Upcoming Events

National | Miscellaneous

no events match your query!

New Events

National

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link Cuomo Wins Al-Qaeda’s ‘Jihadi of the... Wed Mar 03, 2021 15:15 | Rafi Metz

offsite link Facing MBS Questions Washington Suddenly... Wed Mar 03, 2021 14:38 | Dave DeCamp

offsite link Previously Unreleased Footage of Iranian... Wed Mar 03, 2021 13:27 | Colonel Cassad

offsite link Orban Gets a Sinopharm Jab, Slovakia Imp... Wed Mar 03, 2021 12:34 | bne IntelliNews

offsite link Anti-Empire — Shadow Banned by Google Tue Mar 02, 2021 19:12 | Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Sitrep: Eradicating absolute poverty in China Wed Mar 03, 2021 16:07 | amarynth
By Godfree Roberts ? selected from his extensive weekly newsletter : Here Comes China plus editorial notes. You can get it here:  https://www.herecomeschina.... The Biggest News Xi declares ‘complete victory’

offsite link Leaked: Smith College memo demands workers admit White privilege Wed Mar 03, 2021 01:04 | amarynth
by Ramin Mazaheri for the Saker Blog As a daily reporter, columnist and author it seems I have developed a reputation for unparalleled bravery in exposing truths which the 1%

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2021/03/02 ? Open Thread Tue Mar 02, 2021 15:30 | Herb Swanson
2021/03/02 15:30:01Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

offsite link Bernays and Propaganda ? The Transition to Education and Commerce ? Part 4 Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:16 | amarynth
By Larry Romanoff for the Saker Blog The success of Lippman and Bernays did not go unnoticed in many segments of American society. Universities in particular realised the potential of

offsite link Book review: ?Disintegration? by Andrei Martyanov Tue Mar 02, 2021 02:32 | The Saker
[this book review was written for the Unz Review] This is the third book by Andrei Martyanov that I am reviewing, the first one was ?Book Review – Losing Military

The Saker >>

Human Rights in Ireland
A Blog About Human Rights

offsite link Poor Living Conditions for Migrants in Southern Italy Mon Jan 18, 2021 10:14 | Human Rights

offsite link Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights

offsite link Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights

offsite link Turkish President Calls On Greece To Comply With Human Rights on Syrian Refugee Issues Wed Mar 04, 2020 17:58 | Human Rights

offsite link US Holds China To Account For Human Rights Violations Sun Oct 13, 2019 19:12 | Human Rights

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Spirit of Contradiction

offsite link The Party and the Ballot Box Sun Jul 14, 2019 22:24 | Gavin Mendel-Gleason

offsite link On The Decline and Fall of The American Empire and Socialism Sat Jan 26, 2019 01:52 | S. Duncan

offsite link What is Dogmatism and Why Does It Matter? Wed Mar 21, 2018 08:10 | Sylvia Smith

offsite link The Case of Comrade Dallas Mon Mar 19, 2018 19:44 | Sylvia Smith

offsite link Review: Do Religions Evolve? Mon Aug 14, 2017 19:54 | Dara McHugh

Spirit of Contradiction >>

Turmoil in Venezuela

category national | miscellaneous | news report author Wednesday April 17, 2002 16:02author by Joe C - SWPReport this post to the editors

Coup foiled by popular rising

THE POOR of Venezuela defeated an attempted coup against the country's president, Hugo Chavez, last weekend. The attempt to remove Chavez was the work of the head of the employers' organisation, with the connivance of army generals, the head of the Catholic church, and even a corrupt trade union leader.


They were defeated by a popular uprising in Venezuela's capital, Caracas. From the shanty towns on the hills that surround the city, thousands of people risked their lives to take to the streets and defy the coup. Some were rioting and looting, others besieged the presidential palace and main military camp, and others seized control of the country's main TV station. The New York Times reported that those rising up in defence of Chavez were "the vendors and factory workers, the maids and truckers".

Their heroism split the army, broke the coup attempt, and saw Chavez restored to office. The coup's failure is also a serious setback for the gang around George W Bush in the US White House. The South American country is one the world's biggest oil producers, and it also supplies 15 percent of all US oil imports.

At least some of those around Bush's White House seem to have encouraged the coup plotters. The coup attempt was prepared by Venezuela's employers, who seized on Chavez's appointment of new directors to the state oil company as a pretext to organise a shutdown of industry. The corrupt leader of Venezuela's main union federation claimed the shutdown was a "strike" since it had the support of middle and upper management, and called on workers to support it.

Disgracefully, the International Federation of Free Trade Unions, to which Britain's TUC is affiliated, supported him in this. On the second day of the shutdown last week there was a mass anti-Chavez demonstration of the middle classes in Caracas. The protest clashed with a smaller demonstration of Chavez supporters, and shooting took place.

Supporters of the coup within the armed forces then intervened, claiming they were "preventing bloodshed", and declared that Chavez had resigned. Carmona, head of the employers' organisation, declared himself president, closed down the country's congress, and began mass arrests of those believed to be Chavez supporters.

What upset his plans and saw him removed from office was the reaction among the poor. The popular uprising saw sudden panic overtake many ruling class figures who had backed the coup only hours before. They feared civil war between different sections of the armed forces. They also feared a repetition of the great riots of 1989, the "Caracazo".

On that occasion a spontaneous revolt of the country's poor against a government and International Monetary Fund cuts package was only put down after more than 1,000 deaths. The mere threat of a repetition of such turmoil was enough for the heads of the armed forces to force Carmona to resign and announce Chavez's reinstatement.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Struggle from below is key

BY SUNDAY the forces that had plotted to overthrow Hugo Chavez were terrified by the sight of the poor protesting on the streets. They brought Chavez back in the hope they could persuade him to bring the poor under control again.

Armed forces commanders who switched from supporting the coup to opposing it will now be putting pressure on Chavez. They are telling him the only way he can remain secure is by following policies of "moderation". In his first statement on restoration to office Chavez seemed to endorse that message himself.

He announced he was convoking a "round table of national unity" involving "the Catholic and evangelical churches, the employers, the political parties and their leaders, the unions and the mass media". To those who had risked their lives going on the streets on his behalf he said, "I hear there has been rioting and looting. Let's return home and reflect upon events."

It is a message that many who took to the streets will not want to accept. They saw how little concern the bosses' have for democracy or human rights. They are bitter at the newspapers and TV proprietors for conniving in the coup attempt.

They want to be rid of those military commanders who did not immediately move against the coup. It is up to ordinary people to take action to challenge the power of those at the top of society while their structures of control are in disarray. This cannot be done by relying, as much of the left has done for three years, on Chavez to do things using the top-down method.

It means direct struggle from below, run by workers and the poor themselves, not middle class military officers who can so easily switch sides. It also means being absolutely clear that attacking the wages and conditions of employed workers is no way to help the unemployed, the semi-employed and the rural poor.

That only plays into the hands of the rich, the multinationals and the Bush gang in the White House.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Who is Hugo Chavez?

HUGO CHAVEZ has upset the United States in his three years in office. He has campaigned to strengthen the OPEC organisation of oil producing countries, cultivated a friendship with Cuba's Fidel Castro, and refused to support the US- backed war against left wing guerrilla groups in neighbouring Colombia.

Chavez has also upset Venezuela's rulers by promising to reduce the huge gap between rich and poor. His talk of thoroughgoing reform had led to an unexpected electoral victory for him in 1998, and massive popularity during his first year in office. His poll ratings have fallen in the last year. This is because his political method prevented him turning talk of reform into real improvements for the mass of people.

Chavez is a career military officer who tried unsuccessfully to seize power in the early 1990s. His aim was to introduce a series of top-down reforms while leaving Venezuelan capitalism intact. After a spell in prison Chavez turned to the electoral road in order to introduce the same kind of changes. After his electoral victory he insisted he was in favour of the "mixed economy", not an onslaught on capitalism.

When his reforms faced resistance he relied on the command structure of the armed forces to push them through, not a mobilisation of the mass of people. His measures antagonised the ruling class and the US government but did not produce the great social changes Chavez had promised.

