A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog.? We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below).?
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by
The Saker >>
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
Angela Merkel ?Covered Up Intelligence Report Blaming China for Covid? Thu Mar 13, 2025 09:00 | Will Jones
Angela Merkel as German Chancellor covered up an explosive 2020 intelligence report that found a high probability ? 80-95% ? that the?COVID-19 virus came from a laboratory accident in Wuhan, China.
The post Angela Merkel “Covered Up Intelligence Report Blaming China for Covid” appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The DOGEing of the Environmental NGOs Can?t Come Soon Enough Thu Mar 13, 2025 07:00 | Tilak Doshi
As the receipts from DOGE flood in it's clear that environmental NGOs pushing climate alarmism form a key plank of the bloated administrative state. The axe can't come soon enough, says Tilak Doshi.
The post The DOGEing of the Environmental NGOs Can’t Come Soon Enough appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Thu Mar 13, 2025 01:18 | Richard Eldred
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Australia?s Covid Response Caused Significant Harm, Yet Another Official Report Finds Wed Mar 12, 2025 19:14 | Rebekah Barnett
Yet another report ? this time from the Human Rights Commission ? has found that Australia's Covid response caused significant harm. But there's a blind spot, says Rebekah Barnett: the vaccine mandates get a pass.
The post Australia’s Covid Response Caused Significant Harm, Yet Another Official Report Finds appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Bank of England Scraps Diversity Rules Amid DEI Backlash Wed Mar 12, 2025 17:32 | Will Jones
The Bank of England?has scrapped planned DEI rules that would have forced 42,000 UK businesses to report diversity data collected on their employees amid a global backlash over the?'progressive' corporate agenda.
The post Bank of England Scraps Diversity Rules Amid DEI Backlash appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lockdown Skeptics >>
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (15 of 15)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15how about cutting public servants over 100K and their bloated pension plans?? (and politicians too)
How about cutting pay of top trade unionists??
It seems to me this is all just lip service. The government have a handy arrangement with PS unions as long as they stick with croke park and protect the well paid public service. (I'm talking those over 50k not the rest here) and since their pay is linked to these, they protect themselves too.
The recent report on TD pay was an eye opener.
The budget will again hammer those without a strong voice on social welfare and any community voluntary services.
Meanwhile Greedy TD's will keep their basic pay of 93k plus extras which can nearly double it up to 180k. All for having absolutely no effect on Dail decisions which are essentially just pushed through by the party whip.
And all that money and all those ineffective TDs just to manage a population comparable to that of greater manchester.
In a recession this is complete lunacy and a guarantee to bring us further into recession more quickly.
Our ponzi pension scheme is bust paying the likes of shell traitor bertie and crook Ray Burke 100K p.a.
We need to cut where it is deserved and stop haemmoraging huge amounts of money to unsecured foreign banksters and speculators who we don't owe anything to.
increase tax on foreign tax dodging corporations who set up shop here.
They pay fuck all tax and employ fuck all people to create their tax write off operations here.
And We need to stop talking about GDP because their money laundering operations obscure the real state of our economy shown more clearly by the downward spiralling GNP figures.
And I'll trust union leaders more to have the interests of low paid workers at heart when they aren't taking home 100k themselves.
Lets make this the anti-l'oreal budget. Lets cut those who "aren't really worth it"
Absolutely agree with capping public service pay. Cap ALL public service and union salaries at 100,000 per year. And don't stop there. Go for the real problem. Go after the rich. Go after those who have been the prime cause of this crisis, yet who have, incredibly, managed to spin this economic disaster as a crisis of public spending.
These rich, the truly rich, who make even the top public servants and union officials look like beggars, are getting richer, even during this deepening recession. It is time to reverse this. It is time to end the passive acceptance of great wealth, influence and control alongside massive unemployment, hopelessness and poverty. It is time to bring the issue of the distribution of wealth where it belongs - under the democratic control of the people. Politics is about power. Money is power. If democracy is to mean anything, all power, including money power, must be democratically limited by the people.
Don’t continue to be turkeys voting for Christmas. Don’t buy the nonsense from the rich and their hangers-on about high incomes being necessary to attract “talent”, the lie that “If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys”. We paid fortunes, and continue to pay fortunes, and we still got monkeys. Overpaid incompetents are continuing to cause crisis after crisis, while ordinary people’s lives are destroyed.
!00,000 euro (for example) per year should be more than enough for anyone. It should provide more than enough incentive to set up a business. It allows for the fact that some people work harder, or smarter, or more effectively than others. Thousands of successful co-operatives, large and small, the world over, use such a system. A maximum income was used in Japan after WWII. President Roosevelt in the US proposed such a system during WWII. A maximum income could be a temporary or a permanent measure. It could be modified/ revised/fine-tuned/ or repealed every five or ten years. The important thing is that ordinary people are finally given the freedom to vote on an issue of the most crucial importance to them and to society. Many democracies already have a minimum income. It is time to evolve further, towards real democracy, where the really important decisions are taken by the people, rather than by elitist political/bureaucratic cabals in cahoots with unelected business or financial sharks.
One can understand elites and their useful idiots frowning and shaking their heads and giving fifty reasons why it could never work, but for those on low or middle income to not even consider trying the idea is truly like turkeys continuing to vote for Christmas. As George Bush tried to say "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me." But to be fooled continually, again and again, year after year, all your life, to continue sucking up to the rich and authority, to continue, out of cynicism or naivete or apathy or despair, to do nothing, even when possible alternatives are proposed, is sheer lunacy.
Freud thought that the obsession with money was rooted in inadequate potty-training, Likewise, the famous economist Keynes said that "The love of money as a possession as distinguished from the love of money as a means to the enjoyments and realities of life will be recognized for what it is, a somewhat disgusting morbidity, one of those semi-criminal, semi-pathological propensities which one hands over with a shudder to the specialists in mental disease". Even a rich stooge like Winston Churchill could acknowledge that (the people) "will not tolerate the existing system by which wealth is acquired, shared and employed. . . . They will set their faces like flint against the money power, heir of all other powers and tyrannies overthrown, and its obvious injustices."
FIGHT THE MONEY POWER. SUPPORT FULL DEMOCRACY NOW.
There must be figures somewhere perhaps with the CSO, Dept of Finance or Revenue with a breakdown of the number of people in the Civil Service by salary. If we could get hold of those figures then we could cut through some of the rubbish rants around this and focus in those that are earning the big money and figure out how much can be saved.
this is not a matter of saving huge amounts of money, it's a matter of fair play and everyone being treated fairly.
This is currently not the case. That's why highly paid people both in and out of the public service need to be seen to be taking pain proportionately to how the weakest in society are having to.
Taking 100 euro flat tax off a person earning 50k is equivalent to taking 0.2% of their earnings
wheras for a social welfare recipient making 186 a week, it's a full 1% of their earnings.
Every flat tax hits a welfare recipient proportionally 5 times harder than a person earning 50k
The situation is twice as bad when compared to someone on 100k.
Plus that 1% is a greater proportion of their earnings.
If I take away 1% of the earnings of someone on 50k they are left with 49,500
If I take away 1% of the earnings of someone on 9672 they are left with 9575
Its not the same thing qualitatively at all.
The fact is higher paid people are much more insulated against what is going on than the poor who have hardly any insulation and feel the effects immediately. And it's these poor people that are being targetted while some sectors remain protected.
Of course the problem is really bailing out banks for absolutely no apparent gain (they are not really loaning money into the economy) and paying off foreign gambling debts that are not ours to begin with.
But since remedying that has been put off the table despite us being "special", we have to share out the problem in a fairer manner. It's not happening.
We need to see fairness or there will be problems. It's not about huge savings, it's about fairness.
Organised by
Dublin Council of Trade Unions
Communities Campaign Against Cuts
Campaign Against the Household and Water Taxes
Spectacle of Defiance
1 pm 24th November 2012
Parnell Square
Dublin 1