Cops welcomed with smoke bombs and flares Dublin Pride 19:57 Jul 14 0 comments Gemma O'Doherty: The speech you never heard. I wonder why? 05:28 Jan 15 0 comments A Decade of Evidence Demonstrates The Dramatic Failure Of Globalisation 15:39 Aug 23 1 comments Thatcher's " blind eye" to paedophilia 15:27 Mar 12 0 comments Total Revolution. A new philosophy for the 21st century. 15:55 Nov 17 0 comments more >>Blog Feeds
The SakerA bird's eye view of the vineyard
Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Public InquiryInterested in maladministration. Estd. 2005RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Human Rights in IrelandPromoting Human Rights in Ireland
Lockdown Skeptics
Think Tank?s Net Zero Survey Concludes the Public is the Problem Fri Jan 24, 2025 13:10 | Ben Pile
Number of Children Who Think They are Wrong Sex Surges 50-Fold Fri Jan 24, 2025 11:10 | Will Jones
Lib Dem Leader Ed Davey: Go Back to Your Constituencies and Prepare to Live in Mud and Grass Huts Fri Jan 24, 2025 09:00 | Chris Morrison
In Episode 27 of the Sceptic: David Shipley on Southport, Fred de Fossard on Trump vs Woke Capitalis... Fri Jan 24, 2025 07:00 | Richard Eldred
News Round-Up Fri Jan 24, 2025 01:20 | Will Jones |
Neutrality? Ah, shure you an yer oul neutrality!
national |
miscellaneous |
news report
Monday December 16, 2002 05:01 by Phuq Hedd
Interesting new moves by Convention on Future of Europe Defence Group Proposals are afoot to remove the veto power of EU members and replace consensus with simple majority voting. Proposed mutual-defence obligations also leave Ireland's "neutrality" in an interesting position. Compare this pre-Nice Treaty article
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (5 of 5)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5''This section now requires registration.''
please post the whole article
because:
a) to read the article requires registration
b) it will annoy ray
c) especially b)
Unless Europe finds the solidarity, intelligence, courage and will to challenge and resist American power, Europe itself will deserve Alexander Herzen's declaration--"We are not the doctors. We are the disease".
http://www.counterpunch.org/pinter1213.html
The far-reaching report calls for the end of veto rights to block military operations and the creation of new mutual defence and "solidarity" clauses.
In a long, detailed series of recommendations, it also demands the creation of a new EU armaments agency and for military research to be funded by the Union.
The final paper, which has been seen by the Irish Independent, was not agreed by the full committee, with the Green TD, John Gormley and representatives from Finland and Sweden - both neutral states - distancing themselves from the conclusions.
----------8<--------------8<-----------------
I don't know how accurate Sweeney's report is. Do you have other sources that provide a different interpretation?
Sorry Ms Hedd,
I meant the counterpunch article has nothing to do with common defence. (I just thought it was interesting, but didn't want to post it as a copied-and-pasted "new" article). The Europe Convention proposals are obviously the materialisation of all the fears that anti-Nice campaigners expressed about neutrality over the past two years.
The media - including Conor Sweeney - are now crying foul about the EU messing with Ireland's neutrality. This is the same media which hoodwinked the Irish people into believing that Europe is not a threat to Irish neutrality.
Under the Convention proposals, as I interpret them, an attack on one EU state would represent an attack on the EU and all member states would be required to assist in the defence of the country that was attacked. This would not necessarily mean military defence, but all states would be required to provide political "solidarity" and to make all EU institutions available for the defence of the attacked country.
Aside from the fact that this would destroy any pretence of neutrality and sovereignty in Ireland, I also wonder how it would apply if, for instance, Spain and Morocco had a row over the islands and colonies that Spain is refusing to return to Morocco. Personally, I consider these territories to be colonial outposts that rightly belong to Morocco, not Spain. However, should the two sides engage militarily, would all other EU countries be obliged to support Spain?
Counterpunch has carried a few interesting pieces on the Nice referendum. It'll be interesting to see if any of the journos that were so busy avoiding or dismissing the neutrality issue will now admit that they lobbied for a dilution of democracy.