Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
Nanny State Zealots Won?t Listen to the Facts Mon Feb 10, 2025 19:24 | Abbie MacGregor
Nanny state zealots, in a post-pandemic world obsessed with what's good and bad for us, have ensured all debate remains tilted in their direction using skewed statistics and emotional anecdotes, says Abbie MacGregor.
The post Nanny State Zealots Won’t Listen to the Facts appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
New Health Minister Ashley Dalton Said Women?s Toilets Should be Abolished and People Can Identify a... Mon Feb 10, 2025 17:31 | Will Jones
Keir Starmer's new Health Minister Ashley Dalton previously called for an end to women's toilets and backed people identifying as llamas.
The post New Health Minister Ashley Dalton Said Women’s Toilets Should be Abolished and People Can Identify as Llamas appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Leading Labour Peer Calls Attorney General Richard Hermer an ?Arrogant, Progressive Fool? and Demand... Mon Feb 10, 2025 15:40 | Will Jones
Leading Labour peer Lord Glasman has said Attorney General Richard Hermer is an "arrogant, progressive fool" and called for him to quit.
The post Leading Labour Peer Calls Attorney General Richard Hermer an “Arrogant, Progressive Fool” and Demands That He Quit appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
NHS Trans Scandal: More Than 1,000 Women a Year Have Their Healthy Breasts Removed at Taxpayers? Exp... Mon Feb 10, 2025 13:13 | Will Jones
More than 1,000 women a year have their healthy breasts removed on the NHS in transgender surgery funded by the taxpayer.
The post NHS Trans Scandal: More Than 1,000 Women a Year Have Their Healthy Breasts Removed at Taxpayers’ Expense appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Universities ?Queering? Courses to Be More Welcoming to Transgender and Non-binary Students Mon Feb 10, 2025 11:00 | Richard Eldred
Top universities, including Russell Group schools, are "queering the curriculum" to make courses more welcoming for transgender and non-binary students.
The post Universities ?Queering? Courses to Be More Welcoming to Transgender and Non-binary Students appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?119 Fri Feb 07, 2025 15:26 | en
Donald Trump plans to displace Palestinians from Gaza and build a riviera on the... Fri Feb 07, 2025 13:33 | en
Misinterpretations of the Evolution of the United States (2/2), by Thierry Meyss... Tue Feb 04, 2025 06:59 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?118 Sat Feb 01, 2025 12:57 | en
80th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp Sat Feb 01, 2025 12:16 | en
Voltaire Network >>
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (15 of 15)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15how about cutting public servants over 100K and their bloated pension plans?? (and politicians too)
How about cutting pay of top trade unionists??
It seems to me this is all just lip service. The government have a handy arrangement with PS unions as long as they stick with croke park and protect the well paid public service. (I'm talking those over 50k not the rest here) and since their pay is linked to these, they protect themselves too.
The recent report on TD pay was an eye opener.
The budget will again hammer those without a strong voice on social welfare and any community voluntary services.
Meanwhile Greedy TD's will keep their basic pay of 93k plus extras which can nearly double it up to 180k. All for having absolutely no effect on Dail decisions which are essentially just pushed through by the party whip.
And all that money and all those ineffective TDs just to manage a population comparable to that of greater manchester.
In a recession this is complete lunacy and a guarantee to bring us further into recession more quickly.
Our ponzi pension scheme is bust paying the likes of shell traitor bertie and crook Ray Burke 100K p.a.
We need to cut where it is deserved and stop haemmoraging huge amounts of money to unsecured foreign banksters and speculators who we don't owe anything to.
increase tax on foreign tax dodging corporations who set up shop here.
They pay fuck all tax and employ fuck all people to create their tax write off operations here.
And We need to stop talking about GDP because their money laundering operations obscure the real state of our economy shown more clearly by the downward spiralling GNP figures.
And I'll trust union leaders more to have the interests of low paid workers at heart when they aren't taking home 100k themselves.
Lets make this the anti-l'oreal budget. Lets cut those who "aren't really worth it"
Absolutely agree with capping public service pay. Cap ALL public service and union salaries at 100,000 per year. And don't stop there. Go for the real problem. Go after the rich. Go after those who have been the prime cause of this crisis, yet who have, incredibly, managed to spin this economic disaster as a crisis of public spending.
These rich, the truly rich, who make even the top public servants and union officials look like beggars, are getting richer, even during this deepening recession. It is time to reverse this. It is time to end the passive acceptance of great wealth, influence and control alongside massive unemployment, hopelessness and poverty. It is time to bring the issue of the distribution of wealth where it belongs - under the democratic control of the people. Politics is about power. Money is power. If democracy is to mean anything, all power, including money power, must be democratically limited by the people.
Don’t continue to be turkeys voting for Christmas. Don’t buy the nonsense from the rich and their hangers-on about high incomes being necessary to attract “talent”, the lie that “If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys”. We paid fortunes, and continue to pay fortunes, and we still got monkeys. Overpaid incompetents are continuing to cause crisis after crisis, while ordinary people’s lives are destroyed.
!00,000 euro (for example) per year should be more than enough for anyone. It should provide more than enough incentive to set up a business. It allows for the fact that some people work harder, or smarter, or more effectively than others. Thousands of successful co-operatives, large and small, the world over, use such a system. A maximum income was used in Japan after WWII. President Roosevelt in the US proposed such a system during WWII. A maximum income could be a temporary or a permanent measure. It could be modified/ revised/fine-tuned/ or repealed every five or ten years. The important thing is that ordinary people are finally given the freedom to vote on an issue of the most crucial importance to them and to society. Many democracies already have a minimum income. It is time to evolve further, towards real democracy, where the really important decisions are taken by the people, rather than by elitist political/bureaucratic cabals in cahoots with unelected business or financial sharks.
One can understand elites and their useful idiots frowning and shaking their heads and giving fifty reasons why it could never work, but for those on low or middle income to not even consider trying the idea is truly like turkeys continuing to vote for Christmas. As George Bush tried to say "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me." But to be fooled continually, again and again, year after year, all your life, to continue sucking up to the rich and authority, to continue, out of cynicism or naivete or apathy or despair, to do nothing, even when possible alternatives are proposed, is sheer lunacy.
Freud thought that the obsession with money was rooted in inadequate potty-training, Likewise, the famous economist Keynes said that "The love of money as a possession as distinguished from the love of money as a means to the enjoyments and realities of life will be recognized for what it is, a somewhat disgusting morbidity, one of those semi-criminal, semi-pathological propensities which one hands over with a shudder to the specialists in mental disease". Even a rich stooge like Winston Churchill could acknowledge that (the people) "will not tolerate the existing system by which wealth is acquired, shared and employed. . . . They will set their faces like flint against the money power, heir of all other powers and tyrannies overthrown, and its obvious injustices."
FIGHT THE MONEY POWER. SUPPORT FULL DEMOCRACY NOW.
There must be figures somewhere perhaps with the CSO, Dept of Finance or Revenue with a breakdown of the number of people in the Civil Service by salary. If we could get hold of those figures then we could cut through some of the rubbish rants around this and focus in those that are earning the big money and figure out how much can be saved.
this is not a matter of saving huge amounts of money, it's a matter of fair play and everyone being treated fairly.
This is currently not the case. That's why highly paid people both in and out of the public service need to be seen to be taking pain proportionately to how the weakest in society are having to.
Taking 100 euro flat tax off a person earning 50k is equivalent to taking 0.2% of their earnings
wheras for a social welfare recipient making 186 a week, it's a full 1% of their earnings.
Every flat tax hits a welfare recipient proportionally 5 times harder than a person earning 50k
The situation is twice as bad when compared to someone on 100k.
Plus that 1% is a greater proportion of their earnings.
If I take away 1% of the earnings of someone on 50k they are left with 49,500
If I take away 1% of the earnings of someone on 9672 they are left with 9575
Its not the same thing qualitatively at all.
The fact is higher paid people are much more insulated against what is going on than the poor who have hardly any insulation and feel the effects immediately. And it's these poor people that are being targetted while some sectors remain protected.
Of course the problem is really bailing out banks for absolutely no apparent gain (they are not really loaning money into the economy) and paying off foreign gambling debts that are not ours to begin with.
But since remedying that has been put off the table despite us being "special", we have to share out the problem in a fairer manner. It's not happening.
We need to see fairness or there will be problems. It's not about huge savings, it's about fairness.
Organised by
Dublin Council of Trade Unions
Communities Campaign Against Cuts
Campaign Against the Household and Water Taxes
Spectacle of Defiance
1 pm 24th November 2012
Parnell Square
Dublin 1