Cops welcomed with smoke bombs and flares Dublin Pride 19:57 Jul 14 0 comments Gemma O'Doherty: The speech you never heard. I wonder why? 05:28 Jan 15 0 comments A Decade of Evidence Demonstrates The Dramatic Failure Of Globalisation 15:39 Aug 23 1 comments Thatcher's " blind eye" to paedophilia 15:27 Mar 12 0 comments Total Revolution. A new philosophy for the 21st century. 15:55 Nov 17 0 comments more >>Blog Feeds
Anti-EmpireNorth Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi? Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi? Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi? ?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi? US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty
The SakerA bird's eye view of the vineyard
Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Lockdown Skeptics
In Welcoming Trump, Let Us Remember Henry VIII Fri Jan 24, 2025 19:00 | Joanna Gray
Have Covid Travel Requirements Gone Away? Fri Jan 24, 2025 17:00 | Dr Roger Watson
A Golden Age for American Meritocracy Fri Jan 24, 2025 14:15 | Darren Gee
Think Tank?s Net Zero Survey Concludes the Public is the Problem Fri Jan 24, 2025 13:10 | Ben Pile
Number of Children Who Think They are Wrong Sex Surges 50-Fold Fri Jan 24, 2025 11:10 | Will Jones
Voltaire NetworkVoltaire, international editionThe United States bets its hegemony on the Fourth Industrial Revolution Fri Jan 24, 2025 19:26 | en For Thierry Meyssan, the Sarkozy trial for illegal financing of the 2007 preside... Fri Jan 24, 2025 19:23 | en Should we condemn or not the glorification of Nazism?, by Thierry Meyssan Wed Jan 22, 2025 14:05 | en Voltaire, International Newsletter N?116 Sat Jan 18, 2025 06:46 | en After the United Kingdom, Germany and Denmark, the Trump team prepares an operat... Sat Jan 18, 2025 06:37 | en |
Fortress America?
national |
miscellaneous |
news report
Tuesday December 03, 2002 21:41 by vngelis
A return to the 19th Century? For the last few years the leftists who are subjects of the US new world order have pranced about declaring that immigration NEVER actually occurred in the numbers it did, that we have had no wave, no flood, no return to the past (19th century). In the same light they also argue that the US agenda of deregulation, segregation and living hell for millions is a fabrication by those who have views linked to the BNP- the bogeyman to fit all bogeymen. But the real bogeymen, the large transnational corporations which drive deregulation and the globalisation of labour are consistently left off the hook. After all as has been stated many times over if mass immigration in an era of declining capitalism doesn't profit big business but the working class, why is it that we have a return to the 1930's system of the unemployed hanging round street corners waiting for gangmasters to hire them and why the so-called US boom has only benefited the people at the top. If what has happened in America hasn't happened in Europe (figures below are conservative estimates anyway!) one would have to ask themselves where now for the globalists? Open the borders is a defunct slogan as they are open. The line will be in Britain at least, why the public sector will need more immigrants to keep up with the 'shortages', to replace militant workers in the Post Office (Sawyer report), the Firefighters (Bain inquiry) as has already happened in teaching and nursing. The globalists are now entering new territory. One which will force them into an open and unholy alliance with the Murdochs of this world and against their own working class which so far has been relatively concealed due to the myth that immigration only occurred in relatively small numbers... yet it has now surpassed the 19th century... Greatest wave of migrants drives US engine Huge influx in the 1990s plugs gap in labour force Suzanne Goldenberg in Washington America's economic boom of the 1990s was created on the back of foreign workers and a decade that saw the highest number of immigrants in the country's history, a new study says. "We need to recognise that part of our economic strength and prosperity is associated with our ability to get a high level of labour supply." The study estimates that more than 13.5 million people immigrated to the United States in the 1990s, arriving in even greater numbers than the three decades of the "Great Wave" of immigration at the turn of the 19th century, and accounting for 40% of America's population growth. But because of America's ageing population and the high number of job seekers among their ranks, the new immigrants accounted for an even greater share of the growth of the labour market, more than 50%. As the baby boom in America fizzles out, the new workers are younger than the average American. They stepped in to help fill the gap left by the 4.5 million decline in the number of workers aged between 25 and 34. Some 2.8 million foreign workers in that age group joined the economy during the 1990s. Without them, the labour force in that key age group would have declined by 21%. In contrast, relatively few of the new immigrants were elderly, and male workers outnumbered women more than among native-born Americans. Nearly 4.7 million of the newcomers gravitated towards the west, with 3.3 million settling in California alone. Some 4.1 million others moved to the southern states of the eastern seaboard. Although fewer newcomers arrived in the north-east, they accounted for the bulk of the population growth in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts and Rhode Island, the study finds. Were it not even for these arrivals, which provided the engine for growth, the north-eastern states would have had a much smaller share of the boom, Mr Harrington argues. "Really New England is increasingly becoming an economic backwater because we haven't been able to generate new labour supply." The study does not explore where the new workers came from, although the general pattern of immigration has shown an increase in arrivals from Asia and Central and South America. It also estimates that 9 million of the 13.5 million arrivals were undocumented workers, living in the US illegally. That shadowy status, and a lack of education, forced many of the new immigrants into low-skilled and low-paid jobs, driving down wage rates, the study finds. A third of the new immigrants arrived in America without finishing secondary school. Unlike their native-born American counterparts, they were more successful in finding jobs, in the manufacturing industry and in the low-end service occupations. But their arrival saw the return of a phenomenon unknown in America since the depression years of the 1930s: the street corner labour exchanges where men line up in the early morning waiting for day labouring jobs. The better educated had an easier landing, the study finds. Some 27% of the new immigrants arrived with degrees and found private sector jobs in services, health, engineering, and business. They were over-represented in science, engineering and IT, and under-represented in teaching. Mr Harrington argues that the study shows the need for America to adopt an immigration policy that takes into account the needs of the job market, as do Canada and other countries. He also says the study suggests the need for continued immigration even during times of economic slowdown, and that those imperatives should not be sacrificed to security concerns that could limit further immigration. "Even if we are going to achieve the modest rate of growth forecast for the next 10 years we are going to have to see a substantial level of immigration," he said.
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (1 of 1)
Jump To Comment: 1was to cross the border south.
usually US presidents go north to chat with their Canadian counterparts then Britain.
but Bush made a change.
he went south to Mexico to see Fox.
fellow Oil baron ranch owner and fence administrator.
The fence is the Mexico/U.S. border.
they signed agreements on security co-operation,
migrant worker permits, Oil, Cows known in texan as "steers", aliens, [the kind of mexican without permits not the little creatures that mutilate steers], and telecom stuff.
They loved each other.
They spent day upon day of loved up evil world leader in blue jean casual splendour, which properly should be spelled splendor [coz they´re the new Americans].
Mr Fox is very tall, and this makes Mexicans very happy, they like to see their strong leader tower over Mr Bush and Mr Aznar, but not King Juan Carlos 1 of España, who also is very tall. Some three weeks ago they all posed for photos in white and cream shirts and trousers for the Ibero-american summit of leaders and heads of state.
This was extensively photographed for Hola! magazine.
Aznar is very short, lovely moustache though.
very traditional.
Excellent article Vingelis!
look forward to any follow up re: European migration patterns.