re ready for peace, bypass Yassir Arafat and we´ll help you with statehood.” In a news conference yesterday, Mr. Arafat was furious that Mr. Powell did not hang around to listen to his ranting on the media´s soapbox. He was visibly shaking in anger as the absence of Colin Powell, tacitly supported the Israeli conclusion, from last December- that the terrorist in sheep´s clothing is “irrelevant.” George Bush was shrewd to let the global media elite do his work for him. The second benefit of Mr. Powell´s trip was showing that the heads of state in the region are hopelessly anti-Israel. King Mohammed VI´s cool reception towards offering Mr. Arafat exile in his country simply expressed that he would like to see the conflict continue. The rhetoric flowing from Middle Eastern capitols is hardly promoting any type of peace in the area. If the US had stayed home, Yassir Arafat and his coalition of dictators would have looked like heroes, as they called for peace on one hand and supported terrorism on the other. By calling for the United States to get involved in the deadlock, the European elite stated, in essence, their inability to have any leverage in the matter. The liberal countries of the European Union are more dependent on oil from the region than the United States is. They have no choice but to reprimand Israel for actions in self defense. If they were to criticize the Arab nations for their continued support of terror, both verbal and economic, the effects would be disastrous. The post modern countries of Europe can neither defend themselves militarily or at the table diplomatically. Washington´s message to the region is clear. To the Palestinians: if you want your own state, start playing ball at the peace table and you just might get statehood. To Israel: we, too, recognize Yassir Arafat´s irrelevance and we´ll stay quiet, because we understand that current affairs among the Palestinians promote two ideals - death and anarchy. |
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (1 of 1)
Jump To Comment: 1This analysis is simply not true. It is the kind
of thinking that the facist US war-mongering govt
wants you to think. It takes no account of the
desperate plight on the ground nor the intense
background efforts by the Israel & the US Corporate
govt. make Arafat irrelvant. They have already
tested the political water (from Sharon) about
regretting that he was not killed in the 80s.
The agenda the US and Israel however is to make
Arafat irrelevant, because he is one of the few
leaders (whether you like him or not), who can
pick up the phone and get the attention of
governments of other states. Who can name any
other Palestinian with the same 'media' exposure.
By eliminating Arafat, Israel backed by the US
can go in and kill many thousands of Palestinians
and forcefully expell them to places like Jordan,
Syria and Egypt and in such circumstances it will
be easier for the Corporate media to ignore their
calls. At the same time Syria would probably make
some rumblings, but this would just play beautifully
into the US hands, since they have been on and off
the rogue nation list.
If you doubt me, then how come, he hear absolutely
nothing about the war in the Congo, where it is
estimated at least 2 million people have died in the
last 3 or 4 years. This is exactly the intention
of Israel. And indeed the Israeli press has openly
discussed expelling all the Palestinians.