His top-down approach has also led him to attack the wages and conditions of employed workers, even while talking about help to the unemployed, the semi-employed and the rural poor. It was this that enabled union leader Alfredo Ramos to back the employers' shutdown of industry. In this way, Chavez's own policies played into the hands of those who wanted to overthrow him.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A defeat for the Bush gang

THE ATTEMPTED coup came after a long series of denunciations of Chavez by the US government. In February the US State Department and the CIA expressed their "worry" over his activities. A US State Department official told the Washington Post, "Venezuela is in a very dangerous position. If Chavez does not arrange things quickly he will not complete his term in office."

This suggests that at least a section of the US government encouraged the coup plotters. The New York Times spelled out Chavez's crimes in US eyes: "Visions of a united South America unshackled from the dominance of Washington's power," "Selling oil to Castro," "His not so tacit support for the Colombian rebels," and, "The potential threat he posed to thousands of American gas stations."

"Above all," the paper argued, "the US wants stability in its backyard. Mr Chavez did not fit in with President Bush's vision of the century of the Americas."

This is in line with the approach of the core group in the Bush administration, who hold that the US can do whatever it wants anywhere in the world. The Bush gang suffered a significant setback when the poor took to the streets of Caracas on Saturday. That should be good news for everyone opposed to US power.

Related Link: http://www.swp.ie
author by Phuq Heddpublication date Wed Apr 17, 2002 16:16author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Joe C,
I don't agree with the SWP on many things (mostly their organizational structure and how that concentrates power into the party), but I agree with your analysis that Chavez is a failure as a socialist because of his authoritarian style. It should also be pointed out that he has NEVER stated any program of concrete reform and has kept his hands firmly on the reins of power.

The overthrow of the coup demonstrates that if the people decide that they don't want a particular leader then they can remove her/him.

It's a pity that they didn't decide to do away with the ineffective (if he were effective then there'd be no poor to revolt and no rich to plot a coup!) system of leadership.

Democracy is not choosing a different leader, it's controlling your own society through non-authoritarian organization.

author by Fran Donohuepublication date Wed Apr 17, 2002 18:12author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The SWP and other such jokers are not intrested in actual results because they are still wasting their time beliving in a Marxist Revoultion in a changed world, poor aul' Karl must be spinning in his grave having his Cult mis-using his legacy.

Please people get a grip Chavez is getting results, like other realist Left wing leaders, more results than you lads sticking up a few posters and frighting off any sensisible person that would like to get incolved in peace, community action which are really intrested in aiding progress.

Stop wasting your time and get involved in REAL POLITICS

Viva Chavez, Viva Fidel, Viva FARC

author by Brian Cahill - Socialist Partypublication date Wed Apr 17, 2002 18:30author email nigel_irritable at yahoo dot comauthor address author phone Report this post to the editors

The SWP are an irrelevance, but your assertion that working class revolution isn't possible because we live in "a changed world" is just poisonous.

The world has changed in many ways, but we still live in a class society. The vast majority of people still do the work and the bosses still reap the profits.

Billions of people live in grinding poverty while a few have boundless wealth. Capitalist wars rage around the world, while billionaires and their politicians enjoy fine wine and caviar.

Yet what do we here from Fran? Things are different now. The working class can't liberate itself. Instead we are to look towards a rather incoherent list of people to do it for us, some Stalinists and a reformist.

Well thats not good enough.

Related Link: http://www.socialistparty.net
author by aunty party - i'm backpublication date Wed Apr 17, 2002 19:28author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Thanks Joe..we were all waiting to see what the SWP party line was. Should we all learn off by heart the appropriate phrases and use them in casual conversation?

author by whaaa?publication date Wed Apr 17, 2002 19:37author address author phone Report this post to the editors

whaaa are youse talkin about, youse all mad yia are.

author by Fran Donohuepublication date Thu Apr 18, 2002 00:44author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I didn't post the SWP message so I could read more secterian bolloix.

Look all of us of who give a shit about making society adhere turely to the values of Liberty, Faternity and Equality should get behind the people that are making it happen, not just talking about making it happen according to their own little perverted preferences.

Viva Chavez, Viva Fidel, Viva FARC, Viva PFLP

author by Joe C - SWPpublication date Thu Apr 18, 2002 15:56author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Bloddy Stalinist

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2021 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy