Gemma O'Doherty: The speech you never heard. I wonder why? 05:28 Jan 15 0 comments A Decade of Evidence Demonstrates The Dramatic Failure Of Globalisation 15:39 Aug 23 1 comments Thatcher's " blind eye" to paedophilia 15:27 Mar 12 0 comments Total Revolution. A new philosophy for the 21st century. 15:55 Nov 17 0 comments The recent Ebola outbreak 19:28 Jul 03 1 comments more >>Blog Feeds
Anti-EmpireCuomo Wins Al-Qaeda’s ‘Jihadi of the... Wed Mar 03, 2021 15:15 | Rafi Metz Facing MBS Questions Washington Suddenly... Wed Mar 03, 2021 14:38 | Dave DeCamp Previously Unreleased Footage of Iranian... Wed Mar 03, 2021 13:27 | Colonel Cassad Orban Gets a Sinopharm Jab, Slovakia Imp... Wed Mar 03, 2021 12:34 | bne IntelliNews Anti-Empire — Shadow Banned by Google Tue Mar 02, 2021 19:12 | Anti-Empire
The SakerA bird's eye view of the vineyard Sitrep: Eradicating absolute poverty in China Wed Mar 03, 2021 16:07 | amarynth Leaked: Smith College memo demands workers admit White privilege Wed Mar 03, 2021 01:04 | amarynth Moveable Feast Cafe 2021/03/02 ? Open Thread Tue Mar 02, 2021 15:30 | Herb Swanson Bernays and Propaganda ? The Transition to Education and Commerce ? Part 4 Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:16 | amarynth Book review: ?Disintegration? by Andrei Martyanov Tue Mar 02, 2021 02:32 | The Saker
Human Rights in IrelandA Blog About Human RightsPoor Living Conditions for Migrants in Southern Italy Mon Jan 18, 2021 10:14 | Human Rights Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights Turkish President Calls On Greece To Comply With Human Rights on Syrian Refugee Issues Wed Mar 04, 2020 17:58 | Human Rights US Holds China To Account For Human Rights Violations Sun Oct 13, 2019 19:12 | Human Rights
Spirit of ContradictionThe Party and the Ballot Box Sun Jul 14, 2019 22:24 | Gavin Mendel-Gleason On The Decline and Fall of The American Empire and Socialism Sat Jan 26, 2019 01:52 | S. Duncan What is Dogmatism and Why Does It Matter? Wed Mar 21, 2018 08:10 | Sylvia Smith The Case of Comrade Dallas Mon Mar 19, 2018 19:44 | Sylvia Smith Review: Do Religions Evolve? Mon Aug 14, 2017 19:54 | Dara McHugh | Turmoil in Venezuela national | miscellaneous | news report Wednesday April 17, 2002 16:02 by Joe C - SWP Coup foiled by popular rising THE POOR of Venezuela defeated an attempted coup against the country's president, Hugo Chavez, last weekend. The attempt to remove Chavez was the work of the head of the employers' organisation, with the connivance of army generals, the head of the Catholic church, and even a corrupt trade union leader.
Their heroism split the army, broke the coup attempt, and saw Chavez restored to office. The coup's failure is also a serious setback for the gang around George W Bush in the US White House. The South American country is one the world's biggest oil producers, and it also supplies 15 percent of all US oil imports. At least some of those around Bush's White House seem to have encouraged the coup plotters. The coup attempt was prepared by Venezuela's employers, who seized on Chavez's appointment of new directors to the state oil company as a pretext to organise a shutdown of industry. The corrupt leader of Venezuela's main union federation claimed the shutdown was a "strike" since it had the support of middle and upper management, and called on workers to support it. Disgracefully, the International Federation of Free Trade Unions, to which Britain's TUC is affiliated, supported him in this. On the second day of the shutdown last week there was a mass anti-Chavez demonstration of the middle classes in Caracas. The protest clashed with a smaller demonstration of Chavez supporters, and shooting took place. Supporters of the coup within the armed forces then intervened, claiming they were "preventing bloodshed", and declared that Chavez had resigned. Carmona, head of the employers' organisation, declared himself president, closed down the country's congress, and began mass arrests of those believed to be Chavez supporters. What upset his plans and saw him removed from office was the reaction among the poor. The popular uprising saw sudden panic overtake many ruling class figures who had backed the coup only hours before. They feared civil war between different sections of the armed forces. They also feared a repetition of the great riots of 1989, the "Caracazo". On that occasion a spontaneous revolt of the country's poor against a government and International Monetary Fund cuts package was only put down after more than 1,000 deaths. The mere threat of a repetition of such turmoil was enough for the heads of the armed forces to force Carmona to resign and announce Chavez's reinstatement.
Struggle from below is key BY SUNDAY the forces that had plotted to overthrow Hugo Chavez were terrified by the sight of the poor protesting on the streets. They brought Chavez back in the hope they could persuade him to bring the poor under control again. Armed forces commanders who switched from supporting the coup to opposing it will now be putting pressure on Chavez. They are telling him the only way he can remain secure is by following policies of "moderation". In his first statement on restoration to office Chavez seemed to endorse that message himself. He announced he was convoking a "round table of national unity" involving "the Catholic and evangelical churches, the employers, the political parties and their leaders, the unions and the mass media". To those who had risked their lives going on the streets on his behalf he said, "I hear there has been rioting and looting. Let's return home and reflect upon events." It is a message that many who took to the streets will not want to accept. They saw how little concern the bosses' have for democracy or human rights. They are bitter at the newspapers and TV proprietors for conniving in the coup attempt. They want to be rid of those military commanders who did not immediately move against the coup. It is up to ordinary people to take action to challenge the power of those at the top of society while their structures of control are in disarray. This cannot be done by relying, as much of the left has done for three years, on Chavez to do things using the top-down method. It means direct struggle from below, run by workers and the poor themselves, not middle class military officers who can so easily switch sides. It also means being absolutely clear that attacking the wages and conditions of employed workers is no way to help the unemployed, the semi-employed and the rural poor. That only plays into the hands of the rich, the multinationals and the Bush gang in the White House.
Who is Hugo Chavez? HUGO CHAVEZ has upset the United States in his three years in office. He has campaigned to strengthen the OPEC organisation of oil producing countries, cultivated a friendship with Cuba's Fidel Castro, and refused to support the US- backed war against left wing guerrilla groups in neighbouring Colombia. Chavez has also upset Venezuela's rulers by promising to reduce the huge gap between rich and poor. His talk of thoroughgoing reform had led to an unexpected electoral victory for him in 1998, and massive popularity during his first year in office. His poll ratings have fallen in the last year. This is because his political method prevented him turning talk of reform into real improvements for the mass of people. Chavez is a career military officer who tried unsuccessfully to seize power in the early 1990s. His aim was to introduce a series of top-down reforms while leaving Venezuelan capitalism intact. After a spell in prison Chavez turned to the electoral road in order to introduce the same kind of changes. After his electoral victory he insisted he was in favour of the "mixed economy", not an onslaught on capitalism. When his reforms faced resistance he relied on the command structure of the armed forces to push them through, not a mobilisation of the mass of people. His measures antagonised the ruling class and the US government but did not produce the great social changes Chavez had promised. His top-down approach has also led him to attack the wages and conditions of employed workers, even while talking about help to the unemployed, the semi-employed and the rural poor. It was this that enabled union leader Alfredo Ramos to back the employers' shutdown of industry. In this way, Chavez's own policies played into the hands of those who wanted to overthrow him.
A defeat for the Bush gang THE ATTEMPTED coup came after a long series of denunciations of Chavez by the US government. In February the US State Department and the CIA expressed their "worry" over his activities. A US State Department official told the Washington Post, "Venezuela is in a very dangerous position. If Chavez does not arrange things quickly he will not complete his term in office." This suggests that at least a section of the US government encouraged the coup plotters. The New York Times spelled out Chavez's crimes in US eyes: "Visions of a united South America unshackled from the dominance of Washington's power," "Selling oil to Castro," "His not so tacit support for the Colombian rebels," and, "The potential threat he posed to thousands of American gas stations." "Above all," the paper argued, "the US wants stability in its backyard. Mr Chavez did not fit in with President Bush's vision of the century of the Americas." This is in line with the approach of the core group in the Bush administration, who hold that the US can do whatever it wants anywhere in the world. The Bush gang suffered a significant setback when the poor took to the streets of Caracas on Saturday. That should be good news for everyone opposed to US power. |
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (7 of 7)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Joe C,
I don't agree with the SWP on many things (mostly their organizational structure and how that concentrates power into the party), but I agree with your analysis that Chavez is a failure as a socialist because of his authoritarian style. It should also be pointed out that he has NEVER stated any program of concrete reform and has kept his hands firmly on the reins of power.
The overthrow of the coup demonstrates that if the people decide that they don't want a particular leader then they can remove her/him.
It's a pity that they didn't decide to do away with the ineffective (if he were effective then there'd be no poor to revolt and no rich to plot a coup!) system of leadership.
Democracy is not choosing a different leader, it's controlling your own society through non-authoritarian organization.
The SWP and other such jokers are not intrested in actual results because they are still wasting their time beliving in a Marxist Revoultion in a changed world, poor aul' Karl must be spinning in his grave having his Cult mis-using his legacy.
Please people get a grip Chavez is getting results, like other realist Left wing leaders, more results than you lads sticking up a few posters and frighting off any sensisible person that would like to get incolved in peace, community action which are really intrested in aiding progress.
Stop wasting your time and get involved in REAL POLITICS
Viva Chavez, Viva Fidel, Viva FARC
The SWP are an irrelevance, but your assertion that working class revolution isn't possible because we live in "a changed world" is just poisonous.
The world has changed in many ways, but we still live in a class society. The vast majority of people still do the work and the bosses still reap the profits.
Billions of people live in grinding poverty while a few have boundless wealth. Capitalist wars rage around the world, while billionaires and their politicians enjoy fine wine and caviar.
Yet what do we here from Fran? Things are different now. The working class can't liberate itself. Instead we are to look towards a rather incoherent list of people to do it for us, some Stalinists and a reformist.
Well thats not good enough.
Thanks Joe..we were all waiting to see what the SWP party line was. Should we all learn off by heart the appropriate phrases and use them in casual conversation?
whaaa are youse talkin about, youse all mad yia are.
I didn't post the SWP message so I could read more secterian bolloix.
Look all of us of who give a shit about making society adhere turely to the values of Liberty, Faternity and Equality should get behind the people that are making it happen, not just talking about making it happen according to their own little perverted preferences.
Viva Chavez, Viva Fidel, Viva FARC, Viva PFLP
Bloddy Stalinist