Upcoming Events

National | Miscellaneous

no events match your query!

New Events

National

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link Cuomo Wins Al-Qaeda’s ‘Jihadi of the... Wed Mar 03, 2021 15:15 | Rafi Metz

offsite link Facing MBS Questions Washington Suddenly... Wed Mar 03, 2021 14:38 | Dave DeCamp

offsite link Previously Unreleased Footage of Iranian... Wed Mar 03, 2021 13:27 | Colonel Cassad

offsite link Orban Gets a Sinopharm Jab, Slovakia Imp... Wed Mar 03, 2021 12:34 | bne IntelliNews

offsite link Anti-Empire — Shadow Banned by Google Tue Mar 02, 2021 19:12 | Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Sitrep: Eradicating absolute poverty in China Wed Mar 03, 2021 16:07 | amarynth
By Godfree Roberts ? selected from his extensive weekly newsletter : Here Comes China plus editorial notes. You can get it here:  https://www.herecomeschina.... The Biggest News Xi declares ‘complete victory’

offsite link Leaked: Smith College memo demands workers admit White privilege Wed Mar 03, 2021 01:04 | amarynth
by Ramin Mazaheri for the Saker Blog As a daily reporter, columnist and author it seems I have developed a reputation for unparalleled bravery in exposing truths which the 1%

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2021/03/02 ? Open Thread Tue Mar 02, 2021 15:30 | Herb Swanson
2021/03/02 15:30:01Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

offsite link Bernays and Propaganda ? The Transition to Education and Commerce ? Part 4 Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:16 | amarynth
By Larry Romanoff for the Saker Blog The success of Lippman and Bernays did not go unnoticed in many segments of American society. Universities in particular realised the potential of

offsite link Book review: ?Disintegration? by Andrei Martyanov Tue Mar 02, 2021 02:32 | The Saker
[this book review was written for the Unz Review] This is the third book by Andrei Martyanov that I am reviewing, the first one was ?Book Review – Losing Military

The Saker >>

Human Rights in Ireland
A Blog About Human Rights

offsite link Poor Living Conditions for Migrants in Southern Italy Mon Jan 18, 2021 10:14 | Human Rights

offsite link Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights

offsite link Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights

offsite link Turkish President Calls On Greece To Comply With Human Rights on Syrian Refugee Issues Wed Mar 04, 2020 17:58 | Human Rights

offsite link US Holds China To Account For Human Rights Violations Sun Oct 13, 2019 19:12 | Human Rights

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Spirit of Contradiction

offsite link The Party and the Ballot Box Sun Jul 14, 2019 22:24 | Gavin Mendel-Gleason

offsite link On The Decline and Fall of The American Empire and Socialism Sat Jan 26, 2019 01:52 | S. Duncan

offsite link What is Dogmatism and Why Does It Matter? Wed Mar 21, 2018 08:10 | Sylvia Smith

offsite link The Case of Comrade Dallas Mon Mar 19, 2018 19:44 | Sylvia Smith

offsite link Review: Do Religions Evolve? Mon Aug 14, 2017 19:54 | Dara McHugh

Spirit of Contradiction >>

How to Guarantee an Infinite Middle East War

category national | miscellaneous | news report author Wednesday April 10, 2002 17:43author by Jack Kelly - JournalistReport this post to the editors

Discussions on the Middle East conflict

Acts of Palestinian terror, no matter how egregious or how frequent, can never bring the Middle East to the brink of war, because for most world political and opinion leaders, the killing of Jews is of small consequence. There are calls for a halt to violence only when Israelis retaliate.


During the cold war, there was reason to suppose an Arab-Israeli war could spark a third world war. In those days, Israel was a client of the United States. The radical Arab states were clients of the Soviet Union. If the proxies got into a tiff, the conflict could spread to the principals.


The closest we came to this was during the Yom Kippur War of 1973, when Egyptians, in a surprise attack, dealt a severe blow to Israeli defense forces. Only an airlift of M-60 tanks from U.S. bases in Germany kept Israel from being overrun.


Once its initial battle losses had been replaced, Israel quickly regained the initiative, routing Egyptian and Syrian forces. Israeli troops were poised to take Cairo and Damascus.


The Soviets were willing to permit the United States to restore the status quo ante. But they threatened to intervene to prevent a decisive Israeli victory. So we prevailed upon the Israelis to stop short of humiliating their enemies.


Now the cold war is over. Russia is a shadow of what we thought the Soviet Union was, and is more or less an ally in the war on terror. Radical Arabs have lost their sponsor. And Egypt has, after a fashion, switched sides.


There is no longer good reason to suppose a conflict between Israelis and Palestinians would spread.


Another consequence of the Yom Kippur war was the Arab oil embargo. But the oil "weapon" has lost much of its bang.


We are more dependent upon foreign oil now than we were then, but less dependent on oil from the Persian Gulf, since new sources elsewhere have been developed. And Arab governments have become so dependent upon oil revenues that the loss of them would harm Arabs more than the loss of their oil would harm us.


Expect price hikes instead. Oil-producing Arab states would rather line their pockets while expressing solidarity with the Palestinians than empty their pockets while expressing solidarity with the Palestinians. But market forces place a limit on how high prices can go.


So if the Israelis crush the Palestinians, there will be a howling from Arab mobs, but little else. And Israel must inflict a severe military defeat upon the Palestinians if there ever is to be peace.


Most Palestinians believe they can destroy Israel. The Palestinians think they are winning, and think things can't get worse for them than they are now. They must be disabused of these notions.


Palestinians have good reasons for thinking they are winning. Before the Passover massacre, Palestinian terror was met with Israeli concessions, not Israeli force. Palestinian terror evokes expressions of sympathy from Europe, not words of condemnation. Palestinian terror gets Yasser Arafat on evening newscasts, while peace would doom him to obscurity.


Israeli Defense Forces have been rounding up the terror suspects Arafat promised to arrest but didn't, and destroying weapons caches. This will do more to protect Israelis from suicide bombings than any agreement diplomats make.


Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon would like to send Arafat into exile. His intelligence services tell him this would be a bad idea. Perhaps the Israelis will leave him as a figurehead, while arresting his subordinates.


But only when the old Palestinian leadership has been swept away can a new Palestinian leadership emerge.


Once Palestinian attitudes have been adjusted, a settlement very likely can be reached along the lines proposed by former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak at Camp David in the summer of 2000.


But Palestinians will not tread the path of peace until they've been convinced that they can't get what they want through suicide bombings.


Negotiations before this occurs are, as we have seen, doomed to failure. The Mitchell Report, the Tenet Plan, and the Zinni "bridge" have all collapsed. The "peace process" has failed. It's time to give war a chance

author by marpublication date Wed Apr 10, 2002 22:07author email mark_connoly at glay dot orgauthor address author phone Report this post to the editors

jack,
Are you Irish? if you are you have clearly not been studying your
countries history, or for that matter the history of any population at war.
In your article you say: "So if the Israelis crush the Palestinians,
there will be a howling from Arab mobs, but little else. And
Israel must inflict a severe military defeat upon the Palestinians
if there ever is to be peace"

Did bloody sunday in Derry's bogside convince republicans
to pursue peace? or was there ques like never
seen before at IRA enrolement stations
in the north and in the republic the night and following days?
Did the clearly defeated leaders of the easter rising
lead the public to reject them, or did they become
heros in the eyes of Ireland?

Did the people of England, during the blitz, a
clear "military defeat" make the British people
or government seek peace with the Germans?
Or was it one of the single most factors in inspiring
the British to fight on?

War never makes peace when it is waged on a population
the way Israel is conducting this brutal invasion,
which we are so often told is to destroy "terrorist
infrastructure". Including Jack, water, electricity,
water and sewage. Because a Hamas activist in Jenin
runs a tap, did the water supply feeding this tap become
terrorist infrastructure?, when he turns on his TV, did
the power plant providing the electricity become
terrorist infrastructure?

I find it sickening that in a war which has seen hundreds of
innocents die on each side (five times more on the
palestinian side) you actually want to "give war a chance"

You are well versed in middle east history, i suggest
you verse yourself in the history of this type of conflict
so you can understand neither side can ever be subdued
by force.

RSVP, you have my email address

 
© 2001-2021 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